December 19, 2005 - 10SB12G/A: Registration of securities for small business [Section 12(g)]

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-SB/A

GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES

OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUERS UNDER SECTION 12(b)

OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

CryoPort, Inc.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)



Nevada		88-0313393
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
451 Atlas Street, Brea, California		92821
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)
(714) 256-6100
(Issuer’s Telephone Number)

Securities to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities to be registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I		3

ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.	4

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION	28

ITEM 3.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY	37

ITEM 4.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	37

ITEM 5:	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS	38

ITEM 6.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	41

ITEM 7:	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	44

ITEM 8.	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES	45

PART II		46

ITEM 1.	MARKET PRICE OF, AND DIVIDENDS ON, THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, AND OTHER MATTERS.	46

ITEM 2.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	47

ITEM 3.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS	47

ITEM 4.	RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES	47

ITEM 5.	INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS	49

PART F/S		51

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MARCH 31, 2005	51

ITEM 2.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR JUNE 30, 2005	74

PART III		90

ITEM 1.	INDEX TO EXHIBITS	90

ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS	92

PART I

In this registration statement the terms “CryoPort”, “Company” and similar terms refer to CryoPort, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary CryoPort Systems, Inc.

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS:

THE COMPANY HAS MADE SOME STATEMENTS IN THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT, INCLUDING SOME UNDER “BUSINESS”, “RISK FACTORS” AND “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS,” AND ELSEWHERE, WHICH ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS MAY DISCUSS THE COMPANY’S FUTURE EXPECTATIONS, CONTAIN PROJECTIONS OF ITS PLAN OF OPERATION OR FINANCIAL CONDITION OR STATE OTHER FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION. IN THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE GENERALLY IDENTIFIED BY WORDS SUCH AS “ANTICIPATE”, “PLAN”, “BELIEVE”, “EXPECT”, “ESTIMATE”, AND THE LIKE. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE FUTURE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, AND THERE ARE FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS OR PLANS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THE STATEMENTS. THE FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION IS BASED ON VARIOUS FACTORS AND IS DERVIED USING NUMEROUS ASSUMPTIONS. A READER, WHETHER INVESTING IN THE COMPANY’S SECURITIES OR NOT, SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH APPLY ONLY AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT. IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER FROM PROJECTIONS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING:

·	THE SUCCESS OR FAILURE OF MANAGEMENT’S EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT THE COMPANY’S PLAN OF OPERATIONS;

·	THE COMPANY’S ABILITY TO FUND ITS OPERATING EXPENSES;

·	THE COMPANY’S ABILITY TO COMPETE WITH OTHER COMPANIES THAT HAVE A SIMILAR PLAN OF OPERATION;

·	THE EFFECT OF CHANGING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IMPACTING THE COMPANY’S PLAN OF OPERATION; AND

·	THE COMPANY’S ABILITY TO MEET THE OTHER RISKS AS MAY BE DESCRIBED IN ITS FUTURE FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

THE COMPANY UNDERTAKES NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHETHER AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Overview:

The principal focus of the Company is to develop a line of disposable (or one-way) dry cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological materials. A dry cryogenic shipper is a device that uses liquid nitrogen which is contained inside a vacuum insulated bottle as a refrigerant to provide storage temperatures below minus 160° centigrade. The dry shipper is designed such that there can be no pressure build up as the liquid nitrogen evaporates, or spillage of liquid nitrogen. A foam retention system is employed to ensure that liquid nitrogen stays inside the vacuum container. Biological specimens are stored in a “well” inside the container and refrigeration is provided by cold nitrogen gas evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam retention system. Biological specimens transported using the cryogenic shipper can include live cell pharmaceutical products; e.g., cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials, reproductive tissues, infectious substances and other items that require continuous exposure to cryogenic temperature (less than -150°C).

The Company currently manufactures a line of reusable cryogenic dry shippers. These primarily serve as vehicles for the development of the cryogenic technology that supports the disposable product development but also are essential components of the infrastructure that supports testing and research activities of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The Company’s mission is to provide cost effective packaging systems for biological materials requiring, or benefiting from, a cryogenic temperature environment over an extended time period by introducing to market a cost effective disposable/one-time use cryogenic shipper. The conventional concept of cryogenic shipping employs the use of a high cost shipping container, used multiple times over multiple years. The Company plans to introduce the disposable/one-time product manufactured from alternative, lower cost materials, which eliminates the need to replenish the refrigerant during the shipping process resulting in lower overall operating costs. The Company’s intended future product is designed for one-time use with or without a disposable capability. Both methodologies eliminate the need to replenish the refrigerant during transport.

The Company’s production line incorporates innovative technologies developed for aerospace and other industries to develop products that are more cost effective, easier to use and more functional than the traditional dry ice devices and methods currently used for the shipment of temperature-sensitive materials.

The Company currently occupies approximately 8,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space in Brea, California and has five full-time employees and two full-time and eight part-time consultants.

As reported in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accountant on the Company’s March 31, 2005 and 2004 financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and has a stockholders’ deficit. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. See page 26, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” for further discussion.

History:

The Company was originally incorporated under the name G.T.5-Limited on May 25, 1990 as a Nevada corporation. The Company’s original focus was to engage in the business of designing and building exotic body styles for automobiles compatible with the vehicle’s existing chassis. The Company provided a series of hand molded body style products that were based on the chassis designs of the Ford Mustang, Pantera, Ford Cobra and Ferrari Daytona Spider. The Company’s goal was to provide customers with a cost effective solution to developing a great look to their own vehicles without the high costs associated with buying very expensive new vehicles. Acceptance of the Company’s concept never materialized, and revenues during the past few years declined. In 2004, the Company did not have any revenues. As a result, the foregoing operations were discontinued. In January 2005, the Company’s board of directors determined that it would be in its best interests, and that of its shareholders, to find a suitable acquisition candidate.

In March 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with CryoPort Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and its stockholders, pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of CryoPort Systems, Inc. in exchange for 24,108,105 shares of the Company’s common stock (which represents approximately 81% of its total issued and outstanding shares of common stock following the close of the transaction). The exchange price was reached through discussions between CryoPort Systems, Inc.’s board of directors and stockholders, and GT-5 Limited’s board of directors and major stockholders, taking into account supply and demand factors as well as the historical share prices to non-insiders of each company. The acquisition was a transaction involving the cashless exchange of shares only. In connection with this transaction, the Company changed its name to CryoPort, Inc., effective March 16, 2005. In addition, the Company’s then directors and officers resigned, and the directors and officers of CryoPort Systems were elected to fill the vacancies created by such resignations.

Cryoport Systems, Inc., was originally formed in California in 1999 as a limited liability company and was reorganized into a California corporation in December 2000. CryoPort Systems, Inc. was founded in 1999 principally to capitalize on servicing the transportation needs of the growing global “biotechnology revolution”.

Business Strategy:

The Company’s present objective is to leverage its proprietary technology and developmental expertise to design, develop, manufacture and sell cryogenic shipping devices. The key elements of its strategy include:

Expand the Company’s product offerings to address growing markets. Given the need for a temperature-sensitive shipping device that can cost effectively be used, the Company is diligently working to develop a disposable or one-time use shipping device that performs as well as its reusable shippers to eliminate the need for a return shipment and the costs associated therewith as well as eliminate any loss of specimen viability during the shipping process.

Expand the Company’s marketing and distribution channels. The Company’s products serve the shipping needs of companies across a broad spectrum of industries on a growing international level. It is the Company’s goal to establish those contacts necessary to achieve a broader distribution of its products.

Establish strategic partnerships. In order to expedite the Company’s time to market and increase its market presence, the Company is currently negotiating to establish strategic alliances to facilitate the manufacture, promotion and distribution of its products, including establishing alliances with shipping container manufacturers (both cryogenic and dry ice), integrated express companies, and freight forwarding companies.

Industry Overview:

The Company’s products are sold into a rapidly growing niche of the packaging industry focused on the temperature sensitive packaging and shipping of biological materials. Expenditures for “value added” packaging for frozen transport have been increasing for the past several years and are expected to continue to increase even more in the future as more domestic and international biotechnology firms introduce pharmaceutical products that require continuous refrigeration at cryogenic temperatures. This will require a greater dependence on passively controlled temperature transport systems (i.e., systems having no external power source). [References: Cryopak Industries - Investment Package/Annual Report and US Department of Commerce - US Industrial Outlook.]

The Company believes that growth in the following markets has resulted in the need for increased efficiencies and greater flexibility in the temperature sensitive packaging market:

·	Pharmaceutical clinical trials, including transport of tissue culture samples;

·	Pharmaceutical commercial product distribution

·	Transportation of diagnostic specimens;

·	Transportation of infectious materials;

·	Intra laboratory diagnostic testing;

·	Transport of temperature-sensitive specimens by courier;

·	Analysis of biological samples;

·	Gene biotechnology and vaccine production;

·	Food engineering; and

·	Animal and human reproduction.

Many of the biological products in these above markets require transport in a frozen state as well as the need for shipping containers which have the ability to maintain a frozen, cryogenic environment (e.g., -150°C) for a period ranging from two to ten days (depending on the distance and mode of shipment). These products include semen, embryo, tissue, tissue cultures, cultures of viruses and bacteria, enzymes, DNA, vaccines and certain pharmaceutical products. In some instances, transport of these products requires temperatures at, or approaching, -196°C.

One problem faced by many companies operating in these specialized markets is the limited number of cryogenic shipping systems serving their needs, particularly in the areas of pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical trials. The currently adopted protocol, and the most common method for packaging frozen transport in these industries, is the use of solid carbon dioxide (dry ice). Dry ice is used in shipping extensively to maintain a frozen state for a period of one to four days. Dry ice is used in the transport of many biological products, such as pharmaceuticals, laboratory specimens and certain infectious materials that do not require true cryogenic temperatures. The common approach to shipping these items via ground freight is to pack the product in a container, such as an expanded polystyrene (Styrofoam) box or a molded polyurethane box, with a variable quantity of dry ice. The box is taped or strapped shut and shipped to its destination with freight charges based on its initial shipping weight.

With respect to shipments via specialized courier services, there is no standardized method or device currently in use for the purpose of transporting temperature-sensitive frozen biological specimens. One common method for courier transport of biologicals is to place frozen specimens, refrigerated specimens, and ambient specimens into a compartmentalized container, similar in size to a 55 quart Coleman or Igloo cooler. The freezer compartment in the container is loaded with a quantity of dry ice at minus 78°C, while the refrigerated compartment at 8°C utilizes ice substitutes.

Two manufacturers of the polystyrene and polyurethane containers frequently used in the shipping and courier transport of dry ice frozen specimens are Insulated Shipping Containers, Inc. and SCA Thermosafe (formerly Polyfoam Packers Corporation). When these containers are used with dry ice, the average sublimation rate (e.g., the rate at which dry ice turns from a solid to a gaseous state) in a container with a one and one-half inch wall thickness is slightly less than three pounds per 24 hours. Other existing refrigerant systems employ the use of gel packs and ice substitutes for temperature maintenance. Gels and eutectic solutions (phase changing materials) with a wide range of phasing temperatures have been developed in recent years to meet the needs of products with varying specific temperature control requirements.

The use of dry ice and ice substitutes, however, regardless of external packaging used, are frequently inadequate because they do not provide low enough storage temperatures and, in the case of dry ice, last for only a few days without re-icing. As a result, companies run the risk of increased costs due to lost specimens and additional shipping charges due to the need to re-ice.

Some of the other disadvantages to using dry ice for shipping or transporting temperature sensitive products are as follows:

·	Availability of a dry ice source;

·	Handling and storage of the dry ice;

·	Cost of the dry ice;

·	Weight of containers when packed with dry ice;

·	Securing a shipping container with a high enough R-value to hold the dry ice and product for the required time period; and

·	Securing a shipping container that meets the requirements for International Air Transportation Association (“IATA”), the Department of Transportation (“DOT”), the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”), and other regulatory agencies.

Due to the limitations of dry ice, shipment of specimens at true cryogenic temperatures can only be accomplished using liquid nitrogen (LN₂) dry vapor shippers, or by shipping over actual liquid nitrogen. While such shippers provide solutions to the issues encountered when shipping with dry ice, they too are experiencing some criticisms by users or potential users. For example, the cost for these products typically can range from $650 to $3,000 per unit, which can substantially limit their use for the transport of many common biologicals, particularly with respect to small quantities such as is the case with direct to the physician drug delivery. Because of the initial cost and limited production of these containers, they are designed to be reusable. However, the cost of returning these heavy containers can be significant, particularly in international markets, because most applications require only one-way shipping.

Another problem with these existing systems relates to the hold time of the unit in a normal, upright position versus the hold time when the unit is placed on its side or inverted. The liquid nitrogen can leak out of the container when it is positioned on its side or inverted. This leaking will compromise the dependability of these dry shippers, particularly when used in circumstances requiring lengthy shipping times. The Company’s current reusable shippers have only a 40% reduction in hold time when placed on their sides or inverted. One of the Company’s significant competitors, Chart Industries, Inc., publishes on their web site, a 60% reduction in hold time when its units are placed on their side and a 90% reduction when its units are inverted. Since other competitors use similar absorbent materials to that used by Chart Industries, Inc., the Company believes the performance characteristics will be similar for their products of this particular size and volume.

Finally, these containers are often promoted as being durable due to their metal construction. However, rough handling can result in the puncturing of the outer shell or cracking at the neck area, resulting in the loss of the high vacuum insulation. This renders the shippers useless. A hard-shell shipping enclosure is available as an optional accessory to provide additional protection for these units at an additional cost to the user. The metal construction also adds to the weight of the container, thereby adding substantially to shipping costs.

The CryoPort Solution:

During the past several years, a number of trends have emerged in the temperature-sensitive packaging industry as a result of economic and technological changes. The Company has focused its product development efforts to respond to what it perceives to be the more significant of these trends, specifically the following:

·	Smaller, more efficient packaging (increasing thermal density);

·	Emphasis on decreasing costs and system simplification;

·	Need for turnkey services;

·	Development of international programs and markets;

·	Centralization of commercial products and services; and

·	Development of regulatory standards.

Smaller, More Efficient Packaging. Advances in both materials and manufacturing technology have made it possible to reduce the size, weight, complexity and cost of packaging, while increasing the capabilities of high performance packaging. These advances are the result of developments in the aerospace industry in the areas of high strength, low weight materials and thermal technology. The Company is applying this technology in its product development efforts, and believes that it is at the forefront of applying this technology in the public sector. The Company’s development efforts are focused on the application of polymers and high volume metal casting and forming methods that have traditionally been excluded from the cryogenic industry because product quantities have been too low to efficiently utilize these materials and methods. Cryoport currently manufactures its reusable shipper with an approximate liquid nitrogen volume of five liters. The Company’s future intended products will be a range of shippers with liquid nitrogen capacities from approximately one to five liters in size.

Emphasis on Decreasing Costs and System Simplification. Because current dry vapor LN₂ shipping containers are expensive, many users do not keep an ample supply on hand. Consequently, some users require that these be returned promptly. This often results in very expensive express return shipping which will significantly magnify as shipping volumes increase. This has created a demand for smaller, lower cost dry vapor LN₂ shipping containers. In addition, many users have expressed a strong interest in the production of a dry vapor LN₂ shipper that is inexpensive enough to be used in a disposable or limited usage manner. The current price of Cryoport’s reusable shippers range from $685 to $1,095. The price range for the proposed disposable/one way shippers when developed is initially expected to range from $50 to $175 per use, depending on size.

As previously noted, dry vapor LN₂ shipping containers are made of medium gauge metal that makes them vulnerable to denting and breaking and increases shipping costs due to the added weight. Additionally, their design requires that they be kept in an upright position to achieve advertised hold times. If they are placed in a horizontal position, LN₂ can leak out or boil off, substantially reducing their hold times. The Company anticipates manufacturing its shippers in smaller sizes from lighter weight materials that significantly reduce their weight (thereby reducing shipping costs) and manufacturing cost, which will allow them to be used one time for outbound shipments and then disposed. Additionally, the patented absorbent used to hold the LN₂ much more efficiently retains liquid when its shippers are positioned on their sides or inverted. The Company has significantly reduced the boil off (loss of liquid nitrogen refrigerant) that all dry shippers experience when not kept vertical.

