UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

Commission File Number: 001-34632

CRYOPORT, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

20382 Barents Sea Circle

Lake Forest, CA 92630

(Address of principal executive offices) 

(949) 470-2300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No   x

As of October 30, 2015 there were 7,225,364 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.  

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cryoport, Inc. and Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cryoport, Inc. and Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cryoport, Inc. and Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.  

Cryoport, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Management’s Representation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Cryoport, Inc. (the “Company”, “Cryoport”, “our” or “we”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statement presentation. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

On May 12, 2015, our board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse stock split by a ratio of 1-for-12.  The reverse stock split was effective on May 19, 2015.  All share and per share data in this Form 10-Q have been adjusted to give effect to the 1-for-12 reverse stock split of our common stock.

Operating results for the six months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2016. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing and determined that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes thereto other than as disclosed in the accompanying notes.

Note 2. Nature of the Business

Cryoport is the premier provider of cryogenic logistics solutions to the life sciences industry through its purpose-built proprietary packaging, information technology and specialized cold chain logistics expertise. The Company provides leading edge logistics solutions for biologic materials, such as immunotherapies, stem cells, CAR-T cells and reproductive cells for clients worldwide. Leading global companies, such as FedEx, UPS and DHL have each separately selected Cryoport as the preferred cryogenic logistics provider for time- and temperature-sensitive biological material.  Cryoport actively supports points-of-care, contract research organizations, central laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, contract manufacturers and university researchers.

The Company is a Nevada corporation and its common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market exchange under the ticker symbol “CYRX.”

Liquidity

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with U.S. GAAP. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we used cash in operations of $2.9 million and had a net loss of $4.3 million.

We believe that our cash resources at September 30, 2015, together with the revenues generated from our solutions will be sufficient to sustain our planned operations for the next 12 months. Future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the success of our commercialization efforts and the level of customer adoption of our Cryoport Express^® Solutions as well as our ability to establish additional collaborative arrangements. Revenues increased $1.1 million or 62.8% to $2.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $1.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2014. However, we cannot make any assurances that the sales ramp will lead to achievement of sustained profitable operations or that any additional financing will be completed on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or at all.

Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cryoport, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cryoport Systems, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimated amounts. The Company’s significant estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, recoverability of long-lived assets, allowance for inventory obsolescence, deferred taxes and their accompanying valuations, and valuation of equity instruments and conversion features.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, related-party notes payable, notes payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses. The carrying value for all such instruments approximates fair value at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015 due to their short-term nature. The difference between the fair value and recorded values of the related-party notes payable is not significant.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

Customers

The Company grants commercial trade credit to customers under established terms and conditions within the U.S. and to a limited number of international customers and does not require collateral. Revenues from international customers are generally secured by advance payments except for a limited number of established foreign customers. The Company generally requires advance or credit card payments for initial revenues from new customers, who have not received credit approval. The Company’s ability to collect receivables is affected by customer circumstances, economic fluctuations in the respective geographic areas and the industries served by the Company. Reserves for uncollectible amounts are provided based on past experience and a specific analysis of the respective accounts, which management believes is sufficient. Accounts receivable at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015 are net of reserves for doubtful accounts of $38,700 and $12,200, respectively. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.

The majority of the Company’s customers are in the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, animal health and life science industries. Consequently, there is a concentration of accounts receivable within these industries, which is subject to normal credit risk. At September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, there was one customer that accounted for 28.8% and 14.6%, respectively, of net accounts receivable. No other single customer owed us more than 10% of net accounts receivable at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015.

The Company has revenue from foreign customers primarily in the Europe, Japan, Canada, India and Australia regions. During the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had revenues from foreign customers of approximately $421,100 and $293,200, respectively, which constituted approximately 14.7% and 16.6% of total revenues, respectively.

For the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there was one customer that accounted for 16.0% and 27.4% of total revenues, respectively.

Inventories

The Company’s inventories consist of packaging materials and accessories sold to customers. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the standard cost method which approximates the first-in, first-to-expire method. Inventories are reviewed periodically for slow-moving or obsolete status. The Company writes down the carrying value of its inventories to reflect situations in which the cost of inventories is not expected to be recovered. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories. Raw materials and finished goods include material costs less reserves for obsolete or excess inventories. The Company evaluates the current level of inventories considering historical trends and other factors, and based on such evaluation, records adjustments to reflect inventories at its net realizable value. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly from actual results if future economic conditions, customer demand, competition or other relevant factors differ from expectations. These estimates require us to make assessments about future demand for the Company’s products in order to categorize the status of such inventories items as slow-moving, obsolete or in excess-of-need. These estimates are subject to the ongoing accuracy of the Company’s forecasts of market conditions, industry trends, competition and other factors.

Property and Equipment

The Company provides shipping packaging (“shipper”) to its customers and charges a fee in exchange for the use of the shipper. The Company’s arrangements are similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use the container over a period of time. The Company retains the title to the shippers and provides its customers the use of the shipper for a specific shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the shipper is returned to the Company. As a result, the Company classifies the shippers as property and equipment for the per-use shipper program.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Cryogenic shippers are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of three years. Software, equipment and furniture are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives (generally three to seven years) and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Equipment acquired under capital leases is amortized over the estimated useful life of the assets or term of the lease, whichever is shorter and included in depreciation and amortization expense.

Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization applicable to assets retired are removed from the accounts, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in current operations.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are comprised of patents and trademarks and software development costs. The Company capitalizes costs of obtaining patents and trademarks, which are amortized, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of five years once the patent or trademark has been issued. The Company capitalizes certain costs related to software developed for internal use. Software development costs incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stages are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is five years. Capitalized costs include purchased materials and costs of services including the valuation of warrants issued to consultants.

