S-1/A: General form of registration statement for all companies including face-amount certificate companies
Published on January 14, 2010
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14 , 2010 | Registration Number 333-162350 |
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT
NO. 2
TO
FORM
S-1/A
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
CRYOPORT,
INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Nevada
|
3086
|
88-0313393
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(Primary
Standard Industrial
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Classification
Code Number)
|
Identification
No.)
|
20382
Barents Sea Circle
Lake
Forest, California 92630
(Address,
Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Principal
Executive Offices)
Larry
G. Stambaugh
Chief
Executive Officer
20382
Barents Sea Circle
Lake
Forest, California 92630
(949)
470-2300
(Name,
Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent
For Service)
Copies
to:
Mark
R. Ziebell, Esq.
Anthony
Ippolito, Esq.
Snell
& Wilmer L.L.P.
600
Anton Boulevard., Suite 1400
Costa
Mesa, California 92626
Tel:
(714) 427-7400
Fax:
(714) 427-7799
|
Gregory
Sichenzia, Esq.
Thomas
Rose, Esq.
Sichenzia
Ross Friedman Ference LLP
61
Broadway
New
York, New York 10006
Tel:
(212) 930-9700
Fax:
(212) 930-9725
|
Approximate
date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective.
If
any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a
delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, check the following box. ý
If
this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. o
If
this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. o
If
this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated
filer”, “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company ý
|
(Do
not check if smaller reporting company)
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title
of Each Class of Securities to be Registered
|
Amount
To Be
Registered
|
Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering
Price(2)
|
Amount
of
Registration
Fee(1)
|
||||||||
Units,
each consisting of one share of common stock, $0.001 par value, and one
warrant(2)
|
3,593,750
|
$
|
17,250,000
|
$
|
1,229.93
|
||||||
Shares
of common stock included as part of the units(2)
|
3,593,750
|
--
|
--
|
(3) | |||||||
Warrants
included as part of the units(2)
|
3,593,750
|
--
|
--
|
(3) | |||||||
Shares
of common stock underlying the warrants included in the units(2)(4)
|
3,593,750
|
$
|
18,975,000
|
$
|
1,352.92
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
36,225,000
|
$
|
2,582.85
|
(5) |
Unless
otherwise indicated, all share amounts and prices assume the consummation of a
reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1, to be effected prior to the
effectiveness of the registration statement, with the exact timing of the
reverse stock split to be determined by the registrant’s Board of
Directors.
(1)
|
Estimated
solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule
457(o) under the Securities Act.
|
(2)
|
Includes
468,750 units that the representative of the underwriters has the option
to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.
|
(3)
|
No
fee required pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities
Act.
|
(4)
|
Pursuant
to Rule 416, the registrant is also registering an indeterminate number of
additional shares of common stock that are issuable by reason of the
anti-dilution provisions of the warrants.
|
(5)
|
Previously
paid.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or date(s) as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the commission acting pursuant to said Section 8(a) may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
The securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer
to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
|
Subject to Completion
|
January
14 ,
2010
|
3,125,000
Units
CRYOPORT,
INC.
Common
Stock and Warrants
This is a
firm commitment public offering of 3,125,000 units, consisting of an aggregate
of 3,125,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an
additional 3,125,000 shares of our common stock. Each unit
consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of
common stock at an exercise price of 110% of the public offering price of
the units in this offering. The common stock and warrants are
immediately separable and will be issued separately.
Our
common stock is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CYRX. Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part, we will effect a reverse stock split
anticipated to be on a 12-to-1 basis. On December 30, 2009, the last
reported sale price for our common stock was $4.80 per share (giving effect to
the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse split). We have applied for
listing of our common stock and warrants on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the
symbols “CYPT” and “CYPTW,” respectively. No assurance can be given
that our application will be approved. If the application is not
approved, we will not complete this offering and the shares of our common stock
will continue to be traded on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Investing
in our common stock and warrants involves a high degree of
risk. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined whether
this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
Per
unit
|
Total
|
|||||||
Public
offering price
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Underwriting
discounts and commissions (1)
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Proceeds,
before expenses, to us (2)
|
$ | $ |
(1)
|
Does
not include a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 1% of the gross
proceeds of this offering payable to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, the
underwriters’ representative. Non-accountable expenses are estimated to be
$150,000.
|
(2)
|
We
estimate that the total expenses of this offering will be approximately
$350,000, consisting of $150,000 for the underwriter’s non-accountable
expense allowance (equal to 1% of the gross proceeds) and $200,000 for
legal, accounting, printing costs and various fees associated with the
registration and listing of our shares of common stock and
warrants.
|
We have
granted a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to purchase
468,750 units to be offered by us solely to cover over-allotments, if
any. If the underwriters exercise their right to purchase additional
units to cover over-allotments, we estimate that we will receive gross proceeds
of $2,250,000 from the sale of 468,750 units being offered at an assumed public
offering price of $4.80 per unit and net proceeds of $2,047,500 after
deducting $202,500 for underwriting discounts and commissions. The
units issuable upon exercise of the underwriter option are identical to those
offered by this prospectus and have been registered under the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
In
connection with this offering, we have also agreed to sell to Rodman &
Renshaw, LLC, the underwriters’ representative, a warrant to purchase
up to 5% (or 156,250) of the shares of common stock sold (excluding the
over-allotment) for $100. If the underwriters’ representative
exercises this warrant, each share of common stock may be purchased at $6.00 per
share (125% of the price of the units sold in this offering), commencing on a
date which is one year from the effective date of the registration statement and
expiring five years from the effective date of the registration
statement. The warrant may be exercised on a cashless
basis.
The
underwriters expect to deliver our shares of common stock and warrants to
purchasers in this offering on or about [*], 2010.
Rodman
& Renshaw, LLC
The date
of this prospectus is _____________, 2010.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Prospectus
Summary
|
2
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
21
|
Use
Of Proceeds
|
22
|
Market
For Common Equity And Related Stockholder Matters
|
22
|
Determination
Of Offering Price
|
24
|
Capitalization
|
25
|
Dilution
|
26
|
Management’s
Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
Business
|
37
|
Description
Of Property
|
50
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
50
|
Directors
And Executive Officers
|
51
|
Director
Compensation
|
59
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation
|
61
|
Security
Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And
Management
|
61
|
Certain
Relationships And Related Transactions
|
62
|
Description
Of Securities
|
63
|
Underwriting
And Plan Of Distribution
|
64
|
Legal
Matters
|
72
|
Experts
|
72
|
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
72
|
Disclosure
Of Commission Position On Indemnification For Securities Act
Liabilities
|
72
|
Index
To Consolidated Financial Statements
|
73
|
You may
only rely on the information contained in this prospectus or that we have
referred you to. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
different information. This prospectus does not constitute an offer
to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the
common stock and warrants offered by this prospectus. This prospectus
does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any
common stock or warrants in any circumstances in which such offer or
solicitation is unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor
any sale made in connection with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances,
create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the
date of this prospectus or that the information incorporated by reference to
this prospectus is correct as of any time after its date.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This
summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does
not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our
common stock and warrants. You should read this entire prospectus
carefully, especially the risks of investing in our common stock and warrants
discussed under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9, and the consolidated
financial statements and notes to those consolidated financial statements,
before making an investment decision. CryoPort, Inc. is referred to throughout
this prospectus as “CryoPort,” “we” or “us.”
Unless
otherwise indicated, all common stock and prices in this
prospectus assume the consummation of a reverse stock split, at an
anticipated ratio of 12-to-1 to be effected prior to the effective date of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, with the exact timing
of the reverse stock split and the ratio to be determined by our Board of
Directors.
Overview
We are a
provider of an innovative cold chain frozen shipping system dedicated to
providing superior, affordable cryogenic shipping solutions that ensure the
safety, status and temperature of high value, temperature sensitive
materials. We have developed a line of cost effective reusable
cryogenic transport containers (referred to as a "shipper") capable of
transporting biological, environmental and other temperature sensitive materials
at temperatures below 0° Celsius. These dry vapor shippers are one of
the first significant alternatives to dry ice shipping and achieve 10-plus day
holding times compared to one to two day holding times with dry ice (assuming no
re-icing during transit).
Our value
proposition comes from both providing safe transportation and
an environmentally friendly, long lasting shipper, and through our value
added services that offer a simple hassle-free solution for our
customers. These value-added services include an internet-based web
portal that enables the customer to initiate shipping service, track the
progress and status of a shipment, and provides in-transit temperature
monitoring of the shipper. CryoPort also provides a fully ready
charged shipper containing all freight bills, customs documents, and regulatory
paperwork for the entire journey of the shipper to our customers at their
pick up location.
Our
principal focus has been the further development and commercial launch of
CryoPort Express® Portal, an innovative IT solution for shipping and tracking
high-value specimens through overnight shipping companies, and our CryoPort
Express® Shipper, a line of dry vapor
cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological and pharmaceutical
materials. A dry vapor cryogenic shipper is a container that uses
liquid nitrogen in dry vapor form, which is suspended inside a vacuum insulated
bottle as a refrigerant, to provide storage temperatures below minus 150°
Celsius. The dry vapor shipper is designed using innovative,
proprietary, and patented technology which prevents spillage of liquid nitrogen
and pressure build up as the liquid nitrogen evaporates. A
proprietary foam retention system is employed to ensure that liquid nitrogen
stays inside the vacuum container, even when placed upside-down or on its side,
as is often the case when in the custody of a shipping
company. Biological specimens are stored in a specimen chamber,
referred to as a “well,” inside the container. Refrigeration is
provided by harmless
cold nitrogen gas evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam
retention system surrounding the well. Biological specimens
transported using our cryogenic shipper can include clinical samples,
diagnostics, live cell pharmaceutical products (such as cancer vaccines, semen
and embryos, infectious substances) and other items that require and/or are
protected through continuous exposure to frozen or cryogenic temperatures (below
minus 150° Celsius).
We recently entered into our first strategic relationship
with a global courier on January 13, 2010 when we signed an agreement with
Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) pursuant to which we will lease to FedEx
such number of our cryogenic shippers that FedEx shall, from time to time, order
for its customers. Under this agreement, FedEx has the right to and shall,
on a non-exclusive basis, promote, market and sell transportation of our
shippers and our related value-added goods and services, such as our data
logger, web portal and planned CryoPort Express® Smart Pak
System.
Market
Opportunity
As a
result of growing globalization, including with respect to such areas as life
science clinical trials and distribution of pharmaceutical products, the
requirement for effective solutions for keeping certain clinical samples and
pharmaceutical products at frozen temperatures takes on added significance due
to extended shipping times, customs delays and logistics
challenges. Today, such goods are traditionally shipped in cardboard
insulated containers packed with dry ice, gel/freezer packs or a combination
thereof. The current dry ice solutions have limitations that severely
limit their effective and efficient use for both short and long-distances (e.g.,
international). Conventional dry ice shipments often require labor
intensive “re-icing” operations resulting in higher labor and shipping
costs.
-2-
We
believe that our patented cryogenic shippers make us well positioned to take
advantage of the growing demand for effective and efficient international
transport of temperature sensitive materials resulting from continued
globalization. Of particular significance is the trend within the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries toward
globalization. We believe this presents a new and unique opportunity
for pharmaceutical companies, particularly early or developmental stage
companies, to conduct some of their clinical trials in foreign countries where
the cost may be cheaper and/or because the foreign countries significantly
larger population provides a larger pool of potential patients suffering from
the indication that the drug candidate is being developed to
treat. We also plan to provide domestic shipping solutions in
situations and regions where there is a high priority placed on maintaining the
integrity of materials shipped at cryogenic temperatures and where we can be
cost effective.
Competitive
Strengths
We
believe that our cryogenic shipping systems provide us with the following
competitive strengths:
Maintaining the
Integrity of Materials Shipped. We have developed our CryoPort
Express® Shippers, a line of cryogenic dry vapor shippers, to be capable of
maintaining cryogenic temperatures of minus 150° Celsius or less for 10-plus
days. Our CryoPort Express® Shippers were developed with a view
towards meeting the needs of the global biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries which require the ability to transport live cell pharmaceutical
products, such as cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials, reproductive tissues,
infectious and other biological substances, and other items at constant frozen
or cryogenic temperatures. Traditional methods that have been serving
this market, such as dry ice, are only capable of maintaining such temperatures
for a period of one to two days (depending on the size of the package and amount
of dry ice used), thereby potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the
transported materials during longer shipments. We believe our
CryoPort Express® Shippers are the first significant alternative to using dry
ice that achieves 10-plus day holding times.
Durability of
Shipping Devices. Because the outer shell of our CryoPort
Express® Shippers are made from durable materials, as compared to corrugated
cardboard boxes with Styrofoam inserts or similar materials, the risk of damage
to the container and its contents is significantly reduced. Where
corrugated cardboard boxes are susceptible to being crushed or damaged during
shipment, our shippers, which have been tested and are capable of withstanding
drops of up to 30 feet, significantly reduce the risk of damage to the packaged
materials. The durability and long holding times of our shippers has
greater significance for international (or other long distance) shipments due to
the increased shipping times and amplified risk of damage during transit and
mishandling during shipment.
Cost. We
believe we have developed a solution for the shipment of temperature sensitive
materials which is not only more effective, but also more cost efficient,
especially in international shipping. Shipping temperature sensitive
materials using the traditional method of dry ice requires multiple steps,
manual intervention/monitoring, and the coordination of re-icing tasks at
several locations to provide a solution lasting for more than several
days. The cost of developing and maintaining the infrastructure
necessary to support these operations frequently depend on off-shore third party
contractors which adds significant cost. Because our cryogenic
shippers are capable of hold times of 10-plus days, customers will not require
the same extensive infrastructure needed for dry ice
shipments. Furthermore, because our shippers do not rely on dry ice
(which is a hazardous material that produces CO2 gas as it sublimates), there
are more freight courier alternatives available for our
shippers and generally lower freight charges.
Tracking and
Monitoring. We have developed a sophisticated web portal with
user friendly features that will be used for capturing customer orders and
tracking shipments. Our portal enables CryoPort employees to manage
multi-route shipments with minimal amount of human resources by using programmed
analogs and exception monitoring. In addition, our customers are able
to place orders, track shipments, and monitor the status of their packages
through our web portal. CryoPort is also able to internally manage
its shipper inventory, track incoming and outgoing assets, report on shipping
performance metrics, and invoice for shipping services through the technology
employed through its web portal.
The Green
Alternative. Unlike shippers using dry ice, the internal core
of our cryogenic shippers absorbs liquid nitrogen in a gaseous state to
maintain the required cryogenic temperatures. Dry ice is a hazardous
material because it produces excess CO2 gas as it sublimates which is a noted
greenhouse gas and which may be dangerous in confined spaces where there is an
absence or low rates of ventilation. Use of our shippers does not
result in the emission of greenhouse gases or other potentially toxic
materials. In addition, shippers using dry ice are made of corrugated
cardboard with Styrofoam inserts. These shippers are typically not
reusable, resulting in the disposal of the cardboard box. Further,
Styrofoam should not be disposed of in landfills because it is not
biodegradable. Our shippers do not contain Styrofoam, nor do they
present similar landfill disposal issues or other environmental
challenges.
Technology. Once our CryoPort
Express® System
is fully operational, it will represent the most complete and comprehensive
shipping solution available in the market for high-value temperature sensitive
materials. It will reduce operating costs for CryoPort and its
customers and it will provide customized analytics to monitor shipping
efficiency and the health and status of the materials entrusted to our
care.
-3-
Key
Business Strategies
Relationship with
Global Couriers. We believe that our near term success is best
achieved by establishing strategic relationships with global couriers which will
enable us to provide a seamless, end-to-end shipping solution to our
customers. In addition, we will be able to leverage the couriers’
established express, ground and freight infrastructures and penetrate new
markets with minimal investment. To this end, we recently entered
into our first strategic relationship with a global courier on January 13, 2010
when we signed an agreement with Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) pursuant
to which we will lease to FedEx such number of our cryogenic shippers that FedEx
shall, from time to time, order for its customers. Under this
agreement, FedEx has the right to and shall, on a non-exclusive basis, promote,
market and sell transportation of our shippers and our related value-added goods
and services, such as our data logger, web portal and planned CryoPort Express
Smart Pak System , In addition to FedEx, our management team is
commencing discussions with other global couriers in an effort to establish
partnerships pursuant to which the couriers would provide preferred shipping
rates, access to logistics, tracking, and customs clearance capabilities.
As in the case of our agreement with FedEx, we expect that other global freight
couriers will utilize their sales forces to promote and sell transportation of
shippers and our frozen shipping services. We can not assure you that
we will be able to consummate an agreement with any other global
couriers.
Target Large
Clinical Research Organizations and Life Science
Companies. Along with our efforts to establish strategic
relationships with global couriers, we intend to increase our marketing efforts
to the large clinical research organizations (“CRO”) and pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies engaged in the management and/or conduct of both
domestic and international clinical trials. Management has been in
active dialogue with selected large CROs, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies to introduce this new frozen shipping solution and to discuss these
potential customers’ shipping needs. Several of these meetings have been
joint presentations including representatives from a global
courier. We can not assure you that we will be able to consummate an
agreement with one or more large CROs, or pharmaceutical or biotechnology
companies.
Position CryoPort
Express® Portal as a New
Customer Tool for Cost Optimization and Risk Mitigation. In 2008, we
began development of an internal IT system, CryoPort Express® Portal, which
today is used by customers to automate the entry of orders, prepare customs
documentation, and facilitate status and location monitoring of shipped orders
while in transit. The CryoPort Express® Portal is fully
integrated with IT systems at FedEx and runs in a browser requiring no software
installation. It is used by CryoPort to manage shipping operations
typically provisioned by manual labor thereby reducing administrative costs
relating to order-entry, order processing, preparation of shipping documents,
back-office accounting, and to support the high level of customer service
expected by the industry. In addition to reducing operating
costs and facilitating scaling of CryoPort’s operations, more importantly we
believe the CryoPort Express® Portal offers significant value to the
customer in terms of cost avoidance and risk mitigation. Examples
include automation of order entry, development of Key Performance Indicators
(“KPI”) to support our efforts for continuous process improvements in our
business, and programmatic exception monitoring to detect and sometimes
anticipate delays in the shipping process, often before the customer or the
shipping company becomes aware of the delays. In the future we intend
to add rate and mode optimization and in-transit monitoring of temperature,
location and state-of-health monitoring (discussed below) via wireless
communications.
Complete
Development of Our Smart Pak Monitoring Device. In July 2008,
we launched Phase I of our CryoPort Express® Portal which enabled our customers
to enter orders and track their packages during transit. We recently
completed successful testing of Phase II of our Smart Pak Monitoring Device
which is an automated data logger capable of tracking the internal and external
temperatures of samples shipped in our CryoPort Express® Shipper. We
anticipate commercial launch of this new feature in 2010. Phase III
of our Smart Pak Monitoring Device development plan, which we expect to launch
by the end of fiscal year 2010, consists of adding a wireless communications
capability to each shipper to enable monitoring of a shipper’s location,
specimen temperature, and overall state of health of the contents during
transit, which will be fully integrated into the CryoPort Express®
Portal. We anticipate that, due to the high value and importance
placed on the contents of the shipper by the customer, location and
state-of-health monitoring of the contents will become a new standard in
the industry pioneered by CryoPort.
Expand to New
Markets. To date our marketing efforts have focused
on global CROs, and on select companies in the biotechnology and
pharmaceutical industries. Once we have expanded our market presence
in these industries and established the strategic relationships referenced
above, we intend to explore opportunities in other markets where there is a
need to ship temperature sensitive materials such as the food, environmental,
semiconductor and petroleum industries.
Re-Purpose
Product Capability. Presently,
CryoPort products address the needs of biotechnology and pharmaceutical
customers who require sustainable frozen shipping temperatures generally
between the range of minus 80° to minus 150° Celsius. While the
frozen market represents a large opportunity for CryoPort, an adjacent market
exists for the shipment of materials at chilled temperatures. Based
on a report prepared by DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. in April 2001, the market
for pharmaceutical shipments at chilled temperatures is more than double the
market for cryogenic and frozen shipments. CryoPort’s technology may
be applicable to these markets as well since the design concepts of CryoPort
products can be applied to stabilize materials at any desired
temperature. CryoPort is exploring these expansions of its current
business model.
-4-
Corporate
History and Structure
We are a
Nevada corporation originally incorporated under the name G.T.5-Limited (“GT5”)
on May 25, 1990. In connection with a Share Exchange Agreement, on
March 15, 2005 we changed our name to CryoPort, Inc. and acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CryoPort Systems, Inc., a
California corporation, in exchange for 2,009,009 shares (after giving effect to
the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of our common stock (which
represented approximately 81% of the total issued and outstanding shares of
common stock following the close of the transaction). CryoPort
Systems, Inc, which was originally formed in 1999 as a California limited
liability company, and subsequently reorganized into a California corporation on
December 11, 2000, remains the operating company under CryoPort,
Inc.
Our
Corporate Information
Our
principal executive offices are located at 20382 Barents Sea Circle, Lake
Forest, California 92630. The telephone number of our principal
executive offices is (949) 470-2300, and our main corporate website is
www.cryoport.com. The information on, or that can be accessed
through, our website is not part of this prospectus.
We own,
have rights to, or have applied for the service marks and trade names that we
use in conjunction with our business, including CryoPort (both alone and with a
design logo) and CryoPort Express (both alone and with a design
logo). All other trademarks and trade names appearing in this
prospectus are the property of their respective holders.
Recent
Developments
On January 13, 2010 we entered into an
agreement with FedEx to lease our cryogenic shippers based on orders placed by
FedEx for its customers. Pursuant to the agreement, FedEx has agreed to
pay us (i) a fixed per lease transaction (generally measured as up to a maximum
period of 14 days) fee per shipper leased, the amount of which will depend upon
whether the shipper is being transported within a specific designated region or
from one designated region to another designated region, and (ii) additional
fees for any other goods or services ordered in connection with such lease
transaction. All lease
transactions shall be processed through our CryoPort Express
Portal.
Under the agreement, we are further
obligated to establish and have operational shipper recycling centers in Asia,
Europe and South America by October 31, 2010 and a second center in
Asia by June 30, 2011.
Additionally, we shall be responsible
for supplying and recharging all shippers ordered by FedEx and for all recycling
related to the shippers, and FedEx shall be responsible for all pickup, delivery
and shipping.
Unless sooner terminated as provided in
the agreement, the term of the agreement expires on December 31,
2012.
On
January 12, 2010, we entered into an Amendment to Debentures and Warrants,
Agreement and Waiver with the holders of our Debentures
(as defined below) (the “2010 Amendment”). Pursuant to the 2010
Amendment, the debenture holders agreed to defer until March 1, 2010 our
obligation to make the January 1, 2010 and February 1, 2010 debenture
amortization payments (each in the aggregate amount of $200,000). In
addition, subject to our consummating this offering for gross proceeds of not
less than $10,000,000 at a per unit price of not less than $4.80 per unit (after
giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) and obtaining
the listing of our common stock and warrants offered hereby on the NASDAQ
Capital Market by no later than March 1, 2010, the debenture holders have
consented and agreed, among other items, to the following:
● our
effecting a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio not
to exceed 15-to-1 (the maximum ratio previously approved by our
stockholders at our 2009 Annual Stockholders Meeting);
● each
will convert $1,357,215 in principal amount of the outstanding principal balance
of such holder's debenture in exchange for a number of shares of our common
stock which, when added to the shares of common stock then owned by such
holder, will represent 9.9% of the outstanding shares of our common stock
after giving effect the consummation of this offering;
● our
payment in full, from the net proceeds of this offering and within five days
following the consummation thereof, of the remaining outstanding principal
balance of the holders’ debentures following the foregoing conversion (estimated
to be $3,266,995 in the aggregate);
● release
their security interest in our and our subsidiary's assets, including all
intellectual property; and
● the
termination of certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the warrants
held by the debenture holders and their right to maintain a fully-diluted
ownership of our common stock equal to 34.5%.
Subject
to the occurrence of the foregoing, we have agreed to reduce the exercise price
of the warrants held by the debenture holders from $5.40 per share to $4.80
per share (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock
split).
-5-
Summary
Financial Information
In the
table below we provide you with historical consolidated financial data for the
six month periods ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, derived from our audited and unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for any future period. When you read
this historical selected financial data, it is important that you read along
with it the appropriate historical consolidated financial statements and related
notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Six
Months Ended
September
30,
(unaudited)
|
Years
Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
(‘000)
|
2008
(‘000)
|
2009
(‘000)
|
2008
(‘000)
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
22
|
$
|
19
|
$
|
35
|
$
|
84
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
326
|
253
|
546
|
386
|
||||||||||||
Gross
loss
|
(304
|
)
|
(234
|
)
|
(511
|
)
|
(302
|
)
|
||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
1,507
|
1,340
|
2,387
|
2,551
|
||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
181
|
216
|
297
|
166
|
||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,688
|
1,556
|
2,684
|
2,717
|
||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(1,992
|
)
|
(1,790
|
)
|
(3,195
|
)
|
(3,019
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
4
|
24
|
32
|
50
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,143
|
)
|
(1,214
|
)
|
(2,693
|
)
|
(1,593
|
)
|
||||||||
Loss
on sale of fixed assets
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
(1,402)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
(6,811
|
)
|
(10,847
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
other expense, net
|
(5,542)
|
(8,001
|
)
|
(13,508
|
)
|
(1,543
|
)
|
|||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(7,534)
|
(9,791
|
)
|
(16,703
|
)
|
(4,562
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
taxes
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(7,536)
|
$
|
(9,792
|
)
|
$
|
(16,705
|
)
|
$
|
(4,564
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
per share, basic and diluted (after
giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock
split)
|
$
|
(2.02)
|
$
|
(2.85
|
)
|
$
|
(4.86
|
)
|
$
|
(1.38
|
)
|
September
30,
2009
(unaudited)
|
September
30,
2008
(unaudited)
|
March
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Assets
|
$
|
2,438
|
$
|
2,438
|
$
|
1,573
|
$
|
3,461
|
||||||||
Liabilities
|
25,816
|
5,059
|
6,348
|
3,461
|
||||||||||||
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
(23,378
|
)
|
(2,621
|
)
|
(4,775
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
2,438
|
2,438
|
1,573
|
3,461
|
-6-
The
Offering
Securities
offered
|
3,125,000
units, each unit consisting of one share of common stock and warrant to
purchase one share of common stock.
|
|
Common
stock to be outstanding immediately prior to offering
|
4,167,943
shares of common stock (1)
|
|
Common
stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering
|
7,292,943 shares
of common stock (1)(3)(4)
|
|
Warrants
to be outstanding immediately prior to offering
|
0(2)
|
|
Warrants
to be outstanding immediately after this offering
|
3,125,000 warrants (2)(5)
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
We
expect the net proceeds to us from this offering will be approximately
$13.3 million after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated
offering expenses (assuming the representative of the underwriters does
not exercise its option to cover over-allotments). We intend to
use those net proceeds primarily to repay a portion of our outstanding
debt, build up inventory, for capital expenditures, including establishing
selected global staging and refurbishing sites, and for working capital
and general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds” for more
information.
|
|
Over-allotment
option
|
We
have granted the underwriters an option for a period of 45 days to
purchase, on the same terms and conditions set forth above, up to an
additional 468,750 units, consisting of 468,750 shares of our common stock
and warrants to purchase 468,750 shares of our common stock, to cover
over-allotments.
|
|
Description
of Warrants
|
Each
purchaser will receive a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock
for each share of common stock it purchases in this
offering. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of
$5.28 per share of common stock. The warrants are exercisable
starting on __________, and expire on ________, 2015. The
warrants may be redeemed by us upon 10 days prior notice at any time after
the closing bid price of our common stock is at least $7.92 (representing
165% of the unit offering price) for a period of 20 consecutive trading
days for $0.01 per warrant. See “Description of the Warrants”
below for more information.
|
|
OTC
Bulletin Board symbol for our Common Stock
|
CYRX
|
|
Proposed
NASDAQ Capital Market symbols for our Common Stock and
Warrants
|
CYPT
and CYPTW
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
The
purchase of our common stock and warrants involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully review and consider “Risk Factors”
beginning on page 9.
|
(1) The
number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately prior to and
after this offering as reflected in the table above is based on the actual
number of shares of common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2009, which was
4,167,943 (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split),
and does not include (in each case adjusted for the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse
stock split), as of that date:
-7-
●
|
1,800,502 shares
of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of outstanding
convertible debentures after giving effect to the 2010 Amendment,
which will be effective upon the consummation of this offering, pursuant
to which we will repay approximately fifty-five percent (55%) of the
outstanding principal balance of such debentures with proceeds from this
offering with the holders converting the remaining outstanding principal
balance into the foregoing number of shares of common
stock;
|
|
●
|
225,736 shares
of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of outstanding
convertible promissory notes with a conversion price of $6.12 per
share;
|
|
●
|
3,042,406
shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $5.52 per
share, after giving effect to the 2010 Amendment pursuant to which the
exercise price of the warrants held by the holders of our convertible
debentures will be reduced from $5.40 per share to $4.80 per
share (assuming the consummation of the anticipated reverse stock
split, at a ratio of 12-to-1);
|
|
●
|
74,292
shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $7.05
per share; and
|
●
|
254,483 shares
of common stock available for future grant under our 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan and an additional 942,500 shares of common stock available for future
grant under our 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
(2) Does
not include outstanding warrants to purchase up to 3,042,406 shares of our
common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $5.52 per share, after
giving effect to the 2010 Amendment pursuant to which the exercise price of
the warrants held by the holders of our convertible debentures will be
reduced from $5.40 per share to $4.80 per share (assuming the consummation
of the anticipated reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1).
(3) Does
not include 3,125,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the
warrants to be issued in connection with this offering.
(4) Does
not include 937,500 shares of common stock (including the shares of common
stock underlying the warrants included as part of the units) that comprise the
units that may be purchased by the underwriters' representative upon the
exercise of its 45-day option to cover over-allotments, if any, and 156,250
shares of common stock that may be issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC upon
exercise of the warrant we will sell to them (representing 5% of the shares
of common stock sold by us in this offering, excluding the over-allotment
option).
(5) Does
not include warrants to purchase 468,750 shares of common stock that may be
purchased by the underwriters' representative upon the exercise of its
45-day option to cover over-allotments, if any, and the warrant that we
will sell to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC for $100 to purchase 156,250 shares of
common stock (representing 5% of the shares of common stock sold by us
in this offering, excluding the over-allotment option) that may be issued to
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC upon exercise of such warrant.
Except as
otherwise indicated, all information in the prospectus supplement assumes no
exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
-8-
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our shares of common
stock and warrants involves a high degree of risk. Before making an
investment decision, you should carefully consider all of the risks described in
this prospectus. If any of the risks discussed in this prospectus
actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen,
the price of our shares of common stock could decline significantly and you may
lose all or a part of your investment. Our forward-looking statements in
this prospectus are subject to the following risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated by our forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors
below. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”
Risks Related to Our
Business
We
have incurred significant losses to date and may continue to incur
losses.
We have
incurred net losses in each fiscal year since we commenced
operations. The following table represents net losses incurred in
each of our last three fiscal years:
Net
Loss
|
||||
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
$
|
16,705,151
|
||
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
$
|
4,564,054
|
||
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2007
|
$
|
2,326,259
|
As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had accumulated deficits of
$47,828,293 (unaudited) and $30,634,355, respectively. While we
expect to continue to derive revenues from our current products and services, in
order to achieve and sustain profitable operations, we must successfully
commercialize our CryoPort Express® System, significantly expand our market
presence and increase revenues. We may continue to incur losses in
the future and may never generate revenues sufficient to become profitable or to
sustain profitability. Continuing losses may impair our ability to
raise the additional capital required to continue and expand our
operations.
Our
auditors have expressed doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.
The
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to our March 31, 2009
consolidated financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph stating that
the recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception
and our working deficit and cash and cash equivalent balance at March 31,
2009 raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty. If we are unable to establish to the satisfaction of our
independent registered public accounting firm that the net proceeds from this
offering will be sufficient, based on our projected cashflows, to allow for the
removal of this “going concern” qualification, we will not be able to obtain
approval of our NASDAQ listing application.
If
we are unable to obtain additional funding, we may have to reduce or discontinue
our business operations.
As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$1,120,758 (unaudited) and $249,758, respectively. Additionally, at
each of the foregoing dates our current liabilities significantly exceeded our
current assets. We have expended substantial funds on the research
and development of our products and IT systems. As a result, we have
historically experienced negative cash flows from operations and we expect to
continue to experience negative cash flows from operations in the
future. Therefore, our ability to continue and expand our operations
is highly dependent on the amount of cash and cash equivalents on hand combined
with our ability to raise additional capital to fund our future
operations.
-9-
We
anticipate based on currently proposed plans and assumptions relating to our
ability to market and sell our products (but not including any strategic
relationship with a global courier), that our cash on hand and the proceeds from
this offering, together with projected cash flows, will satisfy our operational
and capital requirements for the next 18 to 30 months. There are a
number of uncertainties associated with our financial projections that could
reduce or delay our future projected revenues and cash-inflows, including, but
not limited to, our ability to complete the commercialization of our CryoPort
Express® System, increase our customer base and revenues and enter into a
strategic relationship with a global courier. If our projected
revenues and cash-inflows are reduced or delayed, we may not have sufficient
capital to operate through the next 18 to 30 months unless we raise more
capital. Additionally, if we are unable to realize satisfactory
revenue in the near future, we will be required to seek additional financing to
continue our operations beyond that period. We will also require
additional financing to expand into other markets and further develop and market
our products. Except for the units to be offered in this offering, we
have no current arrangements with respect to any additional
financing. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any
additional financing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, will be
available when needed. The inability to obtain additional capital may
reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. Any
additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then
existing stockholders. In addition, raising additional funding may be
complicated by certain provisions in the securities purchase agreements and
related transaction documents, as amended, entered into in connection with our
prior convertible debenture financings. The uncertainties surrounding
our future cash inflows have raised substantial doubt regarding our ability to
continue as a going concern.
If
we are not successful in establishing strategic relationships with one or more
global couriers, we may not be able to successfully increase revenues and
cashflow which could adversely affect our operations.
We
believe that our near term success is best achieved by establishing strategic
relationships with one or more global couriers. Such a relationship
will enable us to provide a seamless, end-to-end shipping solution to customers
and allow us to leverage the courier’s established express, ground and freight
infrastructures and penetrate new markets with minimal
investment. Further, we expect that the global freight courier will
utilize its sales force to promote and sell our frozen shipping
services. If we are not successful in establishing such a
relationship with a global courier, sales and marketing efforts will be
significantly impacted and anticipated revenue growth will be substantially
delayed which could have an adverse affect on our operations.
Our
agreement with FedEx may not result in a significant increase in our revenues or
cashflow.
On
January 13, 2010, we entered into an agreement with FedEx pursuant to which we
will lease to FedEx such number of our cryogenic shippers that FedEx shall, from
time to time, order for its customers. FedEx has the right to and
shall, on a non-exclusive basis, promote, market and sell transportation of our
shippers and our related value-added goods and services, such as our data
logger, web portal and planned CryoPort Express Smart Pak
System. Because our agreement with FedEx does not contain any
requirement that FedEx lease a minimum number of shippers from us during the
term of the agreement, we may not experience a significant increase in our
revenues or cashflows as a result of this agreement.
Current
economic conditions and capital markets are in a period of disruption and
instability which could adversely affect our ability to access the capital
markets, and thus adversely affect our business and liquidity.
The
current economic conditions and financial crisis have had, and will continue to
have, a negative impact on our ability to access the capital markets, and thus
have a negative impact on our business and liquidity. The shortage of
liquidity and credit combined with substantial losses in worldwide equity
markets could lead to an extended worldwide recession. We may face
significant challenges if conditions in the capital markets do not
improve. Our ability to access the capital markets has been and
continues to be severely restricted at a time when we need to access such
markets, which could have a negative impact on our business plans, including the
commercialization of our CryoPort Express® System and other research and
development activities. Even if we are able to raise capital, it may
not be at a price or on terms that are favorable to us. We cannot
predict the occurrence of future financial disruptions or how long the current
market conditions may continue.
The
sale of substantial shares of our common stock may depress our stock
price.
As of
November 30, 2009, there were 4,167,943 shares (assuming the consummation
of the anticipated reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of our common
stock outstanding. Substantially all of these shares of common stock
are eligible for trading in the public market. The market price of
our common stock may decline if our stockholders sell a large number of shares
of our common stock in the public market, or the market perceives that such
sales may occur.
We could
also issue up to 6,339,919 additional shares (assuming the consummation of the
anticipated reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1 and the issuance of
1,800,502 shares pursuant to the 2010 Amendment) of our common stock that are
issuable upon the conversion of outstanding convertible debentures and
promissory notes and the exercise of outstanding warrants and options or
reserved for future issuance under our stock incentive plans (including our 2009
Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on October 9, 2009), as further described in the
following table:
Number
of Shares of Common
Stock
Issuable or Reserved For
Issuance
(assuming the consummation of the anticipated reverse stock split, at a
ratio of 12-to-1)
|
|||
Common
stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding debentures and convertible
promissory notes (after giving effect to the 2010
Amendment)
|
2,026,238
|
||
Common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants
|
3,042,406
|
||
Common
stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options
or reserved for future incentive awards under our stock incentive
plans
|
1,271,275
|
||
Total
|
6,339,919
|
-10-
Of the
total options and warrants outstanding as of November 30, 2009, options and
warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 2,650,794 shares of common stock (after
giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) would be
considered dilutive to the value of our stockholders’ interest in CryoPort
because we would receive an amount per share that is less than the market price
of our common stock on November 30, 2009.
We
will have difficulty increasing our sales if we experience delays, difficulties
or unanticipated costs in establishing the sales, distribution and marketing
capabilities necessary to successfully commercialize our products.
We are
continuing to develop sales, distribution and marketing capabilities in the
Americas, Europe and Asia. It will be expensive and time-consuming
for us to develop a global marketing and sales network. Moreover, we
may choose, or find it necessary, to enter into additional strategic
collaborations to sell, market and distribute our products. We may
not be able to provide adequate incentive to our sales force or to establish and
maintain favorable distribution and marketing collaborations with other
companies to promote our products. In addition, any third party with
whom we have established a marketing and distribution relationship may not
devote sufficient time to the marketing and sales of our products thereby
exposing us to potential expenses in exiting such distribution
agreements. We, and any of our third party collaborators, must also
market our products in compliance with federal, state, local and international
laws relating to the provision of incentives and
inducements. Violation of these laws can result in substantial
penalties. Therefore, if we are unable to successfully motivate and
expand our marketing and sales force and further develop our sales and marketing
capabilities, or if our distributors fail to promote our products, we will have
difficulty increasing our sales.
Our
ability to grow and compete in our industry will be hampered if we are unable to
retain the continued service of our key professionals or to identify, hire and
retain additional qualified professionals.
A
critical factor to our business is our ability to attract and retain qualified
professionals including key employees and consultants. We are
continually at risk of losing current professionals or being unable to hire
additional professionals as needed. If we are unable to attract new
qualified employees, our ability to grow will be adversely
affected. If we are unable to retain current employees or strategic
consultants, our financial condition and ability to maintain operations may be
adversely affected.
We
are dependent on new products and services, the lack of which would harm our
competitive position.
Our
future revenue stream depends to a large degree on our ability to bring new
products and services to market on a timely basis. We must continue
to make significant investments in research and development in order to continue
to develop new products and services, enhance existing products and services,
and achieve market acceptance of such products and services. We may
incur problems in the future in innovating and introducing new products and
services. Our development stage products and services may not be
successfully completed or, if developed, may not achieve significant customer
acceptance. If we are unable to successfully define, develop and
introduce new, competitive products and services and enhance existing products
and services, our future results of operations would be adversely
affected. Development and manufacturing schedules for technology
products and services are difficult to predict, and we might not achieve timely
initial customer shipments of new products and services. The timely
availability of these products and services and their acceptance by customers
are important to our future success. A delay in new product or
enhanced product introductions could have a significant impact on our results of
operations.
Because
of these risks, our research and development efforts may not result in any
commercially viable products. If significant portions of these
development efforts are not successfully completed, or any new or enhanced
products are not commercially successful, our business, financial condition and
results of operations may be materially harmed.
If
we successfully develop products, but those products do not achieve and maintain
market acceptance, our business will not be profitable.
The
degree of acceptance of our CryoPort Express® Shipper, or any future product or
services, by our current target markets, and any other markets to which we
attempt to sell our products and services, and our profitability and growth will
depend on a number of factors including, among others:
●
|
our
shipper’s ability to
perform and preserve the integrity of the materials
shipped;
|
|
●
|
relative
convenience and ease of use of our shipper and/or web
portal;
|
|
●
|
availability
of alternative products;
|
|
●
|
pricing
and cost effectiveness; and
|
|
●
|
effectiveness
of our or our collaborators’ sales and marketing
strategy.
|
-11-
If any
products we may develop do not achieve market acceptance, then we may not
generate sufficient revenue to achieve or maintain profitability.
In
addition, even if our products achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to
maintain that market acceptance over time if new products or technologies are
introduced that are more favorably received than our products, are more cost
effective, or render our products obsolete.
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain patent protection for our
products, preserve our trade secrets, and operate without infringing the
proprietary rights of others.
Our
policy is to seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods,
filing United States patent applications related to our technology, inventions
and improvements that are important to the development of our
business. We have three issued U.S. patents and one recently
filed provisional patent application, all relating to various aspects of our
products and services. Our patents or provisional patent application
may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented in the future or the rights
granted may not provide a competitive advantage. We intend to
vigorously protect and defend our intellectual property. Costly and
time-consuming litigation brought by us may be necessary to enforce our patents
and to protect our trade secrets and know-how, or to determine the
enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of
others.
We also
rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological
innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. In the
past our employees, consultants, advisors and suppliers have not always executed
confidentiality agreements and invention assignment and work for hire agreements
in connection with their employment, consulting, or advisory
relationships. Consequently, we may not have adequate remedies
available to us to protect our intellectual property should one of these parties
attempt to use our trade secrets or refuse to assign any rights he or she may
have in any intellectual property he or she developed for
us. Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise
gain access to our proprietary technology, or we may not be able to meaningfully
protect our rights in unpatented proprietary technology.
We cannot
assure you that our current and potential competitors and other third parties
have not filed (or in the future will not file) patent applications for (or have
not received or in the future will not receive) patents or obtain additional
proprietary rights that will prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to
make, use or sell our products either in the United States or
internationally. In the event we are required to license patents
issued to third parties, such licenses may not be available or, if available,
may not be available on terms acceptable to us. In addition, we
cannot assure you that we would be successful in any attempt to redesign our
products or processes to avoid infringement or that any such redesign could be
accomplished in a cost-effective manner. Accordingly, an adverse
determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain
necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products
or offering our services, which would harm our business.
We are
not aware of any third party that is infringing any of our patents or trademarks
nor do we believe that we are infringing on the patents or trademarks of any
other person or organization.
Our
products may contain errors or defects, which could result in damage to our
reputation, lost revenues, diverted development resources and increased service
costs and litigation.
Our
products must meet stringent requirements and we must
develop our products quickly to keep pace with the rapidly changing
market. Products and services as sophisticated as ours could contain
undetected errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new
models or versions are released. In general, our products may not be
free from errors or defects after commercial shipments have begun, which could
result in damage to our reputation, lost revenues, diverted development
resources, increased customer service and support costs, and
litigation. The costs incurred in correcting any product errors or
defects may be substantial and could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
-12-
If
we experience manufacturing delays or interruptions in production, then we may
experience customer dissatisfaction and our reputation could
suffer.
If we
fail to produce enough shippers at our own manufacturing facility or at a third
party manufacturing facility, or if we fail to complete our shipper recycling
processes as planned, we may be unable to deliver shippers to our customers on a
timely basis, which could lead to customer dissatisfaction and could harm our
reputation and ability to compete. We currently acquire various
component parts for our shippers from various independent manufacturers in the
United States. We would likely experience significant delays or
cessation in producing our shippers if a labor strike, natural disaster or other
supply disruption were to occur at any of our main suppliers. If we
are unable to procure a component from one of our manufacturers, we may be
required to enter into arrangements with one or more alternative manufacturing
companies which may cause delays in producing our shippers. In
addition, because we depend on third party manufacturers, our profit margins may
be lower, which will make it more difficult for us to achieve
profitability. To date, we have not experienced any material delay
that has adversely impacted our operations. As our business develops
and the quantity of production increases, it becomes more likely that such
problems could arise.
Because
we rely on a limited number of suppliers, we may experience difficulty in
meeting our customers’ demands for our products in a timely manner or within
budget.
We
currently purchase key components of our products from a variety of outside
sources. Some of these components may only be available to us through
a few sources, however, management has identified alternative materials and
suppliers should the need arise. We generally do not have long-term
agreements with any of our suppliers.
Consequently,
in the event that our suppliers delay or interrupt the supply of components for
any reason, we could potentially experience higher product costs and longer lead
times in order fulfillment. Suppliers that we materially rely upon
include Spaulding Composites Company and Lydall Thermal Acoustical
Sales.
Our
CryoPort Express® Portal may be subject to intentional disruption that could
adversely impact our reputation and future sales.
We have
implemented our CryoPort Express® Portal which is used by our customers and
business partners to automate the entry of orders, prepare customs documentation
and facilitate status and location monitoring of shipped orders while in
transit. Although we believe we have sufficient controls in place to
prevent intentional disruptions, we could be a target of attacks specifically
designed to impede the performance of the CryoPort Express®
Portal. Similarly, experienced computer programmers may attempt to
penetrate our CryoPort Express® Portal in an effort to search for and
misappropriate proprietary or confidential information or cause interruptions of
our services. Because the techniques used by such computer
programmers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be
recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these
techniques. Our activities could be adversely affected and our
reputation, brand and future sales harmed if these intentionally disruptive
efforts are successful.
Our
services may expose us to liability in excess of our current insurance
coverage.
Our
products involve significant risks of liability, which may substantially exceed
the revenues we derive from our services. We cannot predict the
magnitude of these potential liabilities.
We
currently maintain general liability insurance, with coverage in the amount of
$1 million per occurrence, subject to a $2 million annual limitation, and
product liability insurance with a $1 million annual coverage
limitation. Claims may be made against us that exceed these
limits.
Our
liability policy is an “occurrence” based policy. Thus, our policy is
complete when we purchased it and following cancellation of the policy it
continues to provide coverage for future claims based on conduct that took place
during the policy term. However, our insurance may not protect us
against liability because our policies typically have various exceptions to the
claims covered and also require us to assume some costs of the claim even though
a portion of the claim may be covered. In addition, if we expand into
new markets, we may not be aware of the need for, or be able to obtain insurance
coverage for such activities or, if insurance is obtained, the dollar amount of
any liabilities incurred could exceed our insurance coverage. A
partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant
magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
-13-
Complying
with certain regulations that apply to shipments using our products can limit
our activities and increase our cost of operations.
Shipments
using our products and services are subject to various regulations in the
countries in which we operate. For example, shipments using our
products may be required to comply with the shipping requirements promulgated by
the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”), the Occupational Safety and Health
Organization (“OSHA”), the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) as well as rules
established by the International Air Transportation Association (“IATA”) and the
International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”). Additionally, our
data logger may be subject to regulation and certification by the Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”), Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), and Federal
Aviation Administration (“FAA”). We will need to ensure that our
products and services comply with relevant rules and regulations to make
our products and services marketable, and in some cases compliance is
difficult to determine. Significant changes in such regulations could
require costly changes to our products and services or prevent use of our
shippers for an extended period of time while we seek to comply with changed
regulations. If we are unable to comply with any of these rule or
regulations or fail to obtain any required approvals, our ability to market our
products and services may be adversely affected. In addition, even if
we are able to comply with these rules and regulations, compliance can result in
increased costs. In either event, our financial results and condition
may be adversely affected. We depend on our business partners and
unrelated and frequently unknown third party agents in foreign countries to act
on our behalf to complete the importation process and to make delivery of our
shippers to the final user. The failure of these third parties to
perform their duties could result in damage to the contents of the shipper
resulting in customer dissatisfaction or liability to us, even if we are not at
fault.
If
we cannot compete effectively, we will lose business.
Our
products, services and solutions are positioned to be competitive in the
cold-chain shipping market. While there are technological and
marketing barriers to entry, we cannot guarantee that the barriers we are
capable of producing will be sufficient to defend the market share we wish to
gain against future competitors. The principal competitive factors in
this market include:
●
|
acceptance
of our business model and a per use consolidated
fee structure;
|
|
●
|
ongoing
development of enhanced technical features and
benefits;
|
|
●
|
reductions
in the manufacturing cost of competitors’ products;
|
|
●
|
the
ability to maintain and expand distribution channels;
|
|
●
|
brand
name;
|
|
●
|
the
ability to deliver our products to our customers when
requested;
|
|
●
|
the
timing of introductions of new products and services;
and
|
|
●
|
financial
resources.
|
Current
and prospective competitors have substantially greater resources, more
customers, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more
established relationships in the industry. As a result, these
competitors may be able to develop and expand their networks and product
offerings more quickly, devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of
their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies. In
addition, these competitors have entered and will likely continue to enter into
business relationships to provide additional products competitive to those we
provide or plan to provide.
We
may not be able to compete with our competitors in the industry because many of
them have greater resources than we do.
We expect
to continue to experience significant and increasing levels of competition in
the future. In addition, there may be other companies which are
currently developing competitive products and services or which may in the
future develop technologies and products that are comparable, superior or less
costly than our own. For example, some cryogenic equipment
manufacturers with greater resources currently have solutions for storing and
transporting cryogenic liquid and gasses and may develop storage solutions that
compete with our products. Additionally, some specialty couriers with
greater resources currently provide dry ice transportation and may develop other
products in the future, both of which compete with our products. A
competitor that has greater resources than us may be able to bring its product
to market faster than we can and offer its product at a lower price than us to
establish market share. We may not be able to successfully compete
with a competitor that has greater resources and such competition may adversely
affect our business.
-14-
Risks
Relating to Our Current Financing Arrangements
Our
outstanding convertible debentures impose certain restrictions on how we conduct
our business. In addition, all of our assets, including our
intellectual property, are pledged to secure this indebtedness. If we
fail to meet our obligations to the debenture holders, our payment obligations
may be accelerated and the collateral securing the indebtedness may be sold to
satisfy these obligations.