Turnkey Services. The pharmaceutical industry depends on clinical trials for Food and Drug Administration approval of new drugs. A significant number of these trials require frozen transport of specimens obtained from patients in the study. A number of pharmaceutical companies now specify temperature-sensitive frozen packaging and services as part of “turnkey” contracts with contract research organizations. To meet the demands of their customers, freight forwarding companies, such as World Courier, Federal Express and DHL, take responsibility for procuring appropriate packaging, shipping by airline, and delivering the specimens to the point of analytical testing. This comprehensive service addresses the stringent requirements imposed by pharmaceutical companies to ensure appropriate quality control for their clinical studies. The Company believes its reusable and disposable dry shippers will greatly enhance the reliability of the quality control required.

Development of International Programs and Markets. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are now transnational industries with locations in various parts of the industrially developed and developing world. Since many products produced by these industries must be shipped in temperature-sensitive packaging, the logistical problems presented by longer distances, and sometimes unreliable forwarding entities, are becoming of greater concern. Weekends, holidays, lost containers, hot weather and indirect courier routes all place a strain on the ability of current shipping devices to provide appropriate temperatures when extraordinary delays are encountered. Because the Company’s shippers are able to maintain cryogenic temperatures of minus 150°C, or less, for up to 10 days, its shippers are better able to insure the integrity of specimens affected by unexpected shipping delays.

Centralization of Commercial Products and Services. In recent years, the competitive environment in health care has intensified rapidly, while increased managed care participation, coupled with Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement issues, have placed significant pressure to increase efficiency on market segments that service the health care industry. These include the diagnostic clinical laboratory industry and pharmaceutical industry. In response to these, and other pressures, the clinical laboratory industry experienced a consolidation, through both acquisition and attrition, which resulted in fewer, more centralized testing locations, processing a larger volume of specimens. With fewer testing sites processing increased volumes, a tremendous strain has been placed on the traditional modes for transporting these goods.

With respect to the pharmaceutical industry, the emergence of international pharmaceutical conglomerates through mergers and acquisitions, such as Smith Kline Beecham, and the dramatic growth of relatively new companies such as Amgen, coupled with the emergence of contract research organizations, such as Quintiles (with testing laboratories in Atlanta, Georgia, Buenos Aires, Edinburgh, Pretoria, Singapore and Melbourne), which contract with pharmaceutical companies to handle, among other things, clinical trials and testing, means that distribution networks for the transport of temperature-sensitive products have become much more complex.

The Company believes that it has developed, and is developing, products that are ideally suited to address the issues presented by these trends.

Development of Regulatory Standards. The shipping of diagnostic specimens, infectious substances and dangerous goods, whether via air or ground, falls under the jurisdiction of many state, federal and international agencies. The quality of the containers, packaging materials and insulation that protect a specimen determine whether or not it will arrive in a usable condition. Many of the regulations for transporting dangerous goods in the United States are determined by international rules formulated under the auspices of the United Nations. For example, the International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”) is the United Nations organization that develops regulations (Technical Instructions) for the safe transport of dangerous goods by air. If shipment is by air, compliance with the rules established by IATA is required. IATA is a trade association made up of airlines and air cargo carriers that publishes annual editions of the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations. These regulations interpret and add to the ICAO Technical Instructions to reflect industry practices. Additionally, the CDC has regulations (published in the Code of Federal Regulations) for interstate shipping of specimens, and the Occupational Safety and Health Organization (“OSHA”) also addresses the safe handling of Class 6.2 Substances. The Company’s DG1000 meets packing instruction 602 and 650 and is certified for the shipment of Class 6.2 Dangerous Goods per the requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air and the International Air Transport Association (IATA).

The Company’s Current Product Line:

Reusable Cryogenic Dry Vapor Shippers. The Company has developed three lines of reusable cryogenic dry vapor shippers which the Company believes solve the specific problems in, and are responsive to the evolving needs of the market place of temperature-critical, frozen and refrigerated transport of biologicals. This line of shippers is capable of maintaining cryogenic temperatures of minus 150 or less, for up to 10 days.

These products, which are in full production at the Company’s Brea facility, consist of the AR1000, the DG1000 and the DS650. The DG1000 is designed for shipping biological material classified as dangerous goods by IATA standards. This shipper is IATA certified for the shipment of Class 6.2 Dangerous Goods. The AR1000 is utilized primarily in the veterinary and human assisted reproduction markets. This shipper may be used where packaging of the biological material need not comply with IATA Packing Instructions 602 or 650. The DS650 is utilized for the shipment of specimens for diagnosis, treatment or evaluation of disease that must conform to the IATA 650 packaging standards. The Company has recently introduced a soft case for the same cryogenic Dewar; identified as the PSX1000 and the PS1000. These units are smaller, lighter in weight, and more easily handled than the units described above. They are pending certification testing.

These shippers are lightweight, low-cost, re-usable vapor phase liquid nitrogen storage containers that combine the best features of packaging, cryogenics and high vacuum technology. Each of these three shippers is composed of an aluminum metallic Dewar flask, with a well for holding the biological material in the inner chamber. A Dewar flask, or “thermos bottle,” is an example of a practical device in which the conduction, convection and radiation of heat are reduced as much as possible. A high surface, low density open cell plastic foam material surrounds the inner chamber for retaining the liquid nitrogen in-situ by absorption, adsorption and surface tension. Absorption is defined as the taking up of matter in bulk by other matter, as in dissolving of a gas by a liquid, whereas adsorption is the surface retention of solid, liquid or gas molecules, atoms or ions by a solid or liquid. This material absorbs LN₂ up to six times faster than currently used materials, while providing the shipper with a hold time and capacity to transport biological materials safely and conveniently. The annular space between the inner and outer Dewar chambers is evacuated to a very high vacuum (10^-6 Torr). The specimen-holding chamber has a primary cap to enclose the specimens, and a removable and replaceable secondary cap to further enclose the specimen holding container and to contain the LN₂. The entire Dewar vessel is then wrapped in a plurality of insulating and cushioning materials and placed either in a hard plastic shipper shell, or in a ballistic nylon soft shell outer case with a hinged lid, as with the Company’s PSX1000.

The Company believes the above product configuration satisfies the needs of the markets that require the temperature-critical, frozen and refrigerated transport of biological materials, such as pharmaceutical clinical trials, gene biotechnology, infectious materials handling, and animal and human reproduction. Due to the Company’s unique proprietary technology and innovative design, its shippers are less prone to losing functional hold time when not kept in an upright position than the competing products. The Company’s continuing R&D efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of smaller size units constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume manufacturing methods that will make it practical to offer disposable or limited use cryogenic packages.

Materials to be transported in the AR1000 shipper are typically placed in a canister that is lowered into the well of the shipper, which is held in place by the cap and neck tube. The materials to be transported in the DG1000 and DS650 shippers are placed in a bio-cartridge, which in turn is placed in a leak proof plastic bag. The canister, or vial holder, and its contents are surrounded by cold LN₂ vapor from the saturated absorbent filler.

An important feature of the DG1000 and DS650 (and soon to be incorporated into the PSX1000) shippers is their compliance with the stringent packaging requirements of IATA Packing Instructions 602 and 650, respectively. These instructions include the internal pressure (hydraulic) and drop performance requirements. The Company believes its shippers were the first cost-effective cryogenic shippers to comply with these regulations, which it hopes will substantially enhance product acceptance, and facilitate its marketing efforts for both its reusable shippers and its planned disposable shippers.

Biological Material Holders for Infectious and Dangerous Goods. The Company has also developed a patented containment bag which is used in connection with the shipment of infectious or dangerous goods. The inner packaging of the DG1000 shipper contains watertight primary receptacles (one and one-half millimeter vials.) Up to five vials are then placed onto aluminum holders and up to fifteen holders (75 vials) are placed into an absorbent pouch, designed to absorb the entire contents of all the vials in the event of leakage. This pouch containing up to 75 vials is then placed in a watertight secondary packaging plastic bag capable of withstanding cryogenic temperatures, and then sealed. This entire package is then placed in a unique, patented, secondary containment bag, which is a plastic film based material, critical to the function of the overall cryogenic package. These bags use a pressure-sensitive adhesive closure much like a common overnight courier envelope. As a result, these bags are inherently disposable, one-use-only. This bag is then placed into the well of the cryogenic shipper.

Artificial Insemination Canisters. The Company has also developed an artificial insemination canister for use with its AR1000 shipper. Semen straws, which resemble the familiar plastic stirrers for hot beverages and are similar in size, come in two sizes, based on volume - one-half cc and one-quarter cc. These straws are sealed at both ends and placed in small cylindrical “goblets” that are in turn placed into a twelve-inch long cane. Fifteen canes can be placed in the metallic cylindrical canister that fits within the well of the shipper. The canister has a flexible handle and separate vapor plug. Straws can also be stored in bulk in 65mm diameter goblets in two layers using a disposable canister or via the use of a lifter. With the disposable canister or lifter, up to 720 ½ cc or 1600 ¼ cc straws can be stored in the AR1000.

The Company’s Future Products:

The Company’s continuing R&D efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of smaller size units constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume manufacturing methods that will make it practical to offer disposable or limited use cryogenic packages.

The transition from a reusable shipper to a one-way shipper is planned during early calendar year 2006 and will be accomplished initially by a simple reduction in the size of existing materials, the simplification of the outer protective shipping package and the use of established manufacturing practices. Subsequently, in order to enable higher volume production, alternate materials which are processed differently will be employed, with anticipated substantial cost reductions to be made to both the inner cryogenic Dewar and the outer integrated shipping case, while maintaining most of the Company’s proven, current manufacturing methods. This product will then be transitioned to a fully disposable one-way shipper with an appropriate recycling program. The one-way shipper will employ alternate materials of construction, which will further enable both higher mass manufacturing and additional cost reduction opportunities.

The Company’s driving logic in developing a one-way shipper is:

·	To make the cost of the cryogenic package less than, or equal to, the total cost of ownership (on a one time use basis including return shipping and handling) of a reusable unit depending on the ultimate capacity and hold time of the shipper.

·	To create the opportunity to ultimately offer a seamless “bio-express” courier service to the Company’s target markets via its strategic partners.

Sales and Marketing:

The Company currently has an internal sales and marketing group which manages both its direct sales efforts and its third party resellers, which include Air Liquide and SCA Thermosafe. The Company also has relationships with several other distributors and agents. The Company’s current distribution channels cover the Americas, Europe and Asia. The company has no distributors or agents that account for greater than 10% of overall sales volumes other than our independent South American sales agent. All agreements are non-exclusive with the exception of our South American sales agent.

The Company’s geographical sales for the year ended March 31, 2005 were as follows:

USA	80.9%
South America	10.0%
Europe	5.9%
Asia	1.8%
Other North America	1.4%

Customer Base:

The Company believes that the primary customers for its dry vapor shippers (both reusable and the future disposable) are concentrated in the following markets for the following reasons:

·	Pharmaceutical clinical trials

·	Gene biotechnology

·	Transport of infectious materials and dangerous goods

·	Pharmaceutical distribution

·	Artificial insemination and embryo transfer in animals; and

·	Human assisted reproduction artificial insemination

Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials. Every pharmaceutical company developing a new drug that must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration conducts clinical trials to, among other things, test the safety and efficacy of the potential new drug. In connection with the clinical trials, the companies may enroll patients from all over the world who regularly submit a blood specimen at the local hospital, doctor’s office or laboratory. These samples are then sent to the specified testing laboratory, which may be local or in another country. The testing laboratories will typically set the requirements for the storage and shipment of blood specimens. While domestic shipping of these specimens is sometimes accomplished adequately using dry ice, international shipments present several problems, as dry ice, under the best of circumstances, can only provide freezing for up to 36 hours, in the absence of re-icing (which is quite costly). Because shipments of packages internationally can be delayed for more than 36 hours due to flight cancellations, incorrect destinations, labor problems, ground logistics and safety reasons, dry ice is not always a reliable and cost effective option. Clinical trial specimens are often irreplaceable because each one represents data at a prescribed point in time, in a series of specimens on a given patient, who may be participating in a trial for years. Sample integrity during the shipping process is vital to retaining the maximum number of patients in each trial. The Company’s shippers are ideally suited for this market, as the hold time provided by its shipper ensures that specimens can be sent over long distances with minimal concern that they will arrive in a condition that will cause their exclusion from the trial.

Furthermore, the IATA requires that all airborne shipments of laboratory specimens be transmitted in either IATA 650 or 602 certified packaging. As a result, shippers of long distance clinical trials specimens will be automatic candidates to use the DG1000, the Company’s 602-certified dangerous goods reusable shipper, or the DS650, 650-certified diagnostic specimen reusable shipper. Once the Company has developed and obtained IATA certification of a disposable dry vapor shipper, it will be ideally suited for this market, in particular due to the elimination of the cost to return the reusable shipper.

Gene Biotechnology. According to a recent edition of the Corporate Technology Directory, there are approximately 3600 pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the United States. Of these companies, approximately 2600 are biotechnology companies and approximately 1000 are pharmaceutical companies. The gene biotechnology market includes basic and applied research and development in diverse areas such as stem cells, cloning, gene therapy, DNA tumor vaccines, tissue engineering, genomics, and blood products. Company’s participating in the foregoing fields rely on the frozen transport of specimens in connection with their research and development efforts.

Transport of Infectious Materials and Dangerous Goods. The transport of potentially infectious materials demands strict adherence to regulations that protect public safety while maintaining the viability of the material being shipped. All blood products are considered to be potentially infective and must be treated as such. Pharmaceutical companies, private research laboratories and hospitals ship tissue cultures and microbiology specimens, which are also potentially infectious materials, between a variety of entities, including private and public health reference laboratories. Almost all specimens in this infectious materials category require either a refrigerated or frozen environment. According to a doctor at the National Institute of Health (NIH), over 2 million vials of potentially infective material are shipped domestically or internationally each year, within the NIH alone. The Company initially developed its DG1000 shipper to meet the shipping requirements of this market.

Partly in response to the attack on the World Trade Center and the anthrax scare, government officials and health care professionals are focusing renewed attention on the possibility of attacks involving biological and chemical weapons such as anthrax, smallpox and sarin gas. Efforts expended on research and development to counteract biowarfare agents requires the frozen transport of these agents to and from facilities conducting the research and development. Vaccine research, including methods of vaccine delivery, also requires frozen transport. The Company’s DG1000 shipper is suited to this type of research and development.

Pharmaceutical Distribution. The current focus for the disposable products under development is in the area of pharmaceutical distribution. There are a significant number of therapeutic drugs and vaccines currently or soon to be, undergoing clinical trials. After the FDA approves them for commercial distribution, it will be necessary for the manufacturers to have a reliable and economical method of distribution to the physician who will administer the product to the patient. Although there are not now a large number of drugs, there are a substantial number in the development pipeline. It is likely that the most efficient and reliable method of distribution will be to ship a single dosage to the administering physician. These drugs are typically identified to individual patients and therefore will require a complete tracking history from the manufacturer to the patient. The most reliable method of doing this is to ship a unit dosage specifically for each patient. Because the drugs require maintenance at cryogenic temperatures, each such shipment will require a cryogenic shipping package. The Company anticipates being in a position to service that need.

Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer in Animals. The primary animal artificial insemination market that the Company is interested in is the bovine market. Markets of secondary interest are the equine, swine, sheep and canine markets. The largest established market is dairy cattle, followed by beef cattle and horses. In addition, the swine breeding industry is rapidly converting to artificial insemination for breeding purposes.

The bovine semen shipping market can be divided into three distinct parts:

·	The shipment of very large numbers of semen straws from one large artificial insemination company to another;

·	The shipment of fewer straws from large artificial insemination companies to smaller distributors; and

·	The “residential” shipment of small quantities of straws to small farms and dairies.