Long-lived Assets

If indicators of impairment exist, we assess the recoverability of the affected long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. If impairment is indicated, we measure the amount of such impairment by comparing the fair value to the carrying value. We believe the future cash flows to be received from the long-lived assets will exceed the assets’ carrying value, and accordingly, we have not recognized any impairment losses through September 30, 2015.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs represent costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the convertible notes payable and equity financings. Deferred financing costs related to the issuance of debt are being amortized over the term of the financing instrument using the effective interest method while offering costs from equity financings are netted against the gross proceeds received from the equity financings.

Conversion Features

If a conversion feature of convertible debt is not accounted for as a derivative instrument and provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount. The convertible debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. The Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate method.

Preferred stock is convertible to common stock at a rate of conversion that is below market value and, therefore, this feature is characterized as a BCF. The Company records this BCF as a discount to the preferred stock and accretes the discount to retained earnings as a deemed dividend through the earliest conversion date or upon issuance if the preferred stock can be immediately converted.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provision of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, or ASC 740. As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, there were no unrecognized tax benefits included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets that would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rates.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. Based on the weight of available evidence, the Company’s management has determined that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Therefore, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets. The Company’s income tax provision consists of state minimum taxes.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on its condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015 and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions. As of September 30, 2015, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years before 2011 and for California franchise and income tax examinations for years before 2010. However, to the extent allowed by law, the taxing authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the amount of the net operating loss carry forward amount. The Company is not currently under examination by U.S. federal or state jurisdictions.

Revenue Recognition

The Company provides shipping containers to its customers and charges a fee in exchange for the use of the shipper. The Company’s arrangements are similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use the shippers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the shipper and provides its customers the use of the shipper for a specified shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the shipper is returned to the Company.

The Company recognizes revenue for the use of the shipper once the shipper has been delivered to the end user of the enclosed materials, and at the time that collectability of the related fees is reasonably certain. Revenue is recorded net of discounts and allowances.

The Company also provides logistics support and management services to some customers, which may include onsite logistics personnel. Revenue is recognized for these services as services are rendered and at the time that collectability is reasonably certain.

Accounting for Shipping and Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs

The Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue. Shipping and handling fees and costs are included in cost of revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Research and Development Expenses

Expenditures relating to research and development are expensed in the period incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based payments to employees and directors in accordance with stock-based payment accounting guidance which requires all stock-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options and warrants, to be recognized based upon their fair values. The fair value of stock-based awards is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (“Black-Scholes”) and the portion that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as compensation cost over the requisite service period. The determination of fair value using Black-Scholes is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables, including expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

Since stock-based compensation is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the Company has applied an estimated forfeiture rate to unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These estimates will be revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. The estimated forfeiture rates at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015 were zero as the Company has not had a significant history of forfeitures and does not expect significant forfeitures in the future.

Cash flows from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options or warrants are classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company’s loss position, there were no such tax benefits during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

The Company’s stock-based compensation plans are discussed further in Note 8.

Equity Instruments Issued to Non-Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

Issuances of the Company’s common stock for acquiring goods or services are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued to consultants or vendors is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance to earn the equity instruments is reached (a “performance commitment” which would include a penalty considered to be of a magnitude that is a sufficiently large disincentive for nonperformance) or (ii) the date at which performance is complete. When it is appropriate for the Company to recognize the cost of a transaction during financial reporting periods prior to the measurement date, for purposes of recognition of costs during those periods, the equity instrument is measured at the then-current fair values at each of those interim financial reporting dates.

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

We calculate basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented, and adjust the amount of net income (loss) used in this calculation for deemed preferred stock dividends and cumulative preferred stock dividends, whether they are earned or not during the period. In periods of a net loss position, basic and diluted weighted average shares are the same. For the diluted earnings per share calculation, we adjust the weighted average number of common shares outstanding to include dilutive stock options, warrants and shares associated with the conversion of convertible debt and convertible preferred stock outstanding during the periods. As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company had cumulative, undeclared, dividends that have not been accrued related to its preferred stock of $753,200 and $305,300, respectively. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, undeclared dividends totaling $239,400 and $447,900 and $71,900 and $99,600, respectively, were added to the net loss on the condensed consolidated statements of operations in order to calculate net loss per share attributable to common stockholders.

The following shows the amounts used in computing net loss per share for the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

The following table sets forth the number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

Segment Reporting

We currently operate in one reportable segment.

Fair Value Measurements

We measure fair value based on the prices that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include the following:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted market prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as consider counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.

We have no assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015.

Foreign Currency Translation

We record foreign currency transactions at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction with resultant gains and losses being included in results of operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been significant for any of the periods presented.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in FASB Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition". The ASU implements a five-step process for customer contract revenue recognition that focuses on transfer of control, as opposed to transfer of risk and rewards. The amendment also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. Other major provisions include the capitalization and amortization of certain contract costs, ensuring the time value of money is considered in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved in certain circumstances. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 which proposed a one year deferral of the effective date for public entities and others. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Management has not selected a transition method and is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 4. Related Party Transactions

As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company had aggregate principal balances of $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in outstanding unsecured indebtedness owed to five related parties, including four former members of the Board of Directors, representing working capital advances made to the Company from February 2001 through March 2005.