We issued
convertible debentures in October 2007 (the "October 2007 Debentures") and in
May 2008 (the "May 2008 Debentures," and together with the October 2007
Debentures, the "Debentures"). The Debentures were issued to four
institutional investors and have an outstanding principal balance of $5,981,425
as of November 30, 2009. In addition, in October 2007 and May 2008, we
issued to these institutional investors warrants to purchase, as of
November 30, 2009, an aggregate of 1,107,671 shares of our common stock
(without regard to beneficial ownership limitations contained in the transaction
documents and certain anti-dilution provisions, but after giving effect to the
anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split). As collateral to secure our
repayment obligations to the holders of the Debentures we have granted such
holders a first priority security interest in generally all of our assets,
including our intellectual property.
The
Debentures, warrant agreements and related transactional documents contain
various covenants that presently restrict our operating
flexibility. Pursuant to the foregoing documents, we may not, among
other things:
●
|
effect
a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
●
|
incur
additional indebtedness, except for certain permitted
indebtedness. Permitted indebtedness is defined to include
lease obligations and purchase money indebtedness of up to an aggregate of
$200,000 and indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the Debentures
and matures following the maturity date of the
Debentures;
|
|
●
|
incur
additional liens on any of our assets except for certain permitted liens
including but not limited liens for taxes, assessments and government
charges not yet due and liens incurred in connection with permitted
indebtedness;
|
|
●
|
pay
cash dividends;
|
|
●
|
redeem
any outstanding shares of our common stock or any outstanding options or
warrants to purchase shares of our common stock except in connection with
a the repurchase of stock from former directors and officers provided such
repurchases do not exceed $100,000 during the term of the
Debentures;
|
|
●
|
enter
into transactions with affiliates other than on arms-length terms;
and
|
|
●
|
make
any revisions to the terms of existing contractual agreements for the
Notes Payable to Former Officer, Related Party Notes Payable and the Line
of Credit (as each is referred to in our Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009).
|
In
addition, so long as the Debentures are outstanding;
●
|
we
must maintain a total cash balance of no less than $100,000 at all
times;
|
|
●
|
we
must maintain an average monthly operating cash burn of no more than
$500,000 with operating cash burn is defined by taking net income (or
loss) and adding back all non-cash items and excludes changes in assets,
liabilities and financing activities;
|
|
●
|
we
must maintain minimum current ratio of 0.5 to 1 with the calculation made
by excluding the current portion of the convertible notes payable and
accrued interest, and liability from derivative instruments from current
liability for the current ratio;
|
|
●
|
our
accounts payable shall not exceed $750,000; and
|
|
●
|
our
accrued salaries shall not exceed
$350,000.
|
-15-
These
provisions could have important consequences for us, including, but not limited
to, (i) preventing us from effecting our contemplated reverse stock split
unless the debenture holders provide a waiver, (ii) making it more difficult for
us to obtain additional debt financing, or obtain new debt financing on terms
favorable to us, because a new lender will have to be willing to be subordinate
to the debenture holders, (iii) causing us to use a portion of our
available cash for debt repayment and service rather than other perceived needs,
and/or (iv) impacting our ability to take advantage of significant,
perceived business opportunities. Our failure to timely repay our
obligations under the Debentures, which mature on July 1, 2010, or meet the
covenants set forth in the Debentures and related transaction documents could
give rise to a default under the Debentures or such transaction
documents. In the event of an uncured default, all amounts owed to
the holders may be declared immediately due and payable and the debenture
holders will have the right to enforce their security interest in the assets
securing the Debentures. In such event, the Debenture holders could
take possession of any or all of our assets in which they hold a security
interest, and dispose of those assets to the extent necessary to pay off our
debts, which would materially harm our business.
In the event that we consummate this offering for minimum gross
proceeds of $10,000,000 and comply with certain other provisions of the 2010
Amendment, then the foregoing limitations and covenants will terminate following
consummation of this offering.
The
issuance of our common stock upon conversion of the Debentures could encourage
short sales by third parties, which could contribute to the future decline of
our stock price and materially dilute existing stockholders’ equity and voting
rights.
The
Debentures have the potential to cause significant downward pressure on the
price of our common stock if they are converted, as is contemplated in the 2010
Amendment (at least with respect to approximately half of the outstanding
balance). This is particularly the case if the shares of common
stock are placed into the market and exceed the market’s ability to
absorb such shares of common stock. Such an event could place
further downward pressure on the price of our common stock. The
opportunity exists for short sellers and others to contribute to the future
decline of our stock price. Significant short sales of our
stock would place downward pressure on the market price of our common
stock, which could cause the price to further decline. If the
foregoing factors cause a continual decline in our stock price, long-term
holders of our common stock might be encouraged to start selling their shares of
our common stock, creating a further imbalance on the sell side of the market
for the stock, which could cause our stock price to further
decline.
Risks
Relating Principally to This Offering and Our Capital Structure
We
have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may
not use them effectively.
We cannot
specify with certainty all of the particular uses of approximately $13.3
million of the net proceeds we will receive from this offering. Other
than our obligation to repay $3,266,995 of the Debentures pursuant to the 2010
Amendment, our management will have broad discretion in the application of
the net proceeds. Accordingly, you will have to rely upon the
judgment of our management with respect to the use of the proceeds, with only
limited information concerning management’s specific intentions. Our
management may spend a portion or all of the net proceeds from this offering in
ways that our stockholders may not desire or that may not yield a favorable
return. The failure by our management to apply these funds
effectively could harm our business. Pending its use, we may invest
the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or
that loses value.
Our
existing stockholders will retain significant control over us following the
completion of this offering.
The
concentration of ownership of our stock may have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control of CryoPort and may adversely affect the voting
or other rights of other holders of our common stock. Upon completion
of this offering, our directors, executive officers and debenture holders will
beneficially own 5,105,661 shares (assuming the consummation of a reverse stock
split, at a ratio of 12-to-1 and without regard to beneficial ownership
limitations contained in certain warrants) of common stock assuming the exercise
of all outstanding warrants, options and conversion of all convertible debt, and
the effectiveness of the 2010 Amendment; or approximately 32.2%
of our outstanding common stock. Of these shares of common stock,
2,219,539 shares, or approximately 14.0%
of our outstanding common stock, will be owned by Enable Growth Partners LP (and
affiliated funds), and 2,126,876 shares, or approximately 13.4%
of our outstanding common stock, will be owned by BridgePointe Master Fund,
Ltd.; provided, however, there are provisions in their warrant agreements that
prohibit exercise of warrants to the extent that their respective beneficial
ownership would exceed 4.99% as a result of such conversion or exercise (which
limitation may be waived and increased to 9.99% upon not less than 61 days prior
notice).
-16-
An
active market for our common stock and warrants may not develop or be
maintained, which could limit your ability to sell your common stock and/or
warrants.
Prior to
this offering, there has been a limited public market for our common stock and
no market for our warrants and the public offering price may bear no
relationship to the price at which our common stock and warrants will trade
after this offering. There can be no assurance that an active public
market for our common stock or warrants will develop or be sustained after this
offering or how liquid that market might become. As a result,
investors may not be able to sell their common stock or warrants at or above the
public offering price or at the time that they would like to sell.
Our
stock and warrant price may be volatile.
The
market price of our common stock and warrants is likely to be highly volatile
and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of
which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:
●
|
technological
innovations or new products and services by us or our
competitors;
|
|
●
|
additions
or departures of key personnel;
|
|
●
|
sales
of our common stock;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to integrate operations, technology, products and
services;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to execute our business plan;
|
|
●
|
operating
results below expectations;
|
|
●
|
loss
of any strategic relationship;
|
|
●
|
industry
developments;
|
|
●
|
economic
and other external factors; and
|
|
●
|
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial
results.
|
You may
consider any one of these factors to be material. The price of common
stock and warrants may fluctuate widely as a result of any of the above listed
factors. In addition, the securities markets have from time to time
experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our
common stock and warrants.
If
equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business
or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common stock and
warrants, the price of our common stock and warrants could decline.
The
trading market for our common stock and warrants will rely in part on the
research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our
business. We do not control these analysts. The price of
our common stock and warrants could decline if one or more equity analyst
downgrades our stock or if analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease
publishing reports about us or our business.
-17-
A
significant portion of our total outstanding shares of common stock may be sold
into the public market in the near future, which could cause the market price of
our common stock and warrants to drop significantly, even if our business is
doing well.
Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could
occur at any time after the expiration of the lock-up agreements described in
“Underwriting and Plan of Distribution.” These sales, or the market
perception that the holders of a large number of shares of common stock intend
to sell shares of common stock, could reduce the market price of our common
stock and warrants. After this offering, we will have
9,093,445 shares of common stock outstanding based on the number of shares
of common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2009 and the debenture
holders conversion of a portion of the outstanding principal balance of their
debentures pursuant to the 2010 Amendment, and assuming the consummation of a
reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1. This includes the
3,125,000 shares of common stock that we are selling in this offering, which may
be resold in the public market immediately. The remaining
5,968,445 shares of common stock, or 66% of our outstanding shares of
common stock after this offering, including 1,800,502 shares of common stock we
will issue to our debenture holders in connection with their conversion of a
portion of the outstanding principal balance of the debentures pursuant to the
2010 Amendment, will be able to be sold, subject to any applicable volume
limitations under federal securities laws, 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, subject to extension in specified instances, due to lock-up
agreements between the holders of these shares of common stock and the
underwriters. However, the underwriters can waive the provisions of
these lock-up agreements and allow these stockholders to sell their shares of
common stock at any time.
We
have not paid dividends on our common stock in the past and do not expect to pay
dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be
limited to the value of our common stock.
We have
never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our
common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business
and economic factors affecting us at such time as the Board of Directors may
consider the payment of any such dividends. In addition, we may not
pay any dividends without obtaining the prior consent of the holders of
our Debentures (provided, however, that this restriction will terminate
upon the consummation of this offering pursuant to the 2010 Amendment). If
we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return
on your investment will only occur if the price of our common stock
appreciates.
When
we effect a reverse stock split, the liquidity of our common stock and market
capitalization could be adversely affected.
At our
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 9, 2009, our stockholders
approved a Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation to give our Board of Directors the authority to effect a reverse
stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock at a ratio to be
determined by the Board of Directors between 2-to-1 and 15-to-1, without further
approval of our stockholders, upon a determination by the Board of Directors
that such a reverse stock split is in the best interests of CryoPort and its
stockholders, at any time before June 30, 2010. Subject to our
compliance with the 2010 Amendment, the Board of Directors intends to effect a
reverse stock split in order to increase the stock price to a level that will
enable it to apply for listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market or other national
stock exchange.
A reverse
stock split is often viewed negatively by the market and, consequently, can lead
to a decrease in our overall market capitalization. If the per share
market price does not increase proportionately as a result of the reverse split,
then the value of our company as measured by our market capitalization will be
reduced, perhaps significantly. In addition, because the reverse
split will significantly reduce the number of shares of our common stock that
are outstanding, the liquidity of our common stock could be adversely affected
and you may find it more difficult to purchase or sell shares of our common
stock.
-18-
Our
stock-based incentive plan may dilute your percentage ownership interest and may
also result in downward pressure on the price of our stock.
At our
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 9, 2009, our stockholders
approved the CryoPort, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (“2009 Plan”), which is
designed to replace the CryoPort, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002
Plan") and provides for the grant of stock-based incentives. A total
of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock (after giving effect to the anticipated
12-to-1 reverse stock split) are reserved under the 2009 Plan for awards to
our officers, directors, employees and consultants as determined by our Board of
Directors. Stockholders would experience a dilution in ownership
interest of approximately 15%, assuming the maximum issuance of 1,000,000 shares
of common stock (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock
split) upon the exercise of stock options granted or other awards issued under
the 2009 Plan. In addition, the existence of a significant number of
shares of common stock reserved under the 2009 Plan may be perceived by the
market as having a potential dilutive effect, which could lead to a decrease in
the price of our common stock.
We
may need additional capital, and the sale of additional shares of common stock
or other equity securities could result in additional dilution to our
stockholders.
We
believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, anticipated cash flow from
operations and the net proceeds from this offering will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs for a period of 18 to 30 months. We may,
however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or
other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may
decide to pursue. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our
cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or
obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities,
or debt securities convertible into equity securities, could result in
additional dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of
indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result
in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our
operations.
Provisions
in our bylaws and Nevada law might discourage, delay or prevent a change of
control of our company or changes in our management and, as a result, may
depress the trading price of our common stock.
Provisions
of our bylaws and Nevada law may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable,
including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your
shares of our common stock. The relevant bylaw provisions may also
prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our
management. These provisions include advance notice requirements
for stockholder proposals and nominations, and the ability of our Board of
Directors to make, alter or repeal our bylaws.
Absent
approval of our Board of Directors, our bylaws may only be amended or repealed
by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding
shares of capital stock entitled to vote.
In
addition, Section 78.438 of the Nevada Revised Statutes prohibits a
publicly-held Nevada corporation from engaging in a business combination with an
interested stockholder (generally defined as a person which together with its
affiliates owns, or within the last three years has owned, 10% of our voting
stock, for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which
the person became an interested stockholder) unless the business combination is
approved in a prescribed manner.
The
existence of the foregoing provisions and other potential anti-takeover measures
could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for
shares of our common stock. They could also deter potential acquirers
of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium
for your common stock in an acquisition.
Our
stock is deemed to be penny stock.
Our stock
is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and is subject to the “penny stock
rules” adopted pursuant to Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The penny stock rules apply to
companies not listed on a national exchange whose common stock trades at less
than $5.00 per share or which have tangible net worth of less than $5,000,000
($2,000,000 if the company has been operating for three or more
years). Such rules require, among other things, that brokers who
trade “penny stock” to persons other than “established customers” complete
certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors and provide
investors with certain information concerning trading in the security, including
a risk disclosure document and quote information under certain
circumstances. Penny stocks sold in violation of the applicable rules
may entitle the buyer of the stock to rescind the sale and receive a full refund
from the broker.
-19-
Many
brokers have decided not to trade “penny stock” because of the requirements of
the penny stock rules and, as a result, the number of broker-dealers willing to
act as market makers in such securities is limited. In the event that
we remain subject to the “penny stock rules” for any significant period, there
may develop an adverse impact on the market, if any, for our
securities. Because our securities are subject to the “penny stock
rules,” investors will find it more difficult to dispose of our
securities. Further, for companies whose securities are traded in the
OTC Bulletin Board, it is more difficult: (i) to obtain accurate
quotations, (ii) to obtain coverage for significant news events because major
wire services, such as the Dow Jones News Service, generally do not publish
press releases about such companies, and (iii) to obtain needed
capital.
If
we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the
price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Our
internal controls over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions
that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have
an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. We are required to
establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial
reporting. Failure to establish those controls (or any failure of those
controls once established) could adversely impact our public disclosures
regarding our business, financial condition or results of operations. In
addition, management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting
may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal
controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for
investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to
be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure of
management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting, or
disclosure of our independent registered public accounting firm’s attestation to
the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, when
required, may have an adverse impact on the price of our common
stock.
Standards
for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are uncertain,
and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could be harmed and
our stock price could decline.
Rules
adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
require an annual assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting,
and attestation of our assessment by our independent registered public
accounting firm. The standards that must be met for management to assess
the internal controls over financial reporting as effective are evolving and
complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible
remediation to meet the detailed standards. We expect to continue to incur
significant expenses and to devote resources to continued Section 404 compliance
during the remainder of fiscal 2010 and on an ongoing basis. It is
difficult for us to predict how long it will take or how costly it will be to
complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting to the satisfaction of our independent registered public
accounting firm for each year, and to remediate any deficiencies in our internal
controls over financial reporting. As a result, we may not be able to
complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely basis. In
addition, the attestation process by our independent registered public
accounting firm will be new for fiscal 2011 and we may encounter problems or
delays in completing the implementation of any requested improvements and
receiving an attestation of our assessment by our independent registered public
accounting firm. In the event that our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer or independent registered public accounting firm determines
that our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective as defined
under Section 404, we cannot predict how regulators will react or how the market
price of our common stock will be affected; however, we believe that there is a
risk that investor confidence and share value may be negatively
impacted.
If
we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements, our securities could be
removed from the OTC Bulletin Board, which would limit the ability of
broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell
their securities in the secondary market.
Companies
trading on the OTC Bulletin Board must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of
the Exchange Act, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in
order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin
Board. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we
could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market
liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting
the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of
stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
There
is no guarantee that our shares of common stock or warrants will be listed on
the NASDAQ Capital Market.
In
connection with the filing of this registration statement, we applied for
listing of our common stock and warrants on the NASDAQ Capital
Market. After the consummation of this offering, we believe that we
will satisfy the listing requirements and expect that our common stock and
warrants will be listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market. Such listing,
however, is not guaranteed. If the application is not approved, we
will not complete this offering and the shares of our common stock will continue
to be traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, and our warrants will not be traded on
any quotation system. Even if such listing is approved, there can be
no assurance any broker will be interested in trading our
stock. Therefore, it may be difficult to sell your shares of common
stock if you desire or need to sell them. Our lead underwriter,
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, is not obligated to make a market in our securities,
and even if they make a market, they can discontinue market making at any time
without notice. Neither we nor the underwriters can provide any
assurance that an active and liquid trading market in our securities will
develop or, if developed, that such market will continue.
Even if our common stock and warrants are approved for listing on the
NASDAQ Capital Market, there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain
such listing for any period of time by perpetually satisfying NASDAQ's continued
listing requirements.
-20-
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
prospectus contains forward-looking statements. All statements other
than statements of historical fact contained in this prospectus, including
statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position,
business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations,
are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements.
In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,”
“target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,”
“potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other similar
words. These statements are only predictions. We have
based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and
projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations. We
discuss many of the risks in greater detail under the heading “Risk
Factors.” Also, these forward-looking statements represent our
estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this
prospectus. Forward-looking statements in this prospectus include,
but are not necessarily limited to, those relating to:
●
|
our
intention to introduce new products or services,
|
|
●
|
our
expectations about the markets for our products or
services,
|
|
●
|
our
expectations about securing strategic relationships with global couriers
or large clinical research organization,
|
|
●
|
our
future capital needs,
|
|
●
|
results
of our research and development efforts, and
|
|
●
|
success
of our patent applications.
|
Forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond
our control. Actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated as a result of the factors described in “Risk Factors” in this
prospectus and detailed in our other SEC filings, including among
others:
●
|
the
effect of regulation by United States and foreign governmental
agencies,
|
|
●
|
research
and development efforts, including delays in developing, or the failure to
develop, our products,
|
|
●
|
the
development of competing or more effective products by other
parties,
|
|
●
|
uncertainty
of market acceptance of our products,
|
|
●
|
errors
in business planning attributable to insufficient market size or
segmentation data,
|
|
●
|
problems
that we may face in manufacturing, marketing, and distributing our
products,
|
|
●
|
problems
that we may encounter in further development of CryoPort Express® Portal
or its ability to scale to meet customer demand and
needs,
|
|
●
|
problems
relating to the development of wireless sensor monitoring devices, or
regulatory approval relating to their use,
|
|
●
|
our
inability to raise additional capital when needed,
|
|
●
|
delays
in the issuance of, or the failure to obtain, patents for certain of our
products and technologies,
|
|
●
|
problems
with important suppliers and strategic business partners,
and
|
|
●
|
difficulties
or delays in establishing marketing relationships with international
couriers.
|
-21-
Because
of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances
discussed in this prospectus might not transpire. Except for our
ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by the federal
securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to
any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. All of
the above factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may
materially affect our actual results and may be beyond our
control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible
for our management to predict all of such factors or to assess the effect of
each factor on our business.
This
prospectus also contains estimates and other industry and statistical data
developed by independent parties and by us relating to market size, growth and
segmentation of markets. This data involves a number of assumptions
and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such
estimates. We have not independently verified these estimates
generated by independent parties and contained in this prospectus and,
accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness. In
addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and
the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily
subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors,
including those described in “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in
this prospectus. These and other factors could cause results to
differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent
parties and by us.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the units that we are
offering will be approximately $13.3 million, based on an assumed public
offering price of $4.80 per unit, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses that we must pay. We
intend to use those net proceeds primarily to repay a portion of the outstanding
principal balance of the Debentures, build up our inventory of shippers, for
capital expenditures, including establishing selected global staging and
refurbishing sites, and for working capital and general corporate
purposes. We may also use these proceeds to finance the acquisition
of complimentary businesses or services. We currently have no
agreements or commitments for any specific acquisitions at this
time.
As
of November 30, 2009, the outstanding principal balance of the Debentures was
$5,981,425. The Debentures mature on July 1, 2010 and, as of November
30, 2009, had an interest rate of 8%. Pursuant to the 2010 Amendment,
upon the consummation of this offering, we must repay $3,266,995
of the principal balance of the Debentures with some of the net proceeds
from this offering. We increased the principal balance of the
Debentures by $628,826
during the prior twelve (12) months which reflects the conversion of accrued
interest payable into principal and the conversion of both accrued interest
payable and future interest payable into principal pursuant to the terms of the
September 2009 Amendment to the Debentures.
Pending
any use, as described above, we plan to invest the net proceeds in
investment-grade, short-term, interest-bearing securities.
MARKET
FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market Information
Presently,
our common stock is traded through the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CYRX. We intend to list our common stock and warrants on the NASDAQ
Capital Market under the symbols “CYPT” and “CYPTW,”
respectively. There can be no assurances that an active public market
for our common stock will develop or be sustained. The following
table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for
our common stock assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio
of 12-to-1.
Fiscal
2010
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
1st
Quarter
|
$
|
10.80
|
$
|
4.92
|
||||
2nd
Quarter
|
8.40
|
4.44
|
Fiscal
2009
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
1st
Quarter
|
$
|
13.80
|
$
|
8.04
|
||||
2nd
Quarter
|
12.00
|
6.00
|
||||||
3rd
Quarter
|
9.00
|
5.64
|
||||||
4th
Quarter
|
6.60
|
3.96
|
-22-
Fiscal
2008
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
1st
Quarter
|
$
|
39.60
|
$
|
9.24
|
||||
2nd
Quarter
|
20.40
|
7.32
|
||||||
3rd
Quarter
|
17.64
|
8.40
|
||||||
4th
Quarter
|
16.44
|
10.20
|
Number
of Stockholders
As of
November 30, 2009, there were approximately 136 holders of record of our
common stock.
Dividend
Policy
Historically,
we have not paid any dividends to the holders of our common stock and we do not
expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future as we expect to
retain our future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our
business.
Securities
Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
CryoPort
currently maintains two equity compensation plans, the 2002 Plan and the 2009
Plan. Our Compensation and Governance Committee is responsible for
making reviewing and recommending grants of options under these plans which are
approved by the Board of Directors. The 2002 Plan, which was approved
by CryoPort’s stockholders in October 2002, allows for the grant of options to
purchase up to 416,666 shares (assuming the consummation of a reverse stock
split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of CryoPort’s common stock. The 2002
Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of CryoPort’s
common stock at prices not less than the fair market value of the stock at the
date of grant and generally expire 10 years after the date of
grant. The stock options are subject to vesting requirements,
generally three or four years. The 2002 Plan also provides for the
granting of restricted shares of common stock subject to vesting
requirements. As of November 30, 2009, a total of 254,983 shares
(after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of common
stock remained available for future option grants under the 2002
Plan.
The 2009
Plan provides for the grant of stock-based incentives. The 2009 Plan
allows for the grant of up to 1,000,000 shares (after giving effect to the
anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of our common stock for awards to
our officers, directors, employees and consultants. The 2009 Plan
provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock rights, restricted stock, performance share units, performance
shares, performance cash awards, stock appreciation rights, and stock grant
awards. The 2009 Plan also permits the grant of awards that qualify
for the “performance-based compensation” exception to the $1,000,000 limitation
on the deduction of compensation imposed by Section 162(m) of the
Code. As
of November 30, 2009, a total of 942,500 shares (after giving effect to the
anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of our common stock remained available
for future grants under the 2009 Plan.
Reverse
Stock Split
Our stockholders
have approved a proposal to grant discretionary authority to our Board of
Directors to amend our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect
a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock at any time
before June 30, 2010 at any whole number ratio between a 2-to-1 reverse
stock split and a 15-to-1 reverse stock split, with the exact exchange ratio and
timing of the reverse stock split (if at all) to be determined at the discretion
of the Board of Directors, without decreasing the number of our shares of
authorized capital stock.
The
reverse stock split will be effected simultaneously for all our then existing
common stock and the exchange ratio will be the same for all of our shares of
issued and outstanding common stock. The reverse stock split will
affect all of our stockholders uniformly and will not affect any stockholder’s
percentage ownership interests in us, except to the extent that the reverse
stock split results in any of our stockholders owning a fractional
share. If this occurs, we will pay a cash payment in lieu of issuing
fractional shares. Shares of common stock issued pursuant to the
reverse stock split will remain fully paid and nonassessable. The
information in the following table is based on 50,015,318 shares of common stock
(not adjusted for the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) issued and
outstanding as of November 30, 2009.
-23-
Proposed
Reverse
Stock
Split
|
Percentage
Reduction in the Outstanding Shares
of
Common Stock
|
Common
Stock Outstanding After the Reverse Stock Split
|
Common
Stock Authorized After the Reverse Stock Split
|
|||||
2-to-1
|
50%
|
25,007,659
|
250,000,000
|
|||||
5-to-1
|
80%
|
10,003,063
|
250,000,000
|
|||||
12-to-1
|
912/3%
|
4,167,943
|
250,000,000
|
|||||
15-to-1
|
931/3%
|
3,334,355
|
250,000,000
|
|||||
DETERMINATION
OF OFFERING PRICE
The
public offering price of the units offered by this prospectus will be based on
the closing market price of the stock immediately prior to the closing date of
this offering, adjusted for the anticipated reverse stock split on a 12-to-1
basis, prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part. We have applied for listing of our common stock
and warrants on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “CYPT” and “CYPTW,”
respectively. No assurance can be given that our application will be
approved. If the application is not approved, we will not complete
this offering and the shares of our common stock will continue to be traded on
the OTC Bulletin Board.
-24-
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents, convertible
debentures, notes payable and capitalization as of September 30, 2009 on an
actual (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) and
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of the units by us
in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $4.80 per share (the pro
forma adjusted closing share price on December 30, 2009, after giving effect to
the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split), after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable
by us and the application of the estimated net proceeds of this offering as
described under “Use of Proceeds.”
This
table should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and related notes and the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Use of Proceeds,”
and “Description of Capital Stock” appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||
Actual
|
As
Adjusted
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,120,758
|
$
|
11,153,763
|
||||
Derivative liabilities | 18,404,578 | 1,119,595 | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable and accrued interest, net of discount of
$775,960
|
639,647
|
639,647
|
||||||
Current
portion of convertible debentures and other long-term debt, net of debt
discounts of $2,468,355
|
$
|
3,883,070
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Convertible
notes payable, net of current portion and discount of
$6,351,425
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value: 250,000,000 shares authorized; 3,965,470 issued
and outstanding, actual; and 9,093,445 shares issued and outstanding,
as adjusted(1)
|
$
|
3,965
|
$
|
9,093
|
||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
$
|
24,446,002
|
$
|
70,257,975
|
||||
Retained
deficit
|
$
|
(47,828,293
|
)
|
$
|
(62,444,336
|
) | ||
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$
|
(23,378,326
|
)
|
$
|
7,822,732
|
(1) The
above table assumes the issuance of 1,800,502 shares of our common stock to the
holders of our convertible debentures upon their conversion of a portion of the
outstanding principal amount of such debentures upon the consummation of this
offering pursuant to the 2010 Amendment, issuance of 68,519 shares of our common
stock to the holders of our convertible debentures upon their conversion of a
portion of the outstanding principal amount of such debentures with a conversion
price of $5.40 prior to this offering, the issuance of 133,955 shares of
our common stock for services and the exercise of warrants prior to this
offering and excludes the following:
●
|
225,736 shares
of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of outstanding
convertible promissory notes with a conversion price of $6.12 per
share;
|
|
●
|
3,042,406
shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $5.52 per
share;
|
|
●
|
74,292
shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $7.05
per share;
|
|
●
|
254,453 shares
of common stock available for future grant under our 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan and an additional 942,500 shares of common stock available for future
grant under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan;
|
|
●
|
3,125,000 shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants to be issued in
connection with this offering; and
|
|
●
|
156,250 shares
of common stock that may be issued to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC upon
exercise of the warrant we will sell to them (representing 5% of the
shares of common stock sold by us in this offering, excluding the
over-allotment option).
|
-25-
DILUTION
If you
invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the
difference between the public offering price per unit you pay and the as
adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this
offering. Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2009 was
($23,637,942), or ($5.96) per share of common stock (after giving effect to the
anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split). We calculate net tangible
book value per share by calculating the difference between the total assets less
goodwill and other intangible assets and total liabilities, and dividing the
result by the number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Net
tangible book value dilution per share represents the difference between the
amount per unit paid by new investors who purchase units in this offering and
the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately
after completion of this offering as of September 30, 2009, after giving
effect to:
|
●
|
the
sale by us of 3,125,000 units at an assumed public offering price of
$4.80 per share, each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one
warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of
$5.28 per share and the application of the estimated net proceeds to us in
this offering as described under “Use of Proceeds”;
|
|
●
|
the
issuance of 1,800,502 shares of common stock to the holders of our
convertible debentures upon their conversion of a portion of the
outstanding principal amount of such debentures upon the consummation of
this offering pursuant to the 2010 Amendment;
|
|
●
|
the
issuance of 68,519 shares of common stock to the holders of our
convertible debentures upon their conversion of a portion of the
outstanding principal amount of such debentures prior to this offering;
|
|
●
|
the
issuance of 133,955 shares of common stock for services and the exercise
of warrants prior to this offering; and
|
|
●
|
the
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses
payable by us.
|
Adjusted
|
||||
Public
offering price per share
|
$
|
4.80
|
||
Net
tangible book value as of September 30, 2009
|
$
|
(5.96
|
)
|
|
Increase
attributable to this offering
|
$
|
6.79
|
||
Adjusted
net tangible book value per share after this
offering
|
$
|
0.83
|
||
Dilution
in net tangible book value per share to new
investors
|
$
|
3.97
|
The
following table summarizes as of November 30, 2009, on a pro forma basis to
reflect the same adjustments described above, the number of shares of common
stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid and the average price per
share paid by:
●
|
The
existing common stockholders (including the holders of
our Debentures who are converting a portion of the
outstanding principal amount of the Debentures upon the consummation of
this offering pursuant to the 2010 Amendment); and
|
|
●
|
The
new investors in this offering, assuming the sale of 3,125,000 units
offered hereby at a public offering price of $4.80 per
share.
|
The
calculations are based upon total consideration given by new and existing
stockholders, before any deduction of estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses.
Shares
of common stock Purchased
|
Total
Consideration
|
Average
Price
Per
Share
|
|||||||||||
Number
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
||||||||||
Existing
Stockholders
|
5,968,445
|
66%
|
$
|
10,683,494
|
42%
|
$
|
1.79
|
||||||
New
Investors
|
3,125,000
|
34%
|
$
|
15,000,000
|
58%
|
$
|
4.80
|
||||||
Total
|
9,093,445
|
100%
|
$
|
25,683,494 |
100%
|
$
|
2.82
|
The above
table excludes an aggregate of up to 6,779,933 additional shares of common
stock reserved and available for future issuance (i) upon the conversion of all
outstanding convertible promissory notes, (ii) the exercise of all
outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase common stock, (iii) the
exercise of all warrants issued in connection with this public offering, and
(iv) under our employee 2002 Plan and our 2009 Plan as of September 30,
2009. As of September 30, 2009, options to purchase 74,292 shares of
common stock have been granted, but have not been exercised pursuant to the 2002
Plan and the 2009 Plan.
-26-
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking
Statements
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this
prospectus. In addition to historical consolidated financial
information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that
reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could
differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these
differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus,
particularly in “Risk Factors.”
General
Overview
We are a
provider of an innovative cold chain frozen shipping system dedicated to
providing superior, affordable cryogenic shipping solutions that ensure the
safety, status and temperature, of high value, temperature sensitive
materials. We have developed a line of cost effective reusable
cryogenic transport containers (referred to as "shippers") capable of
transporting biological, environmental and other temperature sensitive materials
at temperatures below 0° Celsius. These dry vapor shippers are one of
the first significant alternatives to dry ice shipping and achieve 10-plus day
holding times compared to one to two day holding times with dry
ice.
Our value
proposition comes from both providing safe transportation and an
environmentally friendly, long lasting shipper, and through our value added
services that offer a simple hassle-free solution for our
customers. These value-added services include an internet-based web
portal that enables the customer to initiate shipping service, track the
progress and status of a shipment, and provides in-transit temperature
monitoring services of the shipper. CryoPort also provides a fully
ready charged shipper containing all freight bills, customs documents and
regulatory paperwork for the entire journey of the shipper to our customers
at their pick up location.
Our
principal focus has been the further development and commercial launch of
CryoPort Express® Portal, an innovative IT solution for shipping and tracking
high-value specimens through overnight shipping companies, and our CryoPort
Express® Shipper, a line of dry vapor cryogenic shippers for the transport of
biological and pharmaceutical materials. A dry vapor cryogenic
shipper is a container that uses liquid nitrogen in dry vapor form, which is
suspended inside a vacuum insulated bottle as a refrigerant, to provide storage
temperatures below minus 150° Celsius. The dry vapor shipper is
designed using innovative, proprietary, and patented technology which prevents
spillage of liquid nitrogen and pressure build up as the liquid nitrogen
evaporates. A proprietary foam retention system is employed to ensure
that liquid nitrogen stays inside the vacuum container, even when placed
upside-down or on its side, as is often the case when in the custody of a
shipping company. Biological specimens are stored in a specimen
chamber, referred to as a “well,” inside the container and refrigeration is
provided by harmless
cold nitrogen gas evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam
retention system surrounding the well. Biological specimens
transported using our cryogenic shipper can include clinical samples,
diagnostics, live cell pharmaceutical products (such as cancer vaccines, semen
and embryos, infectious substances) and other items that require and/or are
protected through continuous exposure to frozen or cryogenic temperatures (below
minus 150° Celsius).
During
our early years, our limited revenue was derived from the sale of our reusable
product line. Our current business plan focuses on per-use leasing of the
shipping container and added-value services that will be used by us to provide
an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping solution to life science companies
moving pharmaceutical and biological samples in clinical trials and
pharmaceutical distribution.
Going
Concern
As
reported in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to our
March 31, 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements, we have incurred
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since
inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern.
There are
significant uncertainties which negatively affect our
operations. These are principally related to (i) the expected ramp up
of sales of the new CryoPort Express® System, (ii) the absence of any commitment
or firm orders from key customers in our target markets, (iii) the success in
bringing additional products currently under development to market with our key
customers, and (iv) risks associated with scaling company operations to
meet demand. Moreover, there is no assurance as to when, if ever, we
will be able to conduct our operations on a profitable basis. Our
limited historical sales for our reusable product, limited introductory sales to
date of the CryoPort Express® System and the lack of any purchase requirements
in our existing distribution agreements, make it impossible to identify any
trends in our business prospects.
-27-
We have
not generated significant revenues from operations and have no assurance of any
future revenues. We generated revenues from operations of $35,124,
incurred a net loss of $16,705,151 and used cash of $2,586,470 in our operating
activities during the year ended March 31, 2009. We generated
revenues from operations of $22,181, had a net loss of $7,536,045, which
included a loss on the change in fair value of our derivative liabilities of
$1,401,550 and used cash of $1,145,497 in our operating activities during
the six months ended September 30, 2009. In addition, we had a
working capital deficit of $22,902,096, and have cash and cash equivalents of
$1,120,758 at September 30, 2009. Our working capital deficit at
September 30, 2009 included $18,404,758 relating to derivative liabilities, the
balance of which represented the fair value of warrants and embedded conversion
features related to our convertible debentures and were reclassified from equity
during the six months ended September 30, 2009 (see Note 9 in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements). Currently
management has projected that cash on hand, including cash borrowed under the
convertible promissory notes issued in the first, second, and third
quarters of fiscal 2010, will be sufficient to allow us to continue our
operations into the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 until more significant funding
can be secured. These matters raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information
derived from our consolidated statements of operations.
Fiscal
Year
|
For
the Six Months
Ended
September 30,
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2009
(‘000)
|
2008
(‘000)
|
2007
(‘000)
|
2009
(‘000)
|
2008
(‘000)
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
35
|
$
|
84
|
$
|
67
|
$
|
22
|
$
|
19
|
||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
546
|
386
|
177
|
326
|
253
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
loss
|
(511
|
)
|
(302
|
)
|
(110
|
)
|
(304
|
)
|
(234
|
)
|
||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
2,387
|
2,551
|
1,899
|
1,507
|
1,340
|
|||||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
297
|
166
|
88
|
181
|
216
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
2,684
|
2,717
|
1,987
|
1,688
|
1,556
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(3,195
|
)
|
(3,019
|
)
|
(2,097
|
)
|
(1,992
|
)
|
(1,790
|
)
|
||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
32
|
50
|
-
|
4
|
24
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,693
|
)
|
(1,593
|
)
|
(228
|
)
|
(4,143
|
)
|
(1,214
|
)
|
||||||||||
Loss
on sale of fixed assets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,402
|
) |
-
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(10,847
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(6,811
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Total
other expense, net
|
(13,508
|
)
|
(1,543
|
)
|
(228
|
)
|
(5,542
|
)
|
(8,001
|
)
|
||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(16,703
|
)
|
(4,562
|
)
|
(2,325
|
)
|
(7,534
|
)
|
(9,791
|
)
|
||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(16,705
|
)
|
$
|
(4,564
|
) |
$
|
(2,327
|
)
|
$
|
(7,536
|
)
|
$
|
(9,792
|
)
|
|||||
Net
loss available to common stockholders per common
share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$
|
(4.86
|
)
|
$
|
(1.38
|
)
|
$
|
(0.90
|
)
|
$
|
(2.02
|
)
|
$
|
(2.85
|
)
|
|||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock
split)
|
3,436,515
|
3,285,427
|
2,578,596
|
3,712,997
|
3,424,432
|
-28-
Six
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to six months ended September 30,
2008:
Revenues. During the
six months ended September 30, 2009, CryoPort generated $22,181 from shipper
sales compared to revenues of $19,406 in the same period of the prior year, an
increase of $2,775 (14%). The low revenues in both years was
primarily due to CryoPort’s shift initiated in mid-2006 in its sales and
marketing focus from the reusable shipper product line. CryoPort
discontinued sales of the reusable shippers to allow resources to focus on
further development and launch of the CryoPort Express® System and its
introduction into the biopharmaceutical industry sector during fiscal 2009,
which resulted in the slight increase in sales year over year. The
slow increase in product sales was the result of delays in CryoPort securing
adequate funding for the manufacturing and full commercialization of the
CryoPort Express®.
Cost of
Sales. Cost of sales for the six month period ended September
30, 2009 increased $73,113 (29%) to $326,444 from $253,331 for the six month
period ended September 30, 2008 primarily as the result of increased fixed
overhead manufacturing costs which resulted from CryoPort’s discontinuation of
the reusable shippers and refocus of manufacturing operation for the CryoPort
Express® System. During both periods, cost of sales exceeded sales
due to fixed manufacturing costs and plant
underutilization.
Gross Loss. Gross
loss for the six month period ended September 30, 2009 increased by $70,338
(30%) to $304,263 compared to $233,925 for the six month period ended September
30, 2008. The increase in gross loss is due to low revenues and
increased fixed overhead manufacturing costs which resulted from the refocus of
CryoPort’s manufacturing operations as discussed above and plant under
utilization.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased by $167,771 (13%) to $1,507,502 for the six month period ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $1,339,731 for the six month period ended
September 30, 2008 due primarily to a $189,136 (17%) increase in general and
administrative expenses from $1,124,148 for the six month period ended September
30, 2008 to $1,313,284 for the six month period ended September 30, 2009 and by
a $21,365 (10%) decrease in sales and marketing expenses from $215,583 for the
six month period ended September 30, 2008 to $194,218 for the six month period
ended September 30, 2009. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was due to increases in legal and accounting fees, consulting fees and
travel expenses. The increase in legal fees was associated with
CryoPort’s strategic partnering activities and debt
restructuring. The decrease in selling expenses was primarily related
to a decrease in advertising and promotional costs, consulting and travel costs
due to a reduction over prior year costs for additional market research, product
development and the development of customer relationships for the
commercialization of the CryoPort Express® System. These increases in
general and administrative expenses were partially offset by CryoPort’s efforts
to minimize overall costs and diversion of resources to the focus on
market development and sales ramp up of the CryoPort Express®
System.
Research and Development
Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased by
$35,453 (16%) to $180,791 for the six month period ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to $216,244 for the six month period ended September 30,
2008. Prior year expenses included consulting costs associated with
software development for the web based system to be used with the CryoPort
Express® One-Way Shipper, and to other research and development activity related
to the CryoPort Express® One-Way Shipper System, as CryoPort strove to develop
improvements in both the manufacturing processes and product materials for the
purpose of achieving additional product cost
efficiencies.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense increased $2,929,388 to $4,143,256 for the six month period
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1,213,868 for the six month period
ended September 30, 2008. This increase was due to $3,737,569 of
amortized debt discount, $25,579 of amortized financing fees, and $380,108 of
accrued interest, primarily related to the Debentures and the Private
Placement Debentures that were issued during the six month period ended
September 30, 2009. These increases were partially offset by a
reduction in interest expense for related party notes payable and notes payable
to officers as the result of the payments made against the principal note
balances.
Interest
Income. CryoPort recorded interest income of $3,714 for the
six month period ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $24,008 for the six
month period ended September 30, 2008. Prior year interest income
included the impact of increased cash balances related to the funds received in
connection with the Debentures.
-29-
Gain (Loss) on
Extinguishment of Debt. CryoPort incurred a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $6,902,941 during the six months ended September 30,
2008 as the result of the April 30, 2008 Amendment of the October Debentures
which provided for a six month deferral of principal payments. The
loss consists of a combination of the $5,858,344 increase in the fair market
value of warrants issued in connection with the October 2007 Debentures as a
result of the increase in the number of shares of common stock to be purchased
under each of the October Warrants and to the decrease in the exercise price of
October 2007 Warrants from $10.80, $11.04 and $19.20 to $7.20 each, the
elimination of the April 30, 2008 unamortized balance of deferred financing
costs of $312,197 and the $732,400 reduction in the unamortized discount balance
related to the October 2007 Debentures to reflect the present value of the
debentures as of April 30, 2008 (see Note 8 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements). There was no loss on
extinguishment of debt during the six months ended September 30,
2009.
CryoPort
incurred a gain on extinguishment of debt of $91,727 during the six months ended
September 30, 2008 as the result of the August 29, 2008 Amendment of the October
Debentures which provided for an increase of $866,202 in the principal balance
of the October Debentures for the interest that would have been paid September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2008 and for 15% of the aforementioned interest and
the outstanding principal as of the date of the amendment. The gain
consists of a combination of the $866,202 increase in principal offset by the
$899,004 increase in the unamortized discount balance and the previously accrued
interest of $58,925 related to the October Debentures to reflect the present
value of the debentures as of August 29, 2008 (see Note 8 of the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements). There was no gain on
extinguishment of debt in the six months ended September 30,
2009.
Net
Loss. As a result of the factors described above, the net loss
for the six months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $2,255,729 to
$7,536,045 or ($2.02) per share compared to $9,791,774 or ($2.85) per share for
the six months ended September 30, 2008, assuming the consummation of a reverse
stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1. Loss from operations for the six
months ended September 30, 2009 increased $202,656 to $1,992,556 compared to
$1,789,900 for the six months ended September 30, 2008.
Year
Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2008:
Revenues. During
the year ended March 31, 2009, CryoPort generated revenues of $35,124 compared
to revenues of $83,564 during the year ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of
$48,440 (58.0%). These low revenues in both years is primarily due to
CryoPort’s shift initiated in mid-2006 in its sales and marketing focus from the
reusable shipper product line. Further, the decrease in revenues was
caused by the discontinuation of the sales of the reusable shippers early fiscal
2009 to allow resources to focus on the further development and launch of the
CryoPort Express® System and its introduction into the biopharmaceutical
industry sector during fiscal 2009 and to the delays in CryoPort’s securing
adequate funding for the manufacturing and full commercialization of the
CryoPort Express®.
Cost of
Sales. Cost of sales for the year ended March 31, 2009
increased $159,781 (41.4%) to $546,152 from $386,371 for the year ended March
31, 2008 as the result of increased fixed overhead manufacturing costs resulting
from CryoPort’s discontinuation of the reusable shippers and preparation of
manufacturing operation for the launch of the new CryoPort Express® System
during fiscal 2009. During both periods, cost of sales exceeded sales
due to fixed manufacturing costs and plant underutilization.
Gross
Loss. Gross loss for the year ended March 31, 2009 increased
by $208,221 (68.8%) to $511,028 compared to $302,807 for the year ended March
31, 2008. The increase in the gross loss is due to decreased revenues
and increased fixed overhead manufacturing costs resulting from CryoPort’s
discontinuation of the reusable shippers and preparation of manufacturing
operation for the launch of the new CryoPort Express® System during fiscal
2009.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased by $163,491 (6.4%) to $2,387,287 for the year ended March 31,
2009 compared to $2,550,778 for the year ended March 31, 2008 due mainly to
a decrease in general and administrative costs of $213,453 (9.6%) which was
partially offset by an increase in selling expenses of $49,962
(15.4%). The decrease in general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to CryoPort’s efforts to minimize overall costs and diversion
of resources to the focus on market development and sales ramp up of
the CryoPort Express® System. These general and administrative cost
reductions were partially offset by increases in legal and accounting fees,
insurance premiums and travel expenses. The increased selling
expenses were primarily related to increased advertising and promotional costs,
consulting and travel costs as the result of additional market research,
product development and the development of customer relationships for the
commercialization of the CryoPort Express® System.
-30-
Research and Development
Expenses. Research and development expenses increased by
$131,151 (78.9%) to $297,378 for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
$166,227 for the year ended March 31, 2008 in relation to the progression of the
research and development activity, related to the initial development of the web
based customer service portal utilized by the CryoPort Express®
System. Further these efforts are expected to lead to the
introduction of shippers of varying sizes based on market requirements,
constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume manufacturing
methods that will make it practical to provide the cryogenic packages offered by
the CryoPort Express® System. Other research and development effort
has been directed toward third party certification testing and improvements to
the liquid nitrogen retention system to render it more reliable in the general
shipping environment and to the design of the outer packaging.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense increased $1,100,665 to $2,693,383
for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to $1,592,718 for the year ended
March 31, 2008. This increase is primarily due to the interest costs
related to the Debentures including primarily increases of $1,008,130
resulting from the amortization of additional debt discounts and $150,913 of
interest expense on the face value of the debentures which were partially offset
by reductions in amortization of deferred financing fees and interest expense
for related party notes payable as the result of the payments made against the
principal note balances.
Interest Income. CryoPort recorded
interest income of $32,098 for the year ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
$50,076 for the year ended March 31, 2008 as the result of decreased cash
balances related to the use of funds for operations during the
year.
Loss on Extinguishment of
Debt.
CryoPort incurred a total combined loss on extinguishment of debt of
$10,846,573 during the year ended March 31, 2009 as the result of the resulting
change in valuation of the debt and related warrants associated with the
Amendments to the October 2008 Debentures in April 2008, August 2008 and January
2009 and the change in valuation of the debt and related warrants associated
with the January 2009 Amendment to the May 2008 Debentures. The loss
consists of a combined total loss on extinguishment of debt on the October 2007
Debentures of $9,449,498 and $1,397,075 on the May 2008 Debentures. There was no
loss on extinguishment of debt during the year ended March 31,
2008.
Net
Loss. As a result of the factors described above, the net loss
for the year ended March 31, 2009 increased by $12,141,097 (266%) to $16,705,151
or ($4.86) per share compared to $4,564,054 or ($1.38) per share for the year
ended March 31, 2008, assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a
ratio of 12-to-1.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,120,758 and negative
working capital of $22,902,096. CryoPort’s working capital deficit at
September 30, 2009 included $18,404,578 of derivative liabilities, the balance
of which represented the fair value of warrants and embedded conversion features
related to CryoPort’s convertible debentures and were reclassed from equity
during the six months ended September 30, 2009. As of March 31, 2009,
CryoPort had cash and cash equivalents of $249,758 and negative working capital
of $3,693,015.
Net cash
used in operating activities was $1,145,497 for the six months ended September
30, 2009, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $1,584,022 for
the six months ended September 30, 2008. Net loss for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 of $ 7,536,045 included a non-cash loss of
$1,401,550 due to the change in valuation of our derivative liabilities and
non-cash expenses of $3,737,569 due primarily to discount amortization related
to our convertible debt instruments. Offsetting the cash impact of
our net operating loss (excluding non-cash items) was an increase in accrued
interest payable of $278,325 primarily due to our Private Placement Debentures
and an increase in accounts payable of $175,268 due primarily to increased
general and administrative expenses. Net cash used in operating
activities of $1,584,022 for the six months ended September 30, 2008 reflected a
net operating loss of $9,791,774, which included a non-cash loss on
extinguishment of debt of $6,811,214 and non-cash expenses of $958,856 due
primarily to discount amortization related to our convertible debt
instruments. In addition to our net operating loss and related cash
impact, inventories increased by $299,393 and were offset by the positive cash
impact of an increase in accrued interest payable related to our May 2008
debenture.
Net cash
used in investing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was
$34,139 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $53,676 for the
comparable period in 2008. Net cash used in investing activities for
the six months ended September 30, 2009 primarily reflected payment of trademark
costs. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended
September 30, 2008 was comprised primarily of fixed asset
purchases.
-31-
Net cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was
$2,050,636 and was primarily related to proceeds from our Private Placement
Debentures of $1,321,500, which were partially offset by payment of deferred
financing costs and payments on our related party notes payable. Net
cash provided by financing activities of $625,713 for the six months ended
September 30, 2008 reflected proceeds from our May 2008 Debentures of
$1,062,500, which were partially offset by payments for financing costs,
repayments on convertible and related party notes payable.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following summarizes CryoPort’s contractual obligations at March 31, 2009, and
the effects such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in
future periods:
Payments
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
Yr
|
1-3
Years
|
4-5
Years
|
After
5
Years
|
|||||||||||||||
Related
Party Notes
|
$
|
1,129,500
|
$
|
150,000
|
$
|
224,000
|
$
|
192,000
|
$
|
563,500
|
||||||||||
Convertible
Debentures (a)
|
6,681,629
|
4,454,424
|
2,227,205
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
Lease
|
221,000
|
156,000
|
65,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Note
Payable to P. Berry
|
143,950
|
90,000
|
53,950
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Line
of Credit
|
90,310
|
90,310
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Private
Placement Convertible Debt
|
60,000
|
60,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$
|
8,326,389
|
$
|
5,000,734
|
$
|
2,570,155
|
$
|
192,000
|
$
|
563,500
|
(a)
Pursuant to the 2010 Amendment, a portion of the outstanding principal balance
of the Debentures will be converted into shares of common stock upon
completion of this offering.