The last two categories are ideally suited for the use of the Company’s medium capacity AR1000 shipper or the PSX1000 shipper. The first category is viewed as one of limited potential as there are fewer shipments, each containing a very large numbers of straws. Even though the shipments in the first category initially contain larger numbers of straws, they are often broken down into much smaller numbers of straws and shipped to end users in medium capacity shippers, such as The Company’s AR1000 and PSX1000.

Although the bovine market is the largest and most mature market for shipping semen in dry vapor shippers, the use of this procedure for other species such as swine appears to be rapidly increasing.

Breeding horses by artificial insemination or embryo transfer is also becoming commonplace and has a growing international component. Shipping valuable animals for purposes of breeding is both costly and potentially injurious. The demand for desirable equine genetics for improving breeding stock has led to the shipment of semen or embryos to every part of the world.

Sheep, goats, dogs and exotic species are also being increasingly bred by artificial insemination. Airlines do not want to assume the liability of shipping live animals and discourage the practice whenever possible. While it was previously common for dogs to be shipped for breeding purposes, canine sperm banks are shipping semen at an increasing rate.

Assisted Human Reproduction. According to The Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2000 issue, 30,000 infants are born annually in the United States through artificial insemination and according to Department of Health statistics, 10 million Americans annually are affected by infertility problems. It is estimated that this represents at least 50,000 doses of semen. Since relatively few sperm banks provide donor semen, frozen shipping is almost always involved. As with animal semen, human semen must be stored and shipped at cryogenic temperatures to retain viability, to stabilize the cells and to ensure reproducible results. This can only be accomplished with the use of liquid nitrogen or LN₂ dry vapor shippers. The Company anticipates that this market will continue to increase as this practice gains acceptance in new areas of the world.

Competition:

Within the Company’s intended markets for a low cost and disposable or limited usage Dewar, there is no currently known competition. CryoPort intends to become competitive by reason of improved technological characteristics and by introducing the concept of disposability and single use products. None of the traditional suppliers of cryogenic shippers is known to have competitive equipment nor are they expected to have anything available within a short period of time. The traditional suppliers, Chart Industries, Harsco, and Air Liquide have various models of dry shippers available that sell at prices that preclude any concept of disposability. On the other hand, they are more established and have larger organizations and have greater financial, operational, sales and marketing resources and experience in research and development than the Company does. Other competitive factors include the ability of the shipper to retain liquid nitrogen when placed in non-upright positions, the overall “leak-proofness” of the package which determines compliance with shipping regulations and the overall weight and volume of the package which determine shipping costs.

Research and Development:

The Company’s principal research and development activities for the years 2004 and 2005 have centered around the investigation of materials of construction for the products and packages with the view of identifying those materials that yield fabrication costs consistent with the concept of disposability. Prototypes of one version of a unit dose transport system were developed and preliminary designs of a second concept were completed. Other research and development effort was directed toward improvements to the liquid nitrogen retention system to render it more reliable in the general shipping environment. In some circumstances, the Company may out-source the building of a prototype, or a component thereof, to a third party that may have certain areas of expertise necessary for the construction of the prototype. The Company’s research and development expenditures during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 approximated $98,700 and $61,000, respectively.

Grant Funding:

In September 1999, the National Institute of Health awarded us a Phase I SBIR grant to evaluate the “LN₂ Vapor Cooled Dry Frozen Specimen Shipper.” The Company successfully completed the Phase I program and the final SBIR report was submitted on March 30, 2000. The purpose of the study was to develop a low cost, polymer Dewar that would be a major element of the disposable shipper. The Company then submitted a Phase II SBIR grant application to continue this work in August 2001, which was awarded in late 2002. Funding under this grant was subsequently declined due to the need to prioritize the Company’s product development activities in more significant areas.

Manufacturing:

The component parts for the Company’s products are primarily manufactured at third party manufacturing facilities. The Company also has a warehouse at the corporate offices in Brea, California, where the Company is capable of manufacturing certain parts and full assembly of its products. Most of the components that the Company uses in the manufacture of its products are available from more than one qualified supplier. For some components, however, there are relatively few alternative sources of supply and the establishment of additional or replacement suppliers may not be accomplished quickly. The Company anticipates that this will initially be the case with the outer shell the Company is developing for its disposable shipper.

Primary manufacturers include Spaulding Composites Company, Peterson Spinning and Stamping, Lydall Industrial Thermal Solutions, Ludwig, Inc., and Porex Porous Products Group. There are no specific agreements with any manufacturer nor are there any long term commitments to any. It is believed that any of the currently used manufacturers could be replaced within a short period of time as none have a proprietary component nor a substantial capital investment specific to the Company’s products.

The Company’s manufacturing process uses non-hazardous cleaning solutions which are provided and disposed of by an EPA approved supplier. EPA compliance costs for the company are therefore negligible.

Proprietary Rights and Licensing:

In order to remain competitive, the Company must develop and maintain protection on the proprietary aspects of its technologies. The Company relies on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws and confidentiality agreements to protect its intellectual property rights. The Company currently holds two issued U.S. trademarks and three issued U.S. patents primarily covering various aspects of its products. In addition, the Company intends to file for additional patents to strengthen its intellectual property rights. The technology covered by the above indicated patents refer to matters specific to the use of liquid nitrogen dewars relative to the shipment of biological materials. The concepts include those of disposability, package configuration details, liquid nitrogen retention systems, systems related to thermal performance, systems related to packaging integrity, and matters generally relevant to the containment of liquid nitrogen. Similarly, the trademarks mentioned relate to the cryogenic temperature shipping activity. Patents and trademarks currently held by the Company include:

Type:	No.	Issued	Expiration
Patent	6,467,642	Oct. 22, 2002	Oct. 21, 2022
Patent	6,119,465	Sep. 19, 2000	Sep. 18, 2020
Patent	6,539,726	Apr. 1, 2003	Mar. 31, 2023
Trademark	7,583,478,7	Oct. 29, 1999	Oct. 28, 2009
Trademark	7,586,797,8	Dec. 8, 1999	Dec. 7, 2009

The Company’s success depends to a significant degree upon its ability to develop proprietary products and technologies and to obtain patent coverage for these products and technologies. The Company intends to continue to file patent applications covering any newly developed products, components, methods and technologies. However, there can be no guarantee that any of its pending or future filed applications will be issued as patents. There can be no guarantee that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or some third party will not initiate an interference proceeding involving any of its pending applications or issued patents. Finally, there can be no guarantee that its issued patents or future issued patents, if any, will provide adequate protection from competition, as discussed below.

Patents provide some degree of protection for the Company’s proprietary technology. However, the pursuit and assertion of patent rights involve complex legal and factual determinations and, therefore, are characterized by significant uncertainty. In addition, the laws governing patent issuance and the scope of patent coverage continue to evolve. Moreover, the patent rights the Company possesses or are pursuing generally cover its technologies to varying degrees. As a result, the Company cannot ensure that patents will issue from any of its patent applications, or that any of its issued patents will offer meaningful protection. In addition, the Company’s issued patents may be successfully challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable so that its patent rights may not create an effective barrier to competition. Moreover, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect its proprietary rights to the same extent, as do the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that any patents issued to the Company will provide a legal basis for establishing an exclusive market for its products or provide us with any competitive advantages, or that patents of others will not have an adverse effect on its ability to do business or to continue to use its technologies freely.

The Company may be subject to third parties filing claims that its technologies or products infringe on their intellectual property. The Company cannot predict whether third parties will assert such claims against it or whether those claims will hurt its business. If the Company is forced to defend itself against such claims, regardless of their merit, the Company may face costly litigation and diversion of management’s attention and resources. As a result of any such disputes, the Company may have to develop, at a substantial cost, non-infringing technology or enter into licensing agreements. These agreements may be unavailable on terms acceptable to it, or at all, which could seriously harm the Company’s business or financial condition.

The Company also relies on trade secret protection of its intellectual property. The Company attempts to protect trade secrets by entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties, employees and consultants. It is possible that these agreements may be breached, invalidated or rendered unenforceable, and if so, the Company’s trade secrets could be disclosed to its competitors. Despite the measures the Company has taken to protect its intellectual property, parties to its agreements may breach confidentiality provisions in its contracts or infringe or misappropriate its patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and other proprietary rights. In addition, third parties may independently discover or invent competitive technologies, or reverse engineer its trade secrets or other technology. Therefore, the measures the Company is taking to protect its proprietary technology may not be adequate.

Government Regulation:

The Company is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental protection, fire hazard control, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. The Company may incur significant costs to comply with such laws and regulations now or in the future.

Users of the Company’s shippers are subject to state, federal and international government and/or agency regulation with respect to the shipment of diagnostic specimens, infectious substances and dangerous goods. The quality of the containers, packaging materials and insulation that protect a specimen determine whether or not it will arrive in a usable condition. Many of the regulations for transporting dangerous goods in the United States are determined by international rules formulated under the auspices of the United Nations. Companies shipping certain items must comply with any applicable Department of Transportation and ICAO regulations, as well as rules established by IATA, the CDC, OSHA and any other relevant regulatory agency.

RISK FACTORS:

You should carefully consider all of the material risks of the Company’s business, including those described below, in addition to the other information contained in this registration statement. This registration statement contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below as well as those discussed elsewhere in this prospectus.

Concern that the Company will continue as a going concern.

There is uncertainty that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has a history of operating losses, has substantial outstanding indebtedness that the Company may be unable to repay or convert to equity and will need to carefully manage its liquidity. The Company will continue to need additional funds, and if additional capital is not available, the Company may have to limit, scale back or cease its operations.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements report recurring losses and an accumulated deficit. For the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred net losses of $1,038,110 and $1,002,493, respectively, and its operations have used $1,018,116 and $782,093 of cash, respectively. As of March 31, 2005 the Company had an accumulated deficit of $5,516,790. For the three month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company incurred a net loss of $390,934, and its operations have used $299,734 of cash. As of June 30, 2005 the Company had an accumulated deficit of $5,907,724.

At June 30, 2005, the Company had approximately $1,694,290 of outstanding indebtedness in the form of short-term and long-term promissory notes and accrued interest. Of such amount, $1,662,790 of principal amount is long-term debt and an additional $31,500 is considered short-term debt. Included in this indebtedness are notes representing $642,500 in principal amount of outstanding indebtedness to P. Mullens and J.R. Dell, current members of its board of directors, representing working capital advances they made to it, which indebtedness is evidenced by demand notes bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and which provide for repayment in the form of scheduled monthly payments beginning April 1, 2006. An aggregate of an additional $617,000 principal amount of debt that is evidenced by substantially similar notes is owed to two former directors and $110,000 principal amount to R. Takahashi, a CryoPort Inc. shareholder. Any funds applied to repay the Company’s outstanding indebtedness will not be available to fund its business. The Company may be unable to raise the funds necessary to repay its debt and the holders of past due amounts may seek to enforce their rights against it.

Based on presently known commitments and plans, the Company believes that the Company will be able to fund its operations and required expenditures through the second quarter of 2006 from cash on hand, cash flow from operations and cash from debt or equity financings or from lease financing sources. Revenues may not grow in the future, and the Company may not generate sufficient revenues for profitability. If the Company becomes profitable, the Company may not be able to sustain profitable operations. If the Company is unable to generate a sufficient amount of sales of its products to fund its operations and repay its outstanding indebtedness, the Company will need to seek alternative funding sources.

The Company also expects to incur additional costs related to ongoing research and development activities, and the expansion of its manufacturing, sales and marketing, and administrative functions. The Company may also need additional funding for possible strategic acquisitions of synergistic businesses, products and/or technologies. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to defer or limit some or all of its sales, marketing, and/or research and development projects.

The Company will need to seek alternative funding sources from private or public placements of debt or equity, institutional or other lending sources, pursue strategic partners, sell certain assets or change operating plans to accommodate its liquidity issues. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any additional funds on favorable terms. Further, if the Company issues additional equity securities, the new equity securities may have rights or warrants or other securities exercisable for, or convertible into its capital stock, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of its common stock. Any sales of additional shares of the Company’s capital stock are likely to dilute its existing shareholders. Alternatively, the Company may borrow money from commercial lenders, possibly at high interest rates, which will increase the risk of your investment in the Company. The Company may also be required to seek funding through licensing to others on products or technologies that the Company otherwise would seek to commercialize itself.

The Company’s cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, the amount of revenues the Company generates from sales of its products, changes in its regulatory and marketing programs, production costs, anticipated research and development efforts, costs resulting from changes in the focus and direction of its research and development programs, and competitive advances that make it harder for it to market and sell its products. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to reduce capital expenditures and delay, scale back or eliminate some of its research, development, sales and marketing initiatives, which would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and ability to achieve profitability.

Potential difficulties or unanticipated cost in establishing product in the market.

If the Company experiences delays, difficulties or unanticipated costs in establishing the sales, distribution and marketing capabilities necessary to successfully commercialize its products, the Company will have difficulty maintaining and increasing its sales.

The Company is continuing to develop sales, distribution and marketing capabilities in the Americas, Europe and Asia. It will be expensive and time-consuming for it to develop a global marketing and sales network. Moreover, the Company may choose, or find it necessary, to enter into additional strategic collaborations to sell, market and distribute its products. The Company may not be able to provide adequate incentive to its sales force or to establish and maintain favorable distribution and marketing collaborations with other companies to promote its products. In addition, any third party with whom the Company has established a marketing and distribution relationship may not devote sufficient time to the marketing and sales of its products thereby exposing the Company to potential expenses in exiting such distribution agreements. The Company, and any of its third-party collaborators, must also market its products in compliance with federal, state, local and international laws relating to the providing of incentives and inducements. Violation of these laws can result in substantial penalties. If the Company is unable to successfully motivate and expand its marketing and sales force and further develop its sales and marketing capabilities, or if its distributors fail to promote its products, the Company will have difficulty maintaining and increasing its sales.

Failure to compete effectively.

If the Company is not able to compete effectively, the Company may experience decreased demand for its products, which may result in price reductions.

The Company has two significant competitors in the cryogenic shipping container industry, Harsco Corporation and Chart Industries, Inc.. The Company’s success depends upon its ability to develop and maintain a competitive position in the temperature sensitive dry shipper markets. The Company’s competitors are well established with greater financial resources. As a result, they may develop products quicker or at lower costs, that may directly compete with the Company’s future products. In addition, these competitors may develop technologies that render the Company’s products obsolete or otherwise noncompetitive.

The Company may not be able to improve its products or develop new products or technologies quickly enough to maintain a competitive position in its market and continue to commercially develop its business. Moreover, the Company may not be able to compete effectively, and competitive pressures may result in less demand for its products and impair its ability to become profitable.

Failure to attract or retain skilled personnel.

If the Company does not attract and retain skilled personnel, the Company will not be able to expand its business.

The Company’s future success will depend in large part upon its ability to attract and retain highly skilled engineering, operational, managerial and marketing personnel, particularly as the Company expands its activities in product development, and sales and manufacturing. The Company faces significant competition for these types of persons from other companies. The ability to attract personnel to the Company’s vision depends both on the availability of skills and the ability of the Company to offer compensation and challenge compatible to career goals of potentially available individuals. The Company believes that the growth factors in the target markets are sufficient to attract the interest of well-qualified candidates for all positions as the need arises. To date, the Company has not experienced difficulties in attracting or retaining qualified personnel, however, there is no guarantee that there will be well-qualified candidates in the future to choose from. Consequently, if the Company is unable to attract and retain skilled personnel, the Company will not be able to expand its business.

Patents, trade secrets, and proprietary rights of others.

The Company’s success depends, in part, on its ability to obtain patent protection for the Company’s products, preserve its trade secrets, and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others.

The Company’s policy is to seek to protect its proprietary position by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to its technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of its business. The Company has three U.S. patents relating to various aspects of its products. The Company’s patents or patent applications may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented in the future or the rights granted may not provide a competitive advantage. The Company intends to vigorously protect and defend its intellectual property. Costly and time-consuming litigation brought by the Company may be necessary to enforce its patents and to protect its trade secrets and know-how, or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others.