Related-Party Notes Payable

In March 2015, we entered into definitive agreements relating to the exchange or amendment of the notes evidencing such working capital advances. Three of the notes issued to Patrick Mullins, M.D., Maryl Petreccia and Jeffrey Dell, M.D., which as of September 30, 2015 had outstanding principal balances of $448,200, $266,700 and $208,900, respectively, were amended and restated, and the holders received warrants to purchase 37,347, 22,224, and 17,412 shares, respectively, of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, exercisable on March 2, 2015 and expiring on March 1, 2020, and warrants to purchase 834, 417, and 417 shares, respectively, of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, exercisable on March 2, 2015 and expiring on March 1, 2020, to reimburse the three note holders for any fees or other expenses incurred in connection with this transaction. The notes, as amended and restated, require interest payments on a calendar quarterly basis and payment of all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the maturity date, which is the earlier to occur of (i) March 1, 2016, (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or (iii) the merger, consolidation or other similar reorganization of the Company or an affiliate of our Company with another entity. Under the terms of such notes, upon the closing of the public offering in July 2015 (see Note 7), the holder had the option to convert into the securities issued in such offering at a twenty percent (20%) discount to the price per unit issued by the Company in such offering. The holders elected not to convert into such securities issued by the Company.

One note issued to Raymond Takahashi, M.D., was exchanged for (i) a new promissory note with an original principal amount equal to the outstanding principal and interest of the original note, and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,490 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, exercisable on February 20, 2015 and expiring on February 19, 2018. The new note, which as of September 30, 2015 had an outstanding principal balance of $35,800, requires interest payments on a calendar quarterly basis and payment of all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the maturity date, which is March 1, 2016. Under the terms of such note, upon the closing of the public offering in July 2015 (see Note 7) the holder had the option to convert into the securities issued in such offering at a twenty percent (20%) discount to the price per unit issued by the Company in such offering. The holder elected not to convert into such securities issued by the Company.

The conversion feature of the related-party notes payable at a 20% discount resulted in a BCF. The fair value of the BCF of $521,100 was recorded as a debt discount upon the resolution of the contingency and it was amortized to interest expense over the conversion term which ended on September 29, 2015.

The relative fair value of the related-party warrants of $280,400 was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method which approximated the effective interest method over the term of the convertible notes. During the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company amortized $130,200 and $0, respectively, of the debt discount to interest expense for these convertible notes.

 Related-party interest expense under these notes was $28,900 and $16,100 for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Accrued interest, which is included in related-party notes payable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, amounted to $0 and $4,600 as of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

One note issued to Marc Grossman, M.D., which as of September 30, 2015 had an outstanding principal balance of $126,500, as amended, now provides for interest at a rate of 6% per annum commencing on March 13, 2015; however, no interest payments will be due if no event of default occurs and if the Company (i) complies with its regular payment obligations, (ii) reimburses the payee for attorneys’ fees in connection with the negotiation of the note amendment, up to a maximum amount of $1,000, on the later of (A) March 13, 2015, or (B) three (3) days after receiving written notice from the payee of the amount of attorneys’ fees incurred by payee, and (iii) the Company immediately pays all unpaid amounts due and payable in full before the earlier of May 1, 2016 or at the same time that payee(s) of any other promissory note(s) with the Company that were issued in 2005 are paid in full before May 1, 2016, other than (Y) notes that are satisfied upon conversion into common stock, warrants or any other equity of the Company, or (Z) notes that have been paid in full before March 2, 2015. All principal and interest under the original note, as amended by the note amendment, will be due and shall be paid on May 1, 2016. The note requires monthly payments of $20,000, except for the month of June 2015, where the monthly payment was $72,000.

Class B Convertible Preferred Stock

In May 2015, the spouse of the board member Mr. Richard Berman, participated in the Class B convertible preferred stock offering and the Company issued 1,667 shares of Class B convertible preferred stock for total proceeds of $20,000.

Note 5. Notes Payable

From December 2014 through February 2015, the Company issued to certain accredited investors 2014 Series Secured Promissory Notes (the “7% Bridge Notes”) in the aggregate original principal amount of $915,000. The 7% Bridge Notes accrued interest at a rate of 7% per annum. All principal and interest under the 7% Bridge Notes were due on July 1, 2015. In January and March 2015, the Company repaid an aggregate of $173,600 of the original principal balance outstanding, representing 25% of the net proceeds received from the Class A and Class B convertible preferred stock offering through February 28, 2015. All remaining principal and accrued interest was repaid in April 2015.

In connection with the issuance of the 7% Bridge Notes, the Company issued the note holders warrants to purchase 190,625 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share. The warrants were exercisable on May 31, 2015 and expire on November 30, 2021. The relative fair value of the warrants of $458,900 was recorded as a debt discount and was amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest method over the term of the notes.  During the six months ended September 30, 2015, the Company amortized $221,400 of the debt discount to interest expense for these notes.

The Company did not pay any discounts or commissions with respect to the issuance of the 7% Bridge Notes or the warrants.

Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies

Facility and Equipment Leases

We currently lease 11,900 square feet of corporate, research and development, and warehouse facilities in Lake Forest, California under an operating lease on a month-to-month basis. The monthly base rent is $9,500. On October 21, 2015, we entered into a new operating lease for 27,600 square foot corporate, research and development, and warehouse facility in Irvine, California under an operating lease which commences on the later of November 1, 2015 or substantial completion of the improvements thereon and expires seven years after such date, subject to our option to extend the lease for two additional five year periods (see Note 9). The initial base rent will be approximately $21,600 per month. This lease agreement contains certain scheduled annual rent increases which will be accounted for on a straight-line basis. We also lease certain office equipment which expires in March 2018.

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our officers under which payment and benefits would become payable in the event of termination by us for any reason other than cause, or upon a change in control of our Company, or by the employee for good reason.