Impact of
Inflation. From time to
time, CryoPort experiences price increases from third party manufacturers and
these increases cannot always be passed on to CryoPort’s
customers. While these price increases have not had a material impact
on CryoPort’s historical operations or profitability in the past, they could
affect revenues in the future.
Research
and Development
We have
completed the research and development efforts associated with initial
phases of the web-based order entry and tracking system and the CryoPort
Express® Shippers, a line of dry vapor cryogenic shippers, the essential
components of our CryoPort Express® System, which has been developed to provide
a one-call total solution for the transport of temperature sensitive, biological
and pharmaceutical materials. We continue to provide ongoing
research associated with the CryoPort Express® System, as we develop
improvements in both the manufacturing processes and product materials and in
the web-based customer service portal for the purpose of achieving additional
cost efficiencies and customer functionality. As with any research
effort, there is uncertainty and risk associated with whether these efforts will
produce results in a timely manner so as to enhance our market
position. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
research and development costs were $180,791 and $216,244,
respectively. CryoPort’s sponsored research and development costs
related to future products and redesign of present products are expensed as
incurred and include such costs as salaries, employee benefits, costs determined
utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for options issued to the
Scientific Advisory Board and prototype design and materials costs.
Our
research and development efforts are focused on continually improving the
features of the CryoPort Express® System including the web-based customer
service portal and the CryoPort Express® Shippers. Further, these
efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of shippers of varying sizes
based on market requirements, constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing
high volume manufacturing methods that will make it practical to provide the
cryogenic shippers offered by the CryoPort Express® System. Other
research and development effort has been directed toward improvements to the
liquid nitrogen retention system to render it more reliable in the general
shipping environment and to the design of the outer packaging.
-32-
Critical
Accounting Policies
CryoPort’s
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. CryoPort bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions, however, in the past the
estimates and assumptions have been materially accurate and have not required
any significant changes. Specific sensitivity of each of the
estimates and assumptions to change based on other outcomes that are reasonably
likely to occur and would have a material effect is identified individually in
each of the discussions of the critical accounting policies described
below. Should we experience significant changes in the estimates or
assumptions which would cause a material change to the amounts used in the
preparation of our financial statements, material quantitative information will
be made available to investors as soon as it is reasonably
available.
CryoPort
believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our
unaudited consolidated financial statements:
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts. CryoPort maintains allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of CryoPort’s
customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is based on specific identification of customer accounts and CryoPort’s
best estimate of the likelihood of potential loss, taking into account such
factors as the financial condition and payment history of major
customers. CryoPort evaluates the collectability of CryoPort’s
receivables at least quarterly. Such costs of allowance for doubtful
accounts is subject to estimates based on the historical actual costs of bad
debt experienced, total accounts receivable amounts, age of accounts receivable
and any knowledge of the customers’ ability or inability to pay outstanding
balances. If the financial condition of CryoPort’s customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances may be required. The differences could be
material and could significantly impact cash flows from operating
activities.
Inventory. CryoPort writes
down its inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal
to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value
based upon assumptions about future demand, future pricing and market
conditions. Inventory reserve costs are subject to estimates made by
CryoPort based on historical experience, inventory quantities, age of inventory
and any known expectations for product changes. If actual future
demands, future pricing or market conditions are less favorable than those
projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required and
the differences could be material. Such differences might
significantly impact cash flows from operating activities. Once
established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis
of the obsolete or unmarketable inventories.
During
our early years, our limited revenue was derived from the sale of our reusable
product line. Our current business plan focuses on per-use leasing of
the shipping container and added-value services that will be used by us to
provide an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping solution.
We
provide shipping containers to our customers and charge a fee in exchange for
the use of the containers. CryoPort's arrangements are similar to the
accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use the containers
over a period of time. We retain title to the containers and provide
our customers the use of the containers for a specified shipping
cycle. At the culmination of a customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to us. As a result, during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, we reclassified the containers from inventory to fixed
assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program.
Intangible
Assets. Intangible assets
are comprised of patents and trademarks and software development
costs. CryoPort capitalizes costs of obtaining patents and trademarks
which are amortized, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
life of five years. CryoPort capitalizes certain costs related to
software developed for internal use. Software
development costs incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stages
are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application
development stage are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful life of the software which is five
years. Capitalized costs include purchased materials and costs of
services including the valuation of warrants issued to consultants using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
-33-
Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets. CryoPort assesses the recoverability of its
long-lived assets by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of
long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected
undiscounted cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset impairment is
measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which
long-lived asset impairment is determined by
management. Manufacturing fixed assets are subject to obsolescence
potential as result of changes in customer demands, manufacturing process
changes and changes in materials used. CryoPort is not currently
aware of any such changes that would cause impairment to the value of its
manufacturing fixed assets.
Deferred
Financing Costs. Deferred financing costs represent costs
incurred in connection with the issuance of the convertible notes
payable. Deferred financing costs are being amortized over the term
of the financing instrument on a straight-line basis, which approximates the
effective interest method.
Accrued Warranty
Costs. CryoPort estimates the costs of the standard warranty,
which is included with the reusable shippers at no additional cost to the
customer for a period up to one year. These estimated costs are
recorded as accrued warranty costs at the time of product sale. These
estimated costs are subject to estimates made by CryoPort based on the
historical actual warranty costs, number of products returned for warranty
repair, and length of warranty coverage.
Revenue
Recognition. Four conditions must be met before revenue can be
recognized: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii)
delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; (iii) the price is fixed or
determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. CryoPort records a
provision for sales returns and claims based upon historical experience. Actual
returns and claims in any future period may differ from CryoPort’s
estimates.
During
our early years, our limited revenue was derived from the sale of our reusable
product line. Our current business plan focuses on per-use leasing of
the shipping container and added-value services that will be used by us to
provide an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping solution.
We
provide shipping containers to our customers and charge a fee in exchange for
the use of the containers. CryoPort’s arrangements are similar to the
accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use the containers
over a period of time. We retain title to the containers and provide
our customers the use of the containers for a specified shipping
cycle. At the culmination of a customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to us. As a result, during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, we reclassified the containers from inventory to fixed
assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program.
Stock-Based
Compensation. CryoPort accounts for share-based payments to
employees and directors in the consolidated financial statements based upon
their fair values. CryoPort uses the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to estimate the grant-date fair value of share-based
awards. Fair value is determined at the date of grant. The
consolidated financial statement effect of forfeitures is estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, if the actual effect differs from those
estimates. The estimated average forfeiture rate for the periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero as CryoPort has not had a significant
history of forfeitures and does not expect forfeitures in the
future.
All
transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received by
non-employees for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on
the fair value of the consideration received by non-employees or the fair value
of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably
measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of
the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third party
performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance
will occur.
Derivative
Liabilities. Our issued and
outstanding common stock purchase warrants and embedded conversion features
previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were
no longer afforded equity treatment, and the fair value of these common stock
purchase warrants and embedded conversion features, some of which have exercise
price reset features and some that were issued with convertible debt, from
equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative
liability since their date of issue. The common stock purchase
warrants were not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash
flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign
operation. The warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as
such, all future changes in the fair value of these warrants will be recognized
currently in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or
expire. These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an
active securities market, and as such, we estimate the fair value of these
warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
-34-
Convertible
Debentures. If the conversion feature of conventional
convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value,
this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature
(“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by CryoPort as a debt
discount. In those circumstances, the convertible debt will be
recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. CryoPort amortizes
the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective
interest method.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued new standards that defined fair value,
established a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and
required enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. This framework
became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008 the FASB delayed the
effective date of the fair value framework for non-financial assets and
liabilities, other than those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on
a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. In
addition, in October 2008, the FASB clarified the application of the
framework in an inactive market and to illustrate how an entity would determine
fair value in an inactive market. Our adoption of the fair value framework and
for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued guidance that
required collaborators to present the results of activities for which they act
as the principal on a gross basis and report any payments received from (made
to) other collaborators based on other applicable GAAP or, in the absence of
other applicable GAAP, based on analogy to authoritative accounting literature
or a reasonable, rational, and consistently applied accounting policy election.
The guidance clarified that the determination of whether transactions within a
collaborative arrangement are part of a vendor-customer (or analogous)
relationship. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008 and did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB revised the requirements for accounting for
business combinations, which requires companies to record most identifiable
assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a
business combination at “full fair value.” The revised guidelines
require companies to record fair value estimates of contingent consideration and
certain other potential liabilities during the original purchase price
allocation and to expense acquisition costs as incurred. These revised standards
apply to all business combinations, including combinations by contract alone.
Further, all business combinations are to be accounted for by applying the
acquisition method. The revised business combination accounting standards were
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Our
adoption of the business combination accounting standards did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements and any future business
combinations will be evaluated under this accounting standard.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued new standards that required noncontrolling
interests (previously referred to as minority interests) be treated as a
separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of
permanent equity. These guidelines apply to the accounting for noncontrolling
interests and transactions with non-controlling interest holders in consolidated
financial statements and will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling
interests, including any that arose before the effective date except that
comparative period information must be recast to classify noncontrolling
interests in equity, attribute net income and other comprehensive income to
noncontrolling interests, and provide other required disclosures. Our adoption
of accounting for noncontrolling interests at the beginning of fiscal year 2009
had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued new standards that required enhanced disclosures regarding
derivatives and hedging activities, including: (i) the manner in which an entity
uses derivative instruments; (ii) the manner in which derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under existing guidance; and (iii) the
effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The standards are
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Our adoption of the enhanced derivative and
hedging activity disclosures did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
-35-
In
April 2009, the FASB expanded fair value disclosures required for all
financial instruments to interim periods for publicly traded entities. Entities
are required to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to
estimate the fair value of financial instruments in financial statements on an
interim basis and to highlight any changes of the methods and significant
assumptions from prior periods. It does not require interim disclosures of
credit or market risks. The revised disclosure requirements did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May
2009, the FASB issued established general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (subsequent
events). These standards are effective prospectively for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of these
standards did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of our issuance
of the consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued The FASB Accounting Standard Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the Codification) as
a single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP to be launched
July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current GAAP, but is
intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the
authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The
Codification became effective for us in the interim period ending
September 30, 2009, and as a result all references made to GAAP use the new
Codification numbering system prescribed by the FASB. However, as the
Codification is not intended to change existing GAAP, it is not expected to have
any impact on our financial position, operating results or cash
flows.
Change
in Accounting Principle
In June
2008, the EITF issued guidance to address concerns regarding the meaning of
"indexed to an entity’s own stock" as outlined in the accounting guidance for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Equity-linked instruments (or
embedded features) that otherwise meet the definition of a derivative are not
accounted for as derivatives if certain criteria are met, one of which is that
the instrument (or embedded feature) must be indexed to the entity’s own
stock. Guidance is provided on how to determine if equity linked
instruments (or embedded features) such as warrants to purchase our stock and
convertible notes are considered indexed to our stock. Our warrant
and convertible-debt agreements contained adjustment (or ratchet) provisions in
the agreements, and accordingly, we determined that these instruments were not
indexed to our common stock. As a result, we were required to account for these
instruments as derivatives or liabilities. We adopted the guidance
beginning April 1, 2009, and applied the provisions to outstanding instruments
as of that date. The cumulative effect at April 1, 2009 to record, at fair
value, a liability for the warrants and embedded conversion feature, including
the effects on the discounts on the convertible notes of $2,595,059, resulted in
an aggregate reduction to equity of $13,875,623, consisting of a reduction to
additional paid-in capital of $4,217,730 and an increase in the accumulated
deficit of $9,657,893 to reflect the change in the accounting. Under the new
guidance our warrants and embedded conversion features will be carried at fair
value and adjusted quarterly through earnings.
-36-
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a
provider of an innovative cold chain frozen shipping system dedicated to
providing superior, affordable cryogenic shipping solutions that ensure the
safety, status and temperature of high value, temperature sensitive
materials. We have developed a line of cost effective reusable
cryogenic transport containers (referred to as "shippers") capable of
transporting biological, environmental and other temperature sensitive materials
at temperatures below 0° Celsius. These dry vapor shippers are one of
the first significant alternatives to dry ice shipping and achieve 10-plus day
holding times compared to one to two day holding times with dry
ice.
Our value
proposition comes from both providing safe transportation and an
environmentally friendly, long lasting shipper, and through our value added
services that offer a simple hassle-free solution for our
customers. These value-added services include an internet-based web
portal that enables the customer to initiate shipping service, track the
progress and status of a shipment, and provides in-transit temperature
monitoring services of the shipper. CryoPort also provides a fully
ready charged shipper containing all freight bills, customs documents and
regulatory paperwork for the entire journey of the shipper to its customers at
their pick up location.
Our
principal focus has been the further development and commercial launch of
CryoPort Express® Portal, an innovative IT solution for shipping and tracking
high-value specimens through overnight shipping companies, and our CryoPort
Express® Shipper, a line of dry vapor
cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological and pharmaceutical
materials. A dry vapor cryogenic shipper is a container that uses
liquid nitrogen in dry vapor form, which is suspended inside a vacuum insulated
bottle as a refrigerant, to provide storage temperatures below minus 150°
Celsius. The dry vapor shipper is designed using innovative,
proprietary, and patented technology which prevents spillage of liquid nitrogen
and pressure build up as the liquid nitrogen evaporates. A
proprietary foam retention system is employed to ensure that liquid nitrogen
stays inside the vacuum container, even when placed upside-down or on its side,
as is often the case when in the custody of a shipping
company. Biological specimens are stored in a specimen chamber,
referred to as a “well,” inside the container and refrigeration is provided by
harmless cold nitrogen
gas evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam retention system
surrounding the well. Biological specimens transported using our
cryogenic shipper can include clinical samples, diagnostics, live cell
pharmaceutical products (such as cancer vaccines, semen and embryos, infectious
substances) and other items that require and/or are protected through continuous
exposure to frozen or cryogenic temperatures (below minus 150 °
Celsius).
Corporate
History and Structure
CryoPort,
Inc. is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated under the name
G.T.5-Limited (“GT5”) on May 25, 1990. In connection with a Share
Exchange Agreement, on March 15, 2005 we changed our name to CryoPort, Inc. and
acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CryoPort
Systems, Inc., a California corporation, in exchange for 2,009,009 shares (after
giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of our common
stock (which represented approximately 81% of the total issued and outstanding
shares of common stock following the close of the
transaction). CryoPort Systems, Inc, which was originally formed in
1999 as a California limited liability company, and subsequently reorganized
into a California corporation on December 11, 2000, remains the operating
company under CryoPort, Inc.
Market
Opportunity
As a
result of growing globalization, including with respect to such areas as life
science clinical trials and distribution of pharmaceutical products, the
requirement for effective solutions for keeping certain clinical samples and
pharmaceutical products at frozen temperatures takes on added significance due
to extended shipping times, custom delays and logistics
challenges. Today, such goods are traditionally shipped in cardboard
insulated containers packed with dry ice, gel/freezer packs or a combination
thereof. The current dry ice solutions have limitations that severely
limit their effective and efficient use for both short and long-distances (e.g.,
international). Conventional dry ice shipments often require labor
intensive “re-icing” operations resulting in higher labor and shipping
costs.
-37-
We
believe that our patented cryogenic shippers make us well positioned to take
advantage of the growing demand for effective and efficient international
transport of temperature sensitive materials resulting from continued
globalization. Of particular significance is the trend within the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries toward
globalization. We believe this presents a new and unique opportunity
for pharmaceutical companies, particularly early or developmental stage
companies, to conduct some of their clinical trials in foreign countries where
the cost may be cheaper and/or because the foreign countries significantly
larger population provides a larger pool of potential patients suffering from
the indication that the drug candidate is being designed to treat. We
also plan to provide domestic shipping solutions in situations and regions where
there is a high priority placed on maintaining the integrity of materials
shipped at cryogenic temperatures and where we can be cost
effective.
Our
product offering and service offering consists of our CryoPort Express®
Shippers, a line of reusable dry vapor shippers, our Smart Pak data logger, a
temperature monitoring system (which, together with our CryoPort Express®
Shippers, comprise our new business model referred to as the CryoPort Express®
System) and a containment bag which is used in connection with the shipment of
infectious or dangerous goods using the CryoPort Express® Shipper.
The
CryoPort Express® Shippers
Our
CryoPort Express® Shippers are a line of multiple size, cryogenic dry vapor
shippers capable of maintaining cryogenic temperatures of minus 150° Celsius or
below for a period of 10 or more days. A dry cryogenic shipper is a
device that uses liquid nitrogen contained inside a vacuum insulated bottle
which serves as a refrigerant to provide storage temperatures below minus 150°
Celsius. Our CryoPort Express® shipper is designed to ensure that
there is no pressure build up as the liquid nitrogen evaporates or spillage of
liquid nitrogen. We have developed a proprietary foam retention
system to ensure that liquid nitrogen stays inside the vacuum container, which
allows the shipper to be designated as a dry shipper meeting International Air
Transport Association (“IATA”) requirements. Biological or
pharmaceutical specimens are stored in a specimen chamber, referred to as a
“well”, inside the container and refrigeration is provided by cold nitrogen gas
evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam retention
system. Specimens that may be transported using our cryogenic shipper
include live cell pharmaceutical products such as cancer vaccines, diagnostic
materials, semen and embryos, infectious substances and other items that require
continuous exposure to frozen or cryogenic temperatures (e.g., temperatures
below minus 150° Celsius).
The
technology underlying the CryoPort Express® Shipper was developed by modifying
and advancing technology from our first generation of reusable cryogenic dry
shippers. While our CryoPort Express® Shippers share many of the
characteristics and basic design details of our earlier shippers, we are
manufacturing our CryoPort Express® Shippers from alternative, lower cost
materials, which will reduce overall operating costs. We maintain
ongoing development efforts related to our shippers which are principally
focused on material properties, particularly those properties related to the low
temperature requirement, the vacuum retention characteristics, such as the
permeability of the materials, and lower cost materials in an effort to meet the
market needs for achieving a lower cost frozen and cryogenic shipping
solution. Other advances additional to the development work on the
cryogenic container include both an improved liquid nitrogen retention system
and a secondary protective, spill proof packaging system. This
secondary system, outer packaging has a low cost that lends itself to
disposability, and it is made of recyclable materials. Further, it
adds an additional liquid nitrogen retention capability to further assure
compliance with IATA and ICAO regulations that prohibit egress of liquid
nitrogen from the shipping package. IACO stands for the International
Civil Aviation Organization, which is a United Nations organization that
develops regulations for the safe transport of dangerous goods by
air.
-38-
Our
CryoPort Express® Shippers are lightweight, low-cost, re-usable dry vapor liquid
nitrogen storage containers that we believe combine the best features of
packaging, cryogenics and high vacuum technology. A CryoPort Express®
Shipper is composed of an aluminum metallic dewar flask, with a well for holding
the biological material in the inner chamber. The dewar flask, or
“thermos bottle,” is an example of a practical device in which the conduction,
convection and radiation of heat are reduced as much as possible. The
inner chamber of the shipper is surrounded by a high surface, low density open
cell plastic foam material which retains the liquid nitrogen in-situ by
absorption, adsorption and surface tension. Absorption is defined as
the taking up of matter in bulk by other matter, as in the dissolving of a gas
by a liquid, whereas adsorption is the surface retention of solid, liquid or gas
molecules, atoms or ions by a solid or liquid. This material absorbs
liquid nitrogen several times faster than currently used materials, while
providing the shipper with a hold time and capacity to transport biological
materials safely and conveniently. The annular space between the
inner and outer dewar chambers is evacuated to a very high vacuum (10-6
Torr). The specimen-holding chamber has a primary cap to enclose the
specimens, and a removable and replaceable secondary cap to further enclose the
specimen holding container and to contain the liquid nitrogen. The
entire dewar vessel is then wrapped in a plurality of insulating and cushioning
materials and placed in a disposable outer packaging made of recyclable
material.
We
believe the above product configuration satisfies the needs of the markets that
require the temperature-critical, frozen and refrigerated transport of
biological materials, such as the pharmaceutical clinical trials, gene
biotechnology, infectious materials handling, and animal and human reproduction
markets. Due to our proprietary technology and innovative design, our
shippers are less prone to losing functional hold time when not kept in an
upright position than the competing products because such proprietary technology
and innovative design prevent the spilling or leakage of the liquid nitrogen
when the container is tipped or on its side which would adversely affect the
functional hold time of the container.
An
important feature of the CryoPort Express® Shippers is their compliance with the
stringent packaging requirements of IATA Packing Instructions 602 and 650,
respectively. These instructions include the internal pressure
(hydraulic) and drop performance requirements.
The CryoPort
Express®
System
The
CryoPort Express® System is comprised of the CryoPort Express® Shipper, the CryoPort Express® Smart Pak data logger, CryoPort Express® Portal, which manages order
entry and all aspects of shipping operations, and CryoPort Express® Analytics, which monitors
shipment performance metrics and evaluates temperature monitoring data collected
by the data logger during shipment. The CryoPort Express® System is
focused on improving the reliability of frozen shipping while reducing the
customers’ overall operating costs. This is accomplished by providing
a complete end-to-end solution for the transport and monitoring of frozen or
cryogenically preserved biological or pharmaceutical materials shipped though
overnight shipping companies.
CryoPort
Express®
Portal
The
CryoPort Express® Portal is used by CryoPort, our customers and our
business partners to automate the entry of orders, prepare customs documentation
and to facilitate status and location monitoring of shipped orders while in
transit. As an example, the CryoPort Express® Portal is
fully integrated with IT systems at FedEx and runs in a browser requiring no
software installation. It is used by CryoPort to manage shipping
operations and to reduce administrative costs typically provisioned through
manual labor relating to order-entry, order processing, preparation of shipping
documents and back-office accounting. It is also used to support the high level
of customer service expected by the industry. Certain features of the
CryoPort Express® Portal reduce operating costs and facilitate the scaling
of CryoPort’s business, but more importantly they offer significant value to the
customer in terms of cost avoidance and risk mitigation. Examples
these features include automation of order entry, development of Key Performance
Indicators (“KPI”) to support our efforts for continuous process improvements in
our business, and programmatic exception monitoring to detect and sometimes
anticipate delays in the shipping process, often before the customer or the
shipping company becomes aware of it. In the future we will add rate
and mode optimization and in-transit monitoring of temperature, location and
state of health (discussed below), via wireless communications.
The
CryoPort Express® Portal also serves as the communications nerve center for
the management, collection and analysis of Smart Pak data harvested from Smart
Pak data loggers in the field. Data is converted into pre-designed reports
containing valuable and often actionable information that becomes the quality
control standard or “pedigree” of the shipment. This high value
information can be utilized by CryoPort to provide consultative services to the
customer relating to cryogenics.
-39-
The
CryoPort Express® Smart
Pak
Temperature
monitoring is a high value feature from our customers' perspective as it is
an effective and reliable method to determine that the shipment materials were
not damaged or degraded during shipment due to temperature
fluctuations. We recently completed successful testing of Phase II of
our Smart Pak System which is a self-contained automated data logger capable of
recording the internal and external temperatures of samples shipped in our
CryoPort Express® Shipper, and we anticipate commercial launch of this added
feature in 2010.
Phase III
of our Smart Pak System is anticipated to launch by the end of fiscal year 2010,
and consists of adding a smart chip to each shipper with wireless
connectivity to enable our customers to monitor a shipper’s location, specimen
temperature and overall state of health via our web portal. A key
feature of the Phase III product is automatic downloading of data which requires
no customer intervention.
CryoPort
Express®
Analytics
Our
continued development of the CryoPort Express® Portal is a strategic element of
our business strategy and the CryoPort Express® Portal system has been
designed to support planned future features with this thought in
mind. Analytics is a term used by IT professionals to refer to
performance benchmarks or Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) that management
utilizes to measure performance against desired standards. Examples include
time-based metrics for order processing time and on-time deliveries by our
shipping partners, as well as profiling shipping lanes to determine average
transit times and predicting an exception if a
shipment is taking longer than it should based on historical
metrics. The analytical results will be utilized by CryoPort to
render consultative customer services.
Biological
Material Holders
We have
also developed a patented containment bag which is used in connection with the
shipment of infectious or dangerous goods using the CryoPort Express® Shipper.
Up to five vials, watertight primary receptacles, are placed onto aluminum
holders and up to fifteen holders (75 vials) are placed into an absorbent pouch
which is designed to absorb the entire contents of all the vials in the event of
leakage. This pouch containing up to 75 vials is then placed in a
watertight secondary packaging Tyvek bag capable of withstanding cryogenic
temperatures, and then sealed. This bag is then placed into the well
of the cryogenic shipper.
Future
Products
We are
continuing our research and development efforts which are expected to lead to
the introduction of additional dry vapor shippers, including larger and smaller
size units constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing high volume
manufacturing methods. We are also exploring the use of alternative
phase change materials in place of liquid nitrogen in order to seek entry into
the ambient temperature and chilled (2° to 8° Celsius) shipping
markets.
-40-
Competitive
Strengths
We
believe that our cryogenic shipping systems provide us with the following
competitive strengths:
Maintaining the
Integrity of Materials Shipped. We have developed our CryoPort
Express® Shippers, a line of cryogenic dry vapor shippers, to be capable of
maintaining cryogenic temperatures of minus 150° Celsius or less for 10-plus
days. Our CryoPort Express® Shippers were developed with a view
towards meeting the needs of the global biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries which require the ability to transport live cell pharmaceutical
products, such as cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials, reproductive tissues,
infectious and other biological substances, and other items at constant frozen
or cryogenic temperatures. Traditional methods that have been serving
this market, such as dry ice, are only capable of maintaining such temperatures
for a period of one to two days (depending on the size of the package and amount
of dry ice used), thereby potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the
transported materials during longer shipments. We believe our
CryoPort Express® Shippers are the first significant alternative to using dry
ice that achieves 10-plus day holding times.
Durability of
Shipping Devices. Because the outer shell of our CryoPort
Express® Shippers are made from durable materials, as compared to corrugated
cardboard boxes with Styrofoam inserts or similar materials, the risk of damage
to the container and its contents is significantly reduced. Where
corrugated cardboard boxes are susceptible to being crushed or damaged during
shipment, our shippers, which have been tested and are capable of withstanding
drops of up to 30 feet, significantly reduce the risk of damage to the packaged
materials. The durability and long holding times of our shippers has
greater significance for international (or other long distance) shipments due to
the increased shipping times and amplified risk of damage during transit and
mishandling during shipment.
Cost. We
believe we have developed a solution for the shipment of temperature sensitive
materials which is not only more effective, but also more cost efficient,
especially in international shipping. Shipping temperature sensitive
materials using the traditional method of dry ice requires multiple steps,
manual intervention/monitoring, and the coordination of re-icing tasks at
several locations to provide a solution lasting for more than several
days. The cost of developing and maintaining the infrastructure
necessary to support these operations frequently depend on off-shore third party
contractors which adds significant cost. Because our cryogenic
shippers are capable of hold times of 10 plus days, customers will not require
the same extensive infrastructure needed for dry ice
shipments. Furthermore, because our shippers do not rely on dry ice
(which is a hazardous material that produces CO2 gas as it sublimates), there
are more freight courier alternatives available for our
shippers and generally lower freight charges.
Tracking and
Monitoring. We have developed a sophisticated web portal with
user friendly features that will be used for capturing customer orders and
tracking shipments. Our portal enables CryoPort employees to manage
multi-route shipments with minimal amount of human resources by using programmed
analogs and exception monitoring. In addition, our customers are able
to place orders, track shipments, and monitor the status of their package
through our web portal. CryoPort is also able to internally manage
its shipper inventory, track incoming and outgoing assets, report on shipping
performance metrics, and invoice for shipping services through the technology
employed through its web portal.
The Green
Alternative. Unlike shippers using dry ice, the internal core
of our cryogenic shippers absorbs liquid nitrogen in a gaseous state which then
maintains the required cryogenic temperatures. Dry ice is a hazardous
material because it produces excess CO2 gas as it sublimates which is a noted
greenhouse gas and which may be dangerous in confined spaces where there is an
absence or low rates of ventilation. Use of our shippers does not
result in the emission of greenhouse gases or other potentially toxic
materials. In addition, shippers using dry ice are made of corrugated
cardboard with Styrofoam inserts. These shippers are typically not
reusable, resulting in the disposal of the cardboard box. Further,
Styrofoam should not be disposed of in landfills because it is not
biodegradable. Our shippers do not contain Styrofoam, nor do they
present similar landfill disposal issues or other environmental
challenges.
Technology. Once our CryoPort
Express® System
is fully operational, it will represent the most complete and comprehensive
shipping solution available in the market for high-value temperature sensitive
materials. It will reduce operating costs for CryoPort and its
customers and it will provide customized analytics to monitor shipping
efficiency and the health and status of the materials entrusted to our
care.
-41-
Key
Business Strategies
Relationship with
Global Couriers. We believe that our near term success is best
achieved by establishing strategic relationships with global couriers which will
enable us to provide a seamless, end-to-end shipping solution to our
customers. In addition, we will be able to leverage the couriers’
established express, ground and freight infrastructures and penetrate new
markets with minimal investment. To this end, we recently entered
into our first strategic relationship with a global courier on January 13, 2010
when we signed an agreement with Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) pursuant
to which we will lease to FedEx such number of our cryogenic shippers that FedEx
shall, from time to time, order for its customers. Under this
agreement, FedEx has the right to and shall, on a non-exclusive basis, promote,
market and sell transportation of our shippers and our related value-added goods
and services, such as our data logger, web portal and planned CryoPort Express
Smart Pak System , In addition to FedEx, our management team is
commencing discussions with other global couriers in an effort to establish
partnerships pursuant to which the couriers would provide preferred shipping
rates, access to logistics, tracking, and customs clearance capabilities.
As in the case of our agreement with FedEx, we expect that other global freight
couriers will utilize their sales forces to promote and sell transportation of
shippers and our frozen shipping services. We can not assure you that
we will be able to consummate an agreement with any other global
couriers.
Target Large
Clinical Research Organizations and Life Science
Companies. Along with our efforts to establish strategic
relationships with global couriers, we intend to increase our marketing efforts
to the large CROs and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in
the management and/or conduct of both domestic and international clinical
trials. Management has been in active dialogue with selected large
CROs, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to introduce this new
frozen shipping solution and to discuss these potential customers’ shipping
needs. Several of these meetings have been joint presentations including
representatives from a global courier. We can not assure you that we
will be able to consummate an agreement with one or more large CROs, or
pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.
Position CryoPort
Express® Portal as a New
Customer Tool for Cost Optimization and Risk Mitigation. In 2008, we
began development of an internal IT system, CryoPort Express® Portal, which
today is used by customers to automate the entry of orders, prepare customs
documentation, and facilitate status and location monitoring of shipped orders
while in transit. The CryoPort Express® Portal is fully
integrated with IT systems at FedEx and runs in a browser requiring no software
installation. It is used by CryoPort to manage shipping operations
typically provisioned by manual labor thereby reducing administrative costs
relating to order-entry, order processing, preparation of shipping documents,
back-office accounting and to support the high level of customer service
expected by the industry. In addition to reducing operating
costs and facilitate scaling of CryoPort’s operations, more importantly we
believe the CryoPort Express® Portal offers significant value to the
customer in terms of cost avoidance and risk mitigation. Examples
include automation of order entry, development of Key Performance Indicators
(“KPI”) to support our efforts for continuous process improvements in our
business, and programmatic exception monitoring to detect and sometimes
anticipate delays in the shipping process, often before the customer or the
shipping company becomes aware of the delays. In the future we intend
to add rate and mode optimization and in-transit monitoring of temperature,
location and state-of-health monitoring via wireless
communications.
Complete
Development of Our Smart Pak Monitoring Device. In July 2008,
we launched Phase I of our CryoPort Express® Portal which enabled our customers
to enter orders and track their packages during transit. We recently
completed successful testing of Phase II of our Smart Pak Monitoring Device
which is an automated data logger capable of tracking the internal and external
temperatures of samples shipped in our CryoPort Express® Shipper. We
anticipate commercial launch of this new feature in 2010. Phase III
of our Smart Pak Monitoring Device development plan, which we expect to launch
by the end of fiscal year 2010, consists of adding a wireless communications
capability to each shipper to enable monitoring of a shipper’s location,
specimen temperature, and overall state of health of the contents during
transit. We anticipate that, due to the high value and importance
placed on the contents of the shipper by the customer, location and
state-of-health monitoring the contents will become a new standard in the
industry pioneered by CryoPort and fully integrated into CryoPort Express®
Portal.
Completing
the development of our Smart Pak Wireless Monitoring Device is a key component
of our CryoPort Express® System which, once fully implemented, will provide
customers with a one-stop solution, via our web portal, to manage the scheduling
and shipping of temperature sensitive biological or pharmaceutical samples and
drug materials, as well as any other materials requiring cryogenic
transport.
Expand to New
Markets. To date our marketing efforts have focused on select
companies in the global CRO, and biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries. Once we have expanded our market presence in these
industries and established the strategic relationships referenced above, we
intend to explore opportunities in other markets following the first year of
commercialization where there is a need to ship temperature sensitive materials
such as the food, environmental, semiconductor and petroleum
industries.
-42-
Re-Purpose
Product Capability. Presently,
CryoPort products address the needs of biotechnology and pharmaceutical
customers who require sustainable frozen shipping temperatures generally
between the range of minus 80° to minus 150° Celsius. While the
frozen market represents a large opportunity for CryoPort, an adjacent market
exists for the shipment of materials at chilled temperatures. Based
on a report prepared by DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. in April 2001, the market
for pharmaceutical shipments at chilled temperatures is more than double the
market for cryogenic and frozen shipments. CryoPort’s technology may
be applicable to these markets as well since the design concepts of CryoPort
products can be applied to stabilize materials at any desired
temperature. CryoPort is exploring these expansions of its current
business model.
Sales
and Marketing
We
currently have one internal sales person who manages both our direct sales
efforts and our limited third party resellers, which include Miller Supply, Air
Liquide and Tegrant. Our current distribution channels cover the
Americas, Europe and Asia. During the fiscal year ended March 31,
2009, Miller Supply accounted for 18% of our overall sales
volumes. These sales comprised our shipping accessories and our first
generation reusable dry vapor shippers which we discontinued during the past
fiscal year.
Our
geographical sales for the year ended March 31, 2009 were as
follows:
USA
|
81.9%
|
Europe
|
17.3%
|
Canada
|
0.8%
|
We plan
to further expand our sales and marketing efforts through the establishment of a
strategic relationship with a global courier and, subject to available financial
resources, the hiring of additional sales and marketing personnel.
Customers
To date,
most of our customers have been in the pharmaceutical or medical
industries. As we initially focus or efforts to increase revenues, we
believe that the primary target customers for our CryoPort Express® System are
concentrated in the following markets, for the following reasons:
●
|
Pharmaceutical
clinical trials / Contract Research Organizations;
|
|
●
|
Gene
biotechnology;
|
|
●
|
Transport
of infectious materials and dangerous goods;
|
|
●
|
Pharmaceutical
distribution; and
|
|
●
|
Human
assisted reproduction/artificial
insemination.
|
-43-
Pharmaceutical
Clinical Trials. Every pharmaceutical company developing a new
drug must be approved by the FDA who conducts clinical trials to, among other
things, test the safety and efficacy of the potential new drug. Presently,
a significant amount of clinical trial activity is managed by a number of large
CROs. Due to the growing downsizing trend in the pharmaceutical
industry, CROs are going to obtain an increasing share of the clinical trial
market.
In
connection with the clinical trials, due to globalization the companies may
enroll patients from all over the world who regularly submit a blood or other
specimen at the local hospital, doctor’s office or laboratory. These
samples are then sent to specified testing laboratories, which may be local or
in another country. The testing laboratories will typically set the
requirements for the storage and shipment of blood specimens. In
addition, several of the drugs used by the patients require frozen shipping to
the sites of the clinical trials. While both domestic and
international shipping of these specimens is accomplished using dry ice today,
international shipments especially present several problems, as dry ice, under
the best of circumstances, can only provide freezing for one to two days,
in the absence of re-icing (which is quite costly). Because shipments
of packages internationally can take longer than one to two days or be
delayed due to flight cancellations, incorrect destinations, labor problems,
ground logistics, customs and safety reasons, dry ice is not always a reliable
and cost effective option. Clinical trial specimens are often
irreplaceable because each one represents clinical data at a prescribed point in
time, in a series of specimens on a given patient, who may be participating in a
trial for years. Sample integrity during the shipping process is
vital to retaining the maximum number of patients in each trial. Our
shippers are ideally suited for this market, as our longer hold time ensures
that specimens can be sent over long distances with minimal concern that they
will arrive in a condition that will cause their exclusion from the
trial. There are also many instances in domestic shipments where the
CryoPort Express® Shipper will provide higher reliability and be cost
effective.
Furthermore,
the IATA requires that all airborne shipments of laboratory specimens be
transmitted in either IATA 650 or 602 certified packaging. We have
developed and obtained IATA certification of the CryoPort Express® System, which
is ideally suited for this market, in particular due to the elimination of the
cost to return the reusable shipper.
Gene
Biotechnology. The gene biotechnology market includes basic
and applied research and development in diverse areas such as stem cells,
cloning, gene therapy, DNA tumor vaccines, tissue engineering, genomics, and
blood products. Company’s participating in the foregoing fields rely on the
frozen transport of specimens in connection with their research and development
efforts, for which our CryoPort Express® Shippers are ideally
suited.
Transport of
Infectious Materials and Dangerous Goods. The transport of
infectious materials must be classified as such and must maintain strict
adherence to regulations that protect public safety while maintaining the
viability of the material being shipped. Some blood products are
considered infective and must be treated as such. Pharmaceutical
companies, private research laboratories and hospitals ship tissue cultures and
microbiology specimens, which are also potentially infectious materials, between
a variety of entities, including private and public health reference
laboratories. Almost all specimens in this infectious materials
category require either a refrigerated or frozen environment. We
believe our CryoPort Express® Shipper is ideally suited to meet the shipping
requirements of this market.
Partly in
response to the attack on the World Trade Center and the anthrax scare,
government officials and health care professionals are focusing renewed
attention on the possibility of attacks involving biological and chemical
weapons such as anthrax, smallpox and sarin gas. Efforts expended on
research and development to counteract biowarfare agents requires the frozen
transport of these agents to and from facilities conducting the research and
development. Vaccine research, including methods of vaccine delivery,
also requires frozen transport. We believe our CryoPort Express®
Shipper is ideally suited to this type of research and development.
Pharmaceutical
Distribution. The current focus for the CryoPort Express®
System also includes the area of pharmaceutical distribution. There
are a significant number of therapeutic drugs and vaccines currently or soon to
be, undergoing clinical trials. After the FDA approves them for
commercial marketing, it will be necessary for the manufacturers to have a
reliable and economical method of distribution to the physician who will
administer the product to the patient. Although there are not now a
large number of drugs requiring cryogenic transport, there are a number in the
development pipeline. It is likely that the most efficient and
reliable method of distribution will be to ship a single dosage to the
administering physician. These drugs are typically identified to
individual patients and therefore will require a complete tracking history from
the manufacturer to the patient. The most reliable method of doing
this is to ship a unit dosage specifically for each patient. Because
the drugs require maintenance at frozen or cryogenic temperatures, each such
shipment will require a frozen or cryogenic shipping
package. CryoPort anticipates being in a position to service that
need.
-44-
Assisted Human
Reproduction. We estimate that artificial insemination
procedures in the United States account for at least 50,000 doses of semen
annually. Since relatively few sperm banks provide donor semen,
frozen shipping
is almost always involved. As with animal semen, human semen must be
stored and shipped at cryogenic temperatures to retain viability, stabilize
the cells, and ensure reproducible results. This can only be
accomplished with the use of liquid nitrogen or LN2 dry vapor
shippers. CryoPort anticipates that this market will continue to
increase as this practice gains acceptance in new areas of the
world.
In
addition to the above markets, our longer-term plans include expanding into new
markets including, the diagnostics, food, environmental, semiconductor and
petroleum industries.
Industry
Overview
Our
products and services are sold into a rapidly growing niche of the packaging
industry focused on the temperature sensitive packaging and shipping of
biological materials. Expenditures for “value added” packaging for
frozen transport have been increasing for the past several years and, due in
part to continued globalization, are expected to continue to increase even more
in the future as more domestic and international biotechnology firms introduce
pharmaceutical products that require continuous refrigeration at cryogenic
temperatures. We believe this will require a greater dependence on
passively controlled temperature transport systems (i.e., systems having no
external power source).
We
believe that growth in the following markets has resulted in the need for
increased efficiencies and greater flexibility in the temperature sensitive
packaging market:
●
|
Pharmaceutical
clinical trials, including transport of tissue culture
samples;
|
|
●
|
Pharmaceutical
commercial product distribution;
|
|
●
|
Transportation
of diagnostic specimens;
|
|
●
|
Transportation
of infectious materials;
|
|
●
|
Intra
laboratory diagnostic testing;
|
●
|
Transport
of temperature-sensitive specimens by courier;
|
|
●
|
Analysis
of biological samples;
|
|
●
|
Environmental
sampling;
|
|
●
|
Gene
and stem cell biotechnology and vaccine production; and
|
|
●
|
Food
engineering.
|
-45-
Many of
the biological products in these above markets require transport in a frozen
state as well as the need for shipping containers which have the ability to
maintain a frozen, cryogenic environment (e.g., minus 150° Celsius) for a period
ranging from two to ten days (depending on the distance and mode of
shipment). These products include semen, embryo, tissue, tissue
cultures, cultures of viruses and bacteria, enzymes, DNA materials, vaccines and
certain pharmaceutical products. In some instances, transport of
these products requires temperatures at, or approaching, minus 196°
Celsius.
One
problem faced by many companies operating in these specialized markets is the
limited number of cryogenic shipping systems serving their needs, particularly
in the areas of pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical
trials. The currently adopted protocol and the most common method for
packaging frozen transport in these industries is the use of solid carbon
dioxide (dry ice). Dry ice is used in shipping extensively to
maintain a frozen state for a period of one to four days. Dry ice is
used in the transport of many biological products, such as pharmaceuticals,
laboratory specimens and certain infectious materials that do not require true
cryogenic temperatures. The common approach to shipping these items
via ground freight is to pack the product in a container, such as an expanded
polystyrene (Styrofoam) box or a molded polyurethane box, with a variable
quantity of dry ice. The box is taped or strapped shut and shipped to
its destination with freight charges based on its initial shipping
weight.
With
respect to shipments via specialized courier services, there is no standardized
method or device currently in use for the purpose of transporting
temperature-sensitive frozen biological specimens. One common method
for courier transport of biologicals is to place frozen specimens, refrigerated
specimens, and ambient specimens into a compartmentalized container, similar in
size to a 55 quart Coleman or Igloo cooler. The freezer compartment
in the container is loaded with a quantity of dry ice at minus 78° Celsius,
while the refrigerated compartment at 8° Celsius utilizes ice
substitutes.
Two
manufacturers of the polystyrene and polyurethane containers frequently used in
the shipping and courier transport of dry ice frozen specimens are Insulated
Shipping Containers, Inc. and Tegrant (formerly SCA Thermosafe). When
these containers are used with dry ice, the average sublimation rate (e.g., the
rate at which dry ice turns from a solid to a gaseous state) in a container with
a 1½ inch wall thickness is slightly less than three pounds per 24
hours. Other existing refrigerant systems employ the use of gel packs
and ice substitutes for temperature maintenance. Gels and eutectic
solutions (phase changing materials) with a wide range of phasing temperatures
have been developed in recent years to meet the needs of products with varying
specific temperature control requirements.
The use
of dry ice and ice substitutes, however, regardless of external packaging used,
are frequently inadequate because they do not provide low enough storage
temperatures and, in the case of dry ice, last for only a few days without
re-icing. As a result, companies run the risk of increased costs due
to lost specimens and additional shipping charges due to the need to
re-ice.
Some of
the other disadvantages to using dry ice for shipping or transporting
temperature sensitive products are as follows:
●
|
Availability
of a dry ice source;
|
|
●
|
Handling
and storage of the dry ice;
|
|
●
|
Cost
of the dry ice;
|
|
●
|
Weight
of containers when packed with dry ice;
|
|
●
|
Securing
a shipping container with a high enough R-value (which is a measure of
thermal resistance) to hold the dry ice and product for the required time
period;
|
|
●
|
Securing
a shipping container that meets the requirements of IATA, the DOT,
the CDC, and other regulatory agencies; and
|
|
●
|
The
emission of green house gases into the
environment.
|
-46-
Due to
the limitations of dry ice, shipment of specimens at true cryogenic temperatures
can only be accomplished using liquid nitrogen dry vapor shippers, or by
shipping over actual liquid nitrogen. While such shippers provide
solutions to the issues encountered when shipping with dry ice, they too are
experiencing some criticisms by users or potential users. For
example, the cost for these products typically can range from $650 to $3,000 per
unit, which can substantially limit their use for the transport of many common
biologics, particularly with respect to small quantities such as is the case
with direct to the physician drug delivery. Because of the initial
cost and limited production of these containers, they are designed to be
reusable. However, the cost of returning these heavy containers can
be significant, particularly in international markets, because most applications
require only one-way shipping. We expect to provide a cost effective
solution compared to dry ice. We believe we will provide an overall
cost savings of 10% to 20% for international and specialty shipments compared to
dry ice.
Another
problem with these existing systems relates to the hold time of the unit in a
normal, upright position versus the hold time when the unit is placed on its
side or inverted. If a container is laying on its side or is inverted the
liquid nitrogen is prone to leaking out of the container due to a combination of
factors, including a shift in the equilibrium height of the liquid nitrogen
in the absorbent material and the relocation of the point of
gravity, which affects the hold time and compromises the dependability of
the dry shipper, particularly when used in circumstances requiring lengthy
shipping times. Due to the use of our proprietary technology, our
CryoPort Express® Shippers are not prone to leakage when on their side or
inverted, thereby protecting the integrity of our shipper's hold
time.
Competition
Within
our intended markets for our CryoPort Express® Shippers, there is limited known
competition. We intend to become competitive by reason of our
improved technology in our products and through the use of our service enabled
business model. The CryoPort Express® System provides a simple,
effective solution for the frozen or cryogenic transport of biological or
pharmaceutical materials using CryoPort Express® Portal, our web-based
order-entry system, which manages the scheduling and shipping of the CryoPort
Express® Shippers. In addition to the traditional dry ice shipping,
suppliers, such as MVE/Chart Industries, Taylor Wharton, and Air Liquide, have
various models of dry shippers available that are prohibitive for multi-use
and multi-shipment purposes due to their significantly greater unit costs
and unit weights (which may substantially increase the shipping
cost). On the other hand, they are more established and have larger
organizations and have greater financial, operational, sales and marketing
resources and experience in research and development than we
do. Factors that we believe give us a competitive advantage are
attributable to our shipping container which allows our shipper to retain liquid
nitrogen when placed in non-upright positions, the overall “leak-proofness” of
the our package which determines compliance with shipping regulations and the
overall weight and volume of the package which determines shipping costs, and
our business model represented by the merged integration of our shipper with
CryoPort Express Portal and Smart Pak data logger into a seamless shipping,
tracking and monitoring solution. Other companies that offer
potentially competitive products include Industrial Insulation Systems, which
offers cryogenic transport units and has partnered with Marathon Products Inc.,
a manufacturer and global supplier of wireless temperature data collecting
devices used for documenting environmentally sensitive products through the cold
chain and Kodiak Thermal Technologies, Inc. which offers, among other
containers, a repeat use active-cool container that uses free piston stirling
cycle technology. While not having their own shipping devices,
BioStorage Technologies is potentially a competitive company through their
management services offered for cold-chain logistics and long term biomaterial
storage. In addition, BioMatrica, Inc. is developing and offering
technology that stabilizes biological samples and research materials at room
temperature. They presently offer these technologies primarily to
research and academic institutions, however, their technology may eventually
enter the broader cold-chain market.
Research
and Development
Our
research and development efforts are focused on continually improving the
features of the CryoPort Express® System including the web based customer
service portal and the CryoPort Express® Shippers. Further these
efforts are expected to lead to the introduction of shippers of varying sizes
based on market requirements, constructed of lower cost materials and utilizing
high volume manufacturing methods that will make it practical to provide the
cryogenic packages offered by the CryoPort Express® System. Other
research and development effort has been directed toward improvements to the
liquid nitrogen retention system to render it more reliable in the general
shipping environment and to the design of the outer
packaging. Alternative phase change materials in place of liquid
nitrogen may be used to increase the potential markets these shippers can serve
such as ambient and 2-8°C markets. Our research and development
expenditures during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $180,791, $297,378 and
$166,227, respectively.
-47-
Manufacturing
The
component parts for our products are primarily manufactured at third party
manufacturing facilities. We also have a warehouse at our corporate
offices in Lake Forest, California, where we are capable of manufacturing
certain parts and fully assemble our products. Most of the
components that we use in the manufacture of our products are available from
more than one qualified supplier. For some components, however, there
are relatively few alternate sources of supply and the establishment of
additional or replacement suppliers may not be accomplished immediately,
however, we have identified alternate qualified suppliers which we believe could
replace existing suppliers. Should this occur, we believe the maximum
disruption of production could be a short period of time, on the order of
approximately four to six weeks.
Primary
manufacturers used by us include Spaulding Composites Company, Peterson Spinning
and Stamping, Lydall Industrial Thermal Solutions, and Ludwig,
Inc. There are no specific agreements with any manufacturer nor are
there any long term commitments to any manufacturer. We believe that
any of the manufactures currently used by us could be replaced within a short
period of time as none have a proprietary component or a substantial capital
investment specific to our products.
Our
production and manufacturing process incorporates innovative technologies
developed for aerospace and other industries which are cost effective, easier to
use and more functional than the traditional dry ice devices and other methods
currently used for the shipment of temperature-sensitive
materials. Our manufacturing process uses non-hazardous cleaning
solutions which are provided and disposed of by a supplier approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”). EPA compliance costs for
us are therefore negligible.