The Company also relies upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain its competitive position. The Company typically requires its employees, consultants, advisors and suppliers to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment, consulting, or advisory relationships with the Company. If any of these agreements are breached, the Company may not have adequate remedies available thereunder to protect its intellectual property or the Company may incur substantial expenses enforcing its rights. Furthermore, the Company’s competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to its proprietary technology, or the Company may not be able to meaningfully protect its rights in unpatented proprietary technology.

The Company cannot assure that its current and potential competitors and other third parties have not filed or in the future, will not file patent applications for, or have not received or in the future will not receive, patents or obtain additional proprietary rights that will prevent, limit or interfere with its ability to make, use or sell its products either in the U.S. or internationally. In the event the Company was to require licenses to patents issued to third parties, such licenses may not be available or, if available, may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company. In addition, the Company cannot assure that the Company would be successful in any attempt to redesign its products or processes to avoid infringement or that any such redesign could be accomplished in a cost-effective manner. Accordingly, an adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent the Company from manufacturing and selling its products, which would harm its business.

The Company is not aware of any other company that is infringing any of the Company’s patents or trademarks nor does the Company believe that it is infringing on the patents or trademarks of any other person or organization.

Manufacturing delays or interruptions in production.

If the Company experiences manufacturing delays or interruptions in production, then the Company may experience customer dissatisfaction and its reputation could suffer.

If the Company fails to produce enough products at its own manufacturing facility or at a third-party manufacturing facility, the Company may be unable to deliver products to its customers on a timely basis, which could lead to customer dissatisfaction and could harm its reputation and ability to compete. The Company currently acquires various component parts for its products from a number of independent manufacturers in the United States. The Company would likely experience significant delays or cessation in producing its products if a labor strike, natural disaster, local or regional conflict or other supply disruption were to occur at any of its main suppliers. If the Company is unable to procure a component from one of its manufacturers, the Company may be required to enter into arrangements with one or more alternative manufacturing companies which may cause delays in producing its products. In addition, because the Company depends on third-party manufacturers, its profit margins may be lower, which will make it more difficult for the Company to achieve profitability. To date, the Company has not experienced any material delays to the point that its ability to adequately service customer needs has been compromised. As the business develops and quantity of production increases, it becomes more likely that such problems could arise.

Limited number of suppliers.

Because the Company relies on a limited number of suppliers, the Company may experience difficulty in meeting its customers’ demands for its products in a timely manner or within budget.

The Company currently purchases key components of its products from a variety of outside sources. Some of these components may only be available to the Company through a few sources, however, management has identified alternative materials and suppliers should the need arise. The Company generally does not have long-term agreements with any of its suppliers.

Consequently, in the event that the Company’s suppliers delay or interrupt the supply of components for any reason, the Company could potentially experience higher product costs and longer lead times in order fulfillment. Suppliers that the Company materially relies upon are Spaulding Composites Company and Lydall Thermal Acoustical Sales.

Potential dilution of existing stockholders.

If the Company is unable to generate sufficient revenue to provide the cash required to fund its operations in the future, the Company may be required to issue additional equity or convertible debt securities to provide its operations with additional working capital, which, in turn, will have the effect of diluting the relative ownership of its existing stockholders

The Company has supplemented the cash deficit arising from its operations with the proceeds from the sale of common stock, and will, if necessary, continue to supplement with cash from private or public placements of debt or equity. The issuance of additional equity or convertible debt securities will have the effect of reducing the percentage ownership of its current stockholders. In addition, these equity or convertible debt securities may have additional rights, preferences or privileges to those of its common stock, such as registration rights and preferences in liquidation. In the event the Company is required to raise additional funds to support its operations, additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to its company, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to fund its operations or otherwise continue as a going concern. As a result, our auditors have issued a going concern opinion.

Liquidity of Company common stock.

The Company’s common stock is subject to penny stock regulation, which may affect its liquidity.

Because the Company will initially have its shares of common stock quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, its shares will be subject to regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) relating to the market for penny stocks. Penny stock, as defined by the Penny Stock Reform Act, is any equity security not traded on a national securities exchange or quoted on the NASDAQ National or Small Cap Market that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. The penny stock regulations generally require that a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith be delivered to purchasers of penny stocks and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. The broker-dealer must make a suitability determination for each purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement prior to the sale. In addition, the broker-dealer must make certain mandated disclosures, including the actual sale or purchase price and actual bid offer quotations, as well as the compensation to be received by the broker-dealer and certain associated persons. The regulations applicable to penny stocks may severely affect the market liquidity for its common stock and could limit your ability to sell your securities in the secondary market.

Sale of Company shares may depress share price.

The sale of substantial shares of the Company’s common stock may depress its stock price.

As of December 15, 2005, the Company had 29,943,697 shares of common stock outstanding, and the last reported sales price of its common stock on the PinkSheets was $5.05 per share. The Company could also issue up to approximately 4,209,111 additional shares of common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants as further described in the following table:

Description of instrument	Number of Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Per Share Exercise Price
Common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options		2,508,988	$	0.45
Common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants		1,700,123	$	0.74
Total		4,209,111	$	0.33

Accounting for Stock Options.

A recently adopted change in the way companies must account for stock options may affect the Company’s earnings and cause the Company to change its compensation practices.

The Company currently accounts for the issuance of stock options under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) adopted the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which will require the Company to account for equity under its stock plans as a compensation expense and its net income and earnings per share will be reduced. Currently, the Company record compensation expense only in connection with option grants that have an exercise price below fair market value. For option grants that have an exercise price at fair market value, the Company calculates compensation expense and discloses their impact on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share, as well as the impact of all stock-based compensation expense, in a footnote to its consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 123R requires the Company to adopt the new accounting method beginning in its fiscal year beginning April 1, 2006, and will require the Company to expense stock based benefit awards, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights, as compensation cost.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total assets

Cryoport, Inc. (the “Company”), was originally formed with the intention to first develop a reusable line of cryogenic shippers and once underway, to begin the research and development of a disposable, one-way cryogenic shipper. Since initial formation the Company has not had the funds to fully implement its business plan. The reusable line of cryogenic shippers has been in production since 2002, however, difficulties in penetrating the well established market for reusable cryogenic shippers, as well as a need for continuous redevelopment of the product line has resulted in only limited revenue generation from the sale of the reusable cryogenic shipper. During this time, the Company maintained research and development activities focused on the new product line of one-way shippers. The limited revenues produced from the reusable product line along with limited capital funding required the Company to assign only minimal resources to the development of the one-way cryogenic shippers. During the last quarter of the Company’s 2005 operations, funding of $991,875 was raised through a private placement offering of common stock under Regulation D. These funds were raised to allow the Company to focus on accelerating the development and launch of its one-way product. The Company has since been focusing significant resources on the development of a working prototype of this one-way shipper with the goal of launching the new product into the market in early calendar year 2006. The Company plans to introduce the single use/one-way products in limited quantities to selective customers during the first quarter of calendar year 2006. A broad launch to the general market will follow after feedback from this introductory distribution is received and customer demand is further understood. A higher volume demand is expected to develop as pharmaceutical products requiring cryogenic protection come to market.

The Company is currently discussing development of a shipper from the one-way product line for drug delivery with vaccine manufacturers. These potential one-way shipper customers are currently using the Company’s reusable shippers in clinical trials. To address the high volume ramp up necessary to provide these customers with one-way shippers, the Company is currently involved in negotiations for a manufacturing and distribution partnership with two large, and well established manufacturing companies.

General Overview

The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ deficit for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related notes as well as the unaudited quarterly information as of June 30, 2005 and for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 (see Part F/S Financial Statements). This discussion contains forward-looking statements, based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as the Company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.

Going Concern

As reported in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Company’s March 31, 2005 and 2004 financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and has a stockholders’ deficit. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

There are significant uncertainties which negatively affect the Company’s operations. These are principally related to (i) the limited distribution network for the Company’s reusable product line, (ii) the early stage development of the Company’s one-way product and the need to enter a strategic relationship with a larger manufacturer capable of high volume production and distribution, (iii) the absence of any commitment or firm orders from key customers in the Company’s target markets for the reusable or the one-way shippers, (iv) the success in bringing products concurrently under development to market with the Company’s key customers. Moreover, there is no assurance as to when, if ever, the Company will be able to conduct the Company’s operations on a profitable basis. The Company’s limited sales to date for the Company’s product, the lack of any purchase requirements in the existing distribution agreements and those currently under negotiations, make it impossible to identify any trends in the Company’s business prospects. There is no assurance the Company will be able to generate sufficient revenues or sell any equity securities to generate sufficient funds when needed, or whether such funds, if available, will be obtained on terms satisfactory to the Company.

The Company has not generated significant revenues from operations and has no assurance of any future significant revenues. The Company incurred net losses of $390,934 and $319,037 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 respectively. The Company had a cash balance of $413,212 at June 30, 2005. In addition, at June 30, 2005 the Company’s accumulated deficit was $5,907,724 and the Company had working capital of $5,047. The management recognizes that the Company must obtain additional capital for the further development and launch of the one-way product and the eventual achievement of sustained profitable operations.

Management’s plans include obtaining additional capital through a private placement offering of common stock under Regulation D. In addition, the Company’s current negotiations with a manufacturing and distribution partner for the one-way product is expected to generate additional revenues through licensing fees.

The Company had historically operated by efficiently minimizing operating expenses. The Company will continue to maintain minimal operating expenditures through stringent cost containment measures. The Company’s largest expenses relate to personnel and meeting the legal and reporting requirements of a public company. By utilizing part-time consultants, and asking employees to manage multiple roles and responsibilities whenever possible, operating costs have and will continue to be kept low. Additionally, a number of the Company’s key employees and the Company’s Board of Directors receive Company stock in lieu of cash as all or part of their compensation in an effort to minimize monthly cash flow. With this strategy the Company has established a critical mass of experienced business professionals capable of taking the Company forward.

The Company intends to carefully and gradually add key sales, marketing, engineering, scientific and operating personnel only as necessary. These strategic additions will help expand the Company’s product offerings in the reusable and one-way cryogenic shipping markets, leading us to additional revenues and profits. As sales volumes and revenues increase, additional administrative personnel will be necessary to meet the added workload. Other expenses, such as sales, customer service and operations, will increase commensurate with increased revenues. The Company’s current research and development efforts focus on development of the one-way shipper. Due to the ongoing nature of this research the Company is unable to ascertain with certainty the total estimated completion dates and costs associated with all phases of this research. As with any research effort, there is uncertainty and risk associated with whether these efforts will produce results in a timely manner so as to enhance the Company’s market position. For the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, research and development costs were $98,698 and $61,002, respectively. Company sponsored research and development costs related to future products and redesign of present products is expensed as incurred and include such costs as salaries, employees benefits and costs determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for options issued to the Scientific Advisory Board and prototype design and materials costs.

Liquidity and Capital Reserves

As of March 31, 2005 the Company’s current assets of $966,840 exceeded current liabilities of $607,956 by $358,884. Approximately 41% of current liabilities represent accrued payroll for executives who have opted to defer taking salaries until the Company has achieved positive operating cash flows.

Total assets increased to $1,080,428 at March 31, 2005 from $271,889 at March 31, 2004 as a result of cash received from the sale of common stock and increase in notes payable, partially offset by funds used in operating activities.

The Company’s total outstanding indebtedness increased to $2,260,463 at March 31, 2005 from $2,096,979 at March 31, 2004 primarily from the increases in notes payable which was partially offset by a decrease in current liabilities from the reduction in operating payables. As of March 31, 2005, the Company owed $67,440 of remaining principal to Falk, Shaff & Ziebell, LLP based on an unsecured interest bearing note at 5% compounded interest which originated from a March 2002 note payable related to conversion of outstanding legal bills. The original maturity date of this note was December 31, 2002, however, the terms of this note were subsequently amended in May 2004 to lower the monthly payments and eliminate the interest, as a result of the Company’s financial situation and inability to meet the original terms of the note.

The remaining notes payable balance is comprised of unsecured indebtedness owed to five related parties including current and former board of directors representing working capital advances made to the Company from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provide for principal payments beginning April 2006 of $2,500 monthly and increasing by $2,500 every six months to a maximum of $10,000. Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on various dates from February 2008 through June 2011.

Notes Payable:

Lender	Origination Date	Maturity Date	Principal Bal. Mar. 31, 2005	Interest Rate
Patrick Mullens	Aug. 2001	Jun. 2011	$386,500	6%
Marc Grossman	Feb. 2001	Sep. 2011	$330,000	6%
David Petreccia	Apr. 2001	Mar. 2011	$287,000	6%
Jeffrey Dell	Aug. 2001	Nov. 2009	$256,000	6%
Raymond Takahashi	Jun. 2003	Feb. 2008	$110,000	6%
Falk,Shaff & Ziebell, LLP	Mar. 2002	Jun. 2008	$67,440	n/a

As of June 30, 2005 the Company’s current assets of $686,077 exceeded current liabilities of $681,030 by $5,047. Approximately 44% of current liabilities represent accrued payroll for executives who have opted to defer taking salaries until the company has achieved positive operating cash flows.

Total assets decreased to $796,491 at June 30, 2005 from $1,080,428 at March 31, 2005 as a result of funds used in operating activities and usage of deposits previously paid to vendors partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable.

The Company’s total outstanding indebtedness increased to $2,343,840 at June 30, 2005 from $2,260,463 at date March 31, 2005 primarily from the increases in accrued salaries and interest on notes payable.

The Company incurred negative cash flows from operations of $1,018,116 for the year ended March 31, 2005 and $299,734 for the first quarter ended June 30, 2005 due to the lack of adequate sales of the Company’s reusable product group and the costs of research and development of the one way shipper. These negative cash flows from operations plus capital expenditures of $14,879 for the year ended March 31, 2005 and $19,249 for the first quarter ended June 30, 2005 have been financed through proceeds from increases in notes payable and the issuance of common stock. The Company increased principal balances of notes payable by a net amount of $137,136 for the year ended March 31, 2005. There was no increase in notes payable principal balances during the first quarter ended June 30, 2005. Net proceeds from issuance of common stock were $1,609,971 for the year ended March 31, 2005 and $15,000 for the first quarter ended June 30, 2005.

The Company’s cash balances as of March 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005 were $720,195 and $413,212 respectively. Based on presently known commitments and plans, the Company expects to fund its operations through the second quarter of 2006 from cash on hand, cash received on accounts receivable and cash from debt or equity financing or from lease financing sources for capital expenditures.

The Company does not expect to incur any material capital expenditures until sales volumes increase substantially. Any required future capital expenditures for manufacturing equipment for the launch of the one-way product will be funded out of future revenues or additional equity.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company bases it’s estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the Company’s more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of customer accounts and the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood of potential loss, taking into account such factors as the financial condition and payment history of major customers. The Company evaluates the collectibility of the Company’s receivables at least quarterly. The allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to estimates based on the historical actual costs of bad debt experienced, total accounts receivable amounts, age of accounts receivable and any knowledge of the customers’ ability or inability to pay outstanding balances. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The differences could be material and could significantly impact cash flows from operating activities.

Inventory. The Company writes down the Company’s inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand, future pricing and market conditions. Inventory reserve costs are subject to estimates made by the Company based on historical experience, inventory quantities, age of inventory and any known expectations for product changes. If actual future demands, future pricing or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required and the differences could be material. Such differences might significantly impact cash flows from operating activities. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or unmarketable inventories.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses the recoverability of the Company’s long-lived assets by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. Manufacturing fixed assets are subject to obsolescence potential as a result of changes in customer demands, manufacturing process changes and changes in materials used. The Company is not currently aware of any such changes that would cause impairment to the value of its manufacturing fixed assets. If the Company’s patents and trademarks are challenged, current values could become impaired. Currently the Company is not aware of any existing infringements or other such challenges to its patents or trademarks that would cause possible impairment to their values.

Accrued Warranty Costs. The Company estimates the costs of the standard warranty, included with the reusable shippers at no additional cost to the customer for a period up to one year. These estimated costs are recorded as accrued warranty costs at the time of product sale. These estimated costs are subject to estimates made by the Company based on the historical actual warranty costs, number of products returned for warranty repair and length of warranty coverage.