Consulting and Engineering Services

On September 16, 2015, the Company entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”), by and between KLATU Networks, LLC (“KLATU”) and the Company. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company purchased from KLATU certain intellectual property and intellectual property rights related to the Company’s Cryoportal^TM logistics management platform (the “Developed Technology”), which KLATU previously developed for and licensed to the Company pursuant to the Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement, by and between KLATU and the Company, dated October 9, 2007 (as amended, the “Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement”). As full compensation for the sale and assignment of the Developed Technology from KLATU to the Company, the Company will pay KLATU an aggregate amount of $400,000 in two equal installments of which $200,000 was paid in September 2015 and the remaining $200,000 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015.

Concurrently with entering into the Purchase and Sale Agreement, on September 16, 2015, the Company and KLATU entered into the Amended and Restated Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement”) to amend and restate the Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement. The Amended and Restated Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement provides a framework for KLATU to perform certain consulting, software and hardware engineering development services as mutually agreed upon and further set forth in one or more Statements of Work (as defined in the Amended and Restated Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement). To ensure the availability of KLATU personnel to perform services pursuant to the Amended and Restated Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement, the Company agreed to pay KLATU a minimum of $25,000 per month for services fees, which may be carried forward as advance payment for future services under certain conditions. The initial term of the agreement is until December 31, 2017 and will thereafter automatically renew for subsequent one year terms, unless notice of termination is given.

Consulting fees for services provided by KLATU were $66,200 and $86,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $140,500 and $161,900 for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Litigation

The Company may become a party to product litigation in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for open claims based on its historical experience and available insurance coverage. In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving the Company that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. Certain of these guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the States of California and Nevada.

Note 7. Stockholders’ Equity

Authorized Stock

The Company has 20,833,333 authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. In September 2011, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to authorize a class of undesignated or "blank check" preferred stock, consisting of 2,500,000 shares at $0.001 par value per share. Shares of preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, with such rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions to be fixed by the Board of Directors. In May 2014, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation which designated 800,000 shares of the Company's previously authorized preferred stock, par value $0.001, as Class A Convertible Preferred Stock. In February 2015, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation which designated 400,000 shares of the Company’s previously authorized preferred stock, par value $0.001, as Class B Convertible Preferred Stock. In April 2015, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada an Amendment to the Certificate of Designation to increase the number shares of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock from 400,000 shares to 585,000 shares.

Class A Convertible Preferred Stock

In May 2014, the Company entered into definitive agreements for a private placement of its securities to certain institutional and accredited investors (the “Class A Investors”) pursuant to certain subscription agreements and elections to convert between the Company and the Class A Investors. As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, 454,750 shares of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock and 303,167 of the related warrants were outstanding for Class A Investors and 106,432 warrants were outstanding for Emergent Financial, Inc. (“Emergent”) in connection with the Class A Convertible Preferred Stock offering and the 5% Bridge Note conversions.

No dividends have been declared as of September 30, 2015; however, a cumulative preferred stock dividend of $520,400 and $301,500 is included in the liquidation preference at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

Class B Convertible Preferred Stock

In February 2015, the Company entered into definitive agreements for a private placement of its securities to certain institutional and accredited investors (the “Class B Investors”) pursuant to certain subscription agreements and elections to convert between the Company and the Class B Investors. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, aggregate gross cash proceeds of $4.5 million (approximately $3.9 million after offering costs) were collected in exchange for the issuance of 372,862 shares of our Class B Convertible Preferred Stock, and warrants, which were immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time on or before May 31, 2020, to purchase up to a total of 248,575 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share. The shares and warrants were issued as a unit consisting of (i) one share of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.67 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The fair value of the beneficial conversion feature of the convertible preferred stock issuance and the relative fair value of the warrants issued, aggregated $4.5 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015. The amount of $4.5 million was accreted to accumulated deficit and additional paid-in capital during the six months ended September 30, 2015.

Emergent served as the Company’s placement agent in this transaction and received, with respect to the gross proceeds received from Class B Investors, a commission of 10% and a non-accountable finance fee of 3% of the aggregate gross proceeds received from such Class B Investors, plus reimbursement of legal expenses of up to $5,000. Emergent was issued a warrant to purchase 0.25 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share for each Unit issued in this transaction. The offering of units to new Class B Investors concluded on June 9, 2015.

In May 2015, the spouse of the board member Mr. Richard Berman, participated in the Class B convertible preferred stock offering and the Company issued 1,667 shares of Class B convertible preferred stock for proceeds of $20,000.

As of September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, 534,571 and 161,709 shares, respectively, of Class B Convertible Preferred Stock, and 356,381 and 107,806, respectively, of the related warrants were outstanding for Class B Investors and 130,914 and 38,115 warrants, respectively, were outstanding for Emergent in connection with the Class B Convertible Preferred Stock offering.

No dividends have been declared as of September 30, 2015; however, a cumulative preferred stock dividend of $232,800 and $3,800 is included in the liquidation preference at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

Emergent received a total cash consideration of $1.3 million and was issued warrants to purchase 237,345 shares of common stock with respect to the gross proceeds the Company received from the Class A and Class B offerings.

Public Equity Offering

On July 29, 2015, the Company completed the sale of common stock and warrants (the “Units”) under a registered public offering. The gross proceeds to Cryoport from the offering, including the partial exercise of the over-allotment option, were approximately $6.8 million, before underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses (approximately $6.2 million after underwriting discounts, commissions and other expenses).

The public offering price per Unit was $3.25. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Under the terms of the offering, Cryoport issued 2,090,750 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,090,750 shares of common stock, inclusive of the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. The warrants have a per share exercise price of $3.57, are exercisable immediately and will expire five years from the date of issuance.