Intellectual
Property
In order
to remain competitive, we must develop and maintain protection on the
proprietary aspects of its technologies. We rely on a combination of
patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws and confidentiality
agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. We
currently own four registered United States trademarks and three issued United
States patents primarily covering various aspects of our products. In
addition, we have filed a patent application for various aspects of our
shipper and web-portal, which includes, in part, various aspects of our business
model referred to as the CryoPort Express® System, and we intend to file
additional patent applications to strengthen our intellectual property
rights. The technology covered by the above indicated issued patents
relates to matters specific to the use of liquid nitrogen dewars in connection
with the shipment of biological materials. The concepts include those
of disposability, package configuration details, liquid nitrogen retention
systems, systems related to thermal performance, systems related to packaging
integrity, and matters generally relevant to the containment of liquid
nitrogen. Similarly, the trademarks mentioned relate to the cryogenic
temperature shipping activity. Issued patents and trademarks
currently owned by us include:
Type:
|
No.
|
Issued
|
Expiration
|
|||
Patent
|
6,467,642
|
Oct.
22, 2002
|
Oct.
21, 2022
|
|||
Patent
|
6,119,465
|
Sep.
19, 2000
|
Sep.
18, 2020
|
|||
Patent
|
6,539,726
|
Apr.
1, 2003
|
Mar.
31, 2023
|
|||
Trademark
|
7,583,478,7
|
Oct.
9, 2002
|
Oct.
8, 2012
|
|||
Trademark
|
7,586,797,8
|
Apr.
16, 2002
|
Apr.
16, 2012
|
|||
Trademark
|
7,748,667,3
|
Feb.
3, 2009
|
Feb.
3, 2019
|
|||
Trademark
|
7,737,454,1
|
Mar.
17, 2009
|
Mar.
17, 2019
|
Our
success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to develop proprietary
products and technologies and to obtain patent coverage for these products and
technologies. We intend to file trademark and patent applications
covering any newly developed products, methods and
technologies. However, there can be no guarantee that any of our
pending or future filed applications will be issued as patents. There
can be no guarantee that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or some third
party will not initiate an interference proceeding involving any of our pending
applications or issued patents. Finally, there can be no guarantee
that its issued patents or future issued patents, if any, will provide adequate
protection from competition.
-48-
Patents
provide some degree of protection for our proprietary
technology. However, the pursuit and assertion of patent rights
involve complex legal and factual determinations and, therefore, are
characterized by significant uncertainty. In addition, the laws
governing patent issuance and the scope of patent coverage continue to
evolve. Moreover, the patent rights we possess or are pursuing
generally cover our technologies to varying degrees. As a result, we
cannot ensure that patents will issue from any of our patent applications, or
that any of its issued patents will offer meaningful protection. In
addition, our issued patents may be successfully challenged, invalidated,
circumvented or rendered unenforceable so that our patent rights may not create
an effective barrier to competition. Moreover, the laws of some
foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent, as
do the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that any
patents issued to us will provide a legal basis for establishing an exclusive
market for our products or provide us with any competitive advantages, or that
patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our ability to do business
or to continue to use our technologies freely.
We may be
subject to third parties filing claims that our technologies or products
infringe on their intellectual property. We cannot predict whether
third parties will assert such claims against us or whether those claims will
hurt our business. If we are forced to defend against such claims,
regardless of their merit, we may face costly litigation and diversion of
management’s attention and resources. As a result of any such
disputes, we may have to develop, at a substantial cost, non-infringing
technology or enter into licensing agreements. These agreements may
be unavailable on terms acceptable to it, or at all, which could seriously harm
our business or financial condition.
We also
rely on trade secret protection of our intellectual property. We
attempt to protect trade secrets by entering into confidentiality agreements
with third parties, employees and consultants, although, in the past, we have
not always obtained such agreements. It is possible that these
agreements may be breached, invalidated or rendered unenforceable, and if so,
our trade secrets could be disclosed to our competitors. Despite the
measures we have taken to protect our intellectual property, parties
to such agreements may breach confidentiality provisions in our contracts
or infringe or misappropriate our patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets
and other proprietary rights. In addition, third parties may
independently discover or invent competitive technologies, or reverse engineer
our trade secrets or other technology. Therefore, the measures we are
taking to protect our proprietary technology may not be adequate.
Government
Regulation
The
shipping of diagnostic specimens, infectious substances and dangerous goods,
whether via air or ground, falls under the jurisdiction of many states, federal
and international agencies. The quality of the containers, packaging
materials and insulation that protect a specimen determine whether or not it
will arrive in a usable condition. Many of the regulations for
transporting dangerous goods in the United States are determined by
international rules formulated under the auspices of the United
Nations. For example, the ICAO is the United Nations organization
that develops regulations (Technical Instructions) for the safe transport of
dangerous goods by air. If shipment is by air, compliance with the
rules established by IATA is required. IATA is a trade association
made up of airlines and air cargo couriers that publishes annual editions of the
IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations. These regulations interpret and add to the
ICAO Technical Instructions to reflect industry
practices. Additionally, the CDC has regulations (published in the
Code of Federal Regulations) for interstate shipping of specimens, and
the OSHA also addresses the safe handling of Class 6.2
Substances. Our CryoPort Express® Shipper meets packing instruction
602 and 650 and is certified for the shipment of Class 6.2 Dangerous Goods per
the requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air and IATA. Our present and planned future versions
of the CryoPort Smart Pak data logger will likely be subject to regulation by
FAA, FCC, FDA, IATA and possibly other agencies which may be difficult to
determine on a global basis.
We are
also subject to numerous other federal, state and local laws relating to such
matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental
protection, fire hazard control, and disposal of hazardous or potentially
hazardous substances. We may incur significant costs to comply with
such laws and regulations now or in the future.
-49-
Employees
As of
November 30, 2009, we had six full-time employees and four
consultants. Two of the consultants work for us on a full-time
basis.
Insurance
We
currently maintain general liability insurance, with coverage in the amount of
$1 million per occurrence, subject to a $2 million annual
limitation. Claims may be made against us that exceed these
limits. In fiscal year 2009, we did not experience any claims against
our professional liability insurance.
Our
liability policy in an “occurrence” based policy. Thus, our policy is
complete when we purchased it and following cancellation of the policy it
continues to provide coverage for future claims based on conduct that took place
during the policy term. However, our insurance may not protect us
against liability because our policies typically have various exceptions to the
claims covered and also require us to assume some costs of the claim even though
a portion of the claim may be covered. In addition, if we expand into
new markets, we may not be aware of the need for, or be able to obtain insurance
coverage for such activities or, if insurance is obtained, the dollar amount of
any liabilities incurred could exceed our insurance coverage. A
partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant
magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We also
maintain product liability insurance with coverage in the amount of $1,000,000
per year.
DESCRIPTION
OF PROPERTY
CryoPort’s
corporate, research and development, and warehouse facilities are located in one
leased office and warehouse building with approximately 12,000 square
feet. The facilities are located at 20382 Barents Sea Circle, Lake
Forest, CA 92630. CryoPort currently makes base lease payments of
approximately $13,000 per month, due at the beginning of each month, pursuant to
a two year lease through August 2010 with renewal options for three additional
one year lease terms. The landlord is Viking Investors, Barents Sea,
LLC. The facilities are in good condition and are suitable for
CryoPort’s current requirements. CryoPort currently does not own any
real property.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
In the
ordinary course of business, we are at times subject to various legal
proceedings and disputes, including product liability claims. We
currently are not aware of any such legal proceedings or claim that we believe
will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results or cash flows. It is our practice to
accrue for open claims based on our historical experience and available
insurance coverage.
-50-
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors and Executive
Officers
The
following table sets for the name and age of each director and executive
officer, the year first elected as a director and/or executive officer and the
position(s) held with CryoPort:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Date
Elected
|
|||
Larry
G. Stambaugh
|
62
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director
|
2008-2009
|
|||
Bret
Bollinger
|
41
|
Vice
President of Operations
|
2008
|
|||
Catherine
Doll
|
48
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Corporate
Secretary
|
2009
|
|||
Carlton
M. Johnson, Jr.
|
48
|
Director
and Secretary
|
2009
|
|||
Adam
M. Michelin
|
64
|
Director
|
2005
|
|||
John
H. Bonde
|
64
|
Director
|
2010
|
Background
of Directors and Officers:
Larry G.
Stambaugh, age 62, was elected as CryoPort’s Chairman of the Board on
December 5, 2008 and became President and Chief Executive Officer on February
20, 2009. Mr. Stambaugh is currently a Principal of Apercu
Consulting, a firm that he established in 2006. From December 1992 to
January 2006, Mr. Stambaugh served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Maxim Pharmaceuticals, a public company developing cancer and infectious disease
drugs which he co-founded. From December 2007 to February 2008, Mr.
Stambaugh reorganized two biotechnology companies owned by Arrowhead Research
Corporation, a public holding company, Calando Pharmaceuticals and Insert
Therapeutics and served as Chief Executive Officer of each
subsidiary. Mr. Stambaugh has more than 30 years' experience building
global businesses and setting strategies and has an extensive background in life
sciences and clean tech including relationships with and knowledge of Contract
Research Organizations, biotech and pharmaceutical companies. Mr. Stambaugh
serves on several boards including EcoDog, Ridge Diagnostics, Corporate
Directors Forum and BioCom. Mr. Stambaugh earned his BBA
Accounting/Finance from Washburn University in 1969.
Bret
Bollinger, age
41, became Vice President of Operations for CryoPort in February
2008. Prior to joining CryoPort, Mr. Bollinger was Director of
Operations and Engineering for Triangle Brass Manufacturing from July 2003 to
January 2008. Mr. Bollinger served as a Business Process
Consultant for Vistant Corporation, a division of Cardinal Health from July of
2001 through July 2003 and as Operations and Order Fulfillment Manager for
Ingersoll-Rand’s Safety and Security Sector, Falcon Lock Company from July of
1999 to July of 2001. Mr. Bollinger has an extensive background in
manufacturing environments, including experience with opening both manufacturing
and assembly plants domestically as well as in Mexico. In addition,
he has experience in new product design and implementation. Mr.
Bollinger holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Sacramento
State University.
Catherine
Doll, age 49, became Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant
Corporate Secretary effective as of August 20, 2009. Ms. Doll is
the owner and chief executive officer of The Gilson Group, LLC, which she
founded in 2006. The Gilson Group, LLC provides financial and
accounting consulting services to public companies, including Sarbanes Oxley
Section 404 compliance, SEC and financial reporting, budgeting and forecasting
and finance and accounting systems implementations and
conversions. From 1996 to 2006, Ms. Doll was an associate with
Resources Global Professionals, where she provided management, financial and
accounting services for a variety of clients. Ms. Doll received a
B.A. in Economics, with an emphasis in accounting, from the University of
California, Santa Barbara, in 1983. She has over 25 years of
accounting and financial reporting experience.
Carlton M.
Johnson, Jr.,
age 48, was elected as a director and Secretary to the Board of Directors on May
4, 2009 and serves as Chairman of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Johnson has been In-House
Legal Counsel for Roswell Capital Partners, LLC since 1996. Mr.
Johnson has been a member of the Alabama Bar since 1986, the Florida Bar since
1988 and the State Bar of Georgia since 1997. He was a stockholder in
the Pensacola, Florida Bar Registered (AV rated) law firm of Smith, Sauer,
DeMaria & Johnson from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Johnson holds a degree
in History/Political Science from Auburn University and Juris Doctorate from
Samford University, Cumberland School of Law. Mr. Johnson also
serves on the boards of Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Patriot Scientific
Corporation. Mr. Johnson’s appointment to the Board of Directors fulfills an
agreement between CryoPort and BridgePointe Master Fund Ltd. (“BridgePointe”) to
have a representative of BridgePointe on CryoPort’s Board of Directors pursuant
to the Debentures, as amended.
-51-
Adam M.
Michelin, age 65, became a member of CryoPort’s Board of Directors in
June 2005 and serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of the
Compensation and Governance Committee. Mr. Michelin is currently the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Redux Holdings, Inc., positions he has held
since January 2006. Mr. Michelin has held several executive leadership positions
including, Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Group from March 2005,
Principle of Kibel Green, Inc., a position he held for 11 years prior to joining
Enterprise Group, and Partner of KPMG LLP for 10 years. Mr. Michelin
has over 30 years of practice in the areas of executive leadership, operations
and is very experienced in evaluating, structuring and implementing solutions
for companies in operational and/or financial crisis. Mr. Michelin
received his Juris Doctorate from the University of West Los Angeles and his
Bachelor of Science from Tri State University.
John H.
Bonde, 64, was elected as a director to the Board on January 7, 2010 and
serves as a member of Audit Committee. Mr. Bonde is the Chief
Executive Officer of eQsys, Inc., a position he has held since November
2008. From January 2005 through January 2006, Mr. Bonde served as the
Division President of CGS Systems. Mr. Bonde has extensive experience
leading the operation of complex telecommunication and information service
providers and has been a director of numerous private companies in the
past. Mr. Bonde earned his Bachelor of Science in Economics
from City University of New York, Queens College in 1969 and a Masters of
Science in Business Policy from Columbia University in 1982.
The
officers of CryoPort hold office until their successors are elected and
qualified, or until their death, resignation or removal.
None of
the directors or officers holds a directorship in any other reporting company
except: Adam Michelin is Director, CEO/President and Treasurer of
Redux Holdings, Inc. (RDXH) and CEO/Chairman Naturade Inc. (NRDCQ);
and Carlton Johnson is a member of the board of directors of Peregrine
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PPHM) and Patriot Scientific Corporation
(PTSC).
None of
the directors or officers listed above has:
●
|
Had
a bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which that
person was a general partner of executive officer either at the time of
the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
●
|
Had
any conviction in a criminal proceeding, or been subject to a pending
criminal proceeding;
|
|
●
|
Been
subject to any order, judgment, or decree by any court of competent
jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or
otherwise limiting such person’s involvement in any type of business,
securities or banking activities; and
|
|
●
|
Been
found by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Commission, or the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state
securities or commodities law.
|
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our Board
of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation and
Governance Committee. We do not have a formal nominating
committee.
Audit
Committee
The
functions of the Audit Committee are to (i) review the qualifications of the
independent auditors, our annual and interim financial statements, the
independent auditor’s report, significant reporting or operating issues and
corporate policies and procedures as they relate to accounting and financial
controls; and (ii) to consider and review other matters relating to our
financial and accounting affairs. The Board of Directors has adopted
an Audit Committee charter, which is available on CryoPort’s website at
www.cryoport.com under the tab “Corporate Governance” which is found under the
heading “Company.” Information on our website does not constitute a
part of this prospectus.
The
members of the Audit Committee are Adam Michelin, who is the Audit Committee
Chairman, and Carlton M. Johnson, Jr. and John H. Bonde. CryoPort has
determined that (i) Adam Michelin qualifies as an “audit committee financial
expert” as defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K of the SEC rules and is
“independent” within the meaning of NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2) and the related rules
of the SEC, and (ii) Carlton M. Johnson, Jr. and John H. Bonde are “independent”
within the meaning of NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2) and the related rules of the
SEC.
-52-
Compensation
and Governance Committee.
The
purpose of the Compensation and Governance Committee is to discharge the Board
of Directors’ responsibilities relating to compensation of CryoPort’s directors
and executives, to produce an annual report on executive compensation for
inclusion in CryoPort’s proxy statement, as necessary, and to oversee and advise
the Board of Directors on the adoption of policies that govern CryoPort’s
compensation programs including stock and benefit plans. The
Compensation and Governance Committee does not operate under a
charter.
The
current members of the Compensation and Governance Committee are Carlton M.
Johnson, Jr., who is the Chairman of the Compensation and Governance Committee,
and Mr. Adam Michelin, each of whom is independent under applicable independence
requirements. Each of the current members of the Compensation and
Governance Committee is a “non-employee director” under Section 16 of the
Exchange Act and an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Nominating
Committee
CryoPort
does not have a formal nominating committee. The function of the
nominating committee is handled by CryoPort’s Compensation and Governance
Committee. The Board of Directors does not believe that a nominating
committee is necessary because the independent directors participate in the
nominating process.
The following table provides information regarding the compensation
earned during fiscal years 2009 and 2008 by our named executive officers:
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Salary(1)
($)
|
Bonus(7)
($)
|
Option
Awards(8)
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation(14) ($)
|
Total
Compensation
($)
|
||||||
Larry
G. Stambaugh,
President,
Chief Executive Officer
and
Chairman
|
2009
2008
|
48,000(2)
-
|
-
-
|
28,695(9)
-
|
-
-
|
76,695
-
|
||||||
Peter
Berry,
Former
President and
Chief
Executive Officer
|
2009
2008
|
205,000(3)
136,000(3)
|
-
30,000
|
-
47,395(10)
|
7,040
3,300
|
259,435
216,695
|
||||||
Dee
S. Kelly, CPA,
Former
Chief Financial Officer and
Vice
President of Finance
|
2009
2008
|
116,000(4)
100,000(4)
|
-
16,000
|
-
64,639(11)
|
-
-
|
120,000
186,639
|
||||||
Bret
Bollinger,
Vice
President of Operations
|
2009
2008
|
124,000(5)
21,667(5)
|
-
-
|
119,398(12)
52,983(12)
|
6,890
1,196
|
188,288
75,846
|
||||||
Kenneth
Carlson
Former
Vice President of Sales and Marketing
|
2009
2008
|
110,000(6)
106,000(6)
|
-
14,000
|
-
68,877(13)
|
5,234
4,540
|
115,234
193,417
|
(1)
|
This
column represents salary and consulting compensation as reported as of the
last payroll period prior to or immediately after March 31 of each fiscal
year.
|
(2)
|
This
amount represents the $12,000 paid to Mr. Larry Stambaugh as compensation
for consulting services during fiscal 2009, as well as the $36,000 paid to
Mr. Stambaugh as compensation for services as a Director during fiscal
2009. Mr. Stambaugh was elected as Chairman of the Board on
December 10, 2008 and subsequently as President and Chief Executive
Officer on February 20, 2009. On August 21, 2009, the
Compensation and Governance Committee approved an employment agreement
with Mr. Stambaugh which has an effective commencement date of August 1,
2009, the details of which are described
below.
|
-53-
(3)
|
This
amount represents the $192,000 paid to Mr. Peter Berry during fiscal 2009
as salary for his services as the President and Chief Executive Officer
until February 20, 2009, when he resigned his position. In
November and December 2008, Mr. Berry voluntarily took a reduction in his
monthly pay from $16,000 to $14,500 per month. Mr. Berry
resigned from the Board of Directors effective July 30, 2009 but continues
to serve as a consultant for CryoPort in an advisory
role. Effective March 1, 2009, Mr. Berry entered into a
Consulting Agreement to provide advisory services to CryoPort for the
period from March 1, 2009 to January, 1, 2010. The compensation
for Mr. Peter Berry’s consulting services under such agreement for fiscal
2009 was $16,000 for the month of March 2009 and $28,890 for each month
thereafter until expiration of such
agreement.
|
(4)
|
This
amount represents the $10,000 per month paid to Ms. Dee Kelly as a
part-time consultant for CryoPort during fiscal 2009 and fiscal year ended
March 31, 2008. In fiscal 2009, Ms. Kelly deferred
approximately $4,000. In fiscal 2008, Ms. Kelly deferred
approximately $20,000. Ms. Kelly does not have an employment
agreement with CryoPort. Ms. Kelly resigned all of her officer
positions with CryoPort effective August 20,
2009.
|
(5)
|
This
amount represents the $130,000 paid to Mr. Bret Bollinger as salary for
his services as CryoPort’s Vice President of Operations of which $9,000
was deferred as of September 2009 due to Mr. Bollinger’s voluntarily
reduction in his monthly pay from $10,833 to $9,883 in January
2009. Mr. Bret Bollinger’s became CryoPort’s Vice President of
Operations in February 2008.
|
(6)
|
This
amount represents the $120,000 paid to Mr. Kenneth Carlson as salary for
his services as CryoPort’s Vice President of Sales and Marketing for
fiscal 2009 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. In the months
of November 2008 through March 2009, Mr. Carlson voluntarily took a
reduction in his monthly pay from $10,000 to $8,000, resulting in the
deferral of $10,000 in compensation for fiscal
2009.
|
(7)
|
This
amount represents the annual year-end bonus, based on a percentage of
salary, paid to all employees of
CryoPort.
|
(8)
|
This
column represents the expense recorded for the fair value of all stock
options and warrants granted in fiscal 2009 and CryoPort’s fiscal year
ended March 31, 2008, all in accordance with SFAS
123(R). Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the
impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. For information on the valuation assumptions with
respect to the grants made in 2009 and 2008, refer to Note 2 “Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies – Stock-Based Compensation” in CryoPort’s
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on July
1, 2009. For information on the valuation assumptions with
respect to the grants made in 2007, refer to Note 2 “Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies – Stock-Based Compensation” in CryoPort’s
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on June
30, 2008, and amended on July 14,
2008.
|
(9)
|
This
amount represents the fair value of all options and warrants granted to
Mr. Stambaugh as compensation for services as Director during fiscal
2009. On December 10, 2008, based on the recommendation of the
Compensation and Governance Committee and approval by the Board of
Directors, Mr. Stambaugh was granted 41,667 warrants (after giving effect
to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) exercisable at $10.08
which vest in three equal installments on the date of grant and the first
and second anniversary of the date of
grant.
|
(10)
|
This
amount represents the fair value of all options and warrants granted to
Mr. Berry as compensation during fiscal 2009. Based on the recommendation
of the Compensation and Governance Committee and approval by the Board of
Directors, Mr. Berry was granted incentive awards of 2,183 fully
vested warrants exercisable at $9.00 per share on August 27, 2007 and
2,183 fully vested warrants exercisable at $12.84 per share on February
28, 2008, assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio
of 12-to-1. The exercise prices of the warrants are equal to
the fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant
dates.
|
(11)
|
This
amount represents the fair value of all options and warrants granted to
Ms. Kelly as compensation for services during fiscal
2009. Based on the recommendation of the Compensation and
Governance Committee and approval by the Board of Directors, Ms. Kelly was
granted incentive awards of 5,083 fully vested warrants exercisable at
$12.84 per share on February 28, 2008, assuming the consummation of a
reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1. The exercise price
of the warrants is equal to the fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the
grant date.
|
-54-
(12)
|
This
amount represents the fair value of all options and warrants granted to
Mr. Bollinger as compensation for services during fiscal
2009. Based on the recommendation of the Compensation and
Governance Committee and approval by the Board of Directors, Mr. Bollinger
was granted incentive awards of 12,500 warrants exercisable at $12.84 per
share on February 28, 2008 which vests at a rate of 4,167 upon date of
grant, 4,167 on February 28, 2009 and 4,167 on February 28, 2010, assuming
the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of
12-to-1. The exercise price of the warrants is equal to the
fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant date. Mr.
Bollinger was issued 5,183 warrants on April 29, 2009 as a performance
bonus for services rendered during fiscal year
2009.
|
(13)
|
This
amount represents the fair value of all options and warrants granted to
Mr. Carlson as compensation for services during CryoPort’s fiscal year
ended March 31, 2008. Based on the recommendation of the
Compensation and Governance Committee and approval by the Board of
Directors, Mr. Carlson was granted incentive awards of 5,417 fully vested
warrants exercisable at $12.84 per share on February 28, 2008, assuming
the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of
12-to-1. The exercise price of the warrants is equal to the
fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant
date.
|
(14)
|
Amounts
shown in this column reflect the costs of health insurance premiums paid
to each of Messrs. Berry, Carlson and Bollinger. Such items are
currently taxable to such named executive officer. The amount
of taxable income for the individual is determined pursuant to Internal
Revenue Service rules which may differ from the amounts reflected in this
column.
|
Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Employment
Contracts
Larry G.
Stambaugh
On August
21, 2009, the Compensation and Governance Committee approved an employment
agreement with Mr. Stambaugh, CryoPort’s Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chairman, which commenced effective as of August 1, 2009 and will continue
in effect until Mr. Stambaugh’s employment is terminated under the provisions of
the employment agreement (the “Stambaugh Employment
Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Stambaugh Employment
Agreement, Mr. Stambaugh will be paid an initial annual base salary of $360,000
which may be increased from time to time at the discretion of Compensation and
Governance Committee. Mr. Stambaugh also may be eligible to receive a
discretionary annual bonus of up to 60% of his then effective annualized base
salary pursuant to an incentive plan to be prepared by CryoPort’s Board of
Directors with Mr. Stambaugh’s participation and completed at the earliest
practicable time. In addition, in the event that CryoPort raises an
aggregate of $5,000,000 pursuant to equity and/or convertible debt financings
during the period of March 30, 2009 and continuing to the last day of the term
of his employment, then Mr. Stambaugh shall be entitled to receive a onetime
incentive payment in the amount of $125,000. Mr. Stambaugh is
eligible to participate in all employee benefits plans or arrangements which may
be offered by CryoPort during the term of the Stambaugh Employment
Agreement. CryoPort shall pay the cost of Mr. Stambaugh’s health
insurance coverage in accordance with CryoPort’s plans and policies during the
term of his employment. Mr. Stambaugh shall also be eligible for 25
paid time off days a year, and is entitled to receive fringe benefits ordinarily
and customarily provided by CryoPort to its senior officers.
In
addition to the previously awarded warrant for 41,667 shares (assuming the
consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of common stock
issued to Mr. Stambaugh on December 10, 2008, on October 9, 2009, we
granted Mr. Stambaugh an incentive stock option to acquire 55,833 shares
(assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of
common stock of CryoPort at an exercise price of $5.40 per share (assuming
the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of
12-to-1). The right to exercise the stock option vested as to
33⅓% of the underlying shares of common stock upon grant, with the remaining
underlying shares of common stock vesting in equal installments on the first and
second anniversary of the grant date.
-55-
Mr.
Stambaugh has agreed not to solicit any CryoPort employees during the term of
his employment and the one year period following the termination of his
employment. Payments due to Mr. Stambaugh upon a termination
of the Stambaugh Employment Agreement are described
below.
Catherine
Doll
On July
29, 2009, CryoPort retained the full-time services of Ms. Doll, and she was
appointed by the Board of Directors to the offices of Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Corporate Secretary effective as of August 20,
2009. Pursuant to her agreement with CryoPort, Ms. Doll will be paid
the sum of $10,000 per month in consideration for her services to
CryoPort. In addition, on October 9, 2009, we granted Ms. Doll a
fully vested nonstatutory option to purchase 1,667 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $5.40 per share (assuming the consummation of a reverse
stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1). The right to exercise the stock
option vested as to 331/3% of the
underlying shares of common stock upon grant, with the remaining underlying
shares vesting in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the
grant date.
Bret
Bollinger
Bret
Bollinger is subject to an employment agreement which became effective February
1, 2008 (the “Bollinger Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which he is employed
as CryoPort’s Vice President of Operations. Under the terms of the Bollinger
Employment Agreement, as approved by the Compensation and Governance Committee,
Mr. Bollinger’s current annual salary is $130,000 and he is eligible for an
annual cash bonus of up to 30% to 50% of his base salary based on targeted goals
and objectives met, payable in either cash or warrants, as determined by the
President and approved by the Board of Directors. In the event that
CryoPort terminates Mr. Bollinger’s employment without “cause,” as defined in
the Bollinger Employment Agreement, then upon such termination, CryoPort is
obligated to pay to Mr. Bollinger as severance an amount equal to six months of
his then current base salary.
Peter
Berry
Prior to
his voluntary resignation on February 20, 2009, Mr. Berry was subject to an
employment agreement with CryoPort dated November 1, 2002, as amended March 17,
2003 (the “Berry Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which he has been employed
as CryoPort’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Based on the
recommendations of the Compensation and Governance Committee, in December 2005,
December 2006, and November 2007 and again in December 2008, the Board of
Directors approved the extension of Mr. Berry’s employment contract for
additional 1-year terms with the same base salary as that provided for in the
last year of the original Berry Employment Agreement. Under the
extended terms of the Berry Employment Agreement, Mr. Berry’s annual salary was
$192,000 and he was eligible for an annual cash bonus of up to 40% of his base
salary, based on goals and objectives met as recommended by the Compensation and
Governance Committee and approved by the full Board of Directors. On
November 1, 2002, pursuant to the Berry Employment Agreement, CryoPort granted
Mr. Berry a stock option to purchase up to 41,667 shares (assuming the
consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of common stock at
an exercise price of $6.00 per share, which option vested as to 10,417 shares of
common stock on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and thereafter vests
in 36 equal monthly installments through November 11, 2006. In the
event that CryoPort terminates Mr. Berry’s employment without “cause,” as
defined in the Berry Employment Agreement, or fails to renew the Berry
Employment Agreement except for “cause,” then upon such termination, CryoPort is
obligated to pay to Mr. Berry as severance an amount equal to his then current
base salary, plus any earned incentive bonus. In March 2003, the
Berry Employment Agreement was amended to reflect Mr. Berry’s agreement to a
reduced base salary during the first year of $60,000, and agreement to forego
eligibility for an incentive bonus for such year. In exchange for the
foregoing, CryoPort granted Mr. Berry an additional stock option to purchase an
additional 20,833 shares (assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at
a ratio of 12-to-1) of common stock at a price of $6.00 per
share. The option was vested as to 10,417 shares of common stock on
the date of grant, and 5,208 shares of common stock on each of September 30,
2003 and March 31, 2004, assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split, at
a ratio of 12-to-1. All other terms of the Berry Employment Agreement
remained unchanged. The Berry Employment Agreement was further
amended by Board of Directors consent, due to the financial condition of
CryoPort in 2004 at Mr. Berry’s request, to eliminate the 100% bonus provision
per the contract in year two and defer this bonus into the third year of the
Berry Employment Agreement. This entitled Mr. Berry to earn up to
200% of his then salary in the third contract year. Mr. Berry’s bonus earned for
the third year of the Berry Employment Agreement was approved for a total of
$100,000 which was included in Mr. Berry’s accrued salaries as of March 31, 2006
and converted into a note payable during fiscal 2007. Mr. Berry’s
bonuses earned for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2007 based on the terms of
the Berry Employment Agreement were approved by the Board of Directors for
$30,000 each year. Starting March 1, 2009, Mr. Berry entered into a
Consulting Agreement to provide advisory services to CryoPort for the period of
March 1, 2009 through January 1, 2010. The compensation for Mr.
Berry’s services under this agreement was set for $16,000 for the month of March
2009 and $28,890 for each month thereafter until expiration of the
contract. On August 26, 2009, Mr. Berry agreed to accept $20,000 per
month through the remainder of the term of the Consulting Agreement with the
deferred portion payable following expiration of the term. We are
currently in default of our payment obligation to Mr. Berry under
the foregoing consulting Agreement.
-56-
CryoPort
has no other employment agreements.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity
awards granted to our named executive officers as of March 31, 2009:
Outstanding
Equity Awards At Fiscal Year End 2009(*)
|
||||||||||
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|||||
Larry
G. Stambaugh
|
13,889
(13)
|
-
|
27,778(13)
|
$10.08
|
12/4/18
|
|||||
Peter
Berry
|
41,667
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
$6.00
|
11/1/12
|
|||||
20,833
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
$6.00
|
4/1/13
|
||||||
20,833
(3)
|
-
|
-
|
$7.20
|
11/1/13
|
||||||
17,581 (4)
|
-
|
-
|
$0.48
|
8/1/14
|
||||||
2,183
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
$9.00
|
8/27/17
|
||||||
2,183
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
$12.84
|
2/27/18
|
||||||
Dee
S. Kelly
|
6,250
(6)
|
-
|
-
|
$7.20
|
10/1/13
|
|||||
3,063
(7)
|
-
|
-
|
$0.48
|
8/1/14
|
||||||
13,208
(8)
|
-
|
-
|
$12.00
|
8/3/16
|
||||||
5,083
(9)
|
-
|
-
|
$3.36
|
1/3/17
|
||||||
5,083
(9)
|
-
|
-
|
$12.84
|
2/27/18
|
||||||
Kenneth
G. Carlson
|
13,083
(10)
|
-
|
-
|
$12.00
|
8/3/16
|
|||||
5,417
(11)
|
-
|
-
|
$3.36
|
1/3/17
|
||||||
5,417
(11)
|
-
|
-
|
$12.84
|
2/27/18
|
||||||
Bret
Bollinger
|
8,333
(12)
|
-
|
4,167
(12)
|
$12.84
|
2/27/18
|
*
|
This
table represents the amounts of all stock options and warrants outstanding
as of the end of fiscal 2009. This table and accompanying notes
assume the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of
12-to-1.
|
(1)
|
On
November 1, 2002, pursuant to the Berry Employment Agreement, CryoPort
granted Mr. Berry a stock option to purchase up to 41,667 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, which option vested as to
1,042 shares of common stock on the first anniversary of the date of
grant, and thereafter vests in 36 equal monthly installments through
November 11, 2006. In the event that CryoPort terminated Mr.
Berry’s employment without “cause,” as defined in the Berry Employment
Agreement, or fails to renew the Berry Employment Agreement except for
“cause,” then upon such termination, CryoPort is obligated to pay to Mr.
Berry as severance an amount equal to his then current base salary, plus
any earned incentive bonus.
|
(2)
|
In
March 2003, the Berry Employment Agreement was amended to reflect Mr.
Berry’s agreement to a reduced base salary during the first year of
$60,000, and agreement to forego eligibility for an incentive bonus for
such year. In exchange for the foregoing, CryoPort granted Mr. Berry an
additional stock option to purchase an additional 20,833 shares of its
common stock at a price of $6.00 per share. The option was vested as to
1,042 shares of common stock on the date of grant, and 520 shares of
common stock on each of September 30, 2003 and March 31,
2004.
|
(3)
|
On
November 1, 2003, the Berry Employment Agreement was amended to reflect
Mr. Berry’s agreement to a reduced base salary during the second year of
$60,000, and agreement to forego eligibility for an incentive bonus for
such year. In exchange for the foregoing, CryoPort granted Mr. Berry an
additional stock option to purchase an additional 20,833 shares of its
common stock at a price of $7.20 per share. The option was vested as to
750 shares of common stock on March 1, 2004, and 667 shares of common
stock on each of July 1, 2003 and November 1,
2004.
|
-57-
(4)
|
On
August 1, 2004 CryoPort offered on a pro rated basis to all stockholders
416,667 shares of common stock at $0.48 per share. This option was
approved by the compensation committee for Peter Berry to participate for
30,664 shares of common stock. Peter Berry exercised as to 13,083 shares
of common stock in the fiscal year of
2008-2009.
|
(5)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
approval by the Board of Directors, Mr. Berry was granted incentive awards
of 2,183 fully vested warrants exercisable at $9.00 per share on August
27, 2007 and 2,183 fully vested warrants exercisable at $12.84 per share
on February 28, 2008.
|
(6)
|
On
October 1, 2003, Dee Kelly was granted an additional stock option to
purchase 6,250 shares of common stock at a price of $7.20 per share. The
option was vested as to 417 shares of common stock on March 1, 2003, and
167 shares of common stock per month thereafter from November 1, 2003 to
October 1, 2006.
|
(7)
|
Ms.
Kelly was granted an option to purchase 3,063 shares of common stock at
$0.48 per share in connection with the offering described in Note 4
above.
|
(8)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and approval by the
Board of Directors, Ms. Kelly was granted incentive awards of 13,208
warrants exercisable at $12.00 per share on August 3, 2006. The exercise
price of the warrants was equal to the fair value of CryoPort stock as of
the grant date.
|
(9)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
approval by the Board of Directors, Ms. Kelly was granted incentive awards
of 5,083 fully vested warrants exercisable at $3.36 per share on January
3, 2007 and 5,083 fully vested warrants exercisable at $12.84 per share on
February 28, 2008. The exercise price of the warrants is equal to the fair
value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant
date.
|
(10)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and approval by the
Board of Directors, Mr. Carlson was granted incentive awards of 13,083
warrants exercisable at $12.00 per share on August 3,
2006.
|
(11)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
approval by the Board of Directors, Ms. Carlson was granted incentive
awards of 5,417 fully vested warrants exercisable at $3.36 per share on
January 3, 2007 and 5,417 fully vested warrants exercisable at $12.84 per
share on February 28, 2008. The exercise price of the warrants is equal to
the fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant
date.
|
(12)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
approval by the Board of Directors, Mr. Bollinger was granted incentive
awards of 12,500 warrants exercisable at $12.84 per share on February 28,
2009 which vest at a rate of 4,167 upon grant date, 4,167 on February 28,
2009 and 4,167 on February 28, 2010. The exercise price of the warrants is
equal to the fair value of CryoPort stock as of the grant
date.
|
(13)
|
Based
on the recommendation of the Compensation and Governance Committee and
approval by the Board of Directors, Mr. Stambaugh was granted incentive
awards of 41,667 fully warrants exercisable at $10.08 per share on
December 10, 2008, which vest in equal installments on the date of grant
and the first and second of the date of grant. The exercise price of the
warrants is equal to the fair value of CryoPort’s stock as of the grant
date.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
CryoPort
currently maintains one equity compensation plan, referred to as the 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). CryoPort’s Compensation and Governance
Committee is responsible for making reviewing and recommending grants of options
under this plan which are approved by the Board of Directors. The 2002 Plan,
which was approved by CryoPort’s stockholders in October 2002, allows for the
grant of options to purchase up to 416,666 shares (assuming the consummation of
a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) of CryoPort’s common stock. The
2002 Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of CryoPort’s
common stock at prices not less than the fair market value of the stock at the
date of grant and generally expire 10 years after the date of grant. The stock
options are subject to vesting requirements, generally three or four years. The
2002 Plan also provides for the granting of restricted shares of common stock
subject to vesting requirements.
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued 6,891 shares of common stock resulting from
exercises of stock options issued pursuant to the 2002 Plan at an average price
of $0.48 per share for proceeds of $3,307 and issued 12,502 shares of common
stock from the cashless exercises of a total of 13,125 stock options issued
pursuant to the 2002 Plan, assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split,
at a ratio of 12-to-1.
-58-
At our
2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 9, 2009, our stockholders
approved the 2009 Plan, which provides for the grant of stock-based
incentives. The 2009 Plan allows for the grant of up to 1,000,000 shares
(after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of our
common stock for awards to our officers, directors, employees and
consultants. The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock rights, restricted stock,
performance share units, performance shares, performance cash awards, stock
appreciation rights, and stock grant awards. The 2009 Plan also permits
the grant of awards that qualify for the "performance-based compensation"
exception to the $1,000,000 limitation on the deduction of compensation imposed
by Section 162(m) of the Code. As of November 30, 2009, a total of 942,500
shares (after fiving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) of
our common stock remained available for future grants under the 2009
Plan.
Potential
Payments On Termination Or Change In Control
Pursuant
to the Stambaugh Employment Agreement, upon any termination of Mr. Stambaugh’s
employment for any reason, including by CryoPort “for cause” (as defined in the
Stambaugh Employment Agreement), Mr. Stambaugh will receive his salary
through the date of termination and any accrued but unpaid vacation, and he will
retain all of his rights to benefits earned prior to termination under CryoPort
benefit plans in which he participates. If CryoPort terminates Mr. Stambaugh’s
employment other than “for cause” or Mr. Stambaugh terminates his employment due
to a “constructive discharge” (as defined in the Stambaugh Employment
Agreement), subject to Mr. Stambaugh’s signing of a general release, Mr.
Stambaugh will receive a severance payment equal to (i) six months’ base salary,
if such termination occurs during the first twelve months of his employment, or
(ii) twelve months’ base salary if such termination occurs following the first
twelve months of his employment, and, in either instance, health care insurance
coverage for one year.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Bollinger Employment Agreement, in the event that CryoPort
terminates Mr. Bollinger’s employment without “cause” or for change in control
of the leadership of CryoPort as defined by the Bollinger Employment Agreement,
then upon such termination, CryoPort is obligated to pay to Mr. Bollinger as
severance an amount equal to six months of his current base salary.
The 2002
Plan provides that in the event of a “change of control,” all options shares
will become fully vested and may be immediately exercised by the person who
holds the option.
With the
exception of Mr. Stambaugh, CryoPort does not provide any additional payments to
named executive officers upon their resignation, termination, retirement, or
upon a change of control.
Change
in Control Agreements
There are
no understandings, arrangements or agreements known by management at this time
which would result in a change in control of CryoPort or any
subsidiary.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Compensation
for the Board of Directors is governed by CryoPort’s Compensation and Governance
Committee. CryoPort began making cash payments to the directors as approved by
the Compensation and Governance Committee in October 2007. Directors who are
also employees do not receive any additional compensation for services performed
as a member of CryoPort’s Board of Directors or any committees
thereof. Prior to August 21, 2009, non-employee directors other than
the Chairman of the Board of Directors receive an annual cash retainer fee of
$12,700, payable in quarterly installments of $3,175 each. Non-employee
directors each receive meeting fees of $1,000 for scheduled quarterly board
meetings, $500 for special board meetings and $1,000 for stockholder meetings,
if any. Committee members receive fees of $1,000 for Audit Committee meetings,
and $900 for Compensation and Governance Committee meetings. Certain Board of
Directors positions receive additional quarterly retainer fees as follows:
Compensation and Governance Committee Chairman $1,250, Board Vice Chairman
$1,275, Chairman of the Audit Committee $1,850 and Board Secretary $1,600. The
Chairman of the Board position received all inclusive monthly fees of $12,000
until he was also elected as President and Chief Executive Officer in February
2009 at which time these fees became executive compensation as discussed below.
From time to time CryoPort has granted stock warrants to the directors with
exercise prices equal to the fair value as of grant date based on external
expert reports and guidance through the Compensation and Governance Committee
recommendations.
Effective
August 21, 2009, the fees payable to non-employee directors were set at a flat
fee of $15,000 per quarter with no additional fees payable for committee
membership or serving as chairman of a committee. In addition, each
year non-employee directors are granted a warrant or stock option to purchase
4,167 shares (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock
split) of CryoPort’s common stock with exercise prices equal to the closing
price of CryoPort’s common stock on the date of grant. The warrants or options
will vest in four equal quarterly installments.
-59-
The
following table sets forth the director compensation of the non-employee
directors of CryoPort during the year ended March 31, 2009.
Name
|
Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
|
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
|
Warrant
and
Option
Awards
($)
(2)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||
Larry
G. Stambaugh (7)
|
$
|
36,000
|
—
|
$
|
28,895
|
$
|
64,895
|
|||||||||
Gary
C. Cannon (3)
|
$
|
26,850
|
—
|
$
|
21,459
|
$
|
48,309
|
|||||||||
Thomas
Fischer (4)
|
$
|
32,550
|
—
|
$
|
26,408
|
$
|
58,958
|
|||||||||
Adam
M. Michelin (5)
|
$
|
27,600
|
—
|
$
|
22,140
|
$
|
49,740
|
|||||||||
Stephen
L. Scott (6)
|
$
|
14,775
|
—
|
$
|
3,417
|
$
|
18,192
|
(1)
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash as shown in this schedule represent payments and
accruals for directors’ services earned for the period of April 1, 2008
through March 31, 2009.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial reporting purposes for the year
ended March 31, 2009, in accordance with SFAS 123(R) of warrant and stock
option awards pursuant to the 2002 Plan, and thus includes amounts from
the vesting of awards granted in and prior to 2009. Assumptions used in
the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 11, Stock Options
and Warrants. All stock warrants were granted at or higher than the
closing market price of CryoPort’s stock on the date of
grant.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Cannon was granted 4,933 fully vested warrants (assuming the consummation
of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) with an average exercise
price of $6.84 during the year ended March 31, 2009 for his services as a
director, Corporate Secretary, and member of the Compensation and
Governance Committee. Mr. Cannon served as General Counsel for CryoPort
pursuant to a retainer arrangement. For the year ended March 31, 2009 he
was paid a total of $108,050 for retainer and out of pocket fees. Mr.
Cannon was also granted additional 3,000 fully vested warrants (assuming
the consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of
12-to-1) with an average exercise price of $9.84 and combined
Black Scholes valuation of $24,206 as of grant dates, for his legal
services during the year ended March 31, 2009 as General Counsel for
CryoPort.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Fischer was granted 4,933 fully vested warrants (assuming the consummation
of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) with an average exercise
price of $6.84 during the year ended March 31, 2009 for his service as a
director, Lead Director, Chairman of the Compensation and Governance
Committee and member of the Audit Committee.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Michelin was granted 4,145 fully vested warrants (assuming the
consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) with an
average exercise price of $6.96 during the year ended March 31, 2009 for
his service as a director and Chairman of the Audit
Committee.
|
(6)
|
Prior
to his resignation from the Board of Directors on November 7, 2008, Mr.
Scott was granted 1,516 fully vested warrants (assuming the consummation
of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1) with an average exercise
price of $10.08 during the year ended March 31, 2009 for his service as a
director and member of the Audit Committee.
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Stambaugh was elected on December 10, 2008 as Chairman of the Board for a
monthly fee of $12,000. Amounts in this Board Compensation table represent
amounts paid to Mr. Stambaugh in his capacity as Chairman of the Board
until February 20, 2009 when he was also elected to serve the positions of
President and Chief Executive Officer. On December 10, 2008 Mr. Stambaugh
was granted incentive awards of 41,667 warrants exercisable at $10.08 per
share which vest in three equal installments on the grant date and first
and second anniversaries of the grant
date.
|
-60-
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Gary
Cannon served as Secretary of CryoPort from June 2005 to May 2009. None of the
other members of the Compensation and Governance Committee is or has been an
officer or employee of CryoPort.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership
of CryoPort’s common stock as of November 30, 2009, by each person or group
of affiliated persons known to CryoPort to beneficially own 5% or more of its
common stock, each director, each named executive officer, and all of its
directors and named executive officers as a group. As of November 30, 2009,
there were 4,167,943 shares (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1
reverse stock split) of common stock outstanding. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o CryoPort,
Inc., 20382 Barents Sea Circle, Lake Forest, California 92630.
The
following table and accompanying notes assume the consummation of a reverse
stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1. The following table gives effect to the
shares of common stock issuable within 60 days of November 30, 2009,
upon the exercise of all options and other rights beneficially owned by the
indicated stockholders on that date. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons
named in the table have sole voting and sole investment control with respect to
all shares of common stock beneficially owned:
Beneficial
Owner
|
Number
of Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
Percentage
of Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
||||
Executive
Officers and Directors:
|
||||||
Larry
G. Stambaugh
|
32,500
|
(1)
|
*
|
|||
Adam
M. Michelin
|
26,993
|
(1)
|
*
|
|||
Bret
Bollinger
|
13,517
|
(1)
|
*
|
|||
Carlton
M. Johnson
|
4,185
|
(1)
|
*
|
|||
Catherine
Doll
|
556
|
(1)
|
||||
All
directors and named executive officers as a group
(5 persons)
|
77,750
|
1.3%
|
||||
Other
Stockholders:
|
||||||
BridgePointe
Master Fund, Ltd.
|
1,892,979
|
(1)
(2)
|
4.9%
(3)
|
|||
Enable
Growth Partners LP (and related funds)
|
1,979,804
|
(1)
(2)
|
4.9%
(3)
|
*
|
Represents
less than 1%
|
(1)
|
Includes
shares of common stock which individuals shown above have the right to
acquire as of November 30, 2009, or within 60 days thereafter,
pursuant to outstanding stock options and/or warrants as follows: Mr.
Stambaugh – 32,500; Mr. Michelin – 23,546 shares; Mr. Bollinger – 13,517
shares; Mr. Johnson – 2,731; BridgePointe Master Fund, Ltd – 1,226,625
shares and Enable Growth Partners LP – 1,319,288
shares.
|
(2)
|
Includes
shares of common stock which individuals shown above have the right to
acquire as of November 30, 2009, or within 60 days thereafter,
pursuant to outstanding convertible debentures as follows: BridgePointe
Master Fund, Ltd – 604,999 shares and Enable Growth Partners LP – 418,920
shares. The foregoing share amounts for BridgePointe Master Fund, Ltd and
Enable Growth Partners LP do not give effect to the 2010
Amendment.
|
(3)
|
The
number and percentage of shares of common stock beneficially owned is
determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, and the
information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any
other purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares
of common stock as to which the selling stockholder has sole or shared
voting power or investment power and also any shares of common stock,
which the selling stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days.
Nevertheless, for purposes of this table only for each of the other
stockholders does not give effect to the 4.99% limitation on the number of
shares of common stock that may be held by each other stockholder as
agreed to in the warrant held by each selling stockholder which limitation
is subject to waiver by the holder upon 61 days prior written notice to us
(subject to a further non-waivable limitation at
9.99%).
|
-61-
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
CryoPort
has established policies and other procedures regarding approval of transactions
between CryoPort and any employee, officer, director, and certain of their
family members and other related persons, including those required to be
reported under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. These policies and procedures are
generally not in writing, but are evidenced by long standing principles set
forth in our Code of Conduct or adhered to by our Board of Directors. As set
forth in the Audit Committee Charter the Audit Committee reviews and approves
all related-party transactions after reviewing such transaction for potential
conflicts of interests and improprieties. Accordingly, all such
related-party transactions are submitted to the Audit Committee for ongoing
review and oversight. Generally speaking, we enter into related-party
transactions only on terms that we believe are at least as favorable to our
company as those that we could obtain from an unrelated third
party.
In August
2006, Peter Berry, CryoPort’s former Chief Executive Officer, agreed to convert
his deferred salaries to a long-term note payable. Under the terms of this note,
CryoPort began to make monthly payments of $3,000 to Mr. Berry in January 2007.
In January 2008, these monthly payments increased to $6,000 and will remain at
that amount until the loan is fully paid in December 2010. Interest of 6% per
annum on the outstanding principal balance of the note began to accrue on
January 1, 2008. As of August 21, 2009, the total amount of deferred salaries
and accrued interest under this arrangement was $160,864. The largest aggregate
amount of principal outstanding during the year ending March 31, 2009 was
$196,121. CryoPort paid $49,427 of principal on the note during the year ending
March 31, 2009. Interest expense related to this note was $10,573 for the year
ended March 31. Accrued interest related to this note payable amounted to
$13,738 at March 31, 2009. In January 2009, Mr. Berry agreed to defer the
monthly payments of the note due from January 31, 2009 through June 30, 2009. As
of March 31, 2009 these unpaid payments totaled $18,000. Mr. Berry resigned his
position as Chief Executive Officer in February 2009; and resigned from the
Board of Directors in July 2009, but continues to work as a consultant to
CryoPort. Effective August 26, 2009, pursuant to a letter agreement (i) we
agreed to pay Berry the sum of $30,000 plus accrued interest representing past
due payments from January to May 2009 previously waived by Berry, (ii) Berry
agreed to waive payments due to him through December 2009, and (iii) we agreed
to pay to Berry the sum of $42,000 plus accrued interest on January 1, 2010,
representing payments due to him from June 2009 thru December
2009. In addition, pursuant to a separate letter agreement regarding
Mr. Berry’s consulting agreement with us pursuant to which he was entitled to
receive $28,890 per month until January 1, 2010, Mr. Berry agreed to accept
$20,000 per month through the remainder of the term of the Consulting Agreement
with the deferred portion payable following expiration of the
term. We are currently in default of our payment obligations to Mr.