Revenue Recognition. Product sales revenue is recognized upon passage of title to customers, typically upon shipment of product. Any provision for discounts and estimated returns are accounted for in the period the related sales are recorded. Products are generally sold with right of warranty repair for a one year period but with no right of return. Estimated costs of warranty repairs are recorded as accrued warranty costs as described above. Products shipped to customers for speculation purposes are not considered sold and no revenue is recorded by the Company until sales acceptance is acknowledged by the customer.

Results of Operations - Year Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Year ended March 31, 2004

Net Sales. During the year ended March 31, 2005 the Company generated $271,429 from reusable shipper sales compared to revenues of $84,285 in the prior year period, an increase of $187,144, or 222%. Approximately $84,000 of this increase is due to the new product releases of the “soft-shelled” reusable cryogenic shippers in July 2004, approximately $75,000 of the increase is due to increased sales penetration into the biotech and pharmaceutical markets for the Company’s reusable shippers, and the remainder of the sales increase is attributable to a general increase in sales of existing units in existing markets.

During 2006, the Company expects revenues of the “soft-shelled” reusable shippers to increase, but any such increase is not expected to impact significantly the Company’s operating results for 2006. The statement concerning future sales is a forward-looking statement that involves certain risks and uncertainties which could result in a fluctuation of sales below those achieved for the year ended March 31, 2005. Sales could be negatively impacted by potential competing products and overall market acceptance of the Company’s products.

Gross Profit/Loss. Gross loss for the year ended March 31, 2005 decreased by $112,299, or 33% to $228,221 compared to $340,520 for the year ended March 31, 2004. The decrease in the gross loss is due to the increase in sales.

Cost of sales for the year ended March 31, 2005 increased $74,845, or 18%, to $499,650 from $424,805 for the year ended March 31, 2004. This increase was caused by approximately $104,000 from increased sales volume which was partially offset by approximately $16,000 in lower warranty costs and the remaining offset was due to increased production efficiency. During both periods cost of sales exceeded sales due to plant underutilization.

During 2006, management expects the gross loss to decrease further as a result of anticipated increased sales. The statement concerning future gross profit/loss is a forward looking statement that involves certain risks and uncertainties which could result in a fluctuation of gross margins below those achieved for the year ended March 31, 2005. Gross profit/loss could be negatively impacted by potential competing products and overall market acceptance of the Company’s products.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $191,887 or 46%, to $622,797 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $430,910 for the year ended March 31, 2004. Of this increase, $163,965 is related to increased general and administrative costs due to approximately $85,000 from additional accrued executive salaries and expenses related to stock option compensation, approximately $55,000 from salary and personnel increases, and approximately $31,000 from increased litigation settlement costs and additional legal fees related to the share exchange agreement which were offset in part by an approximate $10,000 reduction in facility costs and the remaining offset was due to decreased general and administrative travel expenses. The remaining increase of $27,921 in selling, general and administrative expenses was due to increased sales and marketing expenses related to approximately $10,500 from increased consulting, approximately $7,900 from increased commissions, approximately $5,000 from increased trade shows and the remainder due to an overall increase in sales and marketing activities.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $37,696 to $98,698 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $61,002 for the year ended March 31, 2004 due to approximately $24,000 in increased consulting expenses in connection with the re-engineering activity related to the current reusable product and the remaining increase in research and development expenses was due to the increased development activity on the one-way product.

Net Loss. As a result of the factors described above, in fiscal year 2005, the Company’s net loss was $1,038,110 or ($0.06) per share, compared to a net loss of $1,002,493 or ($0.08) per share in fiscal year 2004.

Results of Operations - Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004

Net Sales. During the three months ended June 30, 2005 the Company generated $122,493 from reusable shipper sales compared to revenues of $66,227 in the same period of the prior year, an increase of $56,266, or 85%. The increase is primarily due to increased sales penetration into the biotech and pharmaceutical markets for the Company’s reusable shippers.

Gross Profit/Loss. Gross loss for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 decreased by $120,714, or 85% to $21,463 compared to $142,177 for the three month period ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in the gross loss is due to the increased sales combined with increased production overhead efficiencies and plant utilization.

Cost of sales for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 decreased $64,408, or 31%, to $143,956 from $208,404 for the three month period ended June 30, 2004. This reduction was the result of an approximate $96,000 reduction in plant overhead as the result of increased plant utilization and production efficiency which was offset by an increase in product costs of approximately $31,500 resulting from the increase in sales volume. During both periods, cost of sales exceeded sales due to plant underutilization.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $126,605, or 89%, to $268,764 for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $142,159 for the three month period ended June 30, 2004. Of this increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, $89,479 was related to additional legal and accounting fees related to the share exchange agreement and public filing compliance costs. The remaining $41,336 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was due to increased selling expenses related to increased sales and marketing activities devoted to further penetration of the biotech and pharmaceutical markets.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $67,288 to $79,353 for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $12,065 for the three month period ended June 30, 2004 in connection increased development activity on the one-way product .

Net Loss. As a result of the factors described above, the net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 increased by $71,897, or 23% to $390,934 or ($0.01) per share compared to $319,037 or ($0.02) per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

Forward Looking Statements

This Report on Form 10SB contains forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements which the Company makes involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include quarterly and yearly fluctuations in results, the progress of research and the development of that research and the other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s reports, including this filing. These forward-looking statement speak only as the date hereof, and should not be given undue reliance. Actual results may vary significantly.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 3.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

The Company’s corporate, research and development, and warehouse facilities are located in one Company-leased office and warehouse building with a square footage of approximately 8,000 square feet. The facilities are located at 451 Atlas Street, Brea, California 92821. The Company currently makes lease payments of $7,500.00 per month. The lease is a two year lease with rent due at the beginning of each month. The landlord is Brea Hospital Properties, LLC. The facilities are in good condition and are suitable for the Company’s current requirements. The Company currently does not own any real property.

ITEM 4.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners:

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of October 10, 2005, by each person or group of affiliated persons known to the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of its common stock, each director, each named executive officer, and all of its directors and named executive officers as a group. As of October 10, 2005, there were 29,907,697 shares of common stock outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o CryoPort, Inc., 451 Atlas Street, Brea, California 92821.

The following table gives effect to the shares of common stock issuable within 60 days of October 10, 2005, upon the exercise of all options and other rights beneficially owned by the indicated stockholders on that date. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment control with respect to all shares beneficially owned:

Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned			Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned

Executive Officers and Directors:

Peter Berry		1,253,370	⁽¹⁾		4.6	%
Patrick Mullens, M.D.		2,592,153			8.7	%
Jeffrey Dell, M.D.		1,515,989			5.1	%
Dee S. Kelly		91,752	⁽¹⁾		*
Adam M. Michelin		0			0.0	%
Gary C. Cannon		0			0.0	%

All directors and named executive officers as a group (6 persons)		5,453,264			17.2	%

Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned			Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned

Other 5% Stockholders:
Raymond Takahashi, M.D.		2,518,012	⁽¹⁾		8.3	%
David Petreccia, M.D.		2,081,751	⁽¹⁾		7.0	%
Dante Panella		1,950,000			6.6	%

*Less than 1% of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.

⁽¹⁾

Includes shares which individuals shown above have the right to acquire as of October 10, 2005, or within 60 days thereafter, pursuant to outstanding stock options and/or warrants as follows: Mr. Berry - 1,253,370 shares; Dr. Takahashi - 583,333 shares; Dr. Petreccia - 83,333 shares; and Ms. Kelly 91,752 shares.

Change in Control Agreements:

There are no understandings, arrangements or agreements known by management at this time which would result in a change in control of CryoPort, Inc. or any subsidiary.

ITEM 5:

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS.

Directors and Executive Officers:

As of October 10, 2005, the directors and executive officers of the Company, their ages, positions, and terms of office are as follows:

Directors and Officers:

Name	Age		Position		Date Elected
Peter Berry		58		Chief Executive Officer, President and Director		2003
Dee S. Kelly, CPA		44		Vice President of Finance		2003
Patrick Mullens, M.D.		59		Chairman of the Board, Director		2000
Gary C. Cannon		54		Secretary and Director		2005
Jeffrey Dell, M.D.		58		Director		2000
Adam M. Michelin		62		Director		2005

The officers of the Company hold office until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their death, resignation or removal.

None of the directors or officers holds a directorship in any other reporting company.

None of the directors or officers listed above has:

·	had a bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which that person was a general partner of executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

·	had any conviction in a criminal proceeding, or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding;

·	been subject to any order, judgment, or decree by any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting such person’s involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

·	been found by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Commission, or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law.

Background of Directors and Officers:

Patrick Mullens MD, became the Company’s Chairman of the Board and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in March 2005 in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement with CryoPort Systems, Inc. Dr. Mullens served as the Company’s Chairman until June 22, 2005. Dr. Mullens was the founder of CryoPort Systems, Inc. and served as its President from 2000 to 2003 and has served as Chairman of the Board since 2000. Dr. Mullens is a Doctor of Pathology (Yale and UCLA), with over 30 years’ cryobiology experience. He has also served as Laboratory Director and Officer with the United States Public Health Service. He was Chief of Pathology at Brea Community Hospital from 1999 to 2004. Since 2004 he has worked at Premier Pathology Laboratories, Inc.

Peter Berry, became the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement. Mr. Berry joined CryoPort Systems, Inc. as a consultant in 2002 and became its President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and a member of its Board of Directors in 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Berry was Vice President Sales & Marketing for BOC Cryostar, AG in Switzerland from 1996 to 2000 and principal of a private consulting practice from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Berry has over 30 years executive experience in cryogenic equipment with Union Carbide, BOC Group and MVE International. He also has business start up, turnaround, sales/marketing and operations background experience, both domestic and international, in manufacturing and service based industries.

Dee S. Kelly CPA, became Vice President of Finance. Ms. Kelly has 22 years experience in public and private accounting. She served 5 years in the Healthcare Group of Ernst & Young, LLP. She has also held financial management positions with international bio-tech and medical device manufacturers. Ms. Kelly recently served as Vice President, Controller for Equifax Financial Services, Inc. from 1995 to 2000. Prior to joining the Company in 2003, Ms. Kelly was Corporate Controller for MacGillivray Freeman Films Corporation from 2000 to 2001, Corporate Controller for Masimo Corporation, a manufacturer of patient monitoring devices from 2001 to 2002 and principal of a private consulting practice since 2002.

Gary C. Cannon, became the Company’s Secretary and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in June 2005. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cannon was securities counsel and compliance officer for The Affordable Energy Group, Inc. from November 2004 to May 2005, and general and securities counsel for World Transport Authority, Inc. from July 2003 to November 2004. Mr. Cannon was in private practice from August 2000 to July 2003, and has practiced law for the past 18 years, representing all sizes of businesses in such areas as, formation, mergers and acquisitions, financing transactions, tax planning, and employee relations. Mr. Cannon has done extensive securities work and has served as a compliance officer for companies with respect to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other compliance matters. Mr. Cannon obtained his Juris Doctorate from National University School of Law, his Masters of Business degree from National University and his Bachelor of Arts from United States International University.

Jeffrey Dell, M.D., became a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in March 2005 in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement. Dr. Dell has served as a Director of CryoPort Systems, Inc. since December 2000. For the past 22 years, Dr. Dell has been a cardiologist in clinical practice at St. Jude Hospital, Fullerton CA. He holds a masters degree in physics from the University of Chicago with specialization in solid state / liquid crystal physics.

Adam M. Michelin, became a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in June 2005. Mr. Michelin is currently the Chief Executive Officer, and a principal, of the Enterprise Group, a position he has held since March 2005. Prior to the Enterprise Group, Mr. Michelin was a principal with Kibel Green, Inc. for a period of 11 years. Mr. Michelin has over 30 years of practice in the areas of executive leadership, operations and is very experienced in evaluating, structuring and implementing solutions for companies in operational and/or financial crisis. Mr. Michelin received his Juris Doctorate from the University of West Los Angeles and his Bachelor of Science from Tri State University. Mr. Michelin has also done MBA course work at New York University.

Board Committees:

The Company formally established an audit committee and adopted an Audit Committee Charter at its board of directors meeting held on August 19, 2005. Adam M. Michelin, who qualifies as the “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and is “independent” as defined by the applicable rules under the NASDAQ Listing standards, was elected chairman of the committee. The Company is currently reviewing the requirements for and the need to set up an executive committee and other committees to help its board of directors oversee the operations of the Company.

ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Executive Compensation:

The following table sets forth the compensation earned for all services rendered to the Company in all capacities for each of the three fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively by the Company’s Chief Executive and Vice President of Finance.

Summary Compensation Table

			Annual Compensation⁽¹⁾				Long-Term Compensation
Name and Position	Fiscal Year		Salary			Bonus	Number of Shares Underlying Options
Peter Berry	2005	$	90,915		$	(4)	367,970
CEO and President	2004	$	89,250				500,000
	2003	$	38,658	(2)	$	(3)	500,000

Dee S. Kelly	2005	$	60,000			n/a	36,752
Vice-President Finance	2004	$	28,300			n/a	75,000

(1)

The column for “Other Annual Compensation” has been omitted because there is no compensation required to be reported in that column. The aggregate amount of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to each executive officer listed above is less than the lesser of $50,000 and 10% of his or her total annual salary and bonus.

(2)

Includes $35,950 paid to Mr. Berry as a consultant.

(3)

A bonus of up to 100% of salary ($84,000) was eliminated along with a reduction in salary from $84,000 per year to $60,000 per year, in exchange for the grant of 250,000 additional stock options.

(4)

A bonus of up to 200% of his current salary of $93,000 can be earned based on agreed targets in 2005. It is estimated that this bonus amount will be approximately $100,000 and is still pending final board approval.

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year:

The following table sets forth information concerning individual grants of options made during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 to each of the Company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The Company has never granted any restricted shares:

	Individual Grants
Name	Number of Shares Underlying Options Granted		% of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year			Exercise Price Per Share		Expiration Date
Peter Berry		367,970		57	%	$	0.04		8/1/09
Dee S. Kelly		36,752		6	%	$	0.04		8/1/09
_____________

Aggregated Option Exercises in the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005 and Year-End Option Values:

The following table sets forth information concerning the number and value of unexercised options held by each of the Company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table at March 31, 2005. None of these executive officers exercised options during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005:

	Shares Acquired on Exercise		Value Realized		Number of Shares Underlying Unexercised Options at March 31, 2005				Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at March 31, 2005⁽¹⁾
Name					Exercisable		Unexercisable		Exercisable		Unexercisable
Peter Berry		n/a		n/a		1,159,626		208,344	$	421,673	$	52,086
Dee S. Kelly		n/a		n/a		73,752		20,000	$	29,794	$	3,800

_____________________

(1) The values of the unexercised in-the-money options have been calculated on the basis of the estimated fair market value at March 31, 2005, of $0.75 based on average selling price of recent unregistered common stock sales, less the applicable exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares acquired on exercise.