In connection with this offering, the Company issued to Aegis Capital Corp. (“Aegis”), the underwriters' representative in the offering, a warrant to purchase up to 80,000 shares of the Company's common stock and Aegis received a total cash consideration, including the reimbursement of public offering-related expenses, of $0.6 million. If such warrant is exercised, each share of common stock may be purchased at $4.47 per share (137.5% of the price of the units sold in the offering), commencing on July 23, 2016 and expiring July 23, 2020.

In connection with this offering, the Company incurred $266,100 in offering costs that have been offset against the proceeds from this offering.

Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance

As of September 30, 2015, approximately 12.3 million shares of common stock were issuable upon conversion or exercise of rights granted under prior financing arrangements, stock options and warrants, as follows:

Note 8. Stock-Based Compensation

Warrant Activity

We typically issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock to investors as part of a financing transaction or in connection with services rendered by placement agents and consultants. Our outstanding warrants expire on varying dates through November 2021. A summary of warrant activity is as follows:

The fair value of each warrant issued was estimated on the date of issuance using Black-Scholes with the following assumptions:

Stock Options

We have three stock incentive plans: the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”) and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), (collectively, the “Plans”). The 2002 Plan expired and no options have been granted pursuant the 2002 Plan or 2009 Plan subsequent to the adoption of the 2011 Plan. On September 6, 2013, the stockholders approved an increase to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2011 Plan by 591,667 shares. On August 29, 2014 the stockholders approved an increase to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2011 Plan by 125,000 shares. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had 25,312 shares and 30,140 shares available for future awards under the 2009 Plan and the 2011 Plan, respectively.

In May 2015, the Company granted employees and members of the board of directors options to purchase 465,633 and 20,835 shares of common stock, respectively, with an exercise price of $7.80 per share, of which 355,001 shares were issued outside of a plan. The exercise price for the shares of common stock pursuant to the option is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

We granted stock options at exercise prices equal to or greater than the quoted market price of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using Black-Scholes with the following weighted average assumptions:

The expected option life assumption is estimated based on the simplified method. Accordingly, the Company has utilized the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all options to calculate the expected option term. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of our employee stock options. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock commensurate with the expected life of the stock-based award. We do not anticipate paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.

We recognize stock-based compensation cost over the vesting period using the straight-line single option method. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest. An estimated forfeiture rate has been applied to unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. The estimated forfeiture rate of 0% per year is based on the historical forfeiture activity of unvested stock options. These estimates are revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the period in which the change in estimate occurs.

A summary of stock option activity is as follows:  

As of September 30, 2015, there was unrecognized compensation expense of $6.4 million related to unvested stock options, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of 3.2 years.

Note 9. Subsequent Events

Common Stock Issuance

On October 1, 2015, the Company issued 55,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $150,200 to a consultant for investor relation services under a consulting agreement that expires on April 1, 2016.

Facility Lease

On October 21, 2015, we entered into a new operating lease for a 27,600 square foot corporate, warehouse operations, and research and development facility in Irvine, California under an operating lease which commences on the later of November 1, 2015 or substantial completion of the improvements thereon and expires seven years after such date, subject to our option to extend the lease for two additional five year periods. The initial base rent will be approximately $21,600 per month. This lease agreement contains certain scheduled annual rent increases which will be accounted for on a straight-line basis.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In this Form 10-Q, the terms “Cryoport”, “Company” and similar terms refer to Cryoport, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cryoport Systems, Inc.

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that have been made pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and concern matters that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or similar words which are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Although we believe that our opinions and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date of this Quarterly Report, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and our actual results may differ substantially from the views and expectations set forth in this Quarterly Report. You should be aware that these statements are projections or estimates as to future events and are subject to a number of factors that may tend to influence the accuracy of the statements. These forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the events or plans of the Company will be achieved. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events after the date of this Quarterly Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, however, review the factors and risks we describe in the reports we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including those contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on May 19, 2015 and those reports filed after the date of this Quarterly Report. Actual results may differ materially from any forward looking statement.

The following management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 (unaudited) and the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015 (audited) and the related unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and the related notes thereto (see Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements), as well as the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years then ended included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

General Overview

We provide cryogenic logistics solutions to the life sciences industry through a combination of purpose-built proprietary packaging, information technology and specialized cold chain logistics knowhow. We view our solutions as disruptive to the “older technologies” of dry ice and liquid nitrogen, in that our solutions are comprehensive and combine our competencies in configurations that are customized to our client’s requirements. We provide comprehensive, reliable, economic alternatives to all existing logistics solutions and services utilized for frozen shipping in the life sciences industry (e.g., personalized medicine, cell therapies, stem cells, cell lines, vaccines, diagnostic materials, semen, eggs, embryos, cord blood, bio-pharmaceuticals, infectious substances, and other commodities that require continuous exposure to cryogenic or frozen temperatures). As part of our services, we provide the ability to monitor, record and archive crucial information for each shipment that can be used for scientific and regulatory purposes.

Our Cryoport Express^® Solutions include a sophisticated cloud-based logistics operating platform, which is branded as the Cryoportal™. The Cryoportal™ supports the management of the entire shipment and logistics process through a single interface, including initial order input, document preparation, customs clearance, courier management, shipment tracking, issue resolution, and delivery. In addition, it provides unique and incisive information dashboards and validation documentation for every shipment. The Cryoportal™ records and retains a fully documented “chain-of-custody” and, at the client’s option, “chain-of-condition” for every shipment, helping ensure that quality, safety, efficacy, and stability of shipped commodities are maintained throughout the process. This recorded and archived information allows our clients to meet exacting requirements necessary for scientific work and for proof of regulatory compliance during the logistics phase.