Berry under the notes and Consulting Agreement as of the January 1, 2010
payments.
From June
2005 until August 2009, CryoPort retained the legal services of Gary C. Cannon,
Attorney at Law, for a monthly retainer fee. From June 2005 to May 2009, Mr.
Cannon also served as CryoPort’s Secretary and was a member of CryoPort’s Board
of Directors. Mr. Cannon continues to serve as Corporate Legal Counsel for
CryoPort and serves as a member of the Advisory Board. In December 2007, Mr.
Cannon’s monthly retainer for legal services was increased from $6,500 per month
to $9,000 per month. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the total
amount expensed by CryoPort for retainer fees and out of pocket expenses was
$108,050 and $88,248, respectively. From October 2008 through March 31, 2009,
Mr. Cannon agreed to defer a portion of his monthly payments and as of March 31,
2009, a total of $15,000 had been deferred. In August 2009, we issued 500
warrants (after giving effect to the anticipated 12-to-1 reverse stock split) in
lieu of payment to Gary C. Cannon, who then served as Corporate Legal Counsel
for CryoPort and as a member of the Advisory Board, to purchase shares of our
common stock at an average exercise price of $6.12 per share. The
exercise prices of these warrants are greater than or equal to the stock price
of CryoPort’s shares of common stock as of the date of grant. In July
2009, Mr. Cannon was given a 30-day notice of his termination as general
legal counsel and advisor to CryoPort.
As of
September 30, 2009, CryoPort had an aggregate principal balance of
$1,069,500, in unsecured indebtedness owed to five related parties, including
four former members of the Board of Directors, representing working capital
advances made to CryoPort from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes
bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provide for aggregate monthly
principal payments which commenced April 1, 2006 of $2,500, and which increased
by an aggregate of $2,500 every six months to the current maximum aggregate
payment of $10,000 per month. Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued
interest is due at maturity. Accrued interest, which is included in related
party notes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, related to
these notes amounted to $554,260 as of March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009,
CryoPort had not made the required payments under the related party notes which
were due on January 1, February 1, and March 1, 2009. However, pursuant to the
note agreements, CryoPort has a 120-day grace period to pay missed payments
before the notes are in default. On April 29, 2009, May 30, 2009, and June 26,
2009, CryoPort paid the January 1, February 1 and March 1 payments respectively,
due on these related party notes. Management expects to continue to pay all
payments due prior to the expiration of the 120-day grace periods.
-62-
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
Our
authorized capital consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value per share, of which 50,015,318 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding as of November 30, 2009 (4,167,943 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding assuming the consummation of a reverse stock split at a
ratio of 12-to-1). The following description is a summary and is
qualified in its entirety by our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws as currently in effect.
Common
Stock
Each
holder of common stock is entitled to receive ratable dividends, if any, as may
be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the
payment of dividends. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not paid any
dividends on our common stock, and none are contemplated in the foreseeable
future. We anticipate that all earnings that may be generated from our
operations will be used to finance our growth.
Holders
of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record. There
are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Thus the holders
of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of our
directors if they choose to do so.
The
holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or
redemption rights. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders
of our common stock are entitled to receive our assets pro rata.
Description
of the Warrants
Each unit
will include a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. The warrants
will be issued in the form of warrant certificates, which will govern the rights
of a holder of the warrants. The warrants are transferable separately from the
common stock that is part of the unit. The warrant certificate has been filed as
an exhibit to this Registration Statement. Capitalized terms not otherwise
defined in this section have the meaning set forth in the warrant
certificate.
The
exercise price per share of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the
warrant is $5.28 (representing 110% of common stock offering price) per share.
The warrants will be exercisable by the holders at any time on or after
[_______, 2010], and through and including [__________, 2015].
The
warrants will, among other things, include provisions for the appropriate
adjustment in exercise price of the warrants and the class and number of the
common stock to be issued upon exercise of the warrants upon the occurrence of
certain events, including any subdivision, consolidation or reclassification of
our common stock, the payment of stock dividends, our amalgamation, and certain
rights offerings and other distributions to all holders of our common
stock.
In the
event of a capital reorganization or a reclassification of our common stock
(except in certain circumstances), any warrant holder, upon exercise of the
warrants, receives, in substitution for the common stock to which he would have
become entitled upon exercise immediately prior to such reorganization or
reclassification, the shares (of any class or classes) or other securities or
property of CryoPort (or cash) that he would have been entitled to receive at
the same aggregate exercise price upon such reorganization or reclassification
if such warrants had been exercised immediately prior to the record date with
respect to such event.
The
warrants may be redeemed by us upon 10 days prior notice at any time after the
closing bid price of our common stock is at least $7.92 (representing 165% of
the common stock offering price) for a period of 20 consecutive trading days for
$0.01 per warrant.
The
common stock underlying the warrants, when issued upon exercise of a warrant,
will be fully paid and non-assessable.
We are
not required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise of a warrant. In lieu
of any fractional share that would otherwise be issuable, we will pay the
warrant holder in cash on the basis of the current market value of any
fractional interest. The holder of a warrant will not possess any rights as our
stockholder until such holder exercises the warrant.
-63-
At any
time in which the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is
effective after [___________, 20__], a warrant may be exercised upon delivery to
us, prior to the expiry date of the warrant, of the exercise form found on the
back of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied
by payment of the exercise price and any applicable transfer tax in immediately
available funds for the number of common shares with respect to which the
warrant is being exercised.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The
Transfer Agent and Registrar for CryoPort’s common stock and warrants is
Integrity Stock Transfer, 3027 E. Sunset Road, Suite 103, Las Vegas, Nevada,
89120.
UNDERWRITING
AND PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Subject
to the terms and conditions of an underwriting agreement, dated ___________,
2010, we have agreed to sell to the underwriter Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, and
the underwriter has agreed to purchase, on a firm commitment basis the number of
units offered in this offering set forth below, at the public offering price,
less the underwriting discount set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus.
Name
|
Number
of Units
|
||||
Rodman
& Renshaw, LLC
|
[___]
|
Nature
of Underwriting Commitment
The
underwriting agreement provides that the underwriter is committed to purchase
all units offered in this offering, other than those covered by the
over-allotment option described below, if the underwriters purchase any of these
securities. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriter to purchase the units offered hereby are conditional and may be
terminated at their discretion based on their assessment of the state of the
financial markets. The obligations of the underwriters may also be terminated
upon the occurrence of other events specified in the underwriting agreement.
Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriters’
obligations are subject to the authorization and the validity of the common
stock and the warrants being accepted for listing on NASDAQ and to various other
customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the
underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriters of officers’
certificates and legal opinions of our counsel.
State
Blue Sky Information
We intend
to offer and sell the units offered hereby to retail customers and institutional
investors in all 50 states. However, we will not make any offer of these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
Pricing
of Securities
The
underwriter has advised us that they propose to offer the units directly to the
public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, and to certain dealers that are members of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), at such price less a concession not in excess of
$[*] per unit. The underwriters may allow, and the selected dealers may reallow,
a concession not in excess of $[*] per unit to certain brokers and dealers.
After this offering, this offering price and concessions and discounts to
brokers and dealers and other selling terms may from time to time be changed by
the underwriters. These prices should not be considered an indication of the
actual value of the units and are subject to change as a result of market
conditions and other factors. No variation in those terms will change the amount
of proceeds to be received by us as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
“CYRX”. We have applied to have our common stock and the warrants listed on
the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “CYPT” and “CYPTW,” respectively,
which we expect to occur prior to the completion of this offering. On
November 30, 2009, the closing market price of our common stock was $4.80,
giving effect to the 12-to-1 reverse stock split to be effected prior to the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
The public offering price for the shares of common stock was determined by
negotiation between us and the underwriters.
-64-
The
principal factors considered in determining the public offering price of the
shares of common stock included:
●
|
the
information in this prospectus and otherwise available to the
underwriters;
|
|
●
|
the
history and the prospects for the industry in which we will
compete;
|
|
●
|
the
current stock price;
|
|
●
|
our
current financial condition and the prospects for our future cash flows
and earnings;
|
|
●
|
the
general condition of the economy and the securities markets at the time of
this offering;
|
|
●
|
the
recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly-traded securities of
generally comparable companies; and
|
|
●
|
the
public demand for our securities in this
offering.
|
We cannot
be sure that the public offering price will correspond to the price at which our
shares of common stock will trade in the public market following this offering
or that an active trading market for our shares of common stock will develop and
continue after this offering.
Commissions
and Discounts
The
following table summarizes the compensation to be paid to the underwriters by us
and the proceeds, before expenses, payable to us, assuming a $____ offering
price. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the
underwriters of the over-allotment option.
Total
|
||||||
Per
Unit
|
Without
Over-Allotment
|
With
Over Allotment
|
||||
[___]
|
||||||
Underwriting
discount (1)
|
||||||
Non-accountable
expense allowance (2)
|
||||||
Proceeds,
before expenses, to us (3)
|
(1)
Underwriting discount is $0.___ per unit (9% of the price of the units sold in
this offering).
(2) The
non-accountable expense allowance of 1% is not payable with respect to the units
sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.
(3) We
estimate that the total expenses of this offering, excluding the underwriters’
discount and the non-accountable expense allowance, are approximately
$_________.
Over-allotment
Option
We
have granted a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to
purchase _________additional units of common stock and warrants solely to cover
over-allotments, if any, at the same price as the initial units. If the
underwriters fully exercise the over-allotment option, the total public offering
price, underwriting fees and expenses and net proceeds (before expenses) to us
will be $______________, $____________, and $___________
respectively.
Lock-ups
All
of our officers, directors and shareholders beneficially owning 3% or more of
our outstanding common stock have agreed that, for a period of six months from
the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms
a part, they will not sell, contract to sell, grant any option for the sale or
otherwise dispose of any of our equity securities, or any securities convertible
into or exercisable or exchangeable for our equity securities, without the
consent of the representative except for exercise or conversion of currently
outstanding warrants, options and convertible debentures, as applicable; and
exercise of options under an acceptable stock incentive plan. The underwriter
representative may consent to an early release from the lock-up periods if, in
its opinion, the market for the common stock would not be adversely impacted by
sales and in cases of a financial emergency of an officer, director or other
stockholder. We are unaware of any officer or director who intends to ask for
consent to dispose of any of our equity securities during the relevant lock-up
periods.
-65-
Underwriter's Warrant
We
have agreed to sell Rodman & Renshaw, LLC for $100 a warrant to
purchase up to a total of _______ shares of common stock (5% of the shares
of common stock sold). The shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of this
warrant are identical to those offered by this prospectus. This warrant is
exercisable at $[*] per share (125% of the price of the units sold in this
offering), commencing on a date which is one year from the effective date of the
registration statement and expiring five years from the effective date of the
registration statement. The warrant may also be exercised on a cashless basis.
The warrant and the ________ shares of common stock underlying the warrant have
been deemed compensation by the FINRA and are therefore subject to a 180-day
lock-up pursuant to Rule 5110(g)(1) of the FINRA. Rodman & Renshaw, LLC (or
permitted assignees under the Rule) will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge, or
hypothecate this warrant or the securities underlying this option, nor will it
engage in any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that
would result in the effective economic disposition of this warrant or the
underlying securities for a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus.
Additionally, the warrant may not be sold transferred, assigned, pledged or
hypothecated for a one-year period (including the foregoing 180 day period)
following the effective date of the registration statement except to any
underwriter and selected dealer participating in this offering and their bona
fide officers or partners. The warrant grants holders “piggy back”
registration rights. These rights apply to all of the securities directly and
indirectly issuable upon exercise of the warrant. We will bear all fees and
expenses attendant to registering the securities issuable on exercise of the
warrant, other than underwriting commissions incurred and payable by the
holders. The exercise price and number of shares issuable upon exercise of the
warrant may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a
stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend or our recapitalization,
reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the warrant exercise price or
underlying shares will not be adjusted for issuances of common stock at a price
below the warrant exercise price.
This
warrant will be valued based on the underlying shares of common stock obtainable
and valuation factors appropriate at the time it is issued. We currently
estimate that value to be approximately $______, based on the number of shares
of common stock subject to this warrant, a offering price of the shares of
$______, the resulting exercise prices related to the warrant on the shares of
common stock, the five year term of the warrant, a risk-free interest rate of
[*] % currently commensurate with that term, an expected dividend yield of [*] %
and estimated volatility of [*] %, based on a review of our historical
volatility. The initial value of this warrant will be charged to additional
paid-in capital as part of this offering costs incurred.
Other
Terms
In
connection with this offering, the underwriters or certain of the securities
dealers may distribute prospectuses electronically. No forms of prospectus other
than printed prospectuses and electronically distributed prospectuses that are
printable in Adobe PDF format will be used in connection with this
offering.
The
underwriters have informed us that they do not expect to confirm sales of shares
of common stock units by this prospectus to accounts over which they exercise
discretionary authority without obtaining the specific approval of the account
holder. We have also granted Rodman & Renshaw, LLC a right of first refusal
to conduct future offerings for us during the 12 months following the date of
this prospectus. In addition, pursuant to section 3.10.1 of the Underwriting
Agreement, we paid $5,000 per individual for the cost of the investigative
search firm that conducted an investigation of our principals.
Stabilization
Until
the distribution of the units offered by this prospectus is completed, rules of
the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriters to bid for and to purchase our
securities. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters may engage in
transactions effected in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act
that are intended to stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our
common stock. The underwriters may engage in over-allotment sales, syndicate
covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids in accordance
with Regulation M.
-66-
●
|
Stabilizing
transactions permit bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing
or maintaining the price of the common stock, so long as stabilizing bids
do not exceed a specified maximum.
|
|
●
|
Over-allotment
involves sales by the underwriters of shares of common stock in excess of
the number of shares of common stock the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a short position. The short position may be either
a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short
position, the number of shares of common stock over-allotted by the
underwriters is not greater than the number of shares of common stock that
they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position,
the number of shares of common stock involved is greater than the number
of shares of common stock in the over-allotment option. The underwriters
may close out any covered short position by either exercising their
over-allotment option or purchasing shares of common stock in the open
market.
|
|
●
|
Covering
transactions involve the purchase of securities in the open market after
the distribution has been completed in order to cover short positions. In
determining the source of securities to close out the short position, the
underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of securities
available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at
which they may purchase securities through the over-allotment option. If
the underwriters sell more shares of common stock than could be covered by
the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position, the position
can only be closed out by buying securities in the open market. A naked
short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the
securities in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in this offering.
|
|
●
|
Penalty
bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a
selected dealer when the shares of common stock originally sold by the
selected dealer are purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering
transaction.
|
These
stabilizing transactions, covering transactions and penalty bids may have the
effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or
preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a
result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might
otherwise exist in the open market.
Neither
we nor the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the effect
that the transactions described above may have on the prices of our securities.
These transactions may occur on the NASDAQ Capital Market or on any other
trading market. If any of these transactions are commenced, they may be
discontinued without notice at any time.
Foreign
Regulatory Restrictions on Purchase of the Units
No action
may be taken in any jurisdiction other than the United States that would permit
a public offering of the units or the possession, circulation or distribution of
this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required.
Accordingly, the units may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and
neither the prospectus nor any other offering material or advertisements in
connection with the units may be distributed or published in or from any country
or jurisdiction except under circumstances that will result in compliance with
any applicable rules and regulations of any such country or
jurisdiction.
In
addition to the public offering of the units in the United States, the
underwriters may, subject to the applicable foreign laws, also offer the units
to certain institutions or accredited persons in the following
countries:
United
Kingdom. No
offer of units has been made or will be made to the public in the United Kingdom
within the meaning of Section 102B of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000, as amended (“FSMA”), except to legal entities which are authorized or
regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities or
otherwise in circumstances which do not require the publication by us of a
prospectus pursuant to the Prospectus Rules of the Financial Services Authority
(“FSA”). Each underwriter: (i) has only communicated or caused to be
communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation
or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21
of FSMA) to persons who have professional experience in matters relating to
investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets
Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 or in circumstances in which Section
21 of FSMA does not apply to us; and (ii) has complied with, and will comply
with all applicable provisions of FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the units in, from or otherwise involving the United
Kingdom.
-67-
European Economic
Area. In relation
to each member state of the European Economic Area which has implemented the
Prospectus Directive, which we refer to as a Relevant Member State, with effect
from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in
that Relevant Member State, which we refer to as the Relevant Implementation
Date, no offer of units has been made and or will be made to the public in that
Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to
the units which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State
and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in
accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that, with effect from and
including the Relevant Implementation Date, an offer of units may be made to the
public in that Relevant Member State at any time: (a) to legal entities which
are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so
authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities; (b) to any legal entity which has two or more of (i) an average of
at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (ii) a total balance
sheet of more than €43,000,000; and (iii) an annual net turnover of more than
€50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or (c) in any
other circumstances which do not require the publication by us of a prospectus
pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. For the purposes of this
provision, the expression an “offer of ordinary shares to the public” in
relation to any units in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer
and the units to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe the units, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by
any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State
and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/ EC and includes
any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.
Germany. Any offer or solicitation of
units within Germany must be in full compliance with the German Securities
Prospectus Act (Wertpapierprospektgesetz — WpPG). The offer and solicitation of
securities to the public in Germany requires the approval of the prospectus by
the German Federal Financial Services Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht — BaFin). This prospectus has not been and will
not be submitted for approval to the BaFin. This prospectus does not constitute
a public offer under the German Securities Prospectus Act
(Wertpapierprospektgesetz). This prospectus and any other document relating to
the units, as well as any information contained therein, must therefore not be
supplied to the public in Germany or used in connection with any offer for
subscription of the units to the public in Germany, any public marketing of the
units or any public solicitation for offers to subscribe for or otherwise
acquire the units. The prospectus and other offering materials relating to the
offer of the units are strictly confidential and may not be distributed to any
person or entity other than the designated recipients hereof.
Greece. This prospectus has not been
approved by the Hellenic Capital Markets Commission or another EU equivalent
authority and consequently is not addressed to or intended for use, in any way
whatsoever, by Greek residents. The units have not been offered or sold and will
not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in Greece, except (i)
to “qualified investors” (as defined in article 2(f) of Greek Law 3401/2005);
and/or (ii) to less than 100 individuals or legal entities, who are not
qualified investors (article 3, paragraph 2(b) of Greek Law 3401/2005), or
otherwise in circumstances which will not result in the offer of the new units
being subject to the Greek Prospectus requirements of preparing a filing a
prospectus (under articles 3 and 4 of Greek Law 3401/2005).
Italy. This offering of the units
has not been cleared by Consob, the Italian Stock Exchanges regulatory agency of
public companies, pursuant to Italian securities legislation and, accordingly,
no units may be offered, sold or delivered, nor may copies of this prospectus or
of any other document relating to the units be distributed in Italy, except (1)
to professional investors (operatori qualificati); or (2) in circumstances which
are exempted from the rules on solicitation of investments pursuant to Decree
No. 58 and Article 33, first paragraph, of Consob Regulation No. 11971 of May
14, 1999, as amended. Any offer, sale or delivery of the units or distribution
of copies of this prospectus or any other document relating to the units in
Italy under (1) or (2) above must be (i) made by an investment firm, bank or
financial intermediary permitted to conduct such activities in Italy in
accordance with the Decree No. 58 and Legislative Decree No. 385 of September 1,
1993, or the Banking Act; (ii) in compliance with Article 129 of the Banking Act
and the implementing guidelines of the Bank of Italy, as amended from time to
time, pursuant to which the issue or the offer of securities in Italy may need
to be preceded and followed by an appropriate notice to be filed with the Bank
of Italy depending, inter alia, on the aggregate value of the securities issued
or offered in Italy and their characteristics; and (iii) in compliance with any
other applicable laws and regulations.
Cyprus. The Underwriter has agreed
that (i) it will not be providing from or within Cyprus any “Investment
Services”, “Investment Activities” and “Non-Core Services” (as such terms are
defined in the Investment Firms Law 144(I) of 2007 (the “IFL”), in relation to
the units, or will be otherwise providing Investment Services, Investment
Activities and Non-Core Services to residents or persons domiciled in Cyprus.
Each underwriter has agreed that it will not be concluding in Cyprus any
transaction relating to such Investment Services, Investment Activities and
Non-Core Services in contravention of the IFL and/or applicable regulations
adopted pursuant thereto or in relation thereto; and (ii) it has not and will
not offer any of the units other than in compliance with the provisions of the
Public Offer and Prospectus Law, Law 114(I)/2005.
-68-
Switzerland. This document does not
constitute a prospectus within the meaning of Art. 652a of the Swiss Code of
Obligations. The units may not be sold directly or indirectly in or into
Switzerland except in a manner which will not result in a public offering within
the meaning of the Swiss Code of Obligations. Neither this document nor any
other offering materials relating to the units may be distributed, published or
otherwise made available in Switzerland except in a manner which will not
constitute a public offer of the units of in Switzerland.
Norway. This prospectus has not been
approved or disapproved by, or registered with, the Oslo Stock Exchange, the
Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority (Kredittilsynet) nor the Norwegian
Registry of Business Enterprises, and the units are marketed and sold in Norway
on a private placement basis and under other applicable exceptions from this
offering prospectus requirements as provided for pursuant to the Norwegian
Securities Trading Act.
Botswana. CryoPort hereby represents
and warrants that it has not offered for sale or sold, and will not offer or
sell, directly or indirectly the units to the public in the Republic of
Botswana, and confirms that this offering will not be subject to any
registration requirements as a prospectus pursuant to the requirements and/or
provisions of the Companies Act, 2003 or the Listing Requirements of the
Botswana Stock Exchange.
Hong
Kong. The units
may not be offered or sold by means of any document other than (i) in
circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning
of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), (ii) to “professional
investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571,
Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” within
the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no
advertisement, invitation or document relating to the units may be issued or may
be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case
whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents of
which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if
permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to units
which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or
only to “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and
Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made
thereunder.
Singapore. This prospectus has not been
registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection
with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the units
may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the units be offered or sold, or
be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether
directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an
institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act,
Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the SFA, (ii) to a relevant person, or any person
pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in
Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with
the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA. Where the units
are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a)
a corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole business of which
is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or
more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where
the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold
investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor, shares, debentures
and units of shares and debentures of that corporation or the beneficiaries’
rights and interest in that trust shall not be transferable for six months after
that corporation or that trust has acquired the units under Section 275 except:
(i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant
person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (ii) where no consideration is
given for the transfer; or (iii) by operation of law.
People’s Republic
of China. This
prospectus has not been and will not be circulated or distributed in the PRC,
and units may not be offered or sold, and will not be offered or sold to any
person for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, to any resident of the
PRC except pursuant to applicable laws and regulations of the PRC. For the
purpose of this paragraph only, the PRC does not include Taiwan and the special
administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau.
Israel. This Prospectus does not
constitute an offer to sell the units to the public in Israel or a prospectus
under the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968 and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, or the Israeli Securities Law, and has not been filed with or
approved by the Israel Securities Authority. In Israel, pursuant to an exemption
afforded under the Israeli Securities Law, this prospectus may be distributed
only to, and may be directed only at, investors listed in the first addendum to
the Israeli Securities Law, or the Addendum, consisting primarily of certain
mutual trust and provident funds, or management companies thereto, banks, as
defined under the Banking (Licensing) Law, 5741-1981, except for joint service
companies purchasing for their own account or for clients listed in the
Addendum, insurers, as defined under the Supervision of Financial Services Law
(Insurance), 5741-1981, portfolio managers purchasing for their own account or
for clients listed in the Addendum, investment advisers purchasing for their own
account, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange members purchasing for their own account or for
clients listed in the Addendum, underwriters purchasing for their own account,
venture capital funds, certain corporations which primarily engage in the
capital market and fully-owned by investors listed in the Addendum and
corporations whose equity exceeds NIS250 Million, collectively referred to as
institutional investors. Institutional investors may be required to submit
written confirmation that they fall within the scope of the
Addendum.
-69-
United Arab
Emirates. This
document has not been reviewed, approved or licensed by the Central Bank of the
United Arab Emirates (the “UAE”), Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority
or any other relevant licensing authority in the UAE including any licensing
authority incorporated under the laws and regulations of any of the free zones
established and operating in the territory of the UAE, in particular the Dubai
International Financial Services Authority (the “DFSA”), a regulatory authority
of the Dubai International Financial Centre (the “DIFC”). The issue of units
does not constitute a public offer of securities in the UAE, DIFC and/or any
other free zone in accordance with the Commercial Companies Law, Federal Law No.
8 of 1984 (as amended), DFSA Offered Securities Rules and the Dubai
International Financial Exchange Listing Rules, accordingly, or otherwise. The
units may not be offered to the public in the UAE and/or any of the free zones
including, in particular, the DIFC. The units may be offered and this document
may be issued, only to a limited number of investors in the UAE or any of its
free zones (including, in particular, the DIFC) who qualify as sophisticated
investors under the relevant laws and regulations of the UAE or the free zone
concerned. Management of CryoPort, and the representatives represent and warrant
that the units will not be offered, sold, transferred or delivered to the public
in the UAE or any of its free zones including, in particular, the
DIFC.
Oman. For the attention of
the residents of Oman:
The
information contained in this memorandum neither constitutes a public offer of
securities in the Sultanate of Oman (“Oman”) as contemplated by the Commercial
Companies Law of Oman (Sultani Decree 4/74) or the Capital Market Law of Oman
(Sultani Decree 80/98), nor does it constitute an offer to sell, or the
solicitation of any offer to buy non-Omani securities in Oman as contemplated by
Article 6 of the Executive Regulations to the Capital Market Law of Oman (issued
vide Ministerial Decision No 4/2001), and nor does it constitute a distribution
of non-Omani securities in Oman as contemplated under the Rules for Distribution
of Non-Omani Securities in Oman issued by the Capital Market Authority of Oman
(“CMA”). Additionally, this memorandum is not intended to lead to the conclusion
of any contract of whatsoever nature within the territory of Oman.
This
memorandum has been sent at the request of the investor in Oman, and by
receiving this memorandum, the person or entity to whom it has been issued and
sent understands, acknowledges and agrees that this memorandum has not been
approved by the CMA or any other regulatory body or authority in Oman, nor has
any authorization, license or approval been received from the CMA or any other
regulatory authority in Oman, to market, offer, sell, or distribute the units
within Oman.
No
marketing, offering, selling or distribution of any financial or investment
products or services has been or will be made from within Oman and no
subscription to any securities, products or financial services may or will be
consummated within Oman. The underwriter is not a company licensed by the CMA to
provide investment advisory, brokerage, or portfolio management services in
Oman, nor banks licensed by the Central Bank of Oman to provide investment
banking services in Oman. The underwriter does not advise persons or entities
resident or based in Oman as to the appropriateness of investing in or
purchasing or selling securities or other financial products.
Nothing
contained in this memorandum is intended to constitute Omani investment, legal,
tax, accounting or other professional advice. This memorandum is for your
information only, and nothing herein is intended to endorse or recommend a
particular course of action. You should consult with an appropriate professional
for specific advice on the basis of your situation.
Any
recipient of this memorandum and any purchaser of the units pursuant to this
memorandum shall not market, distribute, resell, or offer to resell the units
within Oman without complying with the requirements of applicable Omani law, nor
copy or otherwise distribute this memorandum to others.
Canada.
Resale
Restrictions
The
distribution of our securities in Canada is being made only on a private
placement basis exempt from the requirement that we prepare and file a
prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in each province where
trades of our securities are made. Any resale of our securities in Canada must
be made under applicable securities laws that will vary depending on the
relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to be made under available
statutory exemptions or under a discretionary exemption granted by the
applicable Canadian securities regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to
seek legal advice prior to any resale of our securities.
-70-
Representations of
Purchasers
By
purchasing our securities in Canada and accepting a purchase confirmation a
purchaser is representing to us and the dealer from whom the purchase
confirmation is received that:
|
·
|
the
purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities laws to
purchase our securities without the benefit of a prospectus qualified
under those securities laws;
|
|
·
|
where
required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as principal and not as
agent;
|
|
·
|
the
purchaser has reviewed the text above under Resale Restrictions;
and
|
|
·
|
the
purchaser acknowledges and consents to the provision of specified
information concerning its purchase of our securities to the
regulatory authority that by law is entitled to collect the
information.
|
Further
details concerning the legal authority for this information are available on
request.
Rights of Action – Ontario
Purchasers Only
Under
Ontario securities legislation, certain purchasers who purchase a security
offered by this prospectus during the period of distribution will have a
statutory right of action for damages, or while still the owner of our
securities, for rescission against us in the event that this prospectus contains
a misrepresentation without regard to whether the purchaser relied on the
misrepresentation. The right of action for damages is exercisable not later than
the earlier of 180 days from the date the purchaser first had knowledge of the
facts giving rise to the cause of action and three years from the date on which
payment is made for our securities. The right of action for rescission is
exercisable not later than 180 days from the date on which payment is made for
our securities. If a purchaser elects to exercise the right of action for
rescission, the purchaser will have no right of action for damages against us.
In no case will the amount recoverable in any action exceed the price at which
our securities were offered to the purchaser and if the purchaser is shown to
have purchased the securities with knowledge of the misrepresentation, we will
have no liability. In the case of an action for damages, we will not be liable
for all or any portion of the damages that are proven to not represent the
depreciation in value of our securities as a result of the misrepresentation
relied upon. These rights are in addition to, and without derogation from, any
other rights or remedies available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing
is a summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser. Ontario purchasers
should refer to the complete text of the relevant statutory
provisions.
Enforcement of Legal
Rights
All of
our directors and officers as well as the experts named herein may be located
outside of Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or those persons.
All or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of those persons may
be located outside of Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy
a judgment against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside of
Canada.
Taxation and Eligibility for
Investment
Canadian
purchasers of our securities should consult their own legal and tax advisors
with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in our securities in their
particular circumstances and about the eligibility of our securities for
investment by the purchaser under relevant Canadian legislation.
Indemnification
The
underwriting agreement provides for indemnification between us and the
underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act, and for contribution by us and the underwriters to payments that
may be required to be made with respect to those liabilities. We have been
advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities under
the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act,
and is therefore, unenforceable.
-71-
LEGAL
MATTERS
The
validity of the units has been passed upon by Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.,
Costa Mesa, California. Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP in New
York, New York has acted as counsel for the underwriters.
EXPERTS
The
consolidated financial statements of CryoPort, Inc. as of March 31, 2009 and
2008 and for the years then ended, included in this prospectus, have been
audited by KMJ Corbin & Company LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, and elsewhere in
the registration statement, and have been so included in reliance upon the
report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are
required to comply with the information and periodic reporting requirements of
the Exchange Act, and, in accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act,
will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
These periodic reports, proxy statements and other information will be available
for inspection and copying at the regional offices, public reference facilities
and internet site of the SEC referred to below.
We filed
with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act for
the common stock and warrants to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information in the registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules that were filed with the registration statement. For
further information with respect to the common stock, warrants and us, we
refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules that were
filed with the registration statement. Statements made in this prospectus
regarding the contents of any contract, agreement or other document that is
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete,
and we refer you to the full text of the contract or other document filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement.
A copy of
the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules that were filed with
the registration statement may be inspected without charge at the public
reference facilities maintained by the SEC, 100 F Street, Washington, DC 20549.
Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the
SEC upon payment of the prescribed fee. Information regarding the operation of
the public reference rooms may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically
with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.
You can
find more information about us on our website, which is located at
http://www.cryoport.com
DISCLOSURE
OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT
LIABILITIES
Under the
Nevada General Corporation Law and our Articles of Incorporation, as amended,
our directors will have no personal liability to us or our stockholders for
monetary damages incurred as the result of the breach or alleged breach by a
director of his “duty of care.” This provision does not apply to the directors’
(i) acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing and
culpable violation of law, (ii) acts or omissions that a director believes to be
contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its stockholders or that
involve the absence of good faith on the part of the director, (iii) approval of
any transaction from which a director derives an improper personal benefit, (iv)
acts or omissions that show a reckless disregard for the director’s duty to the
corporation or its stockholders in circumstances in which the director was
aware, or should have been aware, in the ordinary course of performing a
director’s duties, of a risk of serious injury to the corporation or its
stockholders, (v) acts or omissions that constituted an unexcused pattern of
inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director’s duty to the
corporation or its stockholders, or (vi) approval of an unlawful dividend,
distribution, stock repurchase or redemption. This provision would generally
absolve directors of personal liability for negligence in the performance of
duties, including gross negligence.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In
the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than
the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will,
unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
-72-
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CryoPort,
Inc.
Consolidated
Financial Statements
March 31,
2009 and 2008
Contents
|
Page
|
|||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-
1
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-
2
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
|
F-
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-
5
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-
7
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
September
30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Contents
|
Page
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and March 31,
2009
|
F-51
|
|
||
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-52
|
|
||
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-53
|
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
F-55
|
-73-
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors of
CryoPort,
Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CryoPort, Inc. (the
“Company”) as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years
then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of CryoPort, Inc. at March 31,
2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring
losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and has a working
capital deficit of $3,693,015 and a cash and cash equivalents balance of
$249,758 at March 31, 2009. Management has estimated that cash on
hand, including cash borrowed under convertible debentures issued in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, will be sufficient to allow the Company to continue its
operations only into the third quarter of fiscal 2010. These matters
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in
Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying
amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should
the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
/s/ KMJ
Corbin & Company LLP
Costa
Mesa, California
June 30,
2009
F-1
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
249,758
|
$
|
2,231,031
|
||||
Restricted
cash
|
101,053
|
203,670
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
2,546
|
21,411
|
||||||
Inventories
|
530,241
|
121,952
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
170,399
|
153,016
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
1,053,997
|
2,731,080
|
||||||
Fixed
assets, net
|
189,301
|
193,852
|
||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
264,364
|
474
|
||||||
Deferred
financing costs, net
|
3,600
|
325,769
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
61,294
|
209,714
|
||||||
$
|
1,572,556
|
$
|
3,460,889
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
218,433
|
$
|
234,298
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
90,547
|
95,048
|
||||||
Accrued
warranty costs
|
18,743
|
29,993
|
||||||
Accrued
salaries and related
|
206,180
|
138,103
|
||||||
Convertible
notes payable, net of discount of $13,586 (2009) and $0
(2008)
|
46,414
|
---
|
||||||
Current
portion of convertible debentures payable and accrued interest, net of
discount of $662,583 (2009) and $1,039,844 (2008)
|
3,836,385
|
902,486
|
||||||
Line
of credit and accrued interest
|
90,310
|
115,943
|
||||||
Current
portion of related party notes payable
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
||||||
Current
portion of note payable to former officer
|
90,000
|
72,000
|
||||||
Current
portion of note payable
|
---
|
12,000
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
4,747,012
|
1,749,871
|
||||||
Related
party notes and accrued interest payable, net of current
portion
|
1,533,760
|
1,582,084
|
||||||
Convertible
debentures payable, net of current portion of $4,454,424 (2009) and
$1,936,884 (2008) and discount of $2,227,205 (2009) and $2,482,513
(2008)
|
---
|
---
|
||||||
Note
payable to former officer and accrued interest, net of current
portion
|
67,688
|
129,115
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
6,348,460
|
3,461,070
|
||||||
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 125,000,000 shares authorized; 41,861,941 (2009)
and 40,928,225 (2008) shares issued and outstanding
|
41,863
|
40,929
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
25,816,588
|
13,888,094
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(30,634,355
|
)
|
(13,929,204
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(4,775,904
|
)
|
(181
|
)
|
||||
$
|
1,572,556
|
$
|
3,460,889
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|||||||
For
the Years Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
35,124
|
|
|
$
|
83,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
546,152
|
|
|
|
386,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
loss
|
|
|
(511,028
|
)
|
|
|
(302,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,387,287
|
|
|
|
2,550,778
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
297,378
|
|
|
|
166,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,684,665
|
|
|
|
2,717,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(3,195,693
|
)
|
|
|
(3,019,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
32,098
|
|
|
|
50,076
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(2,693,383
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592,718
|
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(10,846,573
|
)
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense, net
|
|
|
(13,507,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,542,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(16,703,551
|
)
|
|
|
(4,562,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(16,705,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,564,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss available to common stockholders per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
41,238,185
|
|
|
|
39,425,118
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
April 1, 2007
|
34,782,029
|
$
|
34,782
|
$
|
7,042,536
|
$
|
(9,365,150
|
)
|
$
|
(2,287,832
|
)
|
|||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash, net of issuance costs of
$89,635
|
3,652,710
|
3,653
|
696,213
|
---
|
699,866
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of convertible debentures including accrued
interest
|
1,425,510
|
1,426
|
602,714
|
---
|
604,140
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to consultants
|
525,000
|
525
|
501,975
|
---
|
502,500
|
|||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants for cash
|
156,250
|
156
|
107,344
|
---
|
107,500
|
|||||||||||||||
Cashless
exercise of warrants
|
386,726
|
387
|
(387
|
)
|
---
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Fair
value of stock options and warrants issued to consultants, employees and
directors
|
---
|
---
|
1,066,885
|
---
|
1,066,885
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt
discount related to convertible debentures
|
---
|
---
|
3,845,328
|
---
|
3,845,328
|
|||||||||||||||
Fair
value of warrants issued to lessor
|
---
|
---
|
15,486
|
---
|
15,486
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchase
of fixed assets with warrants
|
---
|
---
|
10,000
|
---
|
10,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
(4,564,054
|
)
|
(4,564,054
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
40,928,225
|
40,929
|
13,888,094
|
(13,929,204
|
)
|
(181
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of convertible debentures including accrued
interest
|
38,906
|
39
|
5,407
|
---
|
5,446
|
|||||||||||||||
Cancellation
of common stock issued for debt principal reduction
|
(140,143
|
)
|
(140
|
)
|
(117,580
|
)
|
---
|
(117,720
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for extinguishment of debt
|
400,000
|
400
|
163,600
|
---
|
164,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of warrants issued in connection with debt
modifications
|
---
|
---
|
9,824,686
|
---
|
9,824,686
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to consultants
|
402,238
|
402
|
248,700
|
---
|
249,102
|
|||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants for cash
|
82,693
|
83
|
3,224
|
3,307
|
||||||||||||||||
Cashless
exercise of warrants
|
150,022
|
150
|
(150
|
)
|
---
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Debt
discount related to convertible debentures
|
---
|
---
|
991,884
|
---
|
991,884
|
|||||||||||||||
Fair
value of stock options and warrants issued to consultants, employees and
directors
|
---
|
---
|
808,723
|
--
|
808,723
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
(16,705,151
|
)
|
(16,705,151
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2009
|
41,861,941
|
$
|
41,863
|
$
|
25,816,588
|
$
|
(30,634,355
|
)
|
$
|
(4,775,904
|
)
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Years Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(16,705,151
|
)
|
$
|
(4,564,054
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
81,984
|
41,298
|
||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
42,284
|
87,706
|
||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
2,223,116
|
1,214,986
|
||||||
Stock
issued to consultants
|
249,102
|
402,500
|
||||||
Fair
value of warrants issued to consultants, employees and
directors
|
699,467
|
880,765
|
||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
10,846,573
|
---
|
||||||
Interest
accrued on restricted cash
|
(6,227
|
)
|
---
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
18,865
|
(11,239
|
)
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(408,289
|
)
|
24,056
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
7,329
|
(49,473
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
(15,865
|
)
|
(72,384
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(8,101
|
)
|
(2,179
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
warranty costs
|
(11,250
|
)
|
(25,414
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
salaries and related
|
68,077
|
(31,434
|
)
|
|||||
Accrued
interest
|
331,616
|
284,616
|
||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(2,586,470
|
)
|
(1,820,250
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
|
||||||||
Decrease
(increase) in restricted cash
|
108,844
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|||||
Purchases
of intangibles
|
(49,781
|
)
|
(474
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of fixed assets
|
(58,578
|
)
|
(182,054
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
485
|
(382,528
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from borrowings under convertible notes
|
1,122,500
|
3,436,551
|
||||||
Net
proceeds from borrowings under line of credit
|
---
|
115,500
|
||||||
Repayment
of convertible debt
|
(117,720
|
)
|
---
|
|||||
Repayment
of line of credit
|
(25,500
|
)
|
---
|
|||||
Payment
of deferred financing costs
|
(191,875
|
)
|
---
|
|||||
Repayment
of note payable
|
(12,000
|
)
|
(55,000
|
)
|
||||
Repayments
of related party notes payable
|
(120,000
|
)
|
(90,000
|
)
|
||||
Repayments
of note payable to officer
|
(54,000
|
)
|
(45,000
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from insurance of common stock, net
|
---
|
699,866
|
||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of options and warrants
|
3,307
|
107,500
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
604,712
|
4,169,417
|
||||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,981,273
|
)
|
(1,966,639
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
2,231,031
|
264,392
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$
|
249,758
|
$
|
2,231,031
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Years Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
95,360
|
$
|
5,620
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
800
|
$
|
1,600
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash activities:
|
||||||||
Estimated
for value of warrants issued to lessor
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
15,486
|
||||
Purchase
of intangible assets with warrants
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
10,000
|
||||
Warrants
issued as deferred financing costs in connection with convertible debt
financing
|
$
|
117,530
|
$
|
525,071
|
||||
Debt
discount in connection with convertible debt
financing
|
$
|
1,263,586
|
$
|
3,320,257
|
||||
Conversion
of debt and accrued interest to common stock
|
$
|
5,446
|
$
|
604,140
|
||||
Cancellation
of shares issued for debt principal reduction
|
$
|
117,720
|
$
|
---
|
||||
Change
in fair value of warrants issued in connection with debt
modifications
|
$
|
9,824,686
|
$
|
---
|
||||
Fair
value of shares issued in connection with debt
modifications
|
$
|
164,000
|
$
|
---
|
||||
Cashless
exercise of warrants
|
$
|
150
|
$
|
387
|
||||
Deferred
financing costs in accrued expenses
|
$
|
3,600
|
$
|
---
|
||||
Addition
of principal due to debt modifications
|
$
|
1,012,232
|
$
|
---
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND
BUSINESS
Organization
CryoPort,
Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated under the name G.T.5-Limited
(“GT5”) on May 25, 1990 as a Nevada Corporation. On March 15, 2005
CryoPort Systems, Inc., a California corporation founded in 1999 and
incorporated on December 11, 2000, became the primary operating company of GT5
upon completion of a Share Exchange Agreement, whereby GT5 acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of CryoPort Systems, Inc. in exchange for
24,108,105 shares of the Company’s common stock representing approximately 81%
of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock following the close
of the transaction. In connection with this transaction GT5 changed
its name to CryoPort, Inc. CryoPort Systems, Inc. continues today as the
operating company under CryoPort, Inc.
The
principal focus of the Company is to provide the biotechnology and
pharmaceutical industries with a cost effective frozen shipping solution, the
CryoPort Express™ System utilizing the Company’s newly developed product line,
the CryoPort Express™ Shippers, for the frozen or cryogenic transport of
biological materials. These biological materials include live cell
pharmaceutical products; e.g., cancer vaccines, diagnostic materials,
reproductive tissues, infectious substances and other items that require
continuous frozen or cryogenic temperatures (less than -150 °
C). The Company has historically designed, manufactured a line of
reusable cryogenic dry vapor shippers. The reusable cryogenic dry shippers
primarily served as the vehicles for the development of the cryogenic technology
that supported the development of the new CryoPort Express™ Shipper. The
Company’s primary mission is to provide reliable and cost effective solutions
for the frozen transportation of biological materials in the life sciences
industry.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The
Company has not generated significant revenues from operations and has no
assurance of any future revenues. The Company generated revenues from
operations of only $35,124, incurred a net loss of $16,705,151 including a
$10,846,573 loss on debt extinguishment and used cash of $2,586,470 in its
operating activities during the year ended March 31,
2009. In addition, the Company has a working capital
deficit of $3,693,015 and has a cash and cash equivalents balance of $249,758 at
March 31, 2009. Currently management has projected that cash on hand,
including cash borrowed under the convertible debentures issued in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, will be sufficient to allow the Company to continue its
operations only into the third quarter of fiscal 2010 until more
significant.
F-7
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND
BUSINESS, continued
funding
can be secured. These matters raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
Through
June 22, 2009 the Company had raised net proceeds of $906,630 under the Private
Placement Debentures. (see Note 10 and Note 14). As a result of this
recent financing, the Company had an aggregate cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash balance of approximately $689,000 as of June 22, 2009 which will
be used to fund the working capital required for minimal operations including
inventory build as well limited sales efforts to advance the Company’s
commercialization of the CryoPort Express™ Shippers until additional capital is
obtained. The Company’s management recognizes that the Company must obtain
additional capital for the achievement of sustained profitable
operations. Management’s plans include obtaining additional capital
through equity and debt funding sources; however, no assurance can be given that
additional capital, if needed, will be available when required or upon terms
acceptable to the Company or that the Company will be successful in its efforts
to negotiate extension of its existing debt. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Principles of
Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CryoPort, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiary, CryoPort Systems, Inc. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
from estimated amounts. The Company’s significant estimates include
the fair value of modified debt, debt discounts, allowances for doubtful
accounts and sales returns, recoverability of long-lived assets, allowances for
inventory obsolescence, accrued warranty costs, valuation of deferred tax
assets, the value of stock options and warrants, and product liability
reserves.
F-8
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Concentrations of Credit
Risk and Customers
Cash
The
Company maintains its cash accounts in financial
institutions. Accounts at these institutions are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Effective October 3,
2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 raised the FDIC deposit
coverage limits to $250,000 per owner from $100,000 per owner. At
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had cash balances of $121,042 and
$2,392,350, respectively, which were in excess of the FDIC insurance
limit. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions
to limit its concentration risk exposure.
Restricted
cash
The
Company has invested cash in a one year restricted certificate of deposit
bearing interest at 2.32% which serves as collateral for borrowings under a line
of credit agreement (see Note 8). At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the
balance in the certificate of deposit was $101,053 and $203,670,
respectively.
Customers
The
Company grants credit to customers within the United States of America and to a
limited number of international customers, and does not require
collateral. Sales to international customers are generally secured by
advance payments except for a limited number of established foreign
customers. The Company generally requires advance or credit card
payments for initial sales to new customers. The Company’s ability to
collect receivables is affected by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas
and industries served by the Company. Reserves for uncollectible
amounts and estimated sales returns are provided based on past experience and a
specific analysis of the accounts which management believes are
sufficient. Accounts receivable at March 31, 2009 and 2008 are net of
reserves for doubtful accounts and sales returns of approximately $600 and
$4,700, respectively. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due,
actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts.
The
Company has limited foreign sales primarily in Europe, Canada, India and
Australia. Foreign sales are primarily to a small number of
customers. During 2009 and 2008, the Company had foreign sales of
approximately $6,500 and $10,500, respectively, which constituted approximately
19% and 13% of net sales, respectively.
The
majority of the Company’s customers are in the biotechnology, pharmaceutical and
life science industries. Consequently, there is a concentration of
receivables within these industries, which is subject to normal credit
risk.
F-9
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days
or less to be cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, accounts receivable, related party notes payable, note payable to officer,
line of credit, convertible notes payable, accounts payable, accrued expenses
and a note payable to a third party. The carrying value for all such
instruments, except the related party notes payable, approximates fair value at
March 31, 2009 and 2008. The difference between the fair value and
recorded values of the related party notes payable is not
significant.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of standard cost or current estimated market
value. Cost is determined using the standard cost method which
approximates the first-in, first-out method. The Company periodically
reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete
inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product
demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of
inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the
obsolete or excess inventories. Raw materials, work in process and
finished goods include material costs less reserves for obsolete or excess
inventories.
Fixed
Assets
Fixed
assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets are provided using the
straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
years
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
5-7
years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Lesser
of lease term or estimated useful
life
|
Betterments,
renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are
capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as
incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and
amortization applicable to assets retired are removed from the accounts, and the
gain or loss on disposition is recognized in current operations.
F-10
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets are comprised of patents and trademarks and software development
costs. The Company capitalizes costs of obtaining patents and
trademarks which are amortized, using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful life of five years. The Company capitalizes certain
costs related to software developed for internal use in accordance with AICPA
Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Software
development costs incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stages
are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application
development stage are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful life of the software which is five
years. Capitalized costs include purchased materials and costs of
services including the valuation of warrants issued to consultants using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company’s management assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets upon
the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and
amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered
through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of
long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is
charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is
determined by management. At March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s
management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived
assets. There can be no assurance however, that market conditions
will not change or demand for the Company’s products will continue, which could
result in impairment of its long-lived assets in the future.
Deferred Financing
Costs
Deferred
financing costs represent costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the
convertible notes payable. Deferred financing costs are being
amortized over the term of the financing instrument on a straight-line basis,
which approximates the effective interest method. During the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company capitalized deferred financing costs
of $111,273 and $408,776 respectively, and amortized deferred financing costs of
$42,284 and $87,706 respectively, to interest expense. During the
year ended March 31, 2009, the Company wrote off unamortized deferred financing
costs pursuant to amendments made to convertible notes payable from the
resulting debt modifications (see Note 10).
F-11
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Accrued Warranty
Costs
Estimated
costs of the Company’s standard warranty, included with products at no
additional cost to the customer for a period up to one year, are recorded as
accrued warranty costs at the time of product sale. Costs related to
servicing the standard warranty are charged to the accrual as
incurred.
The
following represents the activity in the warranty accrual during the years ended
March 31:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Beginning
warranty accrual
|
$
|
29,993
|
$
|
55,407
|
||||
Increase
in accrual (charged to cost of sales)
|
750
|
5,625
|
||||||
Changes
to accrual (product replacement and warranty
expirations)
|
(12,000
|
)
|
(31,039
|
)
|
||||
Ending
warranty accrual
|
$
|
18,743
|
$
|
29,993
|
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101,
Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements, as revised by SAB 104. The Company
recognizes revenue when products are shipped to a customer and the risks and
rewards of ownership and title have passed based on the terms of the
sale. The Company records a provision for sales returns and claims
based upon historical experience. Actual returns and claims in any
future period may differ from the Company’s estimates.
Accounting for Shipping and
Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs
The
Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling
Fees and Costs . Shipping and handling fees and costs are included in
cost of sales.