Employment Agreement and Change-in-Control Arrangements:

Peter Berry is subject to an employment agreement with the Company dated November 1, 2002, as amended March 17, 2003, pursuant to which he has been employed as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer. The Agreement provides for an initial annual base salary of $84,000, which increased to $88,000 and $93,000 in years two and three, respectively. In the event that the Agreement is renewed at the end of the initial term for an additional year, Mr. Berry’s base salary will be increased to $186,000. The Agreement provides that during the initial term Mr. Berry is eligible to earn an annual bonus equal to 100% of his then current base salary upon attaining mutually agreed upon goals. If the Agreement is renewed at the end of the initial term for an additional year, the eligible bonus is 40% of the new base salary. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Berry a stock option to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share, which option vested as to 125,000 shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and thereafter vests in 36 equal monthly installments through November 11, 2006. In the event that the Company terminates Mr. Berry’s employment without “cause”, as defined in the Agreement, or fails to renew the Agreement except for “cause”, then upon such termination, the Company is obligated to pay to Mr. Berry as severance an amount equal to his then current base salary, plus any earned incentive bonus. In March 2003, the Agreement was amended to reflect Mr. Berry’s agreement to a reduced base salary during the first year of $60, 000, and agreement to forego eligibility for an incentive bonus for such year. In exchange for the foregoing, the Company granted Mr. Berry an additional stock option to purchase an additional 250,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $.50 per share. The option was vested as to 125,000 shares on the date of grant, and 62,500 shares on each of September 30, 2003 and March 31, 2004. All other terms of the Agreement remained unchanged. The agreement was further amended by board consent, due to the financial condition of the company in 2004 at Mr. Berry’s request, to eliminate the 100% bonus provision per the contract in year two and defer this bonus into the third year of the employment contract. This entitled Mr. Berry to earn up to 200% of his then salary in the third contract year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information:

The Company currently maintains one equity compensation plan, referred to as the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). As the Company do not have a formal compensation committee, the Board of Directors is responsible for granting options under this plan. The 2002 Plan, which was approved by its shareholders in October 2002, allows for the grant of options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock. The 2002 Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at prices not less than the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. The stock options are subject to vesting requirements, generally 3 or 4 years. The 2002 Plan also provides for the granting of restricted shares of common stock subject to vesting requirements. No restricted shares have been granted pursuant to the 2002 Plan as of May 31, 2005.

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2005 concerning the Company’s common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or pursuant to purchases of stock under its 2002 Plan:

	(a)		(b)		(c)
Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon the Exercise of Outstanding Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options		Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		2,508,988	$	0.45		2,491,012
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		N/A		N/A		N/A
		2,508,988	$	0.45		2,491,012

Compensation of Directors:

Historically, the Company has not compensated its directors for their attendance at meetings. As the Board of Directors plans to establish formal audit, compensation and nominating committees, comprised of independent directors, it is anticipated that non-employee directors will receive both cash fees and stock option grants.

ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In June 2005, the Company engaged Mr. Gary Cannon’s services as outside counsel at the rate of $6,000 per month. Mr. Cannon is the Company’s secretary and a member of its board of directors.

As of June 30, 2005, the Company had $386,500 and $256,000 in principal amount of outstanding indebtedness to Patrick Mullens and Jeffrey Dell respectively, current members of its board of directors, representing working capital advances they made to it, which indebtedness is evidenced by demand notes bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and which provide for repayment in the form of scheduled monthly payments beginning April 1, 2006. Additional principal amounts of $330,000 and $287,000 that is evidenced by substantially similar notes is owed to Mark Grossman and David Petreccia respectively, two former directors and $110,000 principal amount to Raymond Takahashi, a CryoPort Inc. shareholder. No new borrowings have been made by the Company as of October 10, 2005.

ITEM 8. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES.

General:

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with each share having a par value of $0.001. As of March 31, 2005, there were 29,708,105 shares of common stock issued and outstanding held by 270 shareholders of record. There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at such date.

Common Stock:

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation, filed on May 25, 1990, authorizes the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a par value of $.001 per share. The Articles of Incorporation were amended and restated on October 12, 2004, to authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a par value of $.001 per share. As of October 10, 2005, there were 29,907,697 shares of common stock issued and outstanding shares held by 281 shareholders of record. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of Common Stock have no cumulative voting rights. Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to share ratable in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion, from funds legally available therefore. In the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities. Holders of Common Stock have no pre-emptive or other subscription rights, and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. All of the outstanding Common Stock is, and the shares offered by the Company pursuant to this offering will be, issued and delivered, fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred Stock:

There is no preferred stock authorized.

Warrants:

As of October 10, 2005 there were outstanding warrants to purchase up to 1,700,123 shares of the Company’s common stock. The outstanding warrants were issued by CryoPort Systems, Inc. in connection with various debt and equity financings and assumed by the Company in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement. These warrants are exercisable at prices ranging from $6.50 to $0.30 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.74 per share, and have expiration dates ranging from February 2006 to December 2010.

Stock Options:

As of October 10, 2005, there were outstanding options to purchase up to a total of 2,508,988 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options were granted by CryoPort Systems, Inc. pursuant to the 2002 Plan. In connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company assumed the 2002 Plan and the obligations associated with all outstanding stock options. These options are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.04 to $1.00 per share, with an average exercise price of $0.45 per share.

Transfer Agent and Registrar:

The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Company’s Common Stock is Integrity Stock Transfer, 2920 N. Green Valley Parkway, Building 5 - Suite 527, Henderson, Nevada, 89014.

PART II

ITEM 1.

MARKET PRICE OF, AND DIVIDENDS ON, THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, AND OTHER MATTERS.

The Company’s shares in common stock have never traded on any securities exchange. The Company plans to make an application to permit its common stock to trade on the over-the-counter bulletin board (OTCBB) when this registration statement on Form 10-SB shall become effective. There can be no assurance that an active public market for the Company’s common stock will develop or be sustained.

Presently, the Company’s common stock is traded through the PinkSheets under the symbol CYRX.PK. The Company’s stock is considered penny stock and is, therefore, subject to the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. Penny stock is defined as any equity security not traded on a national stock exchange or quoted on NASDAQ and that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. Additional disclosure is required in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (subject to certain exceptions), including the delivery, prior to any such transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Broker-dealers who recommend such low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchase and receive the purchaser's written consent prior to the transaction. Prior to January, 2005, there was no published price for the Company’s common stock on the PinkSheets. Based on information from BigCharts.com, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, the quoted high and low price of the Company’s common stock were $5.80 and $0.39, respectively. As of December 15, 2005, the quoted price of the Company’s stock was $5.05.

Dividends:

The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to apply any future earnings to expanding its operations and related activities.

The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, the Company’s financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Company’s ability to pay dividends may become limited under future loan or financing agreements of the Company that may restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends.

ITEM 2.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently a party to any pending, nor is the Company aware of any threatened, legal, governmental, administrative or judicial proceedings.

ITEM 3.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS.

In May, 2005, the Company retained the independent registered public accounting firm of Corbin and Company, LLP to audit its financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. There were no disagreements with Corbin and Company on accounting or financial disclosures. The Company had no existing relationship with an independent accountant prior to its engagement of Corbin and Company, LLP.

ITEM 4.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.

The following is a summary of transactions by the Company during the past three years involving the issuance and sale of the Company’s securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). All securities sold by the Company were sold to individuals, trusts or others as accredited investors as defined under Regulation D under the Securities Act, as amended.

In connection with the consummation of the Company’s Share Exchange Agreement dated March 16, 2005, with the shareholders of CryoPort Systems, Inc., the Company issued a total of 24,108,105 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of CryoPort Systems, Inc. in exchange for all issued and outstanding shares of CryoPort Systems, Inc.

In fiscal 2005, the Company sold 11,962,522 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.04 to $0.75 resulting in proceeds of $1,609,971, net of offering costs of $80,113.

In fiscal 2004, the Company sold 840,638 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.50 to $0.70 resulting in gross proceeds of $459,984.

The following schedule lists the sales of shares of common stock during the fiscal years ended 2005 and 2004.

	Fiscal 2005		Fiscal 2004
April	$	81,000	$	86,984
May	$	40,000		-
June	$	20,000	$	50,000
July	$	103,513		-
August	$	62,824		-
September	$	8,006	$	10,000
October	$	56,379	$	45,000
November	$	195,237	$	78,000
December	$	131,250	$	40,000
January		-	$	100,000
February	$	835,562		-
March	$	75,500	$	50,000
	$	1,609,271	$	459,984

In June 2005, 50,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.30 per share and 71,592 shares were issued pursuant to a cashless warrant exercise of 82,134 warrants at $0.30 per share.

In August 2005, the Company settled a pending wrongful termination lawsuit involving a former employee with consideration being paid to the plaintiff in the form of 265,420 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $10,617 based on $0.04 per share (estimated fair value at date of settlement), and $25,000 in cash, which is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet at March 31, 2005, to be paid 90 days subsequent to the Company operating under a positive cash flow basis.

In June 2005, 50,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.30 per share and 71,592 shares were issued pursuant to a cashless warrant exercise of 82,134 warrants at $0.30 per share.

In August 2005, the Company entered into Agency Agreements with various brokers to raise funds in a private placement offering of common stock under Regulation D. In connection with this agreement, 78,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were sold to investors at a price of $3.50 per share for gross proceeds of $273,000 to the Company, net of issuance costs of $32,340.

The issuances of the securities of the Company in the above transactions were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. With respect to each transaction listed above, no general solicitation was made by either the Company or any person acting on the Company’s behalf; the securities sold are subject to transfer restrictions; and the certificates for the shares contained an appropriate legend stating such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to an exemption therefrom. No underwriters were involved in connection with the sales of securities referred to in this Part I, Item 10.

ITEM 5. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the “NRS”), every Nevada corporation has authority to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner which such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause or belief his conduct was unlawful.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 78.7502, every Nevada corporation also has the authority to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner which such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. No indemnification shall be made, however, for any claim, issue or matter as to which a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court determines that in view of all the circumstances, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.

To the extent any person referred to in the two immediately preceding paragraphs is successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding, the NRS provides that such person must be indemnified by the corporation against expenses including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.

Section 78.751 of the NRS requires the corporation to obtain a determination that any discretionary indemnification is proper under the circumstances. The corporation’s stockholders must make such a determination; its board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding; or under certain circumstances, by independent legal counsel. The Company’s amended and restated bylaws provide that the Company shall indemnify its directors, officers, employees and agents to the fullest extent provided by the NRS.

In addition, Section 78.138.7 of the NRS provides that directors and officers are not personally liable to the corporation, its stockholders, or its creditors for any damages resulting from their breach of fiduciary duties unless it is proven that the act or omission constituted a breach of fiduciary duty and the breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.

PART F/S

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

CryoPort, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CryoPort, Inc. (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CryoPort, Inc. at March 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses, and has a stockholders' deficit of $1,180,035 at March 31, 2005. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

CORBIN & COMPANY, LLP

Irvine, California

August 22, 2005, except for Note 12 as to

which the date is September 23, 2005

F-1

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

ASSETS	March 31,
	2005
Current assets:
Cash	$	720,195
Accounts receivable, net		44,547
Inventories		150,980
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		51,118
Total current assets		966,840
Fixed assets, net		96,940
Intangible assets, net		16,648
	$	1,080,428
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	162,985
Accrued expenses		104,040
Accrued warranty costs		70,500
Accrued salaries		246,431
Current portion of notes payable		24,000
Total current liabilities		607,956
Related party notes and accrued interest payable		1,609,067
Notes payable and accrued interest, net of current portion		43,440
Total liabilities		2,260,463
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,708,105
shares issued and outstanding		29,708
Additional paid-in capital		4,307,047
Accumulated deficit		(5,516,790	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,180,035	)
	$	1,080,428

See report of independent registered public accounting firm and

accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-2

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For The Years Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Net sales	$	271,429		$	84,285
Cost of sales		499,650			424,805
Gross loss		(228,221	)		(340,520	)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses		622,797			430,910
Research and development expenses		98,698			61,002
Total operating expenses		721,495			491,912
Loss from operations		(949,716	)		(832,432	)
Other expense:
Interest expense		(85,768	)		(67,791	)
Loss on disposition of assets		(1,826	)		(94,609	)
Other		--			(6,861	)

Total other expense		(87,594	)		(169,261	)
Loss before income taxes		(1,037,310	)		(1,001,693	)
Income taxes		800			800
Net loss	$	(1,038,110	)	$	(1,002,493	)
Net loss available to common stockholders per
common share:
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.08	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding		17,907,557			12,952,375

See report of independent registered public accounting firm and

accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

							Additional						Total
	Common Stock						Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Deficit
Balance, April 1, 2003	12,547,092		$	12,547		$	2,112,209		$	(3,476,187	)	$	(1,351,431	)
Issuance of common stock for cash	840,638			841			459,143			--			459,984
Stock options issued to consultants	--			--			68,850			--			68,850
Net loss	--			--			--			(1,002,493	)		(1,002,493	)
Balance, March 31, 2004	13,387,730			13,388			2,640,202			(4,478,680	)		(1,825,090	)
Issuance of common stock for cash, net of
issuance costs of $80,113	11,962,522			11,963			1,598,008			--			1,609,971
Issuance of common stock in connection
with a legal settlement	265,420			265			10,352			--			10,617
Common stock returned by founders
to reduce dilution	(1,507,567	)		(1,508	)		1,508			--			--
Common stock issued in merger
with GT5	5,600,000			5,600			(5,600	)		--			--
Stock options issued to consultants	--			--			62,577			--			62,577
Net loss	--			--			--			(1,038,110	)		(1,038,110	)
Balance, March 31, 2005	29,708,105		$	29,708		$	4,307,047		$	(5,516,790	)	$	(1,180,035	)

See report of independent registered public accounting firm and

accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For The Years Ended March 31,
Cash flows from operating activities:	2005			2004
Net loss	$	(1,038,110	)	$	(1,002,493	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		92,596			91,948
Loss on disposal of assets		1,826			94,609
Fair value of stock options issued to consultants		62,577			68,850
Fair value of common stock issued in connection
with a legal settlement		10,617			--
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(32,163	)		(10,178	)
Inventories		(97,863	)		(5,629	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(43,942	)		(2,735	)
Other assets		--			7,905
Accounts payable		(131,429	)		(110,154	)
Accrued expenses		12,258			8,033
Accrued warranty costs		38,625			(15,375	)
Accrued salaries		24,428			26,742
Accrued interest		82,464			66,384
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,018,116	)		(782,093	)
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchases of fixed assets		(14,879	)		(16,589	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under notes payable		190,000			241,000
Repayments of notes payable		(52,864	)		(2,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		1,609,971			459,984
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,747,107			698,984
Net change in cash		714,112			(99,698	)
Cash, beginning of year		6,083			105,781
Cash, end of year	$	720,195		$	6,083
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	3,304		$	1,407
Income taxes	$	800		$	800

See report of independent registered public accounting firm and

accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Organization

Cryoport, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated under the name G.T.5-Limited (“GT5”) on May 25, 1990 as a Nevada Corporation. The Company was engaged in the business of designing and building exotic body styles for automobiles compatible with the vehicle’s existing chassis.

On March 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Cryoport Systems, Inc. (“Cryoport Systems”), a California corporation, and its stockholders whereby the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Cryoport Systems in exchange for 24,108,105 shares of its common stock (which represents approximately 81% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock following the close of the transaction). Cryoport Systems was originally formed in 1999 as a California limited liability company and was reorganized into a California corporation on December 11, 2000. Cryoport Systems was founded to capitalize on servicing the transportation needs of the growing global “biotechnology revolution.” Effective March 16, 2005, the Company changed its name to Cryoport, Inc. The transaction has been recorded as a reverse acquisition (see Note 2).

The principal focus of the Company is to develop a line of disposable (or one-way) dry cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological materials. These materials include live cell pharmaceutical products; e.g., cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials, reproductive tissues, infectious substances and other items that require continuous exposure to cryogenic temperature (less than -150°C). The Company currently manufactures a line of reusable cryogenic dry shippers. These primarily serve as vehicles for the development of the cryogenic technology that supports the disposable product development but also are essential components of the infrastructure that supports testing and research activities of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Our mission is to provide cost effective packaging systems for biological materials requiring, or benefiting from, a cryogenic temperature environment over an extended period of time.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not generated significant revenues from operations and has no assurance of any future revenues. The Company incurred net losses of $1,038,110 and $1,002,493 during the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively. The Company has a cash balance of $720,195 at March 31, 2005. In addition, at March 31, 2005, the Company’s accumulated deficit was $5,516,790. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

F-6

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS, continued

The Company’s management recognizes that the Company must obtain additional capital for the eventual achievement of sustained profitable operations. Management’s plans include obtaining additional capital through equity funding sources. However, no assurance can be given that additional capital, if needed, will be available when required or upon terms acceptable to the Company or that the Company will be successful in its efforts to negotiate an extension of its existing debt. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The acquisition of Cryoport Systems by the Company has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition, whereby the assets and liabilities of Cryoport Systems are reported at their historical cost. The Company had no assets or operations at the date of acquisition. The reverse acquisition resulted in a change in reporting entity for accounting and reporting purposes. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively restated for all periods presented to report the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Cryoport Systems. Since the Company’s stockholders retained 5,600,000 shares of common stock in connection with the reverse acquisition, such shares have been reflected as if they were issued to the Company on the date of acquisition for no consideration as part of a corporate reorganization.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cryoport, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cryoport Systems, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimated amounts. The Company’s significant estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns, recoverability of long-lived assets, allowances for inventory obsolescence, accrued warranty costs, deferred tax assets and their accompanying valuations and product liability reserves.