The branded packaging for our Cryoport Express^® Solutions includes our liquid nitrogen dry vapor shippers, the Cryoport Express^® Shippers. The Cryoport Express^® Shippers are cost-effective and reusable cryogenic transport shippers (our standard shipper is a patented vacuum flask) utilizing an innovative application of “dry vapor” liquid nitrogen technology. Cryoport Express^® Shippers are International Air Transport Association certified and validated to maintain stable temperatures of minus 150° Celsius and below for a 10-day dynamic shipment period. The Company currently features three Cryoport Express^® Shippers: the Standard Dry Shipper (holding up to 75 2.0 ml vials), the High Volume Dry Shipper (holding up to 500 2.0 ml vials) and the Cryoport Express^® CXVC1 Shipper (holding up to 1,500 2.0 ml vials). In addition, we assist clients with internal secondary packaging as well (e.g., vials, canes, straws, plates, etc.)

Our most used solution is the “turnkey” solution, which can be accessed directly through our cloud-based Cryoportal™ or by contacting Cryoport Client Care for order entry. Once an order is placed and cleared, we ship a fully charged Cryoport Express^® Shipper to the client who conveniently loads its frozen commodity into the inner chamber of the Cryoport Express^® Shipper.  The customer then closes the shipper package and reseals the shipping box displaying the next recipient’s address (“Flap A”) for pre-arranged carrier pick up.  Cryoport arranges for the pick-up of the parcel by a shipping service provider, which is designated by the client or chosen by Cryoport, for delivery to the client’s intended recipient.  The recipient simply opens the shipper package and removes the frozen commodity that has been shipped.  The recipient then reseals the package, displaying the nearest Cryoport Operations Center address (“Flap B”), making it ready for pre-arranged carrier pick-up. When the Cryoport Operations Center receives the Cryoport Express^® Shipper, it is cleaned, put through quality assurance testing, and returned to inventory for reuse.

In late 2012, we shifted our focus to become a comprehensive cryogenic logistics solutions provider. Recognizing that clients in the life sciences industry have varying requirements, we unbundled our technologies, establishing customer facing solutions and taking a consultative approach to the market. Today, in addition to our standard turnkey solution, described above, we also provide the following customer facing, value-added solutions to address our various clients’ needs:

Strategic Logistics Alliances

We have sought to establish strategic alliances as a long-term method of marketing our solutions providing minus 150° Celsius shipping conditions to the life sciences industry. We have focused our efforts on leading companies in the logistics services industry as well as participants in the life sciences industry. In connection with our alliances with providers of shipping services, we refer to their respective offerings as “powered by Cryoport^SM” to reflect our solutions being integrated into our alliance partner’s services.

Cryoport now serves and supports the three largest integrators in the world, responsible for over 85% of worldwide airfreight, with its advanced cryogenic logistics solutions for life sciences. We operate with each independently and confidentially in support of their respective market and sales strategies. These agreements with the three largest integrators in the world represent a significant validation of our solutions and the way we conduct our business.

FedEx. In January 2013, we entered into a master agreement with Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) (the “FedEx Agreement”) renewing these services and providing FedEx with a non-exclusive license and right to use a customized version of our Cryoportal^TM for the management of shipments made by FedEx customers. The FedEx Agreement became effective on January 1, 2013 and, unless sooner terminated as provided in the FedEx Agreement, expires on December 31, 2015. FedEx has the right to terminate this agreement at any time for convenience upon 180 days’ notice.

Under our FedEx Agreement, we provide frozen shipping logistics services through the combination of our purpose-built proprietary technologies and turnkey management processes. FedEx markets and sells Cryoport’s services for frozen temperature-controlled cold chain transportation as its FedEx^® Deep Frozen Shipping Solution on a non-exclusive basis and at its sole expense. As part of the solution, Cryoport has developed a FedEx-branded version of the Cryoportal^TM software platform, which is “powered by Cryoport^SM” for use by FedEx and its customers giving them access to the full capabilities of our cloud-based logistics management software platform.

DHL. In June 2014, we entered into a master agreement with LifeConEx, a part of DHL Global Forwarding (“DHL”). This relationship with DHL is a further implementation of the Company’s expansion of distribution partnerships under the “powered by Cryoport^SM” model described above, allowing us to expand our sales and marketing reach through our partners and build awareness of the benefits of our validated cryogenic solution offerings. DHL can now enhance and supplement its cold chain logistics offerings to its life sciences and healthcare customers with Cryoport’s validated cryogenic solutions. DHL’s network offers Cryoport’s cryogenic solutions under the DHL brands as “powered by Cryoport^SM”. In addition, DHL’s customers will be able to have direct access to our cloud-based order entry and tracking portal to order Cryoport Express^® Solutions and receive preferred DHL shipping rates and discounts. Our proprietary logistics management operating platform, the Cryoportal^TM, is integrated with DHL’s tracking and billing systems to provide DHL life sciences and healthcare customers with a seamless way of accessing critical information regarding shipments of biological material worldwide.

UPS. In October 2014, we added United Parcel Services, Inc. (“UPS”) as our third major distributor by entering into an agreement with UPS Oasis Supply Corporation, a part of UPS, whereby UPS will offer our validated and comprehensive cryogenic solutions to its life sciences and healthcare customers on a global basis. This relationship with UPS is a further implementation of the Company’s expansion of distributors under the “powered by Cryoport^SM” model described above, allowing us to further expand our sales and marketing reach through our partners and build awareness of the benefits of our validated cryogenic solution offerings through UPS.