Advertising
Costs
The
Company expenses the cost of advertising when incurred as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses. During 2009 and 2008,
the Company expensed approximately $61,000 and $33,000, respectively, in
advertising costs.
F-12
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Research and Development
Expenses
The
Company expenses internal research and development costs as
incurred. Third party research and development costs are expensed
when the contracted work has been performed.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for share-based payments to employees and directors in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , (“SFAS
123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees and
directors, including grants of employee stock options and warrants, to be
recognized in the consolidated financial statements based upon their fair
values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
grant-date fair value of share-based awards under SFAS 123(R). Fair value is
determined at the date of grant. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), the
consolidated financial statement effect of forfeitures is estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, if the actual effect differs from those
estimates. The estimated average forfeiture rate for the years ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 was zero as the Company has not had a significant history of
forfeitures and does not expect forfeitures in the future.
SFAS
123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
or warrants to be classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company’s loss
position, there were no such tax benefits during the years ended March 31, 2009
and 2008.
The
Company accounts for equity issuances to non-employees in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments
that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with
Selling, Goods and Services . All transactions in which goods or services
are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are
accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair
value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument
issued is the earlier of the date on which the third party performance is
complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will
occur.
F-13
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Plan
Description
The
Company’s stock option plan provides for grants of incentive stock options and
nonqualified options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company to
purchase the Company’s shares at the fair value, as determined by management and
the board of directors, of such shares on the grant date. The options generally
vest over a five-year period beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year
term. As of March 31, 2009, the Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000
shares under this plan and has 2,511,387 shares available for future
issuances.
Summary
of Assumptions and Activity
The fair
value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, even though this model was developed to
estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without
vesting restrictions, which differ significantly from the Company’s stock
options. The Black-Scholes model also requires subjective assumptions, including
future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly
affect the calculated values. The expected term of options granted is derived
from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment
termination behavior. The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant
is based on the U.S Treasury rate that corresponds to the pricing term of the
grant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected volatility is based on
the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. These factors could
change in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation
expense in future periods.
The
following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to estimate the
per share fair values of stock warrants granted to employees and directors
during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Stock warrants: | |||||
Expected
term
|
5
years
|
5
years
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
201%
- 266%
|
228%
- 293%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.52%
- 3.15%
|
3.74%
- 4.75%
|
|||
Expected
dividends
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
F-14
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
A summary
of employee and director option and warrant activity for the years ended March
31, 2009 and 2008, is presented below:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Yrs.)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at April 1, 2007
|
3,747,563
|
$
|
0.
59
|
7.46
|
||||||||||||
Granted
|
887,800
|
$
|
0.97
|
|||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(79,200
|
)
|
$
|
0.74
|
||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
–
|
$
|
–
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2008
|
4,556,163
|
$
|
0.64
|
7.10
|
||||||||||||
Granted
|
917,400
|
$
|
0.76
|
|||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(232,715
|
)
|
$
|
0.04
|
||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(6,978
|
)
|
$
|
0.04
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding,
vested, and expected to vest at March 31, 2009
|
5,233,880
|
$
|
0.69
|
6.82
|
$
|
624,724
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
4,683,870
|
$
|
0.67
|
6.48
|
$
|
624,724
|
There
were 917,400 warrants and no stock options granted to employees and directors
during the year ended March 31, 2009 and 887,800 warrants and no stock options
granted to employees and directors during the year ended March 31,
2008. In connection with the warrants granted, the modification of
previous options granted, and the vesting of prior options issued, during the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded total charges of
$289,497 and $742,140, respectively, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS
123(R), which have been included in selling, general and administrative expenses
for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. No employee or director warrants or stock
options expired during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The
Company issues new shares from its authorized shares upon exercise of warrants
or options.
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, there was $287,722 and $105,965, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation cost related to employee and director stock option
compensation arrangements.
F-15
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
The
aggregate intrinsic value for stock options and warrants related to stock based
compensation, which were exercised during the years ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 was $203,102 and $30,284, respectively.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 (“SFAS No.
109”), Accounting for Income
Taxes . Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for certain
deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not
realize tax assets through future operations. The Company is a subchapter "C"
corporation and files a federal income tax return. The Company files separate
state income tax returns for California and Nevada.
Basic and Diluted Loss Per
Share
The
Company has adopted SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share.
Basic
loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted
average shares outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were
issued. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same as the effect of stock
options and warrants and convertible debt on loss per share are anti-dilutive
and thus not included in the diluted loss per share calculation. The impact
under the treasury stock method of dilutive stock options and warrants and the
if-converted method of convertible debt would have resulted in weighted average
common shares outstanding of 57,565,246 for the year ended March 31, 2009
and 47,835,303 for the year ended March 31, 2008.
F-16
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
The
following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted loss per share computations for the years ended March
31:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Numerator
for basic and diluted loss per share:
|
||||||||
Net
loss available to common stockholders
|
$
|
(16,705,151
|
)
|
$
|
(4,564,054
|
)
|
||
Denominator
for basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
41,238,185
|
39,425,118
|
||||||
Net
loss per common share available to common stockholders – basic and
diluted
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
Convertible
Debentures
If the
conversion feature of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of
conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a
beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the
Company as a debt discount pursuant to EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for Convertible
Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingency Adjustable
Conversion Ratio, (“EITF 98-05”) and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5
to Certain Convertible Instruments (“EITF 00-27”). In those
circumstances, the convertible debt will be recorded net of the discount related
to the BCF. The Company amortizes the discount to interest expense
over the life of the debt using the effective interest method which approximates
the straight-line amortization method (see Note 10).
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS No. 157”), Fair Value Measurements
.. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Specifically, this
standard establishes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an
entity specific measurement. As such, the value measurement should be
determined based on assumptions the market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability. The expanded disclosures include disclosure of
the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of certain of the
measurements on earnings for the period. SFAS No. 157 was effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. FASB Staff
Position No. FAS 157-2 (“FSP 157-2”), Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 was issued in February 2008. FSP 157-2 delays the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value at
least once a year, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 related
to financial assets and liabilities did not have a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements . The Company is
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS No. 157 may have on its
future consolidated financial statements related to non-financial assets and
liabilities.
F-17
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (“FSP No.
157-3”). FSP No. 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market
that is not active, and provides an illustrative example intended to address
certain key application issues. FSP No. 157-3 is effective immediately, and
applies to the Company’s March 31, 2009 financial statements. The Company has
concluded that the application of FSP No. 157-3 did not have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31,
2009.
In June
2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB published EITF Issue No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an
Instrument is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (“EITF No. 07-5”) to
address concerns regarding the meaning of “indexed to an entity’s own stock”
contained in FASB Statement 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities . This related to the determination of
whether a free-standing equity-linked instrument should be classified as equity
or liability. If an instrument is classified as liability, it is valued at fair
value, and this value is re-measured on an ongoing basis, with changes recorded
in earnings in each reporting period. EITF No. 07-5 is effective for years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is not permitted.
Although EITF No. 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008, any outstanding instrument at the date of adoption will require a
retrospective application of the accounting through a cumulative effect
adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of EITF No. 07-5 on its consolidated financial statements,
but it believes that certain factors of its convertible debentures and warrants
that have been previously classified as equity may require liability
treatment.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “ Business Combinations ”
(“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, “ Business Combinations ”, and
is effective for the Company for business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141(R) requires the new acquiring entity to
recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transactions,
expense all direct transaction costs and account for the estimated fair value of
contingent consideration. This standard establishes an acquisition-date
fair value for acquired assets and liabilities and fully discloses to investors
the financial effect the acquisition will have. The adoption of this
pronouncement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue 07-01 (“EITF
07-01”), “Accounting for
Collaborative Arrangements” . EITF 07-01 requires
collaborators to present the results of activities for which they act as the
principal on a gross basis and report any payments received from (made to) other
collaborators based on other applicable generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States (“GAAP”) or, in the absence of other applicable GAAP, based
on analogy to authoritative accounting literature or a reasonable, rational, and
consistently applied accounting policy election. Further, EITF 07-01
clarified that the determination of whether transactions within a collaborative
arrangement are part of a vendor-customer (or analogous) relationship subject to
Issue 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer”.
EITF 07-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial statements.
F-18
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 3 –
INVENTORIES
Inventories
at March 31, 2009 and 2008 consist of the following:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
350,021
|
$
|
61,342
|
||||
Work
in process
|
7,253
|
5,827
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
172,967
|
54,783
|
||||||
$
|
530,241
|
$
|
121,952
|
NOTE 4 – FIXED
ASSETS
Fixed
assets consist of the following at March 31:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
$
|
23,253
|
$
|
23,253
|
||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
640,748
|
586,465
|
||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
19,426
|
15,131
|
||||||
683,427
|
624,849
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
(494,126
|
)
|
(430,997
|
)
|
||||
$
|
189,301
|
$
|
193,852
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense for fixed assets for the years ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 was $63,129 and $36,602, respectively.
F-19
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Intangible
assets are comprised of patents and trademarks and software developed for
internal uses. The gross book values and accumulated amortization as
of March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Patents
and trademarks
|
$
|
47,375
|
$
|
46,742
|
||||
Software
|
282,112
|
-
|
||||||
329,487
|
46,742
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(65,123
|
)
|
(46,268
|
)
|
||||
$
|
264,364
|
$
|
474
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$18,855 and $4,696, respectively. All of the Company’s intangible assets are
subject to amortization.
Estimated
future annual amortization expense pursuant to these intangible assets is as
follows:
Years
Ending March 31,
|
Patents
and Trademarks
|
Software
|
Total
Intangibles
|
|||||||||
2010
|
$
|
660
|
$
|
56,400
|
$
|
57,060
|
||||||
2011
|
392
|
56,400
|
56,792
|
|||||||||
2012
|
-
|
56,400
|
56,400
|
|||||||||
2013
|
-
|
56,400
|
56,400
|
|||||||||
2014
|
-
|
37,712
|
37,712
|
|||||||||
$
|
1,052
|
$
|
263,312
|
$
|
264,364
|
F-20
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 6 – INCOME
TAXES
The tax
effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred taxes at
March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax asset:
|
||||||||
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
$
|
5,031,000
|
$
|
4,207,000
|
||||
Accrued
expenses and reserves
|
178,000
|
135,000
|
||||||
Expenses
recognized for granting of options and
warrants
|
862,000
|
606,000
|
||||||
Total
gross deferred tax asset
|
6,071,000
|
4,948,000
|
||||||
Less
valuation allowance
|
(6,071,000
|
)
|
(4,948,000
|
)
|
||||
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
The
valuation allowance increased during the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 by
approximately $1,123,000 and $1,236,000, respectively. No current
provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is
required, except for minimum state taxes, since the Company incurred taxable
losses during such years.
The
provision for income taxes for fiscal 2009 and 2008 was $1,600 and $1,600,
respectively, and differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal
income tax rate of 34% to loss before income taxes as a result of the
following:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Computed
tax benefit at federal statutory rate
|
$
|
(5,679,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,549,000
|
)
|
||
State
income tax benefit, net of federal
effect
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
||||||
Non
deductible
extinguishment of debt
|
3,688,000
|
-
|
||||||
Increase
in valuation allowance, net of federal effect
|
955,000
|
1,068,000
|
||||||
Disallowed
convertible debenture interest
|
770,000
|
443,000
|
||||||
Other
|
266,600
|
38,600
|
||||||
$
|
1,600
|
$
|
1,600
|
F-21
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES,
continued
As of
March 31, 2009, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of
approximately $12,600,000 and $12,600,000 for federal and state income tax
reporting purposes, respectively, which expire at various dates through
2028.
The
utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards might be limited due to
restrictions imposed under federal and state laws upon a change in ownership.
The amount of the limitation, if any, has not been determined at this time. A
valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result of
the Company’s continued losses and uncertainties surrounding the realization of
the net operating loss carry forwards, the Company has recorded valuation
allowances equal to the net deferred tax asset amounts as of March 31, 2009 and
2008.
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Operating
Leases
On July
2, 2007, the Company entered into a new lease agreement for a building with
approximately 11,881 square feet of manufacturing and office space. The lease
agreement is for a period of two years with renewal options for three, one-year
periods, beginning September 1, 2007. The lease requires base lease
payments of approximately $13,000 per month plus operating
expenses. In connection with the lease agreement, the Company issued
10,000 warrants to the lessor at an exercise price of $1.55 per share for a
period of two years, valued at $15,486 as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The assumptions used under the Black-Scholes
pricing model included: a risk free rate of 4.75%; volatility of 293%; an
expected exercise term of 5 years; and no annual dividend rate. The Company has
capitalized and is amortizing the value of the warrants over the life of the
lease and the remaining unamortized value of the warrants has been recorded in
other long-term assets. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the unamortized balance
of the value of the warrants issued to the lessor was $2,970 and $10,074,
respectively.
F-22
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
As of
March 31, 2009, future minimum rental payments required under the existing
facility operating lease are as follows:
Years
Ending
March
31,
|
Operating
Lease
|
||
2010
|
$
|
65,000
|
Total
rental expense was approximately $183,000 and $155,000 for the years ended March
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Litigation
The
Company becomes a party to product litigation in the normal course of
business. The Company accrues for open claims based on its historical
experience and available insurance coverage. In the opinion of management, there
are no legal matters involving the Company that would have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
Indemnities and
Guarantees
The
Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be
required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to
certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its
directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the
States of California and Nevada. In connection with its facility
lease, the Company has indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from
the use of the facility. The duration of the guarantees and
indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These
guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum
potential future payments the Company could be obligated to
make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred
any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been
recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
F-23
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 8 – LINE OF
CREDIT
On
November 5, 2007, the Company secured financing for a $200,000 one-year
revolving line of credit (the “Line”) secured by a $200,000 Certificate of
Deposit with Bank of the West. On November 6, 2008, the Company secured a
one-year renewal of the Line for a reduced amount of $100,000 which is secured
by a $100,000 Certificate of Deposit with Bank of the West. All borrowings under
the revolving line of credit bear variable interest based on the prime rate
plus 1% per annum (totaling 4.25% as of March 31, 2009). The Company
utilizes the funds advanced from the Line for capital equipment purchases to
support the launch of the Company’s newly developed product, the CryoPort
Express™ One-Way Shipper. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding balance
of the Line was $90,310 and $115,943, respectively, including accrued interest
of $334 and $443, respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, the Company made payments against the Line of $25,500 and zero
respectively, and recorded interest expense of $3,099 and $1,493, respectively,
related to the Line. No funds were drawn against the Line during the
year ended March 31, 2009 and $120,000 was drawn against the Line during the
year ended March 31, 2008.
NOTE 9 – NOTES
PAYABLE
The
Company had a non-interest bearing note payable to a third party for $77,304,
which was due in April 2003. The Company made the final payments on
the note of $5,000 in April 2008 and $7,000 in May 2008. As of March
31, 2009 and 2008, the remaining unpaid balance was zero and $12,000,
respectively.
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had aggregate principal balances of
$1,129,500 and $1,249,500, respectively, in outstanding unsecured indebtedness
owed to five related parties, including four former members of the board of
directors, representing working capital advances made to the Company from
February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the
rate of 6% per annum and provide for aggregate monthly principal payments which
commenced April 1, 2006 of $2,500, and which increased by an aggregate of $2,500
every six months to the current maximum aggregate payment of $10,000 per month.
Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on
various dates through March 1, 2015.
Related-party
interest expense under these notes was $71,676 and $78,243 for the years ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Accrued interest related
to these notes, which is included in related party notes payable in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, amounted to $554,260 and $482,584 as
of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the
Company had not made the required payments under the related party notes which
were due on January 1, February 1, and March 1, 2009. However,
pursuant to the note agreements, the Company has a 120-day grace period to pay
missed payments before the notes are in default. On April 29, 2009,
May 30, 2009, and June 26, 2009, the Company paid the January 1, February 1 and
March 1 payments respectively, due on these related party
notes. Management expects to continue to pay all payments due prior
to the expiration of the 120-day grace periods.
F-24
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 9 – NOTES PAYABLE,
continued
In August
2006, Peter Berry, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, agreed to
convert his deferred salaries to a long-term note payable. Under the terms of
this note, the Company began to make monthly payments of $3,000 to Mr. Berry in
January 2007. In January 2008, these monthly payments increased to $6,000 and
will remain at that amount until the loan is fully paid in December 2010.
Interest of 6% per annum on the outstanding principal balance of the note began
to accrue on January 1, 2008. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the
total amount of deferred salaries and accrued interest under this arrangement
was $157,688 and $201,115, respectively, of which $67,688 and $129,115,
respectively is recorded as a long-term liability in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense related to this note
was $10,573 and $3,165, respectively for the years ended March 31, 2009 and
2008. Accrued interest related to this note payable amounted to
$13,738 and $3,165 at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in
the note payable to officer in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In
January 2009, Mr. Berry agreed to defer the monthly payments of the note due
from January 31, 2009 through June 30, 2009. As of March 31, 2009 these unpaid
payments totaled $18,000 and are included in the current liability portion of
the note payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Mr.
Berry resigned his position as Chief Executive Officer in February 2009, however
remains a director on the Board and continues to work as a consultant for the
Company.
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE
October 2006
Debentures
In
October 2006, the Company entered into an Agency Agreement with a broker to
raise capital in a private placement offering of convertible debentures under
Regulation D. From February 2006 through January 2007, the
Company received a total of $120,000 under this private placement offering of
convertible debenture debt. Related to the issuance of the
convertible debentures, the Company paid commissions to the broker totaling
$15,600 which were capitalized as deferred financing costs. During the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company amortized zero and $4,699,
respectively, of these deferred financing costs to interest
expense.
Per the
terms of the convertible debenture agreements, the notes had a term of 180 days
from issuance, bore interest at 15% per annum and were convertible into shares
of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 6.67 shares for every dollar of debt
converted. The proceeds of the convertible notes were used in the
ongoing operations of the Company. During the year ended March 31,
2008, the Company converted the full $120,000 of principal balances and $8,857
of accrued interest relating to these convertible debentures into 859,697 shares
of common stock at a conversion price of $0.15 per share. As of March
31, 2009 and 2008, the balance of these convertible notes and accrued interest
was zero. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded
interest expense of zero and $2,784, respectively, related to these
notes.
F-25
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE, continued
In
connection with the issuance of the convertible debt, the Company recorded a
debt discount totaling $106,167 related to the beneficial conversion feature of
the notes. The Company amortized the debt discount using the
effective interest method through the maturity dates of the notes. As
of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the remaining balance of the debt discount was
zero. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company
recorded additional interest expense of zero and $29,638, respectively, related
to the amortization of the debt discount.
October 2007
Debentures
On
October 1, 2007, the Company issued to BridgePointe Master Fund, Ltd. and the
Enable Funds (the “October 2007 Debenture Holders”), Original Issue Discount 8%
Senior Secured Convertible Debentures (the “October 2007 Debentures”) having a
principal face amount of $4,707,705 and generating gross proceeds of $4,001,551.
After accounting for commissions, legal and other fees, the net proceeds
to the Company totaled $3,436,551.
Original
Terms, as amended in February 2008:
In
accordance with the Convertible Debenture Agreement as amended on February 19,
2008, the principal amount under the October 2007 Debentures is payable to the
investors in 24 monthly redemption payments which commenced on March 31,
2008. The principal payments have subsequently been adjusted
according to the terms of the January Amendment discussed in further detail
below. The Company may elect to make principal redemptions in shares
of common stock. If the Company elects to make principal
redemptions in common stock, the conversion rate will be the lesser of (a) the
Conversion Price (as defined below), or (b) 85% of the lesser of (i) the average
of the volume weighted average price for the ten consecutive trading days ending
immediately prior to the applicable date a principal redemption is due or (ii)
the average of such price for the ten consecutive trading days ending
immediately prior to the date the applicable shares are issued and delivered if
such delivery is after the principal redemption due date.
At any
time, holders may convert the Debentures into shares of common stock at a fixed
conversion price of $0.84, subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues
common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) at
a price below the conversion price as such price may be in effect at various
times (the “Conversion Price”). During fiscal 2009 the conversion
price was subsequently reset to $0.51 as a result of the January Amendment
discussed in further detail below.
Quarterly
interest payments for these convertible debentures are payable in cash and
commenced on January 1, 2008. The Company may elect to make interest
payments in shares of common stock provided, generally, that it is not in
default under the Debentures and it has met certain equity conditions prior to
the due date of the interest payments. If the Company elects to make
interest payments in common stock, the conversion rate will be the lesser of (a)
the Conversion Price (as defined below), or (b) 85% of the lesser of (i) the
average of the volume weighted average price for the ten consecutive trading
days ending immediately prior to the applicable date an interest payment is due
or (ii) the average of such price for the ten consecutive trading days ending
immediately prior to the date the applicable shares are issued and delivered if
such delivery is after the interest payment date.
F-26
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE, continued
In
connection with the Debenture financing transaction, the Company issued to the
investors five-year warrants to purchase 5,604,411 shares of common stock at
$0.92 per share and two-year warrants to purchase 1,401,103 shares of common
stock at $0.90 per share and warrants to purchase 1,401,103 shares of common
stock at $1.60 per share (collectively, the “October 2007
Warrants”). The value attributed to these warrants as calculated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $7,838,791 on the date of
issuance. The valuation of the October 2007 Warrants have been affected by the
debt restructurings as the result of subsequent amendments to the October 2007
Debentures as discussed further below.
Under
EITF 00-27, the value of the warrants issued to the investors is calculated
relative to the total amount of the debt offering. The relative fair
value of the warrants issued to the investors was determined to be $2,941,267,
or 62.5% of the total offering. The relative fair value of the
warrants, along with the effective beneficial conversion feature of the debt
($3,557,761) and the face value discount given to the investors ($706,154),
totaled in excess of the face amount of the Debentures. As such, the
Company recorded a debt discount equal to the face value of the Debentures of
$4,707,705. The debt discount is being amortized by the Company
through the maturity dates of the Debentures. The debt discount has
been affected by the debt restructurings as a result of subsequent amendments to
the October 2007 Debentures discussed in further detail below.
Financing
fees of $565,000, including placement agent fees of $440,000 and legal and other
fees of $125,000, were paid in cash from the gross proceeds of the
Debentures. Joseph Stevens and Company (“Joseph Stevens”) acted as
sole placement agent in connection with the Debenture financing
transaction. Also in connection with the Debenture financing
transaction, the Company issued Joseph Stevens three-year warrants to purchase
560,364 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.84 per
share. The value of the warrants issued to Joseph Stevens as
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was
$525,071.
The total
financing fees of $1,090,071 related to the Debenture financing transaction were
allocated to the equity and debt components of the financing. The
Company recorded 62.5% of the financing fees ($681,294) as costs related to the
issuance of the equity instruments, and as such has netted those amounts against
additional paid-in capital as of the date of the financing. The
remaining 37.5% ($408,777) was recorded as deferred financing costs on the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008, and amortized by the
Company through the maturity dates of the Debentures under the effective
interest method. The deferred financing fees were affected by the
debt restructure as a result of the April 2008 Amendment discussed in further
detail below.
F-27
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE, continued
In
connection with the Debentures, the Company also entered into a registration
rights agreement with the investors that requires the Company to register the
shares issuable upon conversion of the principal amounts of the Debentures and
exercise of the Warrants. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, on November 9, 2007 the Company filed a Registration Statement on
Form SB-2. On January 25, 2008, the registration statement, as
amended, became effective with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Per the terms of the registration rights agreement,
following the effective date of the registration statement, the Company may
force conversion of the Debentures if the market price of the common stock is at
least $2.52 for 30 consecutive days. The Company may also prepay the
Debentures in cash at 120% of the then outstanding principal
balance.
The
Debentures rank senior to all of the Company’s current and future indebtedness
and are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.
April
2008 Amendment:
On April
30, 2008, the October 2007 Convertible Debenture Agreement was amended to
reflect changes to the monthly redemption of principal and changes to the
October 2007 Warrants issued with the original October 2007
Debentures. Under the terms of the April 30, 2008 Amendment (the
“April Amendment”), the monthly principal redemptions were suspended until
August 1, 2008 and the remaining principal due on the October 2007 Debentures
were to be paid thereafter on the first date of each month in equal installments
through March 27, 2010, the expiration date. Further, the April Amendment
changed the exercise price of the October 2007 Warrants issued under the terms
of the Securities Purchase Agreement and related Agreements from $0.90, $0.92
and $1.60 to $0.60 each. The number of shares to be purchased under each of the
October 2007 Warrants was also adjusted under the terms of the April Amendment
so that the original dollar amounts to be raised by the Company through the
exercise of each of the October 2007 Warrants remained the same. As a
result, the number of shares to be purchased under the October 2007 Warrants
increased by 6,024,743 from 8,406,617 to 14,431,360.
The April
Amendment to the October 2007 Debentures has been accounted for by the Company
as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19 (“EITF
Issue No. 96-19”), Debtor’s
Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments , and
EITF Issue No. 06-6 (“EITF Issue No. 06-6”), Debtor's Accounting For a
Modification or Exchange of Convertible Debt Instruments . The
Company determined that the net present value of the cash flows under the terms
of the April Amendment was more than 10 percent different from the present value
of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original October 2007
Debentures agreement. Due to the substantial difference, the Company
determined an extinguishment of debt had occurred with the April
Amendment. Accordingly, the Company recorded the amended October 2007
Debentures at their fair value of $1,805,668 at the date of
extinguishment. The difference between the fair value of the amended
October 2007 Debentures and the carrying value of the original October 2007
Debentures at the date of debt extinguishment amounting to $732,400 was recorded
as part of the loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended March 31,
2009.
F-28
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
As a
result of the April Amendment, unamortized deferred financing costs of $312,197
arising from the original issuance of the October 2007 Debentures were written
off and were included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended
March 31, 2009. There were no debt issuance costs incurred in
connection with the April Amendment.
A debt
discount of $2,643,192 was recorded in connection with the debt extinguishment
from April Amendment to the October 2007 Debentures. The debt
discount was amortized monthly based on the maturity dates of the October 2007
Debentures until affected by the August 2008 Amendment discussed in further
detail below.
The
increase in value of the October 2007 Warrants arising from the change in
conversion price and the additional number of warrants issued of $5,858,344 has
been accounted for as a payment to the debt holders in connection with the debt
extinguishment and included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year
ended March 31, 2009.
The total
loss on extinguishment of debt recorded by the Company as a result of changes to
the October 2007 Debentures from the April Amendment discussed above totaled
$6,902,941 which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 31,
2009.
August
2008 Amendment:
On August
29, 2008, the Company entered into an “Amendment to Debentures, Agreement and
Waiver” (the “August Amendment”) with October 2007 Debenture Holders, to amend
the October 2007 Convertible Debenture. The August Amendment waived quarterly
interest payments that would otherwise have been due on October 1, 2008 and
January 1, 2009 and defers the monthly redemption dates from July 31, 2008
through November 30, 2008 to commence upon December 31, 2008, and
terminating upon full redemption of the October 2007 Debentures. In
consideration for entering into the August Amendment, the outstanding principal
amount of the October 2007 Debentures was increased to an amount equal to 115%
of the sum of (i) the outstanding principal amount of as of August 29, 2008, the
date of the August Amendment, plus (ii) an amount equal to the additional amount
of interest that would have accrued on the October 2007 Debenture from July 1,
2008 through December 31, 2008. There were no changes to the warrants related to
the October 2007 Debentures as a result of the August
Amendment. Based on the terms of the August Amendment, the principal
balances of the October 2007 Debentures increased by $866,202 to
$5,285,599.
F-29
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
The
August Amendment to the October 2007 Debentures has been accounted for by the
Company as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19 and
EITF Issue No. 06-6. The Company determined that the net present
value of the cash flows under the terms of the August Amendment was more than 10
percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the
terms of the October 2007 Debentures agreement as previously amended in April
2008. Due to the substantial difference, the Company determined an
extinguishment of debt had occurred with the August
Amendment. Accordingly, the Company recorded the amended October 2007
Debentures at their fair value of $2,203,086 at the date of
extinguishment. The difference between the fair value of the amended
October 2007 Debentures and the carrying value of the original October 2007
Debentures at the date of debt extinguishment amounting to $91,728 was recorded
as an offset against the loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended
March 31, 2009.
A debt
discount of $3,082,511 was recorded in connection with the debt extinguishment
from August Amendment to the October 2007 Debentures which includes $117,851
related to the interest that would have accrued from September to December
2008. This portion of the debt discount was amortized through
December 2008, while the remaining $2,964,660 of the debt discount is being
amortized monthly based on the maturity dates of the October 2007 Debentures
until affected by the January 2009 Amendment discussed in further detail
below.
January
2009 Amendment:
Effective
January 27, 2009, the October 2007 and May 2008 Convertible Debenture Agreements
(see below) were amended to reflect changes to the monthly redemptions of
principal, the quarterly payments of interest and changes to the October 2007
and May 2008 Warrants related to the original October 2007 and May 2008
Debentures. Under the terms of the January 27, 2009 Amendment (the
“January Amendment”), the “Conversion Price” of the debentures was reset from
$0.84 to $0.51, monthly principal redemptions were deferred until August 1, 2009
and the remaining principal due on each of the debentures will be paid
thereafter on the first date of each month in twelve equal installments through
July 1, 2010, the amended maturity date. During the deferral period
interest payments due from January 1, 2009 through July 1, 2009 may be paid
monthly by the Company in common stock shares at a conversion rate of $0.40
given that it has met certain equity conditions prior to the due date of the
interest payments. If the equity conditions are not met, the Company
may add the monthly interest payment to the principal balance of the
debenture.
F-30
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
Further,
the January Amendment reset the “Exercise Price” of the October 2007 and May
2008 Warrants issued in connection with the October 2007 and May 2008 Debentures
Agreements and related agreements from the then current exercise prices of
$0.60, $0.92 and $1.35 to $0.60 and extended the expiration dates of the October
2007 warrants to January 1, 2014. The number of shares to be purchased under the
October 2007 and May 2008 warrants were proportionately increased under the
terms of the amendments so that the original dollar amounts to be raised by
registrant though the exercise of each of the warrants and the proportional
number of warrants issued to each Debenture Holder remained the
same. As a result, the number of common stock shares to be
purchased under the October 2007 Warrants increased by 2,851,897 to
17,283,257.
Under the
terms of the January Amendment, in February 2009, the Company issued a total of
320,800 restricted common shares valued at $131,528 to the October 2007
Debenture Holders.
The
January Amendment to the October 2007 Debentures has been accounted for by the
Company as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19 and
EITF Issue No. 06-6. The Company determined that the net present
value of the cash flows under the terms of the January Amendment was more than
10 percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under
the terms of the original October 2007 Debentures agreement. Due to
the substantial difference, the Company determined an extinguishment of debt had
occurred with the January Amendment. Accordingly, the Company
recorded the amended October 2007 Debentures at their fair value of $2,733,557
as of January 27, 2009, the date of extinguishment. The decrease in
the fair value of the amended October 2007 Debentures from the carrying value of
the amended October 2007 Debentures at the date of debt extinguishment amounting
to $367,557 was recorded as an offset to the total loss on debt extinguishment.
A new debt discount of $2,552,042 was recorded in connection with the debt
extinguishment from the January Amendment to the October 2007
Debentures. The debt discount is being amortized through the July 1,
2010 amended maturity dates of the October 2007 Debentures.
The
increase in value of the October 2007 Warrants arising from the change in
conversion price and the additional number of warrants issued of $2,874,314 has
been accounted for as a payment to the debt holders in connection with the debt
extinguishment and included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year
ended March 31, 2009. In addition the fair value of the 320,800
shares issued to the October 2007 Debenture holders totaled $131,528 and has
been accounted for as a payment to the debt holders in connection with the debt
extinguishment and included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year
ended March 31, 2009.
The total
loss on extinguishment of debt recorded by the Company as a result of changes to
the October 2007 Debentures from the January Amendment discussed above totaled
$2,638,285 which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 31,
2009.
F-31
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
Principal
and interest:
On
January 31, 2008, $100,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted by an
investor. Using the conversion rate of $0.84 per share per the terms
of the Debenture, 119,047 shares of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
On March
31, 2008, the Company converted principal redemptions totaling $188,308 into
224,176 shares of registered common stock and interest payments of $92,821 into
110,501 shares of common stock using the conversion rate of
$0.84.
In April
2008, the Company rescinded and cancelled 140,143 shares of registered common
stock for principal redemptions of the October 2007 Debentures totaling $117,720
and submitted the cash payments in the same amounts to those
holders. Pursuant to a one-time waiver of certain equity conditions,
the remaining $70,588 of the March 31 principal redemption was adjusted to
reflect a one-time conversion rate of $0.70 and, in April 2008 the Company
issued the holder 16,807 additional registered shares in
consideration. In addition, the March 31, 2008 interest
payments were adjusted to reflect a one-time conversion price of $0.70 and in
April 2008 the Company issued the October 2007 Debenture holders 22,099
additional common stock shares. The additional interest expense for
the October 2007 Debentures of $5,446 related to the one-time conversion rate
adjustments of the March 31, 2008 principal and interest payments from $0.84 to
$0.70 was included in accrued interest for the October 2007 Debentures as of
March 31, 2008.
On March
1, 2009 the Company increased the principal balances of the October 2007
Debentures by $70,474, the amount of the accrued interest due as of that date,
as a result of the equity condition constraints for the conversion of interest
payments pursuant to the January Amendment.
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the principal balance of the October 2007 Debentures
totaled $5,356,073 and $4,419,397, respectively, of which the current portion of
$3,570,720 and $1,936,884 is included in the Company’s current liabilities in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had $35,707
and $5,446, respectively of accrued interest related to the October 2007
Debentures included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and recorded
a total of $253,495 and $192,421, respectively, of interest expense related to
the face rate of interest in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. During the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company converted accrued interest
payments of $5,446 and $186,975, respectively on the convertible notes into
38,906 and 222,590 shares of common stock, respectively, using a conversion rate
of $0.84 per share.
F-32
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
Changes
to the principal balances of the October 2007 Debentures during the years ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 are shown below:
Principal
|
|||||
October
2007
|
$
|
4,707,705
|
|||
January
2008
|
Principal
Conversion
|
(100,000
|
)
|
||
March
2008
|
Principal
Payment - Shares
|
(188,308
|
)
|
||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
4,419,937
|
||||
August
2008
|
August
Amendment
|
866,202
|
|||
March
2009
|
Accrued
Interest
|
70,474
|
|||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
$
|
5,356,073
|
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the unamortized balance of the debt discount related to
the October 2007 Debentures was $2,251,802 and $3,522,356,
respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 the
Company recorded additional interest expense of $1,804,716 and $1,185,348
respectively, related to the amortization of the debt discount associated with
the October 2007 Debentures.
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the unamortized balance of the deferred financing fees
related to the October 2007 Debentures was zero and $325,769,
respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 the
Company recorded additional interest expense of $13,572 and $83,007
respectively, related to the amortization of the deferred financing fees
associated with the October 2007 Debentures. In connection with the
April Amendment described above, the unamortized balance of the deferred
financing costs was written off.
Changes
to the exercise prices and number of warrants related to the October 2007
Debentures as a result of the April and January Amendments were made according
to the following schedule:
5
Year
Warrants
|
2
Year
Warrants
|
2
Year
Warrants
|
Combined
|
|
As
Originally Issued:
|
||||
No.
of warrants
|
5,604,411
|
1,401,103
|
1,401,103
|
8,406,617
|
Exercise
price
|
$0.92
|
$0.90
|
$1.60
|
|
As
Modified April Amendment:
|
||||
No.
of warrants
|
8,593,430
|
2,101,655
|
3,736,275
|
14,431,360
|
Exercise
price
|
$0.60
|
$0.60
|
$0.60
|
|
As
Modified January Amendment:
|
||||
No.
of warrants
|
17,283,257
|
-
|
-
|
17,283,257
|
Exercise
price
|
$0.60
|
-
|
-
|
F-33
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
May 2008
Debenture
On June
9, 2008, the Company completed the transactions contemplated under a certain
Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor providing for the
issuance of the Company’s Original Issue Discount 8% Secured Convertible
Debenture (the “May 2008 Debenture”) having a principal face amount of
$1,250,000. The Company realized gross proceeds of $1,062,500 after
giving effect to a 15% discount. After accounting for commissions and
legal and other fees, the net proceeds to the Company totaled
$870,625.
Original
terms:
Under the
original terms, the principal amount under the May 2008 Debenture was payable in
23 monthly payments of $54,348 beginning January 31, 2009. Interest
payments are payable in cash quarterly commencing on January 1, 2009. The
principal and interest payments have been affected by the debt restructures as a
result of the January Amendment discussed in further detail
below. The Company may elect to make principal and interest payments
in shares of common stock provided, generally, that the Company is not in
default under the May 2008 Debenture, it has met certain equity conditions prior
to the due dates and there is then in effect a registration statement with
respect to the shares issuable upon conversion of the May 2008
Debenture. If the Company elects to make principal or interest
payments in common stock, the conversion rate will be the lesser of (a) the
Conversion Price (as defined below), or (b) 85% of the lesser of (i) the average
of the volume weighted average price for the ten consecutive trading days ending
immediately prior to the applicable date an interest payment is due or (ii) the
average of such price for the ten consecutive trading days ending immediately
prior to the date the applicable shares are issued and delivered if such
delivery is after the interest payment date.
At any
time, the holder may convert the May 2008 Debenture into shares of common stock
at a fixed conversion price of $0.84, subject to adjustment in the event the
Company issues common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for
common stock) at a price below the conversion price as such price may be in
effect at various times (the “Conversion Price”). During fiscal 2009, the
conversion price was subsequently reset to $0.51 as a result of the January
Amendment discussed in further detail below.
Following
the effective date of the registration statement described below, the Company
may force conversion of the May 2008 Debenture if the market price of the common
stock is at least $2.52 for 30 consecutive days. The Company may also prepay the
May 2008 Debenture in cash at 120% of the then outstanding principal
balance.
F-34
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
The May
2008 Debenture ranks senior to all current and future indebtedness of the
Company, with the exception of the October 2007 Debentures that were issued by
the Company which rank senior to the May 2008 Debenture. The May 2008
Debenture is secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into a
waiver and subordination agreement with the holders of the October 2007
Debentures.
In
connection with the financing transaction, the Company issued to the investor
five-year warrants to purchase 1,488,095 shares of the Company’s common stock at
$0.92 per share and five-year warrants to purchase 1,488,095 shares of common
stock at $1.35 per share (collectively, the “May 2008 Warrants”).
Under
EITF Issue No. 00-27, the value of the May 2008 Warrants issued to the investor
was calculated relative to the total amount of the debt offering. The relative
fair value of the May 2008 Warrants issued to the investors was determined to be
$815,471, or 65.2% of the total offering. The relative fair value of the May
2008 Warrants, along with the effective beneficial conversion feature of the
debt ($434,529) and the face value discount given to the investors ($187,500),
totaled in excess of the face amount of the May 2008 Debenture. As such, the
Company recorded a debt discount equal to the face value of the May 2008
Debenture of $1,250,000. The debt discount is being amortized by the Company to
interest expense through the maturity date of the May 2008 Debenture. The debt
discount has been affected by the debt restructures as a result of the January
Amendment discussed in further detail below.
The
Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with the investors
that requires the Company to register the shares issuable upon conversion of the
May 2008 Debenture and exercise of the May 2008 Warrants within 45 days after
the closing date of the transaction. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, on July 14, 2008 the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form
S-1, which became effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 28, 2008. As a result of a timely filing, The Company was not
subject to any liquidated damages as described in the registration rights
agreement.
Financing
fees of $191,875 including placement agent fees of $116,875 and legal and other
fees of $75,000 were paid in cash from the gross proceeds of the May 2008
Debenture. National Securities Corporation (“National Securities”)
acted as sole placement agent in connection with the financing transaction.
Also, in connection with the financing transaction, the Company issued National
Securities five-year warrants to purchase 148,810 shares of the Company’s common
stock exercisable at $0.84 per share. The value of the warrants issued to
National Securities as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
was $117,530.
F-35
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
The total
financing fees of $309,405 related to the financing transaction have been
allocated to the equity and debt components of the financing. The Company has
recorded 65.2% of the financing fees ($201,732) as costs related to the issuance
of the equity instruments, and as such has netted those amounts against
additional paid-in capital as of the date of the financing. The remaining 34.8%
($107,673) were recorded as deferred financing fees. The deferred financing fees
have been amortized by the Company through the maturity date of the May 2008
Debenture on a straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest
method. The deferred financing fees have been affected by the debt restructures
as a result of the January Amendment discussed in further detail
below.
All
securities were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration in reliance on
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, and based on the investors’
representations that they are “accredited” as defined in Rule 501 under the
Securities Act.
January
2009 Amendment:
Effective
January 27, 2009 the October 2007 and May 2008 Convertible Debenture Agreements
were amended to reflect changes to the monthly redemptions of principal, the
quarterly payments of interest and changes to the October 2007 and May 2008
Warrants related to the original October 2007 and May 2008
Debentures. Under the terms of the January 27, 2009 Amendment (the
“January Amendment”), the “Conversion Price” of the debentures was reset from
$0.84 to $0.51, monthly principal redemptions were deferred until August 1, 2009
and the remaining principal due on each of the debentures will be paid
thereafter on the first date of each month in twelve equal installments through
July 1, 2010, the amended maturity date. During the deferral period
interest payments due from January 1, 2009 through July 1, 2009 may be paid
monthly by the Company in common stock shares at a conversion rate of $0.40
given that it has met certain equity conditions prior to the due date of the
interest payments. If the equity conditions are not met, the Company
may add the monthly interest payment to the principal balance of the
debenture.
F-36
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
Further,
the January Amendment reset the “Exercise Price” of the October 2007 and May
2008 Warrants issued in connection with the October 2007 and May 2008 Debentures
Agreements and related agreements from the then current exercise prices of
$0.60, $0.92 and $1.35 to $0.60 and extended the expiration dates of the October
2007 warrants to January 1, 2014. The number of shares to be purchased under the
October 2007 and May 2008 warrants were proportionately increased under the
terms of the amendments so that the original dollar amounts to be raised by
registrant though the exercise of each of the warrants and the proportional
number of warrants issued to each Debenture Holder remained the
same. As a result, the number of Common stock shares to be
purchased under the May 2008 Warrants increased by 2,653,770 to
5,629,960.
Under the
terms of the January Amendment, in February 2009, the Company issued a total of
79,200 restricted common shares valued at $32,472 to the May 2008 Debenture
Holder.
The
January Amendment to the May 2008 Debenture has been accounted for by the
Company as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19 and
EITF Issue No. 06-6. The Company determined that the net present
value of the cash flows under the terms of the January Amendment was more than
10 percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under
the terms of the original May 2008 Debenture agreement. Due to the
substantial difference, the Company determined an extinguishment of debt had
occurred with the January Amendment. Accordingly, the Company
recorded the amended May 2008 Debenture at its fair value of $526,950 as of
January 27, 2009, the date of extinguishment. The increase in the
fair value of the amended May 2008 Debentures from the carrying value of the
original May 2008 Debentures at the date of debt extinguishment amounted to
$193,614 and was recorded as a loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended
March 31, 2009. A new debt discount of $723,050 was recorded in connection with
the debt extinguishment from January Amendment to the May 2008
Debenture. The debt discount is being amortized through the July 1,
2010 amended maturity date of the May 2008 Debenture.
The
increase in value of the May 2008 Warrants arising from the change in conversion
price and the additional number of warrants issued of $1,092,028 has been
accounted for as a payment to the debt holders in connection with the debt
extinguishment and included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year
ended March 31, 2009. In addition the fair value of the 79,200 shares
issued to the May 2008 Debenture holder totaled $32,472 and has been accounted
for as a payment to the debt holders in connection with the debt extinguishment
and included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended March 31,
2009.
F-37
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
As a
result of the January Amendment, unamortized deferred financing costs of $78,961
arising from the original issuance of the May 2008 Debentures were written off
and were included in the loss on debt extinguishment for the year ended March
31, 2009. There were no debt issuance costs incurred in connection
with the January Amendment.
The total
loss on extinguishment of debt recorded by the Company as a result of changes to
the May 2008 Debenture from the January Amendment discussed above totaled
$1,397,075 which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 31,
2009.
Principal
and interest:
On March
1, 2009 the Company increased the principal balances of the May 2008 Debenture
by $75,556, the amount of the accrued interest due as of that date, as a result
of the equity condition constraints for the conversion of interest payments
pursuant to the January Amendment.
As of
March 31, 2009, the principal balance of the May 2008 Debenture totaled
$1,325,556, of which the current portion of $883,704 is included in the
Company’s current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at
March 31, 2009.
Changes
to the principal balance of the May 2008 Debenture during the year ended March
31, 2009 are shown below:
Principal
|
|||||
May
2008
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|||
March
2009
|
Accrued
Interest
|
75,556
|
|||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
$
|
1,325,556
|
For the
year ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded interest expense of $84,393
related to the face rate of interest, of which $8,837 is included in
accrued interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at
March 31, 2009.
During
the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded additional interest expense
of $418,400 related to the amortization of the debt discount. As of March 31,
2009, the unamortized balance of the debt discount was $637,986.
During
the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded additional interest expense
of $28,712 related to the amortization of the deferred financing fees on the May
2008 Debenture. In connection with the January Amendment described above,
the unamortized balance of the deferred financing costs was written off. As of
March 31, 2009, the unamortized balance of the deferred financing fees was
zero.
F-38
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE, continued
Changes
to the exercise prices and number of warrants related to the May 2008 Debenture
as a result of the January Amendment were made according to the following
schedule:
5
Year
Warrants
|
5
Year
Warrants
|
Combined
|
|
As
Originally Issued:
|
|||
No.
of warrants
|
1,488,095
|
1,488,095
|
2,976,190
|
Exercise
price
|
$0.92
|
$1.35
|
|
As
Modified January Amendment:
|
|||
No.
of warrants
|
5,629,960
|
5,629,960
|
|
Exercise
price
|
$0.60
|
Private Placement
Debentures
In March
2009 the Company entered into an Agency Agreement with a broker to raise capital
in a private placement offering of one-year convertible debentures under
Regulation D (the “Private Placement Debentures”). From March
through June 2009, the Company intends to raise up to a maximum of
$1,500,000 under this private placement offering of convertible debenture
debt. On March 31, 2009, the Company had received initial gross
proceeds of $60,000 under this private placement offering of convertible
debentures. Related to the issuance of the convertible debentures,
the Company accrued for commissions to the broker totaling $3,600 which have
been capitalized as deferred financing costs. The deferred financing costs will
be amortized to interest expense by the Company through the maturity dates of
the debentures on a straight-line basis which approximates the effective
interest method.
The
Company may elect to make principal redemptions on the maturity dates of the
debentures in shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.51. At
any time, holders may convert the debentures into shares of common stock at the
fixed conversion price of $0.51. The conversion price is subject to adjustment
in the event the Company issues the next equity financing of at least $2,500,000
at a price below $0.51.
Per the
terms of the convertible debenture agreements, the notes have a term of one year
from issuance and are redeemable by the Company with two days
notice. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and are convertible
into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of
$0.51. As of March 31, 2009 the balance of these convertible notes
was $60,000 and accrued interest was zero.
In
connection with the financing transaction, the Company issued to the investors
five-year warrants (the “Private Placement Warrants”) to purchase 23,529 shares
of the Company’s common stock at $0.51 per share. The exercise price of the
warrants is subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues the next
equity financing of at least $2,500,000 at a price below $0.51.
F-39
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 10 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE, continued
Under
EITF Issue No. 00-27, the value of the Private Placement Warrants issued to the
investor was calculated relative to the total amount of the debt offering. The
relative fair value of the Private Placement Warrants issued to the investors
was determined to be $9,146, or 15.2% of the total offering. The relative fair
value of the Private Placement Warrants, along with the effective beneficial
conversion feature of the debt of $4,440 were recorded as a total debt discount
of $13,586 as of March 31, 2009 which is reported in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The Company will amortize the debt discount using
the effective interest method through the maturity dates of the
notes.
As of
June 22, 2009 the Company had received additional gross proceeds of $906,500
under this private placement of convertible debentures. (See Note
14)
Future
Maturities
Future
maturities of all notes payable at March 31, 2009 are as follows:
Years
Ending
March
31,
|
Oct.
2007
May
2008
Convertible
Debentures
|
Note
Payable
Officer
|
Related
Party
Notes
|
Private
Placement
Conv.
Debt.
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
$
|
4,454,424
|
$
|
90,000
|
$
|
150,000
|
$
|
60,000
|
$
|
4,754,424
|
|||||||||||
2011
|
2,227,205
|
53,950
|
120,000
|
-
|
2,401,155
|
||||||||||||||||
2012
|
-
|
-
|
104,000
|
-
|
104,000
|
||||||||||||||||
2013
|
-
|
-
|
96,000
|
-
|
96,000
|
||||||||||||||||
2014
|
-
|
-
|
96,000
|
-
|
96,000
|
||||||||||||||||
Thereafter
|
-
|
-
|
563,500
|
-
|
563,500
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
6,681,629
|
$
|
143,950
|
$
|
1,129,500
|
$
|
60,000
|
$
|
8,015,079
|
NOTE 11 – COMMON
STOCK
In April
2007, the Company issued 375,000 shares of restricted common stock in lieu of
fees paid to a consultant. These shares were issued at a value of
$1.02 per share (based on the underlying stock price on the agreement date after
a fifteen percent deduction as the shares are restricted) for a total cost of
$382,500 which has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses
for the year ended March 31, 2008.
During
fiscal 2008, the Company entered into Agency Agreements with a broker to raise
funds in private placement offerings of common stock under Regulation
D. In connection with these private placement offerings, the Company
sold 3,652,710 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.22 per share
resulting in gross proceeds of $789,501 and incurred offering costs of
$89,635.
F-40
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 11 – COMMON STOCK,
continued
During
fiscal 2008, the Company issued 156,250 shares of common stock resulting from
exercises of stock options and warrants at an average price of $0.69 per share
for proceeds of $107,500 and issued 386,726 shares of common stock from the
cashless exercises of a total of 465,469 warrants.
In
October 2007, the Company engaged the firm of Carpe DM, Inc. to perform the
services as the Company’s investor relations and public relations representative
for a monthly fee of $7,500 per month. Pursuant to the terms of this
36 month consulting agreement, the Company issued 150,000 S-8 registered shares
at $0.80 per share and a total value of $120,000, and 250,000 fully vested and
non-forfeitable warrants at an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of
two and one-half years, valued at $229,834 as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. On November 13, 2007, the Company filed the
Form S-8 as required by this agreement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company recorded the combined value of $349,834 of the shares
and warrants issued as prepaid expense which is being amortized over the life of
the services agreement. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the
unamortized balance of the value of the shares and warrants issued to Carpe DM,
Inc. was $174,928 and $291,532, respectively, and $116,604 and $58,302,
respectively has been amortized and included in selling, general and
administrative expenses as outside services expense for the years ended March
31, 2009 and 2008.