F-7

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Cash

The Company maintains its cash accounts in financial institutions. Accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $100,000. At March 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $582,538 of balances which were in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions to limit its concentration risk exposure.

Customers

The Company grants credit to customers within the United States of America and to a limited number of international customers, and does not require collateral. Sales to international customers are secured by advance payments or letters of credit. The Company’s ability to collect receivables is affected by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas and industries served by the Company. Reserves for uncollectible amounts and estimated sales returns are provided based on past experience and a specific analysis of the accounts which management believes are sufficient. Accounts receivable at March 31, 2005 and 2004 are net of reserves for doubtful accounts and sales returns of approximately $5,000. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.

The Company has foreign sales primarily in Europe, Latin America and Canada. Foreign sales are primarily under exclusive distribution agreements with international distributors. During 2005 and 2004, the Company had foreign sales of approximately $53,500 and $6,100, respectively, which constituted approximately 20% and 7% of net sales, respectively.

The majority of the Company’s customers are in the bio-tech and animal breeding industries. Consequently, there is a concentration of receivables within these industries, which is subject to normal credit risk.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s consolidated financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, related party notes payable, payables, accrued expenses and a note payable to a third party. The carrying value for all such instruments, except the related party notes payable, approximates fair value at March 31, 2005. The difference between the fair value and recorded values of the related party notes payable is not significant.

F-8

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Work in process and finished goods include material, labor and applied overhead. The Company periodically reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets are provided using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:

Furniture and fixtures	7 years
Machinery and equipment	5-7 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life

Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization applicable to assets retired are removed from the accounts, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in current operations.

Intangible Assets

Patents and Trademarks

Patents and trademarks are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of five years.

F-9

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s management assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets upon the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. At March 31, 2005, the Company’s management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue, which could result in impairment of its long-lived assets in the future.

Accrued Warranty Costs

Estimated costs of the Company’s standard warranty, included with products at no additional cost to the customer for a period up to one year, are recorded as accrued warranty costs at the time of product sale. Costs related to servicing the standard warranty are charged to the accrual as incurred.

The following represents the activity in the warranty accrual during the years ended March 31:

	2005			2004
Beginning warranty accrual	$	31,875		$	47,250
Increase in accrual (charged to cost of sales)		65,625			37,875
Charges to accrual (product replacements)		(27,000	)		(53,250	)
Ending warranty accrual	$	70,500		$	31,875

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as revised by SAB 104. The Company recognizes revenue when products are shipped to a customer and the risks and rewards of ownership and title have passed based on the terms of the sale. The Company records a provision for sales returns and claims based upon historical experience. Actual returns and claims in any future period may differ from the Company’s estimates.

F-10

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Accounting for Shipping and Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs

The Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. Shipping and handling fees and costs are included in cost of sales.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses the cost of advertising when incurred as a component of consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses. In 2005 and 2004, the Company expensed $13,227 and $9,668, respectively, in advertising costs.

Research and Development Expenses

The Company expenses internal research and development costs as incurred. Third party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and EITF Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

SFAS No. 123 allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost related to stock and stock options issued to employees using the intrinsic method accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under APB No. 25, compensation cost, if any, is recognized over the respective vesting period based on the difference, on the date of grant, between the fair value of the Company's common stock and the grant price. Entities electing to remain with the accounting method of APB No. 25 must make pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value method of accounting defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied.

F-11

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 10. The Company accounts for employee options granted under this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, as all employee options granted for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were issued at or above the estimated fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

	For The Years Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Net loss as reported	$	(1,038,110	)	$	(1,002,493	)
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation under
fair value based method for all awards, net
of related tax effects		(123,327	)		(146,099	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(1,161,437	)	$	(1,148,592	)
Basic and diluted loss per share - as reported	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.08	)
Basic and diluted loss per share - pro forma	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.09	)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. The Company is a subchapter "C" corporation and files a federal income tax return. The Company files separate state income tax returns for California and Nevada.

F-12

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all potential dilutive common shares were issued. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same as the effect of stock options and warrants on loss per share are anti-dilutive and thus not included in the diluted loss per share calculation. The impact under the treasury stock method of dilutive convertible debt, stock options and warrants would have resulted in an increase of 1,288,173 and 161,111 incremental shares for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted loss per share computations for the years ended March 31:

	2005			2004
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(1,038,110	)	$	(1,002,493	)
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per
common share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		17,907,557			12,952,375

Net loss per common share available to common
stockholders	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.08	)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a significant impact on the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

F-13

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“Statement 123(R)”) to provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB 25. The Company will be required to apply Statement 123(R) in 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of Statement 123(R) will have a significant impact on the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets, which were previously required to be recorded on a carryover basis rather than a fair value basis. Instead, this statement provides that exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance be reported at carryover basis rather than a fair value basis. A non-monetary exchange is considered to have commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this statement are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have an impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 3 - INVENTORY

Inventory at March 31, 2005 consists of the following:

	2005
Raw materials	$	111,538
Work in process		21,582
Finished goods		17,860
	$	150,980

F-14

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 4 - FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following at March 31:

	2005
Furniture and fixtures	$	18,768
Machinery and equipment		407,376
Leasehold improvements		7,900
		434,044
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(337,104	)
	$	96,940

Depreciation and amortization expense for fixed assets for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $83,344 and $82,696, respectively.

NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the following at March 31:

	2005
Assets subject to amortization:
Patents and trademarks	$	46,268
Less accumulated amortization		(29,620	)
	$	16,648

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $9,252 and $9,252, respectively. All of the Company’s intangible assets are subject to amortization.

Estimated future annual amortization expense pursuant to these intangible assets is as follows:

Years Ending March 31,

2006	$	9,252
2007		7,396

F-15

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred taxes at March 31, 2005 are as follows:

Deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss carryforward	$	2,150,000
Accrued expenses and reserves		235,000
Expenses recognized for granting of options and warrants		56,000
Total gross deferred tax asset		2,441,000
Less valuation allowance		(2,441,000	)
	$	--

The valuation allowance increased by approximately $441,000 and $461,000 during the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No current provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is required, except for minimum state taxes, since the Company incurred taxable losses during such years.

The provision for income taxes for fiscal 2005 and 2004 was $800 and differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate of 34% to loss before income taxes as a result of the following:

	2005			2004
Computed tax benefit at federal statutory rate	$	(355,000	)	$	(340,000	)
State income tax benefit, net of federal effect		(62,000	)		(60,000	)
Increase in valuation allowance		441,000			461,000
Other		(23,200	)		(60,200	)
	$	800		$	800

As of March 31, 2005, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $5,700,000 and $2,870,000 for federal and state income tax reporting purposes, which expire at various dates through 2025 and 2015, respectively.

F-16

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES, continued

The utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards might be limited due to restrictions imposed under federal and state laws upon a change in ownership. The amount of the limitation, if any, has not been determined at this time. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result of the Company’s continued losses and uncertainties surrounding the realization of the net operating loss carry forwards, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset amount as of March 31, 2005.

NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company has leased its facility in Brea, California on a month-to-month basis with varying monthly payments. Subsequent to year-end, on April 1, 2005, the Company entered into a noncancelable operating lease requiring monthly payments of $7,500 and expiring on April 1, 2007.

As of March 31, 2005, future minimum rental payments required under the existing noncancelable operating lease are as follows:

Years Ending March 31,	Operating Lease
2006	$	90,000
2007		90,000
Total minimum lease payments	$	180,000

Total rental expense was approximately $20,000 and $29,715 for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Litigation

The Company becomes a party to product litigation in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for open claims based on its historical experience and available insurance coverage. In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving the Company that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

F-17

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, continued

During 2004, a former employee initiated a wrongful termination lawsuit against the Company. The Company expensed all costs related to this matter as incurred in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In August 2004, both parties agreed to settle the lawsuit with consideration being paid to the plaintiff in the form of 265,420 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $10,617 based on $0.04 per share (estimated fair value at date of settlement), and $25,000 in cash, which is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet at March 31, 2005, to be paid 90 days subsequent to the Company operating under a positive cash flow basis. The total settlement cost of $35,617 is reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations for the year ended March 31, 2005.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the States of California and Nevada. In connection with its facility lease, the Company has indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facility. In connection with its business merger, the Company has indemnified the merger candidate for certain claims arising from the failure of the Company to perform any of its representation or obligations under the agreements. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying balance sheets.

NOTE 8 - NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has an unsecured, non-interest bearing note payable to a third party. The Company is currently making monthly payments of $2,000 as agreed upon with the third party. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the remaining unpaid balance was $67,440 and $75,304, respectively.

As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had $1,369,500 and $1,224,500, respectively, in outstanding unsecured indebtedness owed to five related parties including current and former board of directors representing working capital advances made to the Company from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provide for total monthly principal payments of $2,500, which increase by $2,500 every six months to a maximum of $10,000 beginning April 1, 2006. Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on various dates through March 1, 2015.

F-18

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 8 - NOTES PAYABLE, continued

Related party interest expense under these notes was $82,464 and $66,384 for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Accrued interest, which is included in notes payable in the accompanying balance sheet, related to these notes amounted to $239,567 and $157,103 as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Future maturities of notes payable at March 31, 2005 are as follows:

Years Ending March 31,		Related Party		Third Party		Total
2006	$	--	$	24,000	$	24,000
2007		45,000		24,000		69,000
2008		105,000		19,440		124,440
2009		120,000		--		120,000
2010		120,000		--		120,000
Thereafter		979,500		--		979,500
	$	1,369,500	$	67,440	$	1,436,940

NOTE 9 - COMMON STOCK

In fiscal 2005, the Company sold 11,962,522 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.04 to $0.75 resulting in proceeds of $1,609,971, net of offering costs of $80,113.

In connection with the reverse acquisition (see Note 1), the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to a majority stockholder in exchange for the stockholder’s surrender of 1,354,891 shares of Cryoport Systems’ common stock held by the stockholder.

In fiscal 2004, the Company sold 840,638 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.50 to $0.70 resulting in gross proceeds of $459,984.

NOTE 10 - STOCK OPTIONS

Effective October 1, 2002, the Company adopted the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”). The stockholders of the Company approved the 2002 Plan on October 1, 2002. Under the 2002 Plan, incentive stock options and nonqualified options may be granted to officers, employees and consultants of the Company for the purchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The exercise price per share under the incentive stock option plan shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. The exercise price per share under the non-qualified stock option plan shall not be less than 85% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. Expiration dates for the grants may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. The 2002 Plan terminates on October 1, 2012.

F-19

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 10 - STOCK OPTIONS, continued

Under the terms of the 2002 Plan, the Company granted options to purchase 367,970 and 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under incentive stock option agreements in 2005 and 2004, respectively, and granted options to purchase 466,018 and 525,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under non-qualified stock option agreements in 2005 and 2004, respectively. All options granted have an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant, vest upon grant or agreed upon vesting schedules and expire five years from the date of grant. Therefore, there was no compensation expense recognized for options issued to employees during 2005 and 2004. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, total compensation expense recognized for options issued to consultants was $62,577 and $68,850 during 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of March 31, 2005, 2,508,988 options at an average exercise price of $.45 per share were outstanding under the 2002 Plan. There were no options granted subsequent to March 31, 2005. The Company had 2,491,012 options available for grant under the 2002 Plan at March 31, 2005.

The following is a summary of stock option activity during the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

	2005				2004
	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year		1,675,000	$	0.59		650,000	$	0.62
Granted		833,988		0.17		1,025,000		0.58
Exercised		--		--		--		--
Expired/forfeited		--		--		--		--
Outstanding, end of year		2,508,988	$	0.45		1,675,000	$	0.59
Exercisable, end of year		2,050,644	$	0.44		814,164	$	0.60
Weighted average fair value of
options granted			$	0.08			$	0.31

F-20

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 10 - STOCK OPTIONS, continued

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2005:

Exercise Price	Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$1.00	150,000	2.7	150,000	$	1.00
$0.50-$0.75	1,715,375	3.2	1,257,031	$	0.56
$0.04	643,613	4.3	643,613	$	0.04
	2,508,988		2,050,644

The fair value of each option granted during 2005 and 2004 to employees and directors is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant using the following assumptions: (i) no dividend yield, (ii) average volatilities in both years of 60%, (iii) weighted-average risk-free interest rate of approximately 3.21% and 3.29%, respectively, and (iv) expected lives of five years.

NOTE 11 - STOCK WARRANTS

From time to time, the Company issues warrants pursuant to various consulting agreements and other compensatory arrangements.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued warrants to purchase 318,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. No warrants were exercised as of March 31, 2005. As these warrants were issued in connection with fund raising activities and considered issuance costs, no consulting expense was recognized for these warrants in the accompanying statement of operations. All of the warrants are fully vested and are exercisable from April 1, 2006 to June 16, 2006.

During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued warrants to purchase 102,508 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. As these warrants were issued in connection with fund raising activities, no consulting expense was recognized for these warrants in the accompanying statement of operations. All of the warrants are fully vested and are exercisable from April 1, 2006 through June 16, 2006.

F-21

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 11 - STOCK WARRANTS, continued

During the year ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. All of the warrants are fully vested and are exercisable through May 7, 2006. As these warrants were issued in connection with fund raising activities and considered issuance costs, no consulting expense was recognized for these warrants in the accompanying statement of operations. No warrants were exercised as of March 31, 2005.

Certain warrants issued in conjunction with fundraising activities contain a cashless exercise provision. Under the provision, the holder of the warrant surrenders those warrants whose fair market value is sufficient to affect the exercise of the entire warrant quantity. The warrant holder then is issued shares based on the remaining net warrant and no proceeds are obtained by the Company. The surrendered warrants are cancelled by the Company in connection with this transaction.

The fair value of each warrant granted during 2005 and 2004 to consultants and other service providers is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant using the following assumptions: (i) no dividend yield, (ii) average volatility in both years of 60%, (iii) weighted-average risk-free interest rate of approximately 1.7% to 4% and 1.8%, respectively, and (iv) expected life of two to three years and three years, respectively.

The following represents a summary of the warrant activity for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

	2005				2004
	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year		1,411,416	$	0.83		1,391,416	$	0.83
Issued		420,841		0.41		20,000		0.75
Exercised		--		--		--		--
Expired/forfeited		--		--		--		--
Outstanding and exercisable,
end of year		1,832,257	$	0.74		1,411,416	$	0.83
Weighted average fair value of
warrants granted			$	0.34			$	0.15

F-22

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For The Years Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 11 - STOCK WARRANTS, continued

The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2005:

Exercise Price	Number of Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$6.50		11,000		1.9		$6.50
$2.50		100,000		2.2		$2.50
$0.80 - $1.00		143,750		3.3		$0.87
$0.50 - $0.75		1,259,173		4.2		$0.64
$0.30		318,334		2.0		$0.30
		1,832,257

NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In June 2005, 50,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.30 per share.

In June 2005, 71,592 shares were issued pursuant to a cashless warrant exercise of 82,134 warrants at $0.30 per share.