As a result of our new relationship with UPS, UPS customers will have direct access to our cloud-based order entry and tracking portal to order Cryoport Express^® Solutions and gain access to UPS’s broad array of domestic and international shipping and logistics solutions at competitive prices. Our proprietary logistics management operating platform, the Cryoportal^TM, is integrated with UPS’s tracking and billing systems to provide UPS life sciences and healthcare customers with a seamless way of accessing critical information regarding shipments of biological material worldwide.

Life Sciences Agreements

Zoetis. In December 2012, we signed an agreement with Pfizer Inc. relating to Zoetis Inc. (formerly the animal health business unit of Pfizer Inc.) pursuant to which we were engaged to manage frozen shipments of a key poultry vaccine. Under this arrangement, Cryoport provides on-site logistics personnel and its logistics management operating platform, the Cryoportal^TM to manage shipments from the Zoetis manufacturing site in the United States to domestic customers as well as various international distribution centers. As part of our logistics management services, Cryoport is constantly analyzing logistics data and processes to further introduce economies and reliability throughout the network, ensuring products arrive at their destinations in specified conditions, on-time and with the optimum utilization of resources. The Company manages Zoetis’ total fleet of dewar flask shippers used for this purpose, including liquid nitrogen shippers. In July 2013 the agreement was amended to expand Cryoport’s scope to manage all logistics of Zoetis’ key frozen poultry vaccine to all Zoetis’ international distribution centers as well as all domestic shipments. In October 2013, the agreement was further amended to expand Cryoport’s role to include the logistics management for a second poultry vaccine. In September 2015, the agreement was further amended and extended through September 2018, subject to certain termination and extension provisions.

In summary, we serve the life sciences industry with cryogenic logistics solutions that are advanced, comprehensive, reliable, validated, and efficient. Our clients include those companies and institutions that have logistics requirements for personalized medicine, immunotherapies, stem cells, cell lines, tissue, vaccines, in-vitro fertilization, cord blood, and other temperature sensitive commodities of life sciences.

Recent Developments

The Board of Directors authorized the 1-for-12 reverse stock split that became effective on May 19, 2015. All prior periods presented in this Report have been adjusted to reflect the twelve to one reverse stock split. Financial information updated by this capital change includes earnings per common share, dividends per common share, stock price per common share, weighted average common shares, outstanding common shares, treasury shares, common stock, additional paid-in capital, and share-based compensation.

On July 29, 2015, the Company completed the sale of common stock and warrants (the “Units”) under a registered public offering. The gross proceeds to Cryoport from the offering, including the partial exercise of the over-allotment option, were approximately $6.8 million, before underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses (approximately $5.9 million after underwriting discounts, commissions and other expenses).

The public offering price per Unit was $3.25. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Under the terms of the offering, Cryoport issued 2,090,750 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,090,750 shares of common stock, inclusive of the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. The common stock and the warrants are immediately separable and trade on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols CYRX, and CYRXW, respectively. The warrants have a per share exercise price of $3.57, are exercisable immediately and will expire five years from the date of issuance.

On September 16, 2015, the Company entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between KLATU Networks, LLC (“KLATU”) and the Company. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company purchased from KLATU certain intellectual property and intellectual property rights related to the Company’s Cryoportal^TM logistics management platform, which KLATU previously developed for and licensed to the Company pursuant to the Master Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement, by and between KLATU and the Company, dated October 9, 2007. As full compensation for the sale and assignment of the Developed Technology from KLATU to the Company, the Company will pay KLATU an aggregate amount of $400,000 in two equal installments of which $200,000 was paid in September 2015 and the remaining $200,000 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015.

Results of Operations

Three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to three months ended September 30, 2014:

The following table summarizes certain information derived from our condensed consolidated statements of operations:

Revenues. We generated revenues from customers in all of our target life sciences markets, such as biotech and diagnostic companies, pharmaceutical companies, central laboratories, contract research organizations, the reproductive medicine market/in vitro fertilization market, and research institutions. Revenues increased $612,000 or 74.2% to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $825,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. This increase is primarily driven by an overall increase in the number of customers utilizing our services and frequency of shipments compared to the prior year. Revenues in the reproductive medicine market increased by 74.7% over the prior year to $356,400 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, driven by continued success of our targeted sales and marketing campaigns and an increased awareness of our cryogenic logistics solutions in this market. Our revenues from the animal health market were $209,600 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, which is consistent with the same period in the prior year.

Gross margin and cost of revenues. Gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 30.4% of revenues, as compared to 27.3% of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in gross margin is primarily due to the increase in revenues combined with a reduction in freight charges as a percentage of revenues and a decrease of fixed manufacturing costs. Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 69.6% of revenues, as compared to 72.7% of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Our cost of revenues are primarily comprised of freight charges, payroll and related expenses for our operations center in California, third-party charges for our European and Asian operations centers in the Netherlands and Singapore, depreciation expenses of our Cryoport Express^® Shippers and supplies and consumables used for our solutions. The increase in cost of revenues is primarily due to freight charges from the growth in shipments and inventory transfers between operations centers, freight pricing increases and the expansion of the shipping team in anticipation of increased shipping volume.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $647,100 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 or 42.8% as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. This increase is primarily due to equity-based compensation charges, salaries incurred to expand our sales force, the engagement of a new marketing firm and travel expenses associated with the public equity offering.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased $11,000 or 12.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily due to the salary and associated employee costs related to the addition of a research and development engineer. Our research and development efforts are focused on continually improving the features of the Cryoport Express^® Solutions including the Company’s cloud-based logistics management platform, the Cryoportal^TM, the Cryoport Express^® Shippers and development of additional accessories to facilitate the efficient shipment of life science commodities using our solution. We use an outside software development company and other third parties to provide some of these services. These efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of additional shipper designs to meet market requirements, constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume manufacturing methods. In addition, research and development effort has been directed towards developing an advanced condition monitoring system.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased $593,100 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 included amortization of the debt discount on the related-party notes payable of $65,400, the related interest expense of $14,500 and the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature of the related-party notes payable of $521,100. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 included accrued interest on our related-party notes payable of approximately $7,900.