On
October 16, 2007, the shareholders approved an increase in the total number of
voting common shares authorized to be issued to 125,000,000 shares.
On
January 31, 2008, $100,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted by an
investor. Using the conversion rate of $0.84 per share per the terms
of the Debenture, 119,047 shares of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
On March
31, 2008, the Company converted principal redemptions totaling $188,308 into
224,176 shares of registered common stock and interest payments of $92,821 into
110,501 shares of common stock using the conversion rate of
$0.84.
In April
2008, the Company rescinded and cancelled 140,143 shares of registered common
stock for principal redemptions of the October 2007 Debentures totaling $117,720
and submitted the cash payments in the same amounts to those
holders. Pursuant to a one-time waiver of certain equity conditions,
the remaining $70,588 of the March 31 principal redemption was adjusted to
reflect a one-time conversion rate of $0.70 and, in April 2008 the Company
issued the holder 16,807 additional registered shares in
consideration. In addition, the March 31, 2008 interest
payments were adjusted to reflect a one-time conversion price of $0.70 and in
April 2008 the Company issued the October 2007 Debenture holders 22,099
additional common stock shares. The additional interest expense for
the October 2007 Debentures of $5,446 related to the one-time conversion rate
adjustments of the March 31, 2008 principal and interest payments from $0.84 to
$0.70 was included in accrued interest for the October 2007 Debentures as of
March 31, 2008 (see Note 10).
F-41
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 11 – COMMON STOCK,
continued
During
fiscal 2009, the Company issued 244,722 shares of restricted common stock in
lieu of fees paid to various consultants for services
performed. These shares were issued at an average price of $0.69
(based on the underlying stock prices on the dates of issuances) for a total
cost of $168,769 which has been included in selling, general and administrative
expenses for the year ended March 31, 2009.
During
fiscal 2009, the Company issued 82,693 shares of common stock resulting from
exercises of stock options and warrants at an average price of $0.04 per share
for proceeds of $3,307 and issued 150,022 shares of common stock from the
cashless exercises of a total of 157,000 stock options.
Under the
terms of the January Amendment, in February 2009, the Company issued a total of
400,000 restricted common stock shares to the October 2007 and May 2008
Debenture Holders. The total fair value of the shares issues totaled
$164,000 and has been included in the loss on extinguishment of debt for the
year ended March 31, 2009.
In March
2009, the Company issued 157,516 S-8 registered shares of common stock in lieu
of fees paid for services performed by consultants. On March 28,
2009, the Company filed the Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These shares were issued at a value of $0.51 per share for a total
cost of $80,333 which has been included in selling, general and administrative
expenses for the year ended March 31, 2009 (see Note 10).
NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS
Effective
October 1, 2002, the Company adopted the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002
Plan”). The stockholders of the Company approved the 2002 Plan on October 1,
2002. Under the 2002 Plan, incentive stock options and nonqualified
options may be granted to officers, employees and consultants of the Company for
the purchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The
exercise price per share under the incentive stock option plan shall not be less
than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. The exercise
price per share under the non-qualified stock option plan shall not be less than
85% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant. Expiration dates
for the grants may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. The 2002
Plan terminates on October 1, 2012.
F-42
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS, continued
No
incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options were granted during the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. All options granted have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant, vest upon
grant or agreed upon vesting schedules and expire five years from the date of
grant. Total compensation expense recognized in the years ended March
31, 2009 and 2008 for options issued to consultants in prior years was zero.
During the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, 239,693 and 50,000,
respectively, options were exercised. As of March 31, 2009 and
2008, there were 2,198,920 and 2,438,613 options outstanding, respectively, at
an average exercise price of $0.49 and $0.45 per share, respectively, under the
2002 Plan. There were no stock options granted subsequent to
March 31, 2009. The Company had 2,511,387 options available for grant under
the 2002 Plan at March 31, 2009.
From time
to time, the Company issues warrants pursuant to various consulting agreements
and other compensatory arrangements.
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued a total of 6,261,375 warrants
to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an average price of $0.42
per share to 79 individual investors in connection with funds raised in private
placement offerings. The warrants were issued with exercise periods
of 18 months originating from the related investment dates. The
expiration dates ranged from December 2008 to October 2009.
In July
2007, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 699,438 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an average exercise price of $0.29 per share to a
broker in connection with funds raised in previous private placement
offerings. These warrants have 5 year terms beginning from the
dates of the placement offerings and the expiration dates range from March 2011
to March 2012.
On July
2, 2007, in connection with the facility lease agreement, the Company issued
10,000 warrants to the lessor, at an exercise price of $1.55 per share for a
period of two years, valued at $15,486 as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The Company is amortizing the value of the
warrants over the life of the lease and the remaining unamortized value of the
warrants has been recorded in other long term assets. As of March 31, 2009 and
2008, the unamortized balance of the value of the warrants issued to the lessor
was $2,970 and $10,074, respectively and $7,104 and $5,412, respectively, has
been included in selling, general and administrative expenses as additional rent
expense for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
F-43
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS, continued
On July
30, 2007, in connection with the purchase of manufacturing equipment, the
Company issued 79,208 warrants to the seller at an exercise price of $1.01 per
share, with a five year term. The Company has determined the fair
value of the issued warrants, based on the Black-Scholes pricing model, to be
$79,926 as of the date of grant of which $10,000 has been recorded as fixed
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2009 and
2008 (which approximates the fair market value of the equipment acquired) and
$69,926 has been recorded as consulting expense and is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses for services performed by the seller for the
year ended March 31, 2008.
On August
21, 2007, in connection with the extension of payment terms of outstanding
amounts owed, the Company issued 20,000 warrants to First Capital Investors,
LLC, at an exercise price of $0.75 per share with a term of two
years. The Company has determined the fair value of the issued
warrants, based on the Black-Scholes pricing model, to be $14,984 as of the date
of grant which has been recorded as consulting and compensation expense and is
included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
March 31, 2008.
On
October 1, 2007, in connection with the convertible debenture financing
transaction, the Company issued to the investors five-year warrants to purchase
5,604,411 shares of common stock at $0.92 per share and two-year warrants to
purchase 1,401,103 shares of common stock at $0.90 per share and 1,401,103
shares of common stock at $1.60 per share. These warrants were
subsequently increased to a total of 17,283,257, the exercise prices reset to
$0.60 and expiration dates extended to January 1, 2014 as a result of the April
2008 and January 2009 Amendments (see Note 10).
Also in
connection with the convertible debenture financing transaction, in October
2007, the Company issued Joseph Stevens and Company three year warrants to
purchase 560,364 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.84 per share (see
Note 10).
In
October 2007, the Company engaged the firm of Carpe DM, Inc. to perform the
services as the Company’s investor relations and public relations representative
for a monthly fee of $7,500 per month. Pursuant to the terms of this
36 month consulting agreement, the Company issued 150,000 S-8 registered shares
at $0.80 per share and a total value of $120,000, and 250,000 fully vested and
non forfeitable warrants at an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of
two and one-half years, valued at $229,834 as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The Company has recorded the combined value of
$349,834 of the shares and warrants issued as prepaid expense which is being
amortized over the life of the services agreement (see Note 11).
F-44
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS, continued
During
fiscal 2009, the Company issued a total of 1,840,400 warrants to various board
members, advisory board members, employees, and ongoing consultants to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock. The weighted average exercise price of
these warrants is $0.79. The exercise prices of these warrants are
equal to the fair values of the Company’s shares as of the dates of each
grant. The Company has determined the aggregate fair value of the
issued warrants, based on the Black-Scholes pricing model, to be approximately
$990,480 as of the dates of each grant. The assumptions used under
the Black-Scholes pricing model included: a risk free rate ranging from 1.52% to
3.15%; volatility ranging from 201% to 266%; an expected exercise term of 5
years; and no annual dividend rate. Of total fair market value of
$751,325 for warrants issued and vested during fiscal 2009, $232,964 was
recorded as a portion of the capitalized software development costs and $518,361
has been recorded as consulting and compensation expense and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended March 31,
2009. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company had $287,722 and
$105,965, respectively, related to unvested warrants which will be recognized as
selling, general and administrative expenses in future periods as the warrants
become vested. In addition, during fiscal 2009 the Company recognized
$57,398 of compensation expense related to the vesting of warrants issued in
prior years which is included in general and administrative expenses for the
year ended March 31, 2009.
During
fiscal 2008, the Company issued a total of 887,800 warrants to various board
members, advisory board members, employees, and ongoing consultants to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock. The weighted average exercise price of
these warrants is $0.97. The exercise prices of these warrants are
equal to the fair values of the Company’s shares as of the dates of each
grant. The Company has determined the aggregate fair value of the
issued warrants, based on the Black-Scholes pricing model, to be approximately
$858,105 as of the dates of each grant. The assumptions used under
the Black-Scholes pricing model included: a risk free rate ranging from 3.74% to
4.75%; volatility ranging from 229% to 293%; an expected exercise term of 5
years; and no annual dividend rate. Of this total fair market value
of warrants, $742,140 has been recorded as consulting and compensation expense
and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year
ended March 31, 2008 and $105,965 relates to unvested warrants which will be
recognized as the warrants become vested.
On May
27, 2008, in connection with the convertible debenture financing transaction,
the Company issued to the investors five-year warrants to purchase 1,488,095
shares of common stock at $0.92 per share and 1,488,095 shares of common stock
at $1.35 per share. These warrants were subsequently increased to a
total of 5,629,960, the exercise prices reset to $0.60 and expiration dates
extended to January 1, 2014 as a result of the April 2008 and January 2009
Amendments (see Note 10).
Certain
warrants issued in conjunction with compensation and fundraising activities
contain a cashless exercise provision. Under the provision, the
holder of the warrant surrenders those warrants whose fair market value is
sufficient to affect the exercise of the entire warrant quantity. The warrant
holder then is issued shares based on the remaining net warrant and no proceeds
are obtained by the Company. The surrendered warrants are cancelled
by the Company in connection with this transaction.
F-45
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS, continued
The
following represents a summary of all stock option and warrant activity for the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
and
Warrants
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options
and
Warrants
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of year
|
20,397,271
|
$
|
0.74
|
4,520,021
|
$
|
0.58
|
||||||||||
Issued
|
16,519,340
|
0.62
|
17,174,802
|
0.77
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(232,715
|
)
|
0.04
|
(621,719
|
)
|
0.32
|
||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(47,603
|
)
|
2.50
|
(675,833
|
)
|
0.96
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
36,636,293
|
$
|
0.59
|
20,397,271
|
$
|
0.74
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of year
|
36,086,293
|
$
|
0.59
|
20,297,271
|
$
|
0.74
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average fair value of warrants issued
|
$
|
0.70
|
$
|
1.12
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants
outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009:
Warrants
and Options
Outstanding
|
Warrants
and Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
Price
|
Number
of
Options
and
Warrants
Outstanding
And
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
–Years
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||||||
$
|
1.05
- $3.50
|
1,098,950
|
5.6
|
$
|
1.42
|
1,048,950
|
$
|
1.44
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
0.80
- $1.00
|
3,319,132
|
6.2
|
$
|
0.90
|
2,819,132
|
$
|
0.91
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
0.50
- $0.75
|
25,380,822
|
5.8
|
$
|
0.60
|
25,380,822
|
$
|
0.60
|
||||||||||||||
$
|
0.04
- $0.30
|
6,837,389
|
1.2
|
$
|
0.28
|
6,837,389
|
$
|
0.28
|
||||||||||||||
36,636,293
|
36,086,293
|
F-46
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
In August
2006, Peter Berry, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, agreed to
convert his deferred salaries to a long-term note payable. Under the terms of
this note, the Company began to make monthly payments of $3,000 to Mr. Berry in
January 2007. In January 2008, these monthly payments increased to $6,000 and
will remain at that amount until the loan is fully paid in December 2010.
Interest of 6% per annum on the outstanding principal balance of the note began
to accrue on January 1, 2008. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, the
total amount of deferred salaries and accrued interest under this arrangement
was $157,688 and $201,115, respectively, of which $67,688 and $129,115,
respectively is recorded as a long-term liability in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense related to this note
was $10,573 and $3,165, respectively for the years ended March 31, 2009 and
2008. Accrued interest related to this note payable amounted to
$13,738 and $3,165 at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in
the note payable to officer in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In
January 2009, Mr. Berry agreed to defer the monthly payments of the note due
from January 31, 2009 through June 30, 2009. As of March 1, 2009 these unpaid
payments totaled $18,000 and are included in the current liability portion of
the note payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. (see Note
9). Mr. Berry resigned his position as Chief Executive Officer in
February 2009, however remains a director on the Board and continues to work as
a consultant for the Company.
Since
June 2005, the Company has retained the legal services of Gary C. Cannon,
Attorney at Law, for a monthly retainer fee. From June 2005 to May
2009, Mr. Cannon also served as the Company’s Secretary and a member of the
Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Cannon continues to serve as
Corporate Legal Counsel for the Company and serves as a member of the Advisory
Board. In December 2007, Mr. Cannon’s monthly retainer for legal services was
increased from $6,500 per month to $9,000 per month. During the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the total amount expensed by the Company for
retainer fees and out of pocket expenses was $108,050 and $88,248,
respectively. From October 2008 through March 31, 2009 Mr. Cannon
agreed to defer a portion of his monthly payments and as of March 31, 2009 a
total of $15,000 had been deferred is included in accounts payable in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, during the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, The Company expensed board fees for Mr.
Cannon totaling $24,000 and $12,650, respectively and at March 31, 2009 $15,000
of deferred board fees was included in accrued expenses. During
fiscal year 2009 Mr. Cannon was granted a total of 95,150 warrants with an
average exercise price of $0.67 per share, and 72,800 warrants with an average
exercise price of $0.93 during fiscal 2008. All warrants granted to Mr. Cannon
were issued with an exercise price of greater than or equal to the fair value of
the Company’s shares on the grant date.
F-47
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS, continued
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had aggregate principal balances of
$1,129,500 and $1,249,500, respectively, in outstanding unsecured indebtedness
owed to five related parties, including four former members of the board of
directors, representing working capital advances made to the Company from
February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the
rate of 6% per annum and provide for aggregate monthly principal payments which
commenced April 1, 2006 of $2,500, and which increased by an aggregate of $2,500
every six months to the current maximum aggregate payment of $10,000 per month.
Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on
various dates through March 1, 2015.
Related-party
interest expense under these notes was $71,646 and $78,243 for the years ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Accrued interest, which is
included in related party notes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets, related to these notes amounted to $554,260 and $482,584 as of March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had
not made the required payments under the related party notes which were due on
January 1, February 1, and March 1, 2009. However, pursuant to the
note agreements, the Company has a 120-day grace period to pay missed payments
before the notes are in default. On April 29, 2009, May 30, 2009, and
June 26, 2009, the Company paid the January 1, February 1 and March 1 payments
respectively, due on these related party notes. Management expects to
continue to pay all payments due prior to the expiration of the 120-day grace
periods.
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
In March
2009 the Company entered into an Agency Agreement with a broker to raise capital
in a private placement offering of one-year convertible debentures under
Regulation D (the “Private Placement Debentures”). From March
through June 2009, the Company intends to raise up to a maximum of
$1,500,000 under this private placement offering of convertible debenture
debt. On March 31, 2009, the Company had received initial gross
proceeds of $60,000 under this private placement offering of convertible
debentures. Through June 22, 2009 the Company had raised an additional $904,500
under the Private Placement Debentures. Related to the issuance of
the convertible debentures, the Company paid additional commissions to the
broker totaling $54,270 which will be capitalized as deferred financing costs.
The deferred financing costs will be amortized to interest expense by the
Company through the maturity dates of the debentures on a straight-line basis
which approximates the effective interest method.
The
Company may elect to make principal redemptions on the maturity dates of the
debentures in shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.51. At
any time, holders may convert the debentures into shares of common stock at the
fixed conversion price of $0.51. The conversion price is subject to adjustment
in the event the Company issues the next equity financing of at least $2,500,000
at a price below $0.51.
F-48
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS,
continued
Per the
terms of the convertible debenture agreements, the notes have a term of one year
from issuance and are redeemable by the Company with two days
notice. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and are convertible
into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of
$0.51. As of June 22, 2009 the total gross proceeds raised in
connection with these Private Placement Debentures was $964,500.
In
connection with the financing transaction, since March 31, 2009, the Company has
issued to the investors additional five-year warrants (the “Private Placement
Warrants”) to purchase 354,714 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.51 per
share. The exercise price of the warrants is subject to adjustment in the event
the Company issues the next equity financing of at least $2,500,000 at a price
below $0.51. As of June 22, 2009 the Company had issued a total of
378,243 Private Placement Warrants in connection with these Private Placement
Debentures.
The
Company will calculate the value of the Private Placement Warrants relative to
the total amount of the debt offering which will be recorded as a debt discount
and amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method through
the maturity dates of the notes.
In April
2009, the Company issued 64,000 shares of unrestricted common stock in lieu of
fees paid to a consultant pursuant to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on April 13,
2009. These shares were issued at a value of $0.51 per share for a
total cost of $32,640 which will be reported in selling, general and
administrative expenses for the Company in the quarter ending June 30,
2009.
In June
2009, the Company issued 145,425 shares of unrestricted common stock in lieu of
fees paid to various consultants pursuant to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on
June 11, 2009. These shares were issued at a value of $0.51 per share
for a total cost of $74,167 which will be reported in selling, general and
administrative and research and development expenses for the Company in the
quarter ending June 30, 2009.
On April
1, 2009, the Company issued 111,360 common stock shares to the October 2007 and
May 2008 Debenture holders for total payments of $44,544 interest accrued as of
March 31, 2009 using the conversion rate of $0.40. Through June 22,
2009 an additional 222,720 common stock shares have been issued using the
conversion rate of $0.40 for the payment of $89,088 of accrued interest on the
October 2007 and May 2008 Convertible Debentures.
In May
2009 the October 2007 Convertible Debenture holders redeemed principal balances
totaling $713,000 in exchange for 1,398,039 common stock shares using the
conversion rate of $0.51.
In May
2009, the Company issued 110,345 shares of common stock from exercises of a
total of 119,000 cashless stock options.
F-49
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS,
continued
In April
2009, the Company issued a total of 200,000 warrants in lieu of payment to
consultants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an average
exercise price of $0.51 per share. The exercise prices of these
warrants are greater than or equal to the fair values of the Company’s shares as
of the dates of each grant. The fair market value of the warrants
based on the Black-Scholes pricing model will be recorded as consulting and
compensation expense and included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the quarter ending June 30, 2009.
During
the period April through June 2009, the Company issued a total of 209,800
warrants to various board members, advisory board members, employees, and
ongoing consultants as part of a previously approved and ongoing compensation
plan to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an average exercise
price of $0.56 per share. The exercise prices of these warrants are
greater than or equal to the fair values of the Company’s shares as of the dates
of each grant. The fair market value of the warrants based on the
Black-Scholes pricing model will be recorded as consulting and compensation
expense and included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
quarter ending June 30, 2009.
F-50
CRYOPORT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
September
30,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,120,758
|
$
|
249,758
|
||||
Restricted
cash
|
102,115
|
101,053
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
7,273
|
2,546
|
||||||
Inventories
|
-
|
530,241
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
140,778
|
170,399
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
1,370,924
|
1,053,997
|
||||||
Fixed
assets, net
|
613,755
|
189,301
|
||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
259,616
|
264,364
|
||||||
Deferred
financing costs, net
|
193,773
|
3,600
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
-
|
61,294
|
||||||
$
|
2,438,068
|
$
|
1,572,556
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
393,701
|
$
|
218,433
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
370,984
|
90,547
|
||||||
Accrued
warranty costs
|
-
|
18,743
|
||||||
Accrued
salaries and related
|
244,730
|
206,180
|
||||||
Convertible
notes payable and accrued interest, net of discount of $775,960
(unaudited) at September 30, 2009 and $13,586 at March 31,
2009
|
639,647
|
46,414
|
||||||
Current
portion of convertible notes payable and accrued interest, net of discount
of $2,468,355 (unaudited) at September 30, 2009 and $662,583 at March
31, 2009
|
3,883,070
|
3,836,385
|
||||||
Line
of credit and accrued interest
|
90,310
|
90,310
|
||||||
Current
portion of related party notes payable
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
||||||
Current
portion of note payable to former officer
|
96,000
|
90,000
|
||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
18,404,578
|
-
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
24,273,020
|
4,747,012
|
||||||
Related
party notes payable and accrued interest, net of current
portion
|
1,506,898
|
1,533,760
|
||||||
Note
payable to former officer and accrued interest, net of current
portion
|
36,476
|
67,688
|
||||||
Convertible
notes payable, net of current portion and discount of $6,351,425 at
September 30, 2009 and $6,681,629 at March 31,
2009
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
25,816,394
|
6,348,460
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 125,000,000 shares authorized; 47,585,635
(unaudited) at September 30, 2009 and 41,861,941 at March 31, 2009
shares issued and outstanding
|
47,587
|
41,863
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
24,402,380
|
25,816,588
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(47,828,293
|
)
|
(30,634,355
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(23,378,326
|
)
|
(4,775,904
|
)
|
||||
$
|
2,438,068
|
$
|
1,572,556
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited
consolidated financial statements
F-51
CRYOPORT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
The
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
For
The
Six
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues
|
|
$
|
8,478
|
|
|
$
|
5,982
|
|
|
$
|
22,181
|
|
|
$
|
19,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
|
177,267
|
|
|
|
134,953
|
|
|
|
326,444
|
|
|
|
253,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
loss
|
|
(168,789
|
)
|
|
|
(128,971
|
)
|
|
|
(304,263
|
)
|
|
|
(233,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
779,193
|
|
|
|
779,691
|
|
|
|
1,507,502
|
|
|
|
1,339,731
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
93,066
|
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
180,791
|
|
|
|
216,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
872,259
|
|
|
|
885,144
|
|
|
|
1,688,293
|
|
|
|
1,555,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(1,041,048
|
)
|
|
|
(1,014,115
|
)
|
|
|
(1,992,556
|
)
|
|
|
(1,789,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
11,194
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
24,008
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,610,059)
|
|
|
|
(658,099
|
)
|
|
|
(4,143,256)
|
|
|
|
(1,213,868
|
)
|
Loss
on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(797)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(4,535,848)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,401,550)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain
(loss) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91,727
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,811,214)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other expense, net
|
|
|
(6,143,674)
|
|
|
|
(555,178
|
)
|
|
|
(5,541,889
|
)
|
|
|
(8,001,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,184,722
|
)
|
|
|
(1,569,293
|
)
|
|
|
(7,534,445
|
)
|
|
|
(9,790,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(7,186,322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,569,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,536,045)
|
|
|
$
|
(9,791,774
|
)
|
Net
loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
|
46,154,705
|
|
|
|
41,167,472
|
|
|
|
44,555,961
|
|
|
|
41,093,181
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
F-52
CRYOPORT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For
The Six Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(7,536,045
|
)
|
$
|
(9,791,774
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
62,865
|
30,554
|
||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
25,579
|
27,929
|
||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
3,737,569
|
958,586
|
||||||
Stock
issued to consultants
|
118,807
|
105,670
|
||||||
Fair
value of warrants issued to employees and directors
|
352,744
|
337,356
|
||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument
|
1,401,550
|
-
|
||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
6,811,214
|
||||||
Loss
on sale of assets
|
797
|
-
|
||||||
Interest
earned on restricted cash
|
(1,062
|
)
|
(4,526
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(4,727
|
)
|
16,938
|
|||||
Inventories
|
81,012
|
(299,393
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
29,643
|
88,466
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
175,268
|
14,535
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
112,371
|
(245)
|
||||||
Accrued
warranty costs
|
(18,743
|
)
|
(5,625
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
salaries and related
|
38,550
|
(8,225
|
)
|
|||||
Accrued
interest
|
278,325
|
134,518
|
||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,145,497
|
)
|
(1,584,022
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of intangible assets
|
(24,372
|
)
|
(633
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of fixed assets
|
(9,767
|
)
|
(53,043
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(34,139
|
)
|
(53,676
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from borrowings under convertible notes
|
1,321,500
|
1,062,500
|
||||||
Repayment
of convertible notes
|
-
|
(117,720
|
)
|
|||||
Repayment
of borrowings on line of credit, net
|
-
|
(22,500
|
)
|
|||||
Payment
of deferred financing costs
|
(129,290
|
)
|
(191,875
|
)
|
||||
Repayment
of note payable
|
-
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|||||
Repayments
of related party notes payable
|
(60,000
|
)
|
(60,000
|
)
|
||||
Repayments
of note payable to officer
|
(30,000
|
)
|
(36,000
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of fees associated with exercise of warrants
|
(51,174
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of options and warrants
|
999,600
|
3,308
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
2,050,636
|
625,713
|
||||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
871,000
|
(1,011,985
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
249,758
|
2,231,031
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
1,120,758
|
$
|
1,219,046
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
F-53
CRYOPORT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For
The Six Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
3,573
|
$
|
92,757
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1,600
|
$
|
800
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash activities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
financing costs in connection with S-1
|
$
|
74,518
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Deferred
financing costs in connection with convertible debt financing and debt
modifications
|
$
|
11,944
|
$
|
117,530
|
||||
Fair
value of warrants to be issued as cost incurred in connection with warrant
exercises
|
$
|
81,604
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Debt
discount in connection with convertible debt
financing
|
$
|
1,483,415
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
||||
Conversion
of debt and accrued interest to common stock
|
$
|
984,254
|
$
|
5,446
|
||||
Reclassification
of embedded conversion feature to equity
|
$
|
646,102
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Cashless
exercise of warrants
|
$
|
110
|
$
|
150
|
||||
Cancellation
of shares issued for debt principal reduction
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
117,720
|
||||
Accrued
interest added to principal amount of debentures
|
$
|
79,582
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Estimated
fair value of warrants issued in connection of debt
modification
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,858,344
|
||||
Cumulative
effect of accounting change to debt discount for derivative
liabilities
|
$
|
2,595,095
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Cumulative
effect of accounting change to accumulated deficit for derivative
liabilities
|
$
|
9,657,893
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Cumulative
effect of accounting change to additional paid-in capital for derivative
liabilities
|
$
|
4,217,730
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Reclassification
of inventory to fixed assets
|
$
|
449,229
|
$
|
-
|
F-54
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 1 - MANAGEMENT’S
REPRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
CryoPort, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim
financial information, and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article
8 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statement presentation. However, the
Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included.
Operating
results for the six months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31,
2010. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2009.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 16, 2009, the filing
date of this form 10-Q, and determined that no subsequent events have occurred
that would require recognition in the condensed consolidated financial
statements or disclosure in the notes thereto other than as disclosed in the
accompanying notes.
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
The
Company is a provider of an innovative cold chain frozen shipping system
dedicated to providing superior, affordable cryogenic shipping solutions that
ensure the safety, status and temperature, of high value, temperature sensitive
materials. The Company has developed a line of cost-effective
reusable cryogenic transport containers capable of transporting biological,
environmental and other temperature sensitive materials at temperatures below 0°
Celsius. These dry vapor shippers are the first significant
alternative to using dry ice and achieve 10+ day holding times compared to 1–2
day holding times with dry ice. The Company provides safe transportation
and an environmentally friendly, long lasting shipper. These value-added
services include an internet-based web portal that enables the customer to
initiate shipping service and allows the customer to track the progress and
status of a shipment and in-transit temperature monitoring services of the
shipper. CryoPort also provides to its customer at their pick up
location, the fully ready charged shipper containing all freight bills, customs
documents and regulatory paperwork for the entire journey of the
shipper.
The
Company's principal focus has been the further development and commercial launch
of CryoPort Express® Portal – an innovative IT solution for shipping and
tracking high-value specimens through overnight shipping companies –
and its CryoPort Express® Shipper, a line of dry vapor
cryogenic shippers for the transport of biological and pharmaceutical
materials. A dry vapor cryogenic shipper is a container that uses
liquid nitrogen in dry vapor form, which is suspended inside a vacuum insulated
bottle as a refrigerant, to provide storage temperatures below minus 150°
Celsius. The dry vapor shipper is designed using innovative,
proprietary, and patent pending technology such that there can be no pressure
build up as the liquid nitrogen evaporates, nor any spillage of liquid
nitrogen. A proprietary foam retention system is employed to ensure
that liquid nitrogen stays inside the vacuum container even when placed
upside-down or on its side as is often the case when in the custody of a
shipping company. Biological specimens are stored in a specimen
chamber, “well”, inside the container and refrigeration is provided by harmless cold nitrogen gas
evolving from the liquid nitrogen entrapped within the foam retention system
surrounding the well. Biological specimens transported using our
cryogenic shipper can include clinical samples, diagnostics, live cell
pharmaceutical products, such as cancer vaccines, semen and embryos, infectious
substances and other items that require and/or are protected through continuous
exposure to frozen or cryogenic temperatures (less than -150° C).
F-55
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Going
Concern
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going
concern. The Company has not generated significant revenues from
operations and has no assurance of any future revenues. The Company
generated revenues from operations of $35,124, incurred a net loss of
$16,705,151 and used cash of $2,586,470 in its operating activities during the
year ended March 31, 2009. The Company generated revenues from
operations of $22,181, had net loss of $7,536,045, and used cash of $1,145,497
in its operating activities during the six months ended September 30,
2009. In addition, the Company had a working capital deficit of
$22,902,096, and has cash and cash equivalents of $1,120,758 at September 30,
2009. The Company’s working capital deficit at September 30, 2009
included $18,404,578 of derivative liabilities, the balance of which represented
the fair value of warrants and embedded conversion features related to the
Company’s convertible debentures which were reclassified from equity during
the six months ended September 30, 2009 (see Note 9). Currently
management has projected that cash on hand, including cash borrowed under the
convertible debentures issued in the first second, and third quarter
of fiscal 2010, will be sufficient to allow the Company to continue its
operations only into the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 until more significant
funding can be secured. These matters raise substantial doubt about
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Through
November 10, 2009, the Company had raised proceeds of $1,381,500 under the
Private Placement Debentures (see Note 8) and proceeds of $1,437,100 (see
Note 11 and 13) from the exercise of warrants. As a result of these
recent financings, the Company had an aggregate cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash balance of approximately $1,260,453 as of November 10, 2009
which will be used to fund the working capital required for minimal operations
including limited inventory build as well as limited sales efforts to advance
the Company’s commercialization of the CryoPort Express® Shippers until
additional capital is obtained. The Company’s management recognizes that the
Company must obtain additional capital for the achievement of sustained
profitable operations. Management’s plans include obtaining
additional capital through equity and debt funding sources; however, no
assurance can be given that additional capital, if needed, will be available
when required or upon terms acceptable to the Company or that the Company will
be successful in its efforts to negotiate extension of its existing
debt. In this regard on October 6, 2009 the Company filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-162350) for a possible underwritten public offering of units, each unit
to consist of one share of common and one warrant to purchase one share of
common stock. Management cannot assure you that this contemplated
offering will be consummated, or if consummated, whether the proceeds from such
offering will be sufficient to fund the Company’s planned operations. The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP.
Principles of
Consolidation
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CryoPort,
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, CryoPort Systems, Inc. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
F-56
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
from estimated amounts. The Company’s significant estimates include allowances
for doubtful accounts and sales returns, recoverability of long-lived assets,
realizability of inventories, accrued warranty costs, deferred tax assets and
their accompanying valuations, product liability reserves, valuation of
derivative liabilities and the valuations of common stock, warrants and stock
options issued for products or services.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days
or less to be cash equivalents.
Concentrations of Credit
Risk
Cash
and cash equivalents
The
Company maintains its cash accounts in financial
institutions. Accounts at these institutions are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Effective October 3,
2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 raised the FDIC deposit
coverage limits to $250,000 per owner from $100,000 per owner. At
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had $1,058,485 and $121,042,
respectively, of cash balances, including restricted cash, which were in excess
of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these
institutions to limit its concentration risk exposure.
Restricted
cash
The
Company has invested cash in a one year restricted certificate of deposit
bearing interest at 2.32% which serves as collateral for borrowings under a line
of credit agreement (see Note 6). At September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, the balance in the certificate of deposit was $102,115 and $101,053,
respectively.
Customers
The
Company grants credit to customers within the United States of America and to a
limited number of international customers and does not require collateral. Sales
to international customers are generally secured by advance payments except for
a limited number of established foreign customers. The Company
generally requires advance or credit card payments for initial sales to new
customers. The Company’s ability to collect receivables is affected
by economic fluctuations in the geographic areas and industries served by the
Company. Reserves for uncollectible amounts and estimated sales
returns are provided based on past experience and a specific analysis of the
accounts which management believes are sufficient. Accounts
receivable at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 are net of reserves for
doubtful accounts and sales returns of approximately of zero and $600,
respectively. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual
collections may differ from the estimated amounts.
F-57
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
The
Company has foreign sales primarily in Europe, Canada, India and
Australia. Foreign sales were approximately $2,200 and $10,700 which
constituted approximately 26% and 48%, of net sales for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $300 and $6,500 which
constituted approximately 5% and 33%, of net sales for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
The
majority of the Company’s customers are in the biotechnology, pharmaceutical and
life science industries. Consequently, there is a concentration of receivables
within these industries, which is subject to normal credit risk.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, accounts receivable, related-party notes payable, note payable to officer,
a line of credit, convertible notes payable, accounts payable and accrued
expenses. The carrying value for all such instruments, except the related party
notes payable, approximates fair value at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009.
The difference between the fair value and recorded values of the related party
notes payable is not material.
Inventories
Inventories
were stated at the lower of standard cost or current estimated market
value. Cost was determined using the standard cost method which
approximates the first-in, first-out method. The Company periodically
reviewed its inventories and recorded a provision for excess and obsolete
inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product
demand and production requirements. Once established, write-downs of
inventories were considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the
obsolete or excess inventories. Raw materials, work in process and
finished goods included material costs less reserves for obsolete or excess
inventories.
The
Company provides shipping containers to their customers and charges a fee in
exchange for the use of the container. The Company’s arrangements are
similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use
the containers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the
containers and provides its customers the use of the container for a specified
shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to the Company. As a result, during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the Company reclassified the containers from inventory
to fixed assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program (see Note
3).
Fixed
Assets
Depreciation
and amortization of fixed assets are provided using the straight-line method
over the following useful lives:
Cryogenic
shippers
|
3
Years
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
years
|
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
5-7
years
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Lesser
of lease term or estimated useful
life
|
F-58
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Betterments,
renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are
capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The
cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired are
removed from the accounts, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in
current operations.
The
Company provides shipping containers to their customers and charges a fee in
exchange for the use of the container. The Company’s arrangements are
similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use
the containers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the
containers and provides its customers the use of the container for a specified
shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to the Company. As a result, during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the Company reclassified the containers from inventory
to fixed assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program (see Note
3).
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets are comprised of patents and trademarks and software development
costs. The Company capitalizes costs of obtaining patents and
trademarks which are amortized, using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful life of five years. The Company capitalizes certain
costs related to software developed for internal use. Software
development costs incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stages
are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application
development stage are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful life of the software, which is five
years. Capitalized costs include purchased materials and costs of
services including the valuation of warrants issued to consultants using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company’s management assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets upon
the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the depreciation and
amortization of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered
through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of long-lived asset
impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations
in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management.
At September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company’s management believes
there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance
however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s
products will continue, which could result in impairment of its long-lived
assets in the future.
Deferred Financing
Costs
Deferred
financing costs represent costs incurred in connection with the Company’s
planned public offering of units and issuance of the convertible notes
payable. Deferred financing costs are being amortized over the term
of the financing instrument on a straight-line basis, which approximates the
effective interest method. During the six month periods ended September 30,
2009, the Company capitalized deferred financing costs of $215,752, of which
$124,518 related to the Company’s planned public offering and will be
reclassified to paid-in capital and netted against the proceeds of the offering
upon completion. Amortization of deferred financing costs was $17,675
and $25,579 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, and $10,767 and $27,929 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively.
F-59
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
The
following represents the activity in the warranty accrual account during the six
month period ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended March 31,
2009:
September
30,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|||||||
Beginning
warranty accrual
|
$
|
18,743
|
$
|
29,993
|
||||
Increase
in accrual (charged to cost of sales)
|
-
|
750
|
||||||
Charges
to accrual (product replacements)
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
||||||
Reversal
of remaining accrual due to expected future claims
|
(18,743)
|
-
|
||||||
Ending
warranty accrual
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
18,743
|
Derivative
Liabilities
Effective
April 1, 2009, certain of the Company's issued and outstanding common
stock purchase warrants and embedded conversion features previously treated as
equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded
equity treatment, and the fair value of these common stock purchase warrants and
embedded conversion features, some of which have exercise price reset features
and some that were issued with convertible debt, were reclassified from equity
to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability
since their date of issue. The common stock purchase warrants were
not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair
value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation. The
warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future changes in
the fair value of these warrants will be recognized currently in earnings until
such time as the warrants are exercised, expire or the related rights have been
waived. These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active
securities market, and as such, the Company estimates the fair value
of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model (see “Change in
Accounting Principle” section below and Note 9).
Convertible
Debentures
If the
conversion features of conventional convertible debt provide for a rate of
conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a
beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the
Company as a debt discount pursuant. In those circumstances, the convertible
debt will be recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. The
Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt
using the effective interest rate method (see Note 8).
Revenue
Recognition
Four
conditions must be met before revenue can be recognized: (i) there is persuasive
evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or service has
been rendered; (iii) the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is
reasonably assured. The Company records a provision for sales returns and claims
based upon historical experience. Actual returns and claims in any future period
may differ from the Company’s estimates. During its early years, the
Company's limited revenue was derived from the sale of our reusable product
line. The Company's current business plan focuses on per-use leasing of the
shipping container and added-value services that will be used by us to provide
an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping solution.
The
Company provides shipping containers to their customers and charges a fee in
exchange for the use of the container. The Company’ arrangements are
similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use
the containers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the
containers and provides its customers the use of the container for a specified
shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to the Company.
F-60
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Accounting for Shipping and
Handling Revenue, Fees and Costs
The
Company classifies amounts billed for shipping and handling as revenue. Shipping
and handling fees and costs are included in cost of sales.
Advertising
Costs
The
Company expenses the cost of advertising when incurred as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses. During the six month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company expensed approximately $9,000 and
$51,000, respectively, in advertising costs.
Research and Development
Expenses
The
Company expenses internal research and development costs as incurred. Third
party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has
been performed.
Stock-Based
Compensation
All
share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee
stock options and warrants, are recognized in the consolidated financial
statements based upon their fair values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to estimate the grant-date fair value of share-based
awards. Fair value is determined at the date of grant. The
consolidated financial statement effect of forfeitures is estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, if the actual effect differs from those
estimates. The estimated average forfeiture rate for the six month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero as the Company has not had a significant
history of forfeitures and does not expect forfeitures in the
future.
Stock
Option Plans
The
Company maintains two stock option plans, the 2002 Plan and the 2009 Plan. The
2002 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options and nonqualified
options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company to purchase the
Company’s shares at the fair value, as determined by management and the board of
directors, of such shares on the grant date. The options generally vest over a
five-year period beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares
under this plan and has 2,210,042 shares available for future
issuances.
On
October 9, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved and adopted the 2009 Plan,
which had previously been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August
31, 2009. The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock rights, restricted stock,
performance share units, performance shares, performance cash awards, stock
appreciation rights, and stock grant awards (collectively, “Awards”) to
employees, officers, non-employee directors, consultants and independent
contractors of the Company. A total of 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock is authorized for the granting of awards under the 2009 Plan. The number
of shares available for awards, as well as the terms of outstanding awards, are
subject to adjustment as provided in the 2009 Plan for stock splits, stock
dividends, recapitalizations and other similar events. Awards may be
granted under the 2009 Plan until October 9, 2019 or until all shares available
for awards under the 2009 Plan have been purchased or acquired. As of
September 30, 2009, no options had been granted under the 2009
Plan.
F-61
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Summary
of Assumptions and Activity
The fair
value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, even though this model was developed to
estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without
vesting restrictions, which differ significantly from the Company’s stock
options. The Black-Scholes model also requires subjective assumptions, including
future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly
affect the calculated values. The expected term of options granted is derived
from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment
termination behavior. The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant
is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that corresponds to the pricing term of the
grant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected volatility is based on
the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. These factors could
change in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation
expense in future periods.
The
following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to estimate the
per share fair values of stock warrants granted to employees and directors
during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
Stock
options and warrants:
|
||||||
Expected
term
|
4.75
- 5 years
|
5
years
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
195% –
197%
|
211%
|
||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.43%
– 2.58%
|
2.88%
|
||||
Expected
dividends
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A summary
of employee and director options and warrant activity for the six month period
ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (Yrs.)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
5,233,880
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||||||
Granted
|
310,000
|
$
|
0.53
|
|||||||
Exercised
|
(110,345
|
)
|
$
|
0.04
|
||||||
Forfeited
|
(8,655)
|
$
|
0.04
|
|||||||
Outstanding and
expected to vest at September 30, 2009
|
5,424,880
|
$
|
0.69
|
6.58
|
$
|
209,644
|
||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2009
|
4,774,800
|
$
|
0.68
|
6.28
|
$
|
208,644
|
F-62
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
There
were 210,000 warrants and 100,000 stock options with a weighted average fair
value of $0.53 per share granted to employees and directors during the six
months ended September 30, 2009 and 88,600 warrants and no stock options with a
weighted average fair value of $0.92 per share granted to employees and
directors during the six months ended September 30, 2008. In
connection with the warrants and options granted and the vesting of prior
warrants issued, during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Company recorded total charges of $190,462 and $337,356, respectively, which
have been included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations. No
employee or director warrants or stock options expired during the six months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company issues new shares from
its authorized shares upon exercise of warrants or options.
As of
September 30, 2009, there was $251,257 of unrecognized compensation cost related
to employee and director stock based compensation arrangements, which is
expected to be recognized over the next two years.
The
aggregate intrinsic value of stock options and warrants exercised during
the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $60,690 and
$203,012, respectively.
Issuance of Stock for
Non-Cash Consideration
All
issuances of the Company's stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a
per share amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the
value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The
majority of the non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by
consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares on
the dates issued. In certain instances, the Company has discounted the values
assigned to the issued shares for illiquidity and/or restrictions on
resale.
The
measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is
determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance
by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant
or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to
consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term
of the consulting agreement. The Company records the fair value of the fully
vested non-forfeitable common stock issued for future consulting services as
prepaid expenses in its consolidated balance sheets.
F-63
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for certain
deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not
realize tax assets through future operations. The Company is a subchapter "C"
corporation and files a federal income tax return. The Company files separate
state income tax returns for California and Nevada.
Basic and Diluted Loss Per
Share
Basic
loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by
dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all
dilutive potential common shares were issued. For the six months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company was in a loss position and the
basic and diluted loss per share are the same since the effect of stock options
and warrants on loss per share was anti-dilutive and thus not included in the
diluted loss per share calculation. The impact under the treasury stock method
of dilutive stock options and warrants and the if-converted method of
convertible debt would have resulted in weighted average common shares
outstanding of 66,572,876 and 67,039,579 for the three and six month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 58,965,164 and 58,459,328 for the three
and six month periods ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
F-64
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In
May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855-10, Subsequent Events, or ASC
855-10, which establishes general standards for accounting and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. The pronouncement requires
the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The Company
adopted ASC 855-10 and evaluated subsequent events through the issuance date of
the financial statements. ASC 855-10 did not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105-10, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or
ASC 105-10. ASC 105-10 became the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernment entities. It also modified the GAAP
hierarchy to include only two levels of GAAP; authoritative and
non-authoritative. The Company adopted ASC 105-10 for the reporting in its 2009
second quarter. The adoption did not have a significant impact on its
consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations or
consolidated statements of cash flows.
Change in Accounting
Principle
Equity-linked
instruments (or embedded features) that otherwise meet the definition of a
derivative are not accounted for as derivatives if certain criteria are met, one
of which is that the instrument (or embedded feature) must be indexed to the
entity’s own stock. The warrant and convertible debt agreements contain
adjustment (or ratchet) provisions and accordingly, we determined that
these instruments are not indexed to the Company’s common stock. As a
result, the Company is required to account for these instruments as derivatives
or liabilities. The Company applied these provisions to outstanding instruments
as of April 1, 2009. The cumulative effect at April 1, 2009 to record, at
fair value, a liability for the warrants and embedded conversion features,
including the effects on the discounts on the convertible notes of
$2,595,095, resulted in an aggregate reduction to equity
of $13,875,623 consisting of a reduction to additional paid-in capital
of $4,217,730 and an increase in the accumulated deficit of $9,657,893 to
reflect the change in the accounting. The warrants and embedded
conversion features will be carried at fair value and adjusted quarterly through
earnings.
The
following table summarizes the effect of the change in accounting principle on
the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of April 1, 2009:
As
Previously Reported
|
As
Adjusted
|
Cumulative
Adjustment
|
||||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Deficit:
|
||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
$
|
6,348,460
|
$
|
20,224,083
|
$
|
13,875,623
|
||||||
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
41,863
|
41,863
|
—
|
|||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
25,816,588
|
21,598,858
|
(4,217,730
|
)
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(30,634,355
|
)
|
(40,292,248
|
)
|
(9,657,893
|
)
|
||||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(4,775,904
|
)
|
(18,651,527
|
)
|
(13,875,623
|
)
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
$
|
1,572,556
|
$
|
1,572,556
|
$
|
—
|
F-65
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Fair Value
Measurements
The
Company determines the fair value of its derivative instruments using a
three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements which these assets and
liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of observable or
unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from
independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market
assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when
available. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value
hierarchy:
Level 1 —
Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for
identical securities. Currently the Company does not have any items classified
as Level 1.
Level 2 —
Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as
quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either
directly or indirectly. Currently the Company does not have any items classified
as Level 2.
Level 3 —
Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement, and involve management judgment. The Company used the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the
instruments.
If the
inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value
hierarchy, a financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The
following table presents the Company’s warrants and embedded conversion features
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and
April 1, 2009 (the Company’s adoption date of derivative liability
accounting) classified using the valuation hierarchy:
Level
3
|
Level
3
|
|||||||
Carrying
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
|||||||
September
30, 2009
|
April
1, 2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Embedded
Conversion Option
|
$
|
3,658,026
|
$
|
3,900,134
|
||||
Warrants
|
14,746,552
|
12,570,584
|
||||||
$
|
18,404,578
|
$
|
16,470,718
|
|||||
Increase
in fair value included in other expense
|
$
|
1,401,550
|
F-66
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 2 - ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
The
following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances
for the Company’s derivative liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3
inputs:
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
$
|
—
|
||
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle
|
16,470,718
|
|||
Derivative
liability added - warrants
|
389,781
|
|||
Derivative
liability added – conversion option
|
788,631
|
|||
Reclassification
of conversion feature to equity upon conversions of
notes
|
(646,102)
|
|||
Change
in fair value
|
1,401,550
|
|||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$
|
18,404,578
|
NOTE 3 -
INVENTORIES
Inventories
at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 consist of the following:
September
30,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
350,021
|
||||
Work
in process
|
-
|
7,253
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
-
|
172,967
|
||||||
$
|
-
|
$
|
530,241
|
During
its early years, the Company's limited revenue was derived from the sale of our
reusable product line. The Company's current business plan focuses on per-use
leasing of the shipping container and added-value services that will be used by
us to provide an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping solution.
The
Company provides shipping containers to their customers and charges a fee in
exchange for the use of the container. The Company’s arrangements are
similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use
the containers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the
containers and provides its customers the use of the container for a specified
shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to the Company. As a result, during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the Company reclassified the containers from inventory
to fixed assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program.
F-67
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 4 – FIXED
ASSETS
Fixed
assets consist of the following at September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009:
September
30,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cryogenic
shippers
|
$
|
449,229
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
23,253
|
23,253
|
||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
649,718
|
640,748
|
||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
19,426
|
19,426
|
||||||
1,141,626
|
683,427
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(527,871
|
)
|
(494,126
|
)
|
||||
$
|
613,755
|
$
|
189,301
|
During
its early years, the Company's limited revenue was derived from the sale of our
reusable product line. The Company's current business plan focuses on
per-use leasing of the shipping container and added-value services that will be
used by us to provide an end-to-end and cost-optimized shipping
solution.
The
Company provides shipping containers to their customers and charges a fee in
exchange for the use of the container. The Company’ arrangements are
similar to the accounting standard for leases since they convey the right to use
the containers over a period of time. The Company retains title to the
containers and provides its customers the use of the container for a specified
shipping cycle. At the culmination of the customer’s shipping cycle, the
container is returned to the Company. As a result, during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the Company reclassified the containers from inventory
to fixed assets upon commencement of the loaned-container program.
Depreciation and amortization expenses for fixed assets were $16,397 and $33,745
for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and
$15,923 and $30,554 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Intangible
assets are comprised of patents and trademarks and software developed for
internal uses. The gross book values and accumulated amortization as
of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 were as follows:
September
30,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Patents
and trademarks
|
$
|
71,747
|
$
|
47,375
|
||||
Software
|
282,112
|
282,112
|
||||||
353,859
|
329,487
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(94,243
|
)
|
(65,123
|
)
|
||||
$
|
259,616
|
$
|
264,364
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets was $14,966 and $29,120 for the three and six
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $0 for both the three
and six months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. All of
the Company’s intangible assets are subject to amortization.
F-68
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 6 – LINE OF
CREDIT
On
November 5, 2007, the Company secured financing for a $200,000 one-year
revolving line of credit (the “Line”) secured by a $200,000 Certificate of
Deposit with Bank of the West. On November 6, 2008, the Company secured a
one-year renewal of the Line for a reduced amount of $100,000 which is secured
by a $100,000 Certificate of Deposit with Bank of the West. All borrowings under
the revolving line of credit bear variable interest based on the prime rate
plus 1% per annum (totaling 4.25% as of September 30, 2009). The Company
utilizes the funds advanced from the Line for capital equipment purchases to
support the commercialization of the Company’s CryoPort Express® One-Way
Shipper. As of both September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the outstanding
balance of the Line was $90,310, including accrued interest of $310. During the
six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made principal
payments against the Line of $0 and $22,500, respectively, and recorded interest
expense of $1,840 and $2,118, respectively, related to the Line. No
funds were drawn against the Line during the six months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008.