F-23

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

	June 30, 2005
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash	$	413,212
Accounts receivable, net		103,444
Inventories		157,071
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12,350
Total current assets		686,077
Fixed assets, net		95,959
Intangible assets, net		14,455
	$	796,491
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	169,002
Accrued expenses		109,213
Accrued warranty costs		70,128
Accrued salaries		301,187
Current portion of related party notes payable		7,500
Current portion of note payable		24,000
Total current liabilities		681,030
Related party notes payable and accrued interest payable,
net of current portion		1,622,350
Note payable, net of current portion		40,440
Total liabilities		2,343,820
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,829,697 shares issued and outstanding		29,830
Additional paid-in capital		4,330,565
Accumulated deficit		(5,907,724	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,547,329	)
	$	796,491

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

F-24

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	For The Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net sales	$	122,493		$	66,227
Cost of sales		143,956			208,404
Gross loss		(21,463	)		(142,177	)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses		268,764			142,159
Research and development expenses		79,354			12,065
Total operating expenses		348,118			154,224
Loss from operations		(369,581	)		(296,401	)
Other expense:
Interest expense		(21,353	)		(20,810	)
Loss on disposition of assets		--			(1,826	)
Total other expense		(21,353	)		(22,636	)
Loss before income taxes		(390,934	)		(319,037	)
Income taxes		--			--
Net loss	$	(390,934	)	$	(319,037	)
Net loss available to common stockholders per
common share:
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding		29,732,491			17,541,219

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

F-25

CRYOPORT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For The Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(390,934	)	$	(319,037	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		22,423			23,165
Loss on disposal of assets		--			1,826
Estimated fair value of stock options issued to
consultants		8,640			15,644
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(58,897	)		(16,730	)
Inventories		(6,091	)		31,305
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		38,768			776
Accounts payable		6,017			(15,688	)
Accrued expenses		5,173			8
Accrued warranty costs		(372	)		9,657
Accrued salaries		54,756			(4,886	)
Accrued interest		20,783			20,616
Net cash used in operating activities		(299,734	)		(253,344	)
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchases of fixed assets		(19,249	)		(4,005	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under notes payable		--			145,000
Repayment of notes payable		(3,000	)		(614	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		15,000			141,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,000			285,386
Net change in cash		(306,983	)		28,037
Cash, beginning of period		720,195			6,083
Cash, end of period	$	413,212		$	34,120
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	--		$	--
Income taxes	$	800		$	--

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

F-26

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 1 - MANAGEMENT’S REPRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Cryoport, Inc. (the "Company"), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) has been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2006. It is suggested that the consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

The Company was originally incorporated under the name G.T.5-Limited on May 25, 1990 as a Nevada Corporation. The Company was engaged in the business of designing and building exotic body styles for automobiles compatible with the vehicle’s existing chassis.

On March 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Cryoport Systems, Inc. (“Cryoport Systems”), a California corporation, and its stockholders whereby the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Cryoport Systems in exchange for 24,108,105 shares of its common stock (which represents approximately 81% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock following the close of the transaction). Cryoport Systems was originally formed in 1999 as a California limited liability company and was reorganized into a California corporation on December 11, 2000. Cryoport Systems was founded to capitalize on servicing the transportation needs of the growing global “biotechnology revolution”. Effective March 16, 2005, the Company changed its name to Cryoport, Inc. The transaction was recorded as a reverse acquisition.

F-27

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

The principal focus of the Company is to develop a line of disposable (or one-way) dry cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological materials. These materials include live cell pharmaceutical products; e.g., cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials, reproductive tissues, infectious substances and other items that require continuous exposure to cryogenic temperature (less than -150°C). The Company currently manufactures a line of reusable cryogenic dry shippers. These primarily serve as vehicles for the development of the cryogenic technology that supports the disposable product development but also are essential components of the infrastructure that supports testing and research activities of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The Company’s mission is to provide cost effective packaging systems for biological materials requiring, or benefiting from, a cryogenic temperature environment over an extended period of time.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not generated significant revenues from operations and has no assurance of any future revenues. The Company incurred a net loss of $390,934 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 and had a cash balance of $413,212 at June 30, 2005. In addition, at June 30, 2005, the Company’s accumulated deficit was $5,907,724 and the Company had working capital of $5,047. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s management recognizes that the Company must obtain additional capital for the eventual achievement of sustained profitable operations. Management’s plans include obtaining additional capital through equity funding sources. However, no assurance can be given that additional capital, if needed will be available when required or upon terms acceptable to the Company or that the company will be successful in its efforts to negotiate the extension of its existing debt. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cryoport, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cryoport Systems, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

F-28

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Use of Estimates

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Cash

The Company maintains its cash accounts in financial institutions. Accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $100,000. At June 30, 2005, the Company had approximately $370,000 of balances which were in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions to limit its concentration risk exposure.

Customers

The Company grants credit to customers within the United States of America and to a limited number of international customers, and does not require collateral. Sales to other international customers are secured by advance payments, letters of credit, or cash against documents. The company’s ability to collect receivables is affected by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas and industries served by the Company. Reserves for uncollectible amounts are provided based on past experience and a specific analysis of the accounts which management believes are sufficient. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.

The Company has foreign sales primarily in Europe, Latin America and Canada. Foreign sales are primarily under exclusive distribution agreements with international distributors. During the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company had foreign sales of approximately $45,000 and $24,000 which constituted approximately 37% and 36%, respectively, of net sales.

F-29

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

The majority of the Company’s customers are in the Bio-tech and animal breeding industries. Consequently, there is a concentration of receivables within these industries, which is subject to normal credit risk.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s consolidated financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, related party notes payable, payables, accrued expenses and a note payable to a third party. The carrying value for all such instruments, except the related party notes payable, approximates fair value at June 30, 2005. The fair value of related party notes payable is not determinable as the transactions are with related parties.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. The Company periodically reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories. Work in process and finished goods include material, labor and applied overhead. Inventories at June 30, 2005 consist of the following:


Raw materials	$	119,979
Work in process		21,582
Finished goods		15,510
	$	157,071

Fixed Assets

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets are provided using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:

Furniture and fixtures	7 years
Machinery and equipment	5-7 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life

F-30

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired are removed from the accounts, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in current operations.

Intangible Assets

Patents and Trademarks

Patents and trademarks are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful life of five years.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s management assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets upon the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. At June 30, 2005, the Company’s management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue, which could result in impairment of its long-lived assets in the future.

Accrued Warranty Costs

Estimated costs of the standard warranty, included with products at no additional cost to the customer for a period up to one year, are recorded as accrued warranty costs at the time of product sale. Costs related to servicing the extended warranty plan are expensed as incurred.

The following represents the activity in the warranty accrual account during the three month period ended June 30:

	2005			2004
Beginning warranty accrual	$	70,500		$	31,875
Increase in accrual (charged to cost of sales)		11,250			9,675
Charges to accrual (product replacements)		(11,622	)		--
Ending warranty accrual	$	70,128		$	41,550

F-31

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Revenue Recognition

Accounting for Shipping and Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs

The Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue in accordance with EITF 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. Shipping and handling fees and costs are included in cost of sales.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses the cost of advertising when incurred as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. During the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company expensed approximately $5,600 and $4,800, respectively, in advertising costs.

Research and Development Expenses

The company expenses internal research and development costs as incurred. Third party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Emerging Issue Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

F-32

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - OGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

SFAS No. 123 allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost related to stock and stock options issued to employees using the intrinsic method accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under APB 25, compensation cost, if any, is recognized over the respective vesting period based on the difference, on the date of grant, between the fair value of the Company's common stock and the grant price. Entities electing to remain with the accounting method of APB 25 must make pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value method of accounting defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied.

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan. The Company will account for employee options granted under this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB 25, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations, as all employee options granted or vesting during the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were issued at or above the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

	For The Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
Net loss as reported	$	(390,934	)	$	(319,037	)
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation under
fair value based method for all awards, net
of related tax effects		(2,667	)		(8,992	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(393,601	)	$	(328,029	)
Basic and diluted loss per share - as reported	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Basic and diluted loss per share - pro forma	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

F-33

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. The Company is a subchapter "C" corporation and files a federal income tax return. The Company files separate state income tax returns for California and Nevada.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share (see Note 9).

Basic loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued. Basic and diluted loss per share is the same as the effect of stock options and warrants on loss per share are anti-dilutive and thus not included in the diluted loss per share calculation. The impact under the treasury stock method of dilutive convertible debt and stock options and warrants would have resulted in an increase of 1,276,389 and 166,319 shares for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

F-34

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

NOTE 3 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable at June 30, 2005 is net of reserves for doubtful accounts and sales returns of approximately $5,000.

NOTE 4 - FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following at June 30, 2005:

Furniture and fixtures	$	22,982
Machinery and equipment		415,658
Leasehold improvements		14,653
		453,293
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(357,334	)
	$	95,959

F-35

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 4 - FIXED ASSETS, continued

Depreciation and amortization expense for fixed assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $20,230 and $20,852, respectively.

NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the following at June 30, 2005:

Assets subject to amortization:
Patents and trademarks	$	46,268
Less accumulated amortization		(31,813	)
	$	14,455

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $2,193 and $2,313, respectively. All of the Company’s intangible assets are subject to amortization.

NOTE 6 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

The Company becomes a party to product litigation in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for open claims based on its historical experience and available insurance coverage. In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving the Company that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s condition or results of operations.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the States of California and Nevada. In connection with its facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. Additionally, the Company indemnifies a financial institution under the line of credit agreement against certain claims as a result of the violation of any law. In connection with its business acquisitions, the Company has indemnified the sellers for certain claims arising from the failure of the Company to perform any of its representation or obligations under the agreements. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

F-36

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has a non-interest bearing note payable to a third party for $77,304, which was due in April 2003. The Company is currently making monthly payments of $2,000 as agreed with the lender. As of June 30, 2005, the remaining unpaid balance was $64,440.

As of June 30, 2005, the Company had $1,369,500 in outstanding unsecured indebtedness owed to five related parties including current and former board of directors representing working capital advances made to the Company from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provide for total monthly principal payments of $2,500, which increase by $2,500 every six months to a maximum of $10,000 beginning April 1, 2006. Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on various dates through March 1, 2015.

Related party interest expense under these notes was $20,783 and $20,616 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Accrued interest, which is included in notes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, related to these notes amounted to $260,350 as of June 30, 2005.

NOTE 8 - EQUITY

In June 2005, 50,000 warrants were exercised at a price of $0.30 per share.

In June 2005, 71,592 shares were issued pursuant to a cashless warrant exercise of 82,134 warrants.

During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, compensation expense from the vesting of options issued to non-employees totaled $8,640 and $15,644, respectively, and has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

F-37

CRYOPORT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

NOTE 9 - LOSS PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted loss per share computations for the three month periods ended June 30:

	2005			2004
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(390,934	)	$	(319,037	)

Denominator for basic and diluted loss per common
share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		29,732,491			17,541,219

Net loss per common share available to common
stockholder	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

F-38

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	CryoPort Systems, Inc. (Registrant)

Date: October 18, 2005	By:	/s/ PETER BERRY
		Peter Berry,
		CEO and President

PART III

ITEM 1. INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description	Page or Method of Filing
3.1	State of Nevada Corporate Charter for G.T. 5- Limited	Filed Herewith
3.2	Articles of Incorporation Of G.T 5-Limited	Filed Herewith
3.3	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of G T. 5-Limited issue 100M shares	Filed Herewith
3.4	Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of G.T.5-Limited name change to CryoPort, Inc	Filed Herewith
3.5	Amended and Restated By-Laws Of CryoPort, Inc.	Filed Herewith
3.6	Articles of Incorporation CryoPort Systems, Inc.	Filed Herewith
3.7	By-Laws of CryoPort Systems, Inc.	Filed Herewith
3.8	CryoPort, Inc. Stock Certificate Specimen	Filed Herewith
3.9	Code of Conduct for CryoPort, Inc.	Filed Herewith
3.10	Code of Ethics for Senior Officers	Filed Herewith
3.11	Statement of Policy on Insider Trading	Filed Herewith
3.12	CryoPort, Inc. Audit Committee Charter	Filed Herewith
3.13	CryoPort Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan	Filed Herewith
3.14	Stock Option Agreement ISO - Specimen	Filed Herewith
3.15	Stock Option Agreement NSO -Specimen	Filed Herewith
3.16	Warrant Agreement - Specimen	Filed Herewith
3.17	Patents and Trademarks
3.17.1	CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,467,642	On File with Company
3.17.2	CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,119,465	On File with Company

3.17.3	CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,539,726	On File with Company
3.17.4	CryoPort Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,583,478,7	On File with Company
3.17.5	CryoPort Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,586,797,8	On File with Company
10.1	Contracts
10.1.1	Stock Exchange Agreement associated with the merger of G.T.5-Limited and CryoPort Systems, Inc. dated 03/05/01.	Filed Herewith
10.1.2	Commercial Promissory Notes between CryoPort, Inc. and D. Petreccia	Filed Herewith
10.1.3	Commercial Promissory Notes between CryoPort, Inc. and J. Dell	Filed Herewith
10.1.4	Commercial Promissory Notes between CryoPort, Inc. and M. Grossman	Filed Herewith
10.1.5	Commercial Promissory Notes between CryoPort, Inc. and P. Mullens	Filed Herewith
10.1.6	Commercial Promissory Notes between CryoPort, Inc. and R. Takahashi	Filed Herewith
10.1.7	Lease Agreement between CryoPort Systems, Inc. and Brea Hospital Properties, LLC.	Filed Herewith

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF EXHBITS

3.1		Corporate Charter for G.T.5-Limited issued by the State of Nevada on March 15, 2005.

3.2		Articles of Incorporation for G.T.5-Limited filed with the State of Nevada in May 25, 1990.

3.3.		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of G.T.5-Limited increasing the authorized shares from 5,000,000 to 100,000,000 shares filed with the State of Nevada on October 12, 2004.

3.4		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from G.T.5-Limited to CryoPort, Inc. filed with the State of Nevada on March 16, 2005.

3.5		Amended and Restated By-Laws of CryoPort, Inc. adopted by the Board of Directors on June 22, 2005.

3.6		Articles of Incorporation of CryoPort Systems, Inc. filed with the State of California on December 11, 2000, including Corporate Charter for CryoPort Systems, Inc. issued by the State of California on December 13, 2000.

3.7		By-Laws of CryoPort Systems, Inc. adopted by the Board of Directors on December 11, 2000.

3.8		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Stock Certificate Specimen.

3.9		Code of Conduct for CryoPort, Inc. pending adoption by Board of Directors.

3.10		Code of Ethics for Senior Officers of CryoPort, Inc. and subsidiaries pending adoption by Board of Directors.

3.11		Statement of Policy on Insider Trading pending adoption by Board of Directors.

3.12.		CryoPort, Inc. Audit Committee Charter, under which the Audit Committee will operate, adopted by the Board of Directors on August 19, 2005.

3.13		CryoPort Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on October 1, 2002.

3.14		Stock Option Agreement ISO - Specimen adopted by the Board of Directors on October 1, 2002.


3.15		Stock Option Agreement NSO - Specimen adopted by Board of Directors on October 1, 2002.

3.16		Warrant Agreement - Specimen adopted by the Board of Directors on October 1, 2002.

3.17		Patents and Trademarks

3.17.1		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,467,642 information sheet and Assignment to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document.

3.17.2		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,119,465 information sheet and Assignment to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document.

3.17.3		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Patent #6,539,726 information sheet and Assignment to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document.

3.17.4		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,583,478,7 information sheet and Assignment to CryoPort Systems, Inc.document.

3.17.5		CryoPort Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,586,797,8 information sheet and Assignment to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document.

10.1		Contracts

10.1.1		Stock Exchange Agreement associated with the merger of G.T.5-Limited and CryoPort Systems, Inc. signed on March 15, 2005.

10.1.2		Commercial Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and D. Petreccia executed on August 26, 2005.

10.1.3		Commercial Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and J. Dell executed on September 1, 2005.

10.1.4		Commercial Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and M. Grossman executed on August 25, 2005.

10.1.5		Commercial Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and P. Mullens executed on September 2, 2005.

10.1.6		Commercial Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and R. Takahashi executed on August 25, 2005.

10.1.7		Lease Agreement between CryoPort Systems, Inc. and Brea Hospital Properties, LLC, executed on March 11, 2005.

Form: 10SB12G/A

Documents