Other expense, net. The other expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2015 is primarily due to administrative charges and foreign exchange losses on accounts receivable and payable invoices.

Six months ended September 30, 2015 compared to six months ended September 30, 2014:

The following table summarizes certain information derived from our condensed consolidated statements of operations:

Revenues. We generated revenues from customers in all of our target life sciences markets, such as biotech and diagnostic companies, pharmaceutical companies, central laboratories, contract research organizations, animal health, the reproductive medicine market/in vitro fertilization market, and research institutions. Revenues increased $1.1 million or 62.8% to $2.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $1.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2014. This increase is primarily driven by an overall increase in the number of customers utilizing our services and frequency of shipments compared to the prior year. Revenues in the reproductive medicine market increased by 70.9% over the prior year to $691,500 for the six months ended September 30, 2015, driven by continued success of our targeted sales and marketing campaigns and an increased awareness of our cryogenic logistics solutions in this market. Our revenues from the animal health market were $478,200 for the six months ended September 30, 2015, representing a 4.8% decrease over the same period in the prior year.

Gross margin and cost of revenues. Gross margin for the six months ended September 30, 2015 was 32.2% of revenues, as compared to 32.0% of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2014. Cost of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2015 was 67.8% of revenues, as compared to 68.0% of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2014. Our cost of revenues are primarily comprised of freight charges, payroll and related expenses for our operations center in California, third-party charges for our European and Asian operations centers in the Netherlands and Singapore, depreciation expenses of our Cryoport Express^® Shippers and supplies and consumables used for our solutions. The increase in cost of revenues is primarily due to freight charges from the growth in shipments and inventory transfers between operations centers, freight pricing increases and the expansion of the shipping team in anticipation of increased shipping volume.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015 or 42.4% as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2014. This increase is primarily due to equity-based compensation charges, salaries incurred to expand our sales force, the engagement of a new marketing firm and travel expenses associated with the public equity offering.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased $9,500 or 5.6% for the six months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily due to the salary and associated employee costs related to the addition of a research and development engineer. Our research and development efforts are focused on continually improving the features of the Cryoport Express^® Solutions including the Company’s cloud-based logistics management platform, the Cryoportal^TM, the Cryoport Express^® Shippers and development of additional accessories to facilitate the efficient shipment of life science commodities using our solution. We use an outside software development company and other third parties to provide some of these services. These efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of additional shipper designs to meet market requirements, constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume manufacturing methods. In addition, research and development effort has been directed towards developing an advanced condition monitoring system.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $231,900 for the six months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2014. Interest expense for the six months ended September 30, 2015 included amortization of the debt discount on the related-party notes payable of $130,200, the related interest expense of $28,900, the amortization of the debt discount on the notes payable of $221,400, related interest expense of $3,300 as well as the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature of the related-party notes payable of $521,100. Interest expense for the six months ended September 30, 2014 included amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing fees of approximately $1.1 million, of which $826,900 related to the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature of the 5% Bridge Notes that was triggered by the convertible preferred stock offering, interest expense on our 5% Bridge Notes of approximately $10,600 and accrued interest on our related party notes payable of approximately $16,100.

Other expense, net. The other expense, net for the six months ended September 30, 2015 is primarily due to administrative charges and foreign exchange losses on accounts receivable and payable invoices.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $7.1 million and working capital of $5.8 million. Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of our debt and equity securities.

For the six months ended September 30, 2015, we used $2.9 million of cash for operations primarily as a result of the net loss of $4.3 million offset by non-cash expenses of $2.2 million primarily comprised of amortization of debt discounts, stock-based compensation expense, and depreciation and amortization. Also contributing to the cash impact of our net operating loss (excluding non-cash items) was an increase in accounts receivable of $147,300 due to increased revenues and a reduction in accounts payable and other accrued expenses and accrued compensation of $443,800.  

Net cash used in investing activities of $335,400 during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily due to the purchase from KLATU of certain intellectual property and intellectual property rights related to the Company’s Cryoportal^TM logistics management platform, which KLATU previously developed for and licensed to the Company, Cryoport Express^® CXVC1 Shippers and data loggers.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $8.9 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, and resulted from net proceeds from the public equity offering of $5.9 million, issuance of convertible preferred stock of $3.9 million and proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants of $10,900, partially offset by the repayment of notes payable of $741,400 and the repayment of related-party notes payable of $172,000.

The Company received gross proceeds of $4.5 million (approximately $3.9 million after offering costs) in exchange for the issuance of 372,862 shares of convertible preferred stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 which is further described in Note 7 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The funds raised are being used for working capital purposes and to continue our sales efforts to advance the Company’s commercialization of the Cryoport Express^® Solutions.

In July 2015, the Company completed a public offering of its common stock and warrants under a registered public offering to provide working capital, support the Company’s anticipated operations and development plans and meet the eligibility requirement to list its common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market. The gross proceeds to Cryoport from this offering, including the partial exercise of the over-allotment option, were approximately $6.8 million. The Company’s management believes that, based on its current plans and assumptions, the current cash on hand and proceeds from this public offering, together with projected cash flows, will satisfy our operational and capital requirements for the next 12 months. No assurance can be given that additional capital, if needed, will be available when required or upon terms acceptable to the Company.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the timelines specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2015 at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The risks described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risk factors do not identify all of the risks that we face. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial. There have been no material changes to the “Risk Factors” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.