NOTE 7 – NOTES
PAYABLE
Related Party Notes
Payable
As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had aggregate principal
balances of $1,069,500 and $1,129,500, respectively, in outstanding unsecured
indebtedness owed to five related parties, including four former members of the
board of directors, representing working capital advances made to the Company
from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at the rate of
6% per annum and provide for aggregate monthly principal payments which began
April 1, 2006 of $2,500, and which increased by an aggregate of $2,500 every six
months to a maximum of $10,000 per month. As of September 30, 2009,
the aggregate principal payments totaled $10,000 per month. Any
remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on various
dates through March 1, 2015.
Related-party
interest expense under these notes was $16,344 and $33,138 for the three and six
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $18,144 and $36,738 for
the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Accrued
interest, which is included in related party notes payable in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated balance sheets, related to these notes amounted to
$587,398 and $554,260 as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had not made the required payments under
the related-party notes which were due on July 1, August 1, and September 1,
2009. However, pursuant to the note agreements, the Company has a 120-day grace
period to pay missed payments before the notes are in default. On October 31,
2009, the Company paid the July 1 note payments due on these related party
notes. Management expects to continue to pay all payments due prior to the
expiration of the 120-day grace periods.
F-69
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Note Payable to Former
Officer
In August
2006, Peter Berry, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, agreed to
convert his deferred salaries to a long-term note payable. Under the terms of
this note, the Company began to make monthly payments of $3,000 to Mr. Berry in
January 2007. In January 2008, these monthly payments increased to $6,000 and
will remain at that amount until the loan is fully paid in December 2010.
Interest of 6% per annum on the outstanding principal balance of the note began
to accrue on January 1, 2008. As of September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, the total amount of deferred salaries and accrued interest under this
arrangement was $132,476 and $157,688, respectively, of which, $36,476 and
$67,688, respectively, is recorded as a long-term liability in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense related to
this note was $2,412 and $4,788 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and $2,714 and $5,657 for the three and
six months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Accrued interest related
to this note payable amounted to $18,526 and $13,738 at September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in the note payable to officer in
the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets. In January 2009, Mr.
Berry agreed to defer the monthly payments of the note due from January 31, 2009
through June 30, 2009. Effective August 26, 2009, pursuant to a letter agreement
(i) the Company agreed to pay Mr. Berry the sum of $30,000 plus accrued interest
representing past due payments from January to May 2009 previously waived by Mr.
Berry, (ii) Mr. Berry agreed to waive payments due to him through December 2009,
and (iii) the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Berry the sum of $42,000 plus accrued
interest on January 1, 2010, representing payments due to him from June 2009
thru December 2009. As of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 these unpaid
payments totaled $24,000 and $18,000, respectively, and are included in the
current liability portion of the note payable in the accompanying unaudited
consolidated balance sheets. In February 2009, Mr. Berry resigned his
position as Chief Executive Officer and on July 16, 2009. Mr. Berry
resigned his position from the Board on July 30, 2009.
NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE
The
Company’s convertible debenture balances are shown below:
September
30,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
October
2007 Debentures
|
$
|
5,018,647
|
$
|
5,356,073
|
||||
May
2008 Debentures
|
1,332,778
|
1,325,556
|
||||||
Private
Placement Debentures
|
1,381,500
|
60,000
|
||||||
Accrued
interest on Private Placement Debentures
|
34,107
|
44,544
|
||||||
7,767,032
|
6,786,173
|
|||||||
Debt
discount
|
(3,244,315
|
)
|
(2,903,374
|
)
|
||||
Total
convertible debentures, net
|
$
|
4,522,717
|
$
|
3,882,799
|
||||
Convertible
notes payable and accrued interest, net
|
$
|
639,647
|
$
|
46,414
|
||||
Current
portion of convertible notes payable, net
|
3,883,070
|
3,836,385
|
||||||
Convertible
notes payable, net
|
$
|
4,522,717
|
$
|
3,882,799
|
During
the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized an
aggregate of $1,468,879 and $3,737,569 in interest expense, respectively, due to
amortization of debt discount related to the warrants and embedded conversion
features associated with the Company’s outstanding convertible notes
payable. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2008,
the Company recognized an aggregate of $540,311 and $958,586 in interest
expense, respectively, due to amortization of debt discount related to the
warrants and embedded conversion features associated with the Company’s
outstanding convertible notes payable.
F-70
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
October 2007 and May 2008
Debentures
In May
2009, approximately $713,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted
by a note holder. Using the conversion rate of $0.51 per share
per the terms of the Debenture, 1,398,039 shares of common stock were issued to
the investor. In addition, the fair value of $593,303 related to the conversion
feature was reclassed from the liability for derivative instruments to
additional paid-in capital (see Note 9) and accelerated the recognition of
$508,886 of unamortized debt discount as interest expense.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company converted interest payments
due on the October 2007 and May 2008 convertible debentures (the "Debentures")
totaling $126,710 into 428,134 shares of common stock using the
conversion rate of $0.40.
On July
30, 2009, the Company entered into a Consent, Waiver and Agreement with the
holders of the Debentures (the “July Agreement”). Pursuant to the
terms of the July Agreement, the Holders (i) consented to the Company’s issuance
of convertible notes and warrants in connection with a bridge financing of up to
$1,500,000 which commenced in March 2009 (the “Bridge Financing”), and (ii)
waived, as it relates to the Bridge Financing, a covenant contained in the
Debentures not to incur any further indebtedness, except as otherwise permitted
by the Debentures. This Bridge Financing is more particularly
described below under the caption “Private Placement Debentures.” In
addition, in connection with the July Agreement, the Company and Holders
confirmed that (i) the exercise price of the warrants issued to the Holders in
connection with their purchase of the Debentures had been reduced, pursuant to
the terms of the warrants, to $0.51 as a result of the Bridge Financing, and
(ii) as a result of the foregoing decrease in the exercise price, pursuant to
the terms of the warrants (the “Warrants”), the number of shares underlying the
Warrants held by Holders of the Debentures had been proportionally increased by
4,043,507 pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreements. As a
result of the foregoing adjustments, the Company recognized a loss in other
expense due to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,608,540
and a corresponding increase to the liability for derivative
instruments.
On
September 17, 2009, the Company entered into an Amendment to Debentures and
Warrants, Agreement and Waiver (the “Amendment”) with the Holders the Company’s
outstanding Debentures and associated Warrants to purchase common stock, as such
Debentures and Warrants have been amended. The effective date
of the Amendment was September 1, 2009. The purpose of the Amendment
was to restructure the Company’s obligations under the outstanding Debentures in
order to reduce the amount of the required monthly principal payment and
temporarily defer the commencement of monthly principal payments (which was
scheduled to commence September 1, 2009) and ceased the continuing interest
payments for a period time.
The
following is a summary of the material terms of the Amendment:
1. The
Company must obtain stockholder approval of an amendment to its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares
of its common stock to 250,000,000, and file such amendment with the Nevada
Secretary of State, by December 31, 2009.
2. As
of September 1, 2009, the principal amount of the Debentures was increased by
$482,796, which was added to the outstanding principal balances and $403,214 was
recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the remaining life of the
Debentures of nine months. The increase reflected all accrued and
unpaid interest as of such date, plus all interest that would have accrued on
the principal amount (as increased as of September 1, 2009, to reflect the then
accrued but unpaid interest) from September 1, 2009, to July 1, 2010 (the
maturity date of the Debentures). The Company shall have no
obligation under the Debentures to make further payments of interest, and
interest shall cease to accrue, during the period September 1, 2009 to July 1,
2010.
F-71
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
3. The
conversion price of the Debentures was decreased from $0.51 per share to $0.45
per share, which resulted in an increase in the number shares of common stock
which the Debentures may be converted into, an increase in the liability for
derivative instruments of $802,200 and a corresponding loss was recorded in
other expense due to the change in fair value of derivatives.
4. The
commencement of the Company’s obligation to make monthly payments of principal
was deferred from September 1, 2009, to January 1, 2010, at which time the
Company will make monthly pro rata payments to the Holders in the aggregate
amount of $200,000 with a balloon payment due on the maturity date of July 1,
2010. Prior to the Amendment, the Company was obligated to repay the
entire outstanding principal amount of the debentures in twelve equal monthly
payments commencing on August 1, 2009.
5. The
Holders’ existing right to maintain a fully diluted ownership equal to 31.5% has
been increased by the Amendment to a fully diluted ownership of
34.5%.
6. The
exercise price of the outstanding Warrants was decreased from $0.51 per share to
$0.45 per share, which also resulted in a corresponding pro rata increase in the
number of shares that may be purchased upon exercise of the Warrants to an
aggregate of 30,550,955 shares. The reduction in exercise price of
the Warrants to $0.45 per share and the 3,594,230 share increase in the number
of Warrants resulted in an increase in the liability for derivative instruments
of $1,679,990 and a corresponding loss was recorded in other expense due to the
change in fair value of derivative liabilities.
7. The
following additional covenants were added to the Debentures (replacing similar
covenants which had terminated as of June 30, 2009) and shall remain in full
force so long as any of the Debentures remain outstanding (the “Covenant
Period”):
a. The
Company shall maintain a total cash balance of no less than $100,000 at all
times during the Covenant Period;
b. The
Company shall have an average monthly operating cash burn of no more than
$500,000 during the Covenant Period. Operating cash burn is defined by taking
net income (or loss) and adding back all non-cash items, and excludes changes in
assets, liabilities and financing activities;
c. The
Company shall have a minimum current ratio of 0.5 to 1 at all times during the
Covenant Period. This calculation is to be made by excluding the current portion
of the convertible notes payable and accrued interest, and liability from
derivative instruments from current liability for the current
ratio;
d. Accounts
payable shall not exceed $750,000 at any time during the Covenant
Period;
e. Accrued
salaries shall not exceed $350,000 at any time during the Covenant Period;
and
f. The
Company shall not make any revisions to the terms of the existing contractual
agreements for the Notes Payable to Former Officer, Related Party Notes Payable
and the Line of Credit (as each is referred to in the Company’s Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009); other than the previous amendment to the
payment terms of a note payable to the Company’s former CEO.
8. The
Company may not deliver a redemption notice with respect to the outstanding
Debentures until such time as the closing price of the Company’s common stock
shall have exceeded $0.70 (as adjusted for stock splits or similar transactions)
for ten consecutive trading days prior to the delivery of the redemption
notice.
On
September 22, 2009, the holders of the May 2008 Debentures converted $100,000
principal into 222,222 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $0.45. As a result of the conversion, the Company
reclassified $52,799 of the derivative liability related to the embedded
conversion feature to additional paid in capital and accelerated the recognition
of $41,277 of unamortized debt discount as interest expense.
F-72
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE, continued
During
the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized an
aggregate of $1,233,360 and $3,387,756 in interest expense, respectively, due to
amortization of debt discount related to the warrants and embedded conversion
features associated with the Company’s outstanding Debentures. During
the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized an
aggregate of $540,311 and $958,586 in interest expense, respectively, due to
amortization of debt discount related to the warrants and embedded conversion
features associated with the Company’s outstanding Debentures.
Private Placement
Debentures
In March
2009, the Company entered into an Agency Agreement with a broker to raise
capital in a private placement offering of one-year convertible debentures
pursuant to Regulation D of the Securities Act and the Rules promulgated
thereunder (the “Private Placement Debentures”). As of
September 30, 2009, the Company had received gross proceeds of $1,381,500
under this private placement offering of convertible debentures which includes
$395,000 and $1,321,500 raised during the three and six months ended September
30, 2009, respectively (also see Note 13 - Subsequent Events).
The
Company may elect to make principal redemptions on the maturity dates of the
debentures in shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.51 per
share. At any time, holders may convert the debentures into shares of common
stock at the fixed conversion price of $0.51. The conversion price is subject to
adjustment in the event the Company issues its next equity financing of at least
$2,500,000 at a price below $0.51 per share.
Per the
terms of the convertible debenture agreements, the notes have a term of one year
from issuance and are redeemable by the Company with two days
notice. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and are convertible
into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.51 per
share. In connection with the Private Placement Debentures, the
Company issued to investors an aggregate of 541,772 five-year warrants to
purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.51 per share (the “Private
Placement Warrants”), which includes 154,902 warrants and 518,242 warrants
issued to investors during the three and six months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The Company has determined the aggregate fair value of the issued
warrants as of the dates of each grant, based on the Black-Scholes pricing
model, to be approximately $72,642 and $291,571 for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2009. The exercise price of the warrants is subject to
adjustment in the event the Company issues its next equity financing of at least
$2,500,000 at a price below $0.51 per share. At September 30, 2009,
the aggregate fair value of the Private Placement Warrants was $252,971 and is
accounted for as a derivative liability (see Note 9).
In
connection with the issuance of the Private Placement Debentures, the Company
recognized a debt discount and derivative liability at the dates of issuance in
the aggregate amount of $1,125,773 related to the fair value of the warrants and
embedded conversion features, which included $256,992 and $1,080,201 of debt
discount recorded for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The debt discount will be amortized to interest expense over the
life of the debentures and the derivative liability will be revalued each
reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
During
the three and six months ending September 30, 2009, the Company recognized an
aggregate of $235,519 and $349,813 in interest expense, respectively, due to
amortization of debt discount related to the warrants and embedded conversion
features associated with the Company’s outstanding Private Placement
Debentures. There were no corresponding amounts recognized during the
three and six months ended September 30, 2008 related to the Private Placement
Debentures.
F-73
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 9 — DERIVATIVE
LIABILITIES
In
accordance with current accounting guidance (see Note 2), outstanding warrants
to purchase shares of common stock and embedded conversion features in
convertible notes payable previously treated as equity were no longer afforded
equity treatment because these instruments have reset or ratchet provisions in
the event the Company raises additional capital at a lower price, among other
adjustments. As such, effective April 1, 2009 the
Company reclassified the fair value of these common stock purchase warrants
and embedded conversion features, from equity to liability status as if these
warrants and conversion features were treated as derivative
liabilities since their dates of issuance or modification. The
cumulative effect at April 1, 2009 to record, at fair value, a liability
for the warrants and embedded conversion features, and related adjustments to
discounts on convertible notes of $2,595,095, resulted in an aggregate reduction
to equity of $13,875,623 consisting of a reduction to additional paid-in
capital of $4,217,730 and an increase in the accumulated deficit of $9,657,893
to reflect the change in the accounting.
Any
change in fair value subsequent to April 1, 2009 is recorded as non-operating,
non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the
derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will
record a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives is
lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record
non-operating, non-cash income.
In July
2009, as a result of the July Agreement, the exercise price of the Warrants was
decreased from $0.60 per share to $0.51 per share, which resulted in an increase
in the liability for derivative instruments of $1,608,540 and a corresponding
loss was recorded in other expense due to the change in fair value of derivative
liabilities (see Note 8).
In
September 2009, as a result of the September Amendment, the conversion price of
the Debentures and the exercise price of the Warrants was decreased from $0.51
per share to $0.45 per share, pursuant to the terms of the Debentures, which
resulted in an aggregate increase in the liability for derivative instruments of
$1,679,990 and a corresponding loss was recorded in other expense due to the
change in fair value of derivative liabilities. In addition, the
conversion price of the Debentures was decreased from $0.51 per share to $0.45
per share, which resulted in an increase in the number shares of common stock
which the Debentures may be converted into, an increase in the liability for
derivative instruments of $802,200 and a corresponding loss was recorded in
other expense due to the change in fair value of derivatives (see Note
8).
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued a total of 200,000
warrants to various consultants in lieu of fees paid for services performed by
consultants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an average
exercise price of $0.51 per share. The exercise prices of these
warrants are equal to the stock price of the Company’s shares as of the dates of
each grant. The Company determined the aggregate fair value of the
issued warrants, based on the Black-Scholes pricing model, to be approximately
$87,448 as of the dates of each grant. Since the exercise price of the
warrants is subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues the next
equity financing, the warrants are accounted for as a derivative
liability.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, in connection with the termination of a
consulting agreement, the Company modified the terms of 546,761 warrants issued
in October 2007 and May 2008. The exercise price of the warrants was reduced
from $0.84 per share to $0.60 per share and the expiration date was extended to
5 years from the date of modification. As a result of the modification, the
Company recognized expense of $10,763 in other expense based on
the change in the Black-Scholes fair value before and after
modification.
During
the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized
aggregate losses of $4,535,848 and $1,401,550, respectively, due to the change
in fair value of its derivative instruments. See Note 2 – Organization and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies – Fair Value Measures, for the components
of changes in derivative liabilities. During the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008, there were no derivative liabilities and therefore no
recognized changes in fair value.
F-74
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The
common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and
as such, the Company estimates the fair value of these warrants using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
September
30,
|
April
1,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
Annual
dividend yield
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
4.26
– 4.88
|
3.50
– 5.00
|
||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.31%
-2.66%
|
1.65%
|
||||||
Expected
volatility
|
182%
- 184%
|
204%
|
Historical
volatility was computed using daily pricing observations for recent periods that
correspond to the remaining term of the warrants, which had an original term of
five years from the date of issuance. The expected life is based on the
remaining term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S.
Treasury securities with a maturity corresponding to the remaining term of the
warrants.
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Operating
Leases
On July
2, 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Viking Investors -
Barents Sea, LLC (Lessor) for a building with approximately 11,881 square feet
of manufacturing and office space located at 20382 Barents Sea Circle, Lake
Forest, CA, 92630. The lease agreement is for a period of two years with renewal
options for three, one-year periods, beginning September 1, 2007. The lease
requires base lease payments of approximately $13,000 per month plus operating
expenses. In connection with the lease agreement, the Company issued 10,000
warrants to the lessor at an exercise price of $1.55 per share for a period of
two years, valued at $15,486 as calculated using the Black Scholes option
pricing model. The assumptions used under the Black-Scholes pricing model
included: a risk free rate of 4.75%; volatility of 293%; an expected exercise
term of 5 years; and no annual dividend rate. The Company has capitalized and is
amortizing the value of the warrants over the life of the lease and the
remaining unamortized value of the warrants has been recorded in other long-term
assets. The Company capitalized and amortized the value of the
warrants over the life of the lease and recorded the unamortized value of the
warrants in other long-term assets. For the three and six months
ended September 30, 2009, the Company amortized $1,776 and $2,970,
respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of the
warrants has been fully amortized. On August 24, 2009, the Company entered
into the second amendment to the lease for its manufacturing and office space.
The amendment extended the lease for twelve months from the end of the existing
lease term with a right to cancel the lease with a minimum of 120 day written
notice at anytime as of November 30, 2009. In the event the Company
does exercise its option to cancel the lease, the Company shall reimburse the
Lessor for the unearned leasing commissions. Total rental expense was
approximately $42,000 and $85,000 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and approximately $44,000 and $90,000 for
the three and six months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
Litigation
The
Company may become a party to product litigation in the normal course of
business. The Company accrues for open claims based on its historical experience
and available insurance coverage. In the opinion of management, there are no
legal matters involving the Company that would have a material adverse effect
upon the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Indemnities and
Guarantees
The
Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be
required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to
certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors,
officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the States of
California and Nevada. In connection with its facility lease, the Company has
indemnified its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facility.
The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to
the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for
any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be
obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred
any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been
recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying unaudited
consolidated balance sheets.
F-75
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 11 -
EQUITY
Common
Stock and Warrants
In
October 2007, the Company engaged the firm of Carpe DM, Inc. to perform the
services as the Company’s investor relations and public relations representative
for a monthly fee of $7,500 per month. Pursuant to the terms of this
36 month consulting agreement, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock
at a price of $0.80 per share and a total value of $120,000, the resale of which
is registered on a Form S-8 registration statement and 250,000 fully vested and
non-forfeitable warrants at an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of
two and one-half years, valued at $229,834 as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. On November 13, 2007, the Company filed the
Form S-8 as required by this agreement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company recorded the combined value of $349,834 of the shares
and warrants issued as prepaid expense which is being amortized over the life of
the services agreement. As of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
the unamortized balance of the value of the shares and warrants issued to Carpe
DM, Inc. was $116,626 and $174,928, respectively. Amortization
expense related to the value of the shares and warrants was $29,151 and $58,302
for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
In May
2009, $713,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted by the note
holder. Using the conversion rate of $0.51 per share per the terms of
the Debenture, 1,398,039 shares of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
In July
2009, the Company engaged an agent to solicit the holders of certain warrants to
exercise their rights to purchase shares of the Company’s common
stock. Pursuant to the terms of the engagement, the Company agreed to
pay the agent compensation of 5% of the gross proceeds totaling
$51,174, which is included equity and netted again the gross proceeds in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet at September 30,
2009. In addition, the Company will issue to the agent a warrant to
purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 5% of the
number of shares issued in the exercise of the warrants, or a total of 166,600
warrants as of September 30, 2009. The warrant has an exercise price
of $0.51. As of September 30, 2009, the estimated fair value of
warrants owed to the agent was approximately $82,000 and has been recorded as an
accrued liability with the offset to additional paid in capital on the
accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet, and will permit the agent or
its designees to purchase shares of common stock on or prior to October 1,
2014. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company
issued 3,332,000 shares of its common stock for gross cash proceeds of $999,600
from the exercise of warrants which resulted from the solicitation.
During
July 2009, the Company entered into the July Agreement with the holders of the
Company’s Debentures (see Note 8). Pursuant to the terms of the July Agreement,
the Holders (i) consented to the Company’s issuance of convertible notes and
warrants in connection with the Bridge Financing of up to $1,500,000 which
commenced in March 2009, and (ii) waived, as it relates to the Bridge Financing,
a covenant contained in the Debentures not to incur any further indebtedness,
except as otherwise permitted by the Debentures. This Bridge Financing is more
particularly described in Note 8 above under the caption “Private Placement
Debentures.” In addition, in connection with the July Agreement, the Company and
Holders confirmed that (i) the exercise price of the warrants issued to the
Holders in connection with their purchase of the Debentures had been reduced,
pursuant to the terms of the warrants, to $0.51 as a result of the Bridge
Financing, and (ii) as a result of the foregoing decrease in the exercise price,
pursuant to the terms of the warrants, the number of shares underlying the
warrants held by Holders of the Debentures had been proportionally increased by
4,043,507 pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreements (see Note
8).
In August
2009, the Company issued 6,000 warrants in lieu of payment to Gary C. Cannon,
who then served as Corporate Legal Counsel for the Company and as a member of
the Advisory Board, to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.51 per share with a five year term. The exercise prices of
these warrants are greater than or equal to the stock price of the Company’s
shares as of the date of grant. The fair market value of the warrants based on
the Black-Scholes pricing model of $2,799 was recorded as consulting and
compensation expense and included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the quarter ending September 30, 2009. In July 2009, Mr. Cannon was
given a 30 day notice of his termination as general legal counsel and advisor to
the Company.
F-76
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
On August
21, 2009, the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Adam Michelin an
option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.48
per share (the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant) in
consideration for his services as an independent director and Chairman of the
Audit Committee. The option vests in four equal quarterly
increments.
On August
21, 2009 the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Carlton Johnson an
option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.48
per share (the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant) in
consideration for his service as an independent director and Chairman of the
Compensation and Governance Committee. The option vests in four equal quarterly
increments.
Effective
September 1, 2009, in connection with the Amendment (as defined) with the
holders of the October 2007 and May 2008 Convertible Debentures, the exercise
price of certain outstanding warrants held by such holders was reduced to $0.45
per share which resulted in a proportionate increase the number of shares that
may be purchased upon the exercise of such warrants of 3,594,230 shares (see
Note 8).
In
September 2009, $100,000 of the May 2008 Debentures was converted by the note
holder. Using the conversion rate of $0.45 per share per the terms of
the Debenture, 222,222 share of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009 the Company issued convertible
debentures with an aggregate principal amount of $1,321,500. The
Company paid $79,290 in commissions to the broker. In addition, the Company
issued to the purchasers of the convertible debentures warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 518,242 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of
$0.51.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company converted interest payments
due on the Debentures totaling $171,254 into 428,134 shares of common stock
using the conversion rate of $0.40 per share.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 110,345 shares of
common stock upon the cashless exercises of a total of 119,000 warrants at an
average exercise price of $0.04 per share.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 232,954 shares of
common stock the resale of which is registered pursuant to Form S-8 in lieu of
fees paid for services performed by consultants. On April 13, 2009
and June 11, 2009, the Company filed the related Forms S-8 with the SEC. These
shares were issued at a value of $0.51 per share for a total cost of $118,807
which has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the
six months ended September 30, 2009.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 210,000
warrants and 100,000 options with a fair value of $107,507 to employees and
directors and 200,000 warrants with a fair value of $87,448 in lieu of fees
paid for services performed to various consultants for purchase of the Company’s
common stock (see Notes 2 and 9, respectively).
F-77
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
In August
2006, Peter Berry the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, agreed to
convert his deferred salaries to a long-term note payable. Under the terms of
this note, the Company began to make monthly payments of $3,000 to Mr. Berry in
January 2007. In January 2008, these monthly payments increased to $6,000 and
will remain at that amount until the loan is fully paid in December 2010.
Interest of 6% per annum on the outstanding principal balance of the note began
to accrue on January 1, 2008. As of September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, the total amount of deferred salaries and accrued interest under this
arrangement was $132,476 and $157,688, respectively, of which $36,476 and
$67,688, respectively was recorded as a long-term liability in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense related to
this note was $2,412 and $4,788 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and $2,714 and $5,657 for the three and
six months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Accrued interest related
to this note payable amounted to $18,526 and $13,738 at September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in the note payable to officer in
the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets. In January 2009, Mr.
Berry agreed to defer the monthly payments of the note due from January 31, 2009
through June 30, 2009. Effective August 26, 2009, pursuant to a letter agreement
(i) we agreed to pay Mr. Berry the sum of $30,000 plus accrued interest
representing past due payments from January to May 2009 previously waived by Mr.
Berry, (ii) Mr. Berry agreed to waive payments due to him through December 2009,
and (iii) we agreed to pay to Mr. Berry the sum of $42,000 plus accrued interest
on January 1, 2010, representing payments due to him from June 2009 thru
December 2009. As of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 these unpaid payments
totaled $24,000 and $18,000, respectively and are included in the current
liability portion of the note payable in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
balance sheets (see Note 7). Mr. Berry resigned his position as Chief
Executive Officer in February 2009. Mr. Berry resigned his position from
the Board on July 30, 2009.
In May
2009, the Company issued 110,345 shares of common stock to Peter Berry,
resulting from the cashless exercise of 119,000 warrants at an exercise price of
$0.04 per share (see Note 11).
Since
June 2005, the Company had retained the legal services of Gary C. Cannon,
Attorney at Law, for a monthly retainer fee. From June 2005 to May
2009, Mr. Cannon also served as the Company’s Secretary and a member of the
Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Cannon continued to serve as
Corporate Legal Counsel for the Company and served as a member of the Advisory
Board. In December 2007, Mr. Cannon’s monthly retainer for legal
services was increased from $6,500 per month to $9,000 per month. The
total amount paid to Mr. Cannon for retainer fees and out-of-pocket expenses for
the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $34,000 and $54,000,
respectively. From October 2008 through March 31, 2009 Mr. Cannon
agreed to defer a portion of his monthly payments. As of September
30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 a total of $26,000 and $15,000, respectively, had
been deferred and was included in accounts payable in the accompanying unaudited
consolidated balance sheets Board fees expensed for Mr. Cannon were $0 and
$5,388 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
and $6,675 and $12,450 for the three and six months ended September 30,
2008, respectively. At September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, $19,788 and
$15,000, respectively, of deferred board fees was included in accrued
expenses. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, Mr. Cannon was
granted a total of 25,575 warrants with an average exercise price of $0.59 per
share. For the six months ended September 30, 2008, Mr. Cannon was granted
a total of 18,000 warrants with an average exercise price of $.95 per share. All
warrants granted to Mr. Cannon were issued with an exercise price of greater
than or equal to the stock price of the Company’s shares on the grant date. On
May 4, 2009, Gary Cannon resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors and in
July 2009 Mr. Cannon was given 30 days notice that he was terminated as the
general legal counsel and advisor to the Company (see Note 13 for subsequent
events).
As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had aggregate principal
balances of $1,069,500 and $1,129,500, respectively, in outstanding unsecured
indebtedness owed to five related parties, including four former members of the
board of directors, representing working capital advances made to the Company
from February 2001 through March 2005. These notes bear interest at
the rate of 6% per annum and provide for aggregate monthly principal payments
which commenced April 1, 2006 of $2,500, and which increased by an aggregate of
$2,500 every six months to the current maximum aggregate payment of $10,000 per
month. Any remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on
various dates through March 1, 2015. Related-party interest expense
under these notes was $16,344 and $33,138 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and $18,144 and $36,738 for the three and
six months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Accrued
interest, which is included in related party notes payable in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated balance sheets, related to these notes amounted to
$587,398 and $554,260 as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. The Company had not made the required payments under
the related party notes which were due on April 1, 2009, May 1, 2009 and June 1,
2009. However, pursuant to the note agreements, the Company has a
120-day grace period to pay missed payments before the notes are in
default. On July 29, 2009, August 25, 2009, and September 30, 2009,
the Company paid the April 1, 2009, May 1, 2009 and June 1,2009 payments
respectively, due on these related party notes. Management expects to
continue to pay all payments due prior to the expiration of the 120-day grace
periods.
F-78
CRYOPORT,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS, continued
On July
20, 2009, Dee Kelly informed the Company’s Board of her intent to terminate the
consulting agreement between Dee Kelly Financial Services and the Company and
resign as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
effective August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the thirty (30) day notice
period provided for in the consulting agreement. The Company also
entered into a Settlement and Mutual General Release of Claims (the “Release
Agreement”) with Ms. Kelly on July 24, 2009, that governs the terms of her
departure and that provides, in exchange for a general release by Ms. Kelly, for
the following: (i) the Company will pay to Ms. Kelly on July 31, 2009, the sum
of $14,000 representing the amount of deferred compensation owed to Ms. Kelly as
of July 24, 2009, which the Company and Ms. Kelly had previously agreed to
defer; and (ii) a general release of claims by the Company in favor of Ms.
Kelly. The Release Agreement also contains other customary
provisions.
In August
2009, the Company issued 6,000 warrants in lieu of payment to Gary C. Cannon,
who then served as Corporate Legal Counsel for the Company and as a member of
the Advisory Board, to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.51 per share and 5 year term. The exercise prices of these
warrants are greater than or equal to the stock price of the Company’s shares as
of the date of grant. The fair market value of the warrants of $2,799 based on
the Black-Scholes pricing model was recorded as consulting and compensation
expense and included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
quarter ending September 30, 2009.
NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
During
the period October 1, 2009 through November 10, 2009, 1,458,333 warrants were
exercised at an average price of $0.30 per share for aggregate proceeds of
$437,500.
On
October 15, 2009, the Company issued 22,616 shares of common stock upon the
cashless exercises of a total of 51,400 warrants at an average exercise price of
$0.28 per share.
On
October 30, 2009, $90,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted by the
note holder. Using the conversion rate of $0.45 per share per the
terms of the Debenture, 200,000 shares of registered common stock were issued to
the investor.
On
November 4, 2009, the Company issued 58,808 shares of common stock the resale of
which is registered pursuant to Form S-8 in lieu of fees paid for services
performed by the Board of Directors. On June 11, 2009 and April 13,
2009, the Company filed the related Forms S-8 with the SEC. These shares were
issued at a value of $0.43 per share.
On
November 7, 2009, the Company issued 24,566 shares of common stock upon the
cashless exercises of a total of 65,000 warrants at an average exercise price of
$0.28 per share.
On
October 6, 2009 the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-162350) for a possible
underwritten public offering of units, each unit to consist of one share of
common and warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Management
cannot assure you that this contemplated offering will be consummated, or if
consummated, whether the proceeds from such offering will be sufficient to fund
the Company’s planned operations.
F-79
3,125,000 Units
CRYOPORT,
INC.
PROSPECTUS
Rodman
& Renshaw, LLC
The date
of this prospectus is ______________, 2010.
Until
______________, 2010 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the
obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and
with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
You
should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference to
this prospectus in deciding whether to purchase our common stock. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained
or incorporated by reference to this prospectus. Under no circumstances should
the delivery to you of this prospectus or any sale made pursuant to this
prospectus create any implication that the information contained in this
prospectus is correct as of any time after the date of this prospectus. To the
extent that any facts or events arising after the date of this prospectus,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the
information presented in this prospectus, this prospectus will be updated to the
extent required by law.
PART
II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
ITEM
24. INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Under the
Nevada General Corporation Law and our Articles of Incorporation, as amended,
our directors will have no personal liability to us or our stockholders for
monetary damages incurred as the result of the breach or alleged breach by a
director of his “duty of care.” This provision does not apply to the directors’
(i) acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing and
culpable violation of law, (ii) acts or omissions that a director believes to be
contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its stockholders or that
involve the absence of good faith on the part of the director, (iii) approval of
any transaction from which a director derives an improper personal benefit, (iv)
acts or omissions that show a reckless disregard for the director’s duty to the
corporation or its stockholders in circumstances in which the director was
aware, or should have been aware, in the ordinary course of performing a
director’s duties, of a risk of serious injury to the corporation or its
stockholders, (v) acts or omissions that constituted an unexcused pattern of
inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director’s duty to the
corporation or its stockholders, or (vi) approval of an unlawful dividend,
distribution, stock repurchase or redemption. This provision would generally
absolve directors of personal liability for negligence in the performance of
duties, including gross negligence.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In
the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than
the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will,
unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
ITEM
25. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The
following table sets forth an estimate of the costs and expenses payable by
registrant in connection with this offering described in this registration
statement. All of the amounts shown are estimates except the SEC registration
fee:
SEC
Registration Fee
|
$ | 2,582.85 | ||||||
Accounting
Fees and Expenses
|
$ | 35,000 | * | |||||
NASDAQ
Capital Market Listing Fee
|
$ | 7,500 | * | |||||
Printing
and Engraving Expenses
|
$ | 20,000 | * | |||||
Legal
Fees and Expenses
|
$ | 125,000 | * | |||||
Miscellaneous
|
$ | 9,917.15 | * | |||||
Total
|
$ | 200,000 |
*
Estimated
ITEM
26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The
following is a summary of transactions by CryoPort during the past three years
involving the issuance and sale of CryoPort’s securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act. Unless otherwise indicated, the
issuance of the securities in the transactions below were deemed to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act by virtue of the exemption under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering, or by virtue of the exemption under Rule 506 of the Securities
Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The following assumes the
consummation of a reverse stock split, at a ratio of 12-to-1.
II-1
On
October 9, 2009, the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Larry
Stambaugh an option to purchase 55,833 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $5.40 per share (the closing price of CryoPort’s stock on the date of
grant). The right to exercise the stock options will vest as to 33⅓% of the
underlying shares of common stock upon grant, with the remaining underlying
shares vesting in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the
grant date.
On
October 9, 2009, the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Catherine
Doll an option to purchase 1,667 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$5.40 per share (the closing price of CryoPort’s stock on the date of grant).
The right to exercise the stock options will vest as to 33⅓% of the underlying
shares of common stock upon grant, with the remaining underlying shares vesting
in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the grant
date.
On
October 15, 2009, CryoPort issued 1,885 shares of common stock upon the cashless
exercises of a total of 4,283 warrants at an average exercise price of $3.36 per
share.
On
October 30, 2009, $90,000 of the May 2008 Debentures was converted by the note
holder. Using the conversion rate of $5.40 per share per the terms of
the Debenture, 16,667 shares of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
On November 4, 2009, CryoPort issued
4,901 shares of common stock the resale of which is registered pursuant to Form
S-8 in lieu of fees paid for services performed by the Board of
Directors. On June 11, 2009 and April 13, 2009, CryoPort filed the
related Forms S-8 with the SEC. These shares of common stock were issued at a
value of $5.16 per share.
On
November 7, 2009, CryoPort issued 2,047 shares of common stock upon the cashless
exercises of a total of 5,417 warrants at an average exercise price of $3.36 per
share.
On
November 17, 2009, CryoPort issued 3,595 shares of common stock the resale of
which is registered pursuant to Form S-8 in lieu of fees paid for legal services
performed by Gary Cannon. On June 11, 2009 and April 13, 2009,
CryoPort filed the related Forms S-8 with the SEC. These shares of
common stock were issued at a value of $6.12 per share.
On
November 19, 2009, $180,000 of the May 2008 Debentures was converted by the note
holder. Using the conversion rate of $5.40 per share per the terms of
the Debenture, 33,333 shares of registered common stock were issued to the
investor.
On November 25, 2009, $100,000 of the
October 2007 Debentures was converted by the note holder. Using the
conversion rate of $5.40 per share per the terms of the Debenture, 18,519 shares
of registered common stock were issued to the investor.
During the six months ended September
30, 2009, CryoPort issued convertible debentures with an aggregate principal
amount of $1,321,500. CryoPort paid $79,290 in commissions to the
broker. In addition, CryoPort issued to the purchasers of the
convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of 43,107 shares of
common stock at an initial exercise price of $6.12.
On July 1, 2009, CryoPort paid accrued
interest due on the Debentures in the amount of $37,620 by issuing to the
debenture holders a total of 7,838 shares of common stock, based on the
contractual exchange rate of $4.80 per share.
During
the period July 1, 2009 through November 30, 2009, CryoPort issued a
aggregate of 399,194 shares of common stock upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants. The average exercise price of the warrants was $3.60 per
share and CryoPort received aggregate proceeds of $1,437,100.
II-2
On July
30, 2009, in connection with CryoPort’s execution of a Consent, Waiver and
Agreement with the holders of the Debentures, the exercise price of certain
outstanding warrants held by such holders was reduced to $6.12 per share which
resulted in a proportionate increase the number of shares of common stock that
may be purchased upon the exercise of such warrants of 336,959 shares of common
stock.
In August
2009, CryoPort issued a fully vested warrant to purchase 500 shares of common
stock to Gary C. Cannon, who then served as CryoPort’s Corporate Legal Counsel
and as a member of the Advisory Board. The exercise price of the warrant
was $6.12 per share.
On August
21, 2009, the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Adam Michelin an
option to purchase 4,167 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.76
per share (the closing price of CryoPort’s stock on the date of grant) in
consideration for his services as an independent director and Chairman of the
Audit Committee. The option vests in four equal quarterly
increments.
On August
21, 2009 the Compensation and Governance Committee granted Carlton Johnson an
option to purchase 4,167 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.76
per share (the closing price of CryoPort’s stock on the date of grant) in
consideration for his service as an independent director and Chairman of the
Compensation and Governance Committee. The option vests in four equal quarterly
increments.
On
September 22, 2009, $100,000 of the October 2007 Debentures was converted by the
note holder. Using the conversion rate of $5.40 per share per the
terms of the Debenture, 18,519 shares of registered common stock were issued to
the investor.
Effective
September 1, 2009, in connection with CryoPort’s execution of a Consent, Waiver
and Agreement with the holders of the Debentures, the exercise price of
certain outstanding warrants held by such holders was reduced to $5.40 per share
which resulted in a proportionate increase the number of shares of common stock
that may be purchased upon the exercise of such warrants of 299,519 shares of
common stock.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009, CryoPort issued 9,195 shares of common
stock resulting from the cashless exercises of warrants for 9,917 shares of
common stock.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009, CryoPort issued warrants to purchase a
total of 16,667 shares of common stock to various consultants in lieu of fees
paid for services performed by consultants to purchase shares of CryoPort’s
common stock.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 CryoPort issued warrants to purchase 8,067
shares of common stock to members of the Board of Directors to purchase shares
of CryoPort’s common stock.
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued 6,891 shares of common stock resulting from the
cashless exercise of warrants at an average exercise price of $0.48 per share
resulting in proceeds of $3,307.
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued 12,502 shares of common stock resulting from the
cashless exercises of options for 13,083 shares of common stock at an average
market price of approximately $0.48 per share resulting in options for 582
shares of common stock used for the cashless conversion.
II-3
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued 33,520 shares of common stock in lieu of fees paid
to a consultant. These shares of common stock were issued at an
average value of $7.32 per share for a total cost of $249,102 which has been
included in selling general and administrative expenses for the year ended March
31, 2009.
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued 33,333 shares of common stock for extinguishment of
debt. These shares of common stock were issued at a value of $4.92
per share (based on the stock price on the agreement date) for a total cost of
$164,000 which has been included in the loss on extinguishment of
debt.
During
fiscal 2009, CryoPort issued to an accredited investor Original Issue Discount
8% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures having a principal face amount of
$1,250,000 and generating gross proceeds to us of $1,062,500 after giving effect
to a 15% discount. After accounting for commissions and legal and
other fees, the net proceeds to us totaled $870,625. In connection
with the financing transaction, CryoPort issued to the investor 5-year warrants
to purchase 124,008 shares of common stock at $11.04 per share and 5-year
warrants to purchase 124,008 shares of common stock at $16.20 per
share. CryoPort paid to the placement agent cash in the amount of
$116,875 and issued warrants to purchase 12,401 shares of CryoPort’s common
stock at $10.08 per share.
During
fiscal 2008, 304,393 shares of CryoPort’s common stock were sold to investors at
an average price of $2.64 per share resulting in proceeds of
$789,501.
During
fiscal 2008, CryoPort issued 13,021 shares of common stock resulting from the
cashless exercises of warrants at an average exercise price of $8.28 per share
resulting in proceeds of $107,500.
During
fiscal 2008, CryoPort issued 32,227 shares of common stock resulting from the
cashless exercise of warrants for 38,789 shares of common stock converted using
an average market price of approximately $14.28 per share resulting in 6,562
warrants used for the cashless conversion.
During
fiscal 2008, CryoPort issued 3,125 shares of common stock in lieu of fees paid
to a consultant. These shares of common stock were issued at a value
of $12.24 per share (based on the stock price on the agreement dates after a 15%
deduction as the shares of common stock are restricted) for a total cost of
$382,500 which has been included in selling general and administrative expenses
for the year ended March 31, 2008.
During
fiscal 2008, CryoPort issued 12,500 S-8 registered shares of common stock in
lieu of fees paid to a consultant for a 36 month consulting
agreement. These shares of common stock were issued at a value of
$9.60 per share (based on the stock price on the agreement date) for a total
cost of $120,000, which is being amortized over the life of the service
agreement.
During
fiscal 2008, CryoPort issued to a number of accredited investors Original Issue
Discount 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures having a principal face amount
of $4,707,705 and generating gross proceeds to us of
$4,001,551. After accounting for commissions and legal and other
fees, the net proceeds to us totaled $3,436,551.25. In connection with the
financing transaction, CryoPort also issued to the investors 5-year warrants to
purchase 467,034 shares of our common stock at $11.04 per share, two-year
warrants to purchase 95,593 shares of common stock at $10.80 per share and
78,125 shares of common stock at $19.20 per share. In connection with this
offering, CryoPort paid to a placement agent cash in the amount of $440,000 and
issued warrants to purchase 46,697 shares of CryoPort’s common stock at $10.08
per share.
II-4
During
fiscal 2007, 391,000 shares of CryoPort’s common stock were sold to investors at
an average price of $2.64 per share resulting in proceeds of $902,028 to
CryoPort.
During
fiscal 2007, CryoPort issued 694 shares of common stock resulting from exercises
of warrants at an average exercise price of $3.60 per share resulting in
proceeds of $2,500.
The
following schedules list the sales of shares of common stock net of offering
costs (excluding exercises of options and warrants) and issuances of options and
warrants during the 2009, 2008, and 2007 fiscal years.
Fiscal
2009
|
||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Warrants
|
|||||||||||
$
|
Shares
|
Avg.
Price
|
Issued
|
Ex.
Price
|
||||||||
Qtr
1
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
767,212
|
$
|
7.32
|
||||
Qtr
2
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
38,313
|
$
|
10.20
|
||||
Qtr
3
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
83,845
|
$
|
10.08
|
||||
Qtr
4
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
487,241
|
$
|
7.08
|
||||
$
|
-
|
-
|
1,376,612
|
Fiscal
2008
|
||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Warrants
|
|||||||||||
$
|
Shares
|
Avg.
Price
|
Issued
|
Ex.
Price
|
||||||||
Qtr
1
|
$
|
554,140
|
286,945
|
$
|
1.92
|
504,333
|
$
|
4.20
|
||||
Qtr
2
|
$
|
166,606
|
17,448
|
$
|
8.40
|
92,939
|
$
|
6.60
|
||||
Qtr
3
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
768,082
|
$
|
12.36
|
||||
Qtr
4
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
65,879
|
$
|
16.56
|
||||
$
|
699,866
|
304,393
|
1,431,234
|
Fiscal
2007
|
||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Warrants
|
|||||||||||
$
|
Shares
|
Avg.
Price
|
Issued
|
Ex.
Price
|
||||||||
Qtr
1
|
$
|
22,185
|
1,417
|
$
|
18.00
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Qtr
2
|
$
|
166,605
|
15,667
|
$
|
12.24
|
70,563
|
$
|
12.00
|
||||
Qtr
3
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Qtr
4
|
$
|
713,238
|
373,917
|
$
|
2.16
|
31,350
|
$
|
3.36
|
||||
$
|
902,028
|
391,000
|
104,913
|
The
issuances of the securities of CryoPort in the above transactions were deemed to
be exempt from registration under the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(2)
thereof or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as a transaction by an issuer
not involving a public offering. With respect to each transaction
listed above, no general solicitation was made by either CryoPort or any person
acting on CryoPort’s behalf; the securities sold are subject to transfer
restrictions; and the certificates for the shares of common stock contained an
appropriate legend stating such securities have not been registered under the
Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to
an exemption therefrom.
II-5
ITEM
27. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
1.1
|
Form
of Underwriting Agreement **
|
|
3.1
|
Corporate
Charter for G.T.5-Limited issued by the State of Nevada on March 15,
2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.2
|
Articles
of Incorporation for G.T.5-Limited filed with the State of Nevada in May
25, 1990. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.3
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation of G.T.5-Limited increasing the authorized
shares of common stock from 5,000,000 to 100,000,000 shares of common
stock filed with the State of Nevada on October 12, 2004. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated
February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.4
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from
G.T.5-Limited to CryoPort, Inc. filed with the State of Nevada on March
16, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.4.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated October 19, 2008.
Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
October 19, 2007.
|
|
3.4.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the State of Nevada on November 2, 2009. *** | |
3.5
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws of CryoPort, Inc. adopted by the Board of Directors
on June 22, 2005 and amended by the Certificate of Amendment of Amended
and Restated Bylaws of CryoPort, Inc. adopted by the Board of Directors on
October 9, 2009. ***
|
|
3.6
|
Articles
of Incorporation of CryoPort Systems, Inc. filed with the State of
California on December 11, 2000, including Corporate Charter for CryoPort
Systems, Inc. issued by the State of California on December 13,
2000. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.7
|
By-Laws
of CryoPort Systems, Inc. adopted by the Board of Directors on December
11, 2000. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.8
|
CryoPort,
Inc. Stock Certificate Specimen. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.9
|
Code
of Conduct for CryoPort, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.10
|
Code
of Ethics for Senior Officers of CryoPort, Inc. and
subsidiaries. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.11
|
Statement
of Policy on Insider Trading. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.12
|
CryoPort,
Inc. Audit Committee Charter, under which the Audit Committee will
operate, adopted by the Board of Directors on August 19,
2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
II-6
3.13
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors
on October 1, 2002. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.14
|
Stock
Option Agreement ISO - Specimen adopted by the Board of Directors on
October 1, 2002. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
|
3.15
|
Stock
Option Agreement NSO – Specimen adopted by Board of Directors on October
1, 2002. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.16
|
Warrant
Agreement – Specimen adopted by the Board of Directors on October 1,
2002. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
|
3.17
|
Patents
and Trademarks
|
|
3.17.1
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Patent #6,467,642 information sheet and Assignment to
CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.2
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Patent #6,119,465 information sheet and Assignment to
CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.3
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Patent #6,539,726 information sheet and Assignment to
CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.4
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,583,478,7 information sheet and Assignment to
CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.5
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,586,797,8 information sheet and Assignment to
CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.6
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,748,667,3 information sheet and Assignment
to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
3.17.7
|
CryoPort
Systems, Inc. Trademark #7,737,454,1 information sheet and Assignment
to CryoPort Systems, Inc. document. On File with
CryoPort.
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of Debenture - Original Issue Discount 8% Secured Convertible Debenture
dated September 28, 2007. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated November 9,
2007.
|
|
4.1.1
|
Amendment
to Convertible Debenture dated February 19, 2008. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2008 and
referred to as Exhibit 10.1.10.
|
|
4.1.2
|
Amendment
to Convertible Debenture dated April 30, 2008. CryoPort’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2008 and referred to as Exhibit
10.1.11.
|
|
4.1.2.1
|
Annex
to Amendment to Convertible Debenture dated April 30,
2008. CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30,
2008 and referred to as Exhibit 10.1.11.1.
|
|
4.1.3
|
Amendment
to Convertible Debenture dated August 29, 2008. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29,
2008.
|
|
4.1.4
|
Amendment
to Convertible Debenture effective January 27, 2009 and dated February 20,
2009. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated February 19, 2009.
|
II-7
4.1.5
|
Amendment
to Debentures and Warrants with Enable Growth Partners LP, Enable
Opportunity Partners LP, Pierce Diversified Strategy Master Fund LLC, Ena,
BridgePointe Master Fund Ltd. and CryoPort Inc. dated September 1,
2009. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated September 17, 2009.
|
|
4.2
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated September 28, 2007. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated November
9, 2007.
|
|
4.3
|
Original
Issue Discount 8% Secured Convertible Debenture dated May 30,
2008. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated June 9, 2008.
|
|
4.4
|
Common
Stock Purchase Warrant dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9,
2008
|
4.5
|
Common
Stock Purchase Warrant dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9,
2008
|
4.6
|
Form
of Warrant and Warrant Certificate**
|
5.1
|
Legal
Opinion of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. ***
|
10.1.1
|
Stock
Exchange Agreement associated with the merger of G.T.5-Limited and
CryoPort Systems, Inc. signed on March 15, 2005. Incorporated
by reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated
February 23, 2006.
|
10.1.2
|
Commercial
Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and D. Petreccia executed on August
26, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
10.1.3
|
Commercial
Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and J. Dell executed on September
1, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
10.1.4
|
Commercial
Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and M. Grossman executed on August
25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
10.1.5
|
Commercial
Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and P. Mullens executed on
September 2, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23,
2006.
|
10.1.6
|
Commercial
Promissory Note between CryoPort, Inc. and R. Takahashi executed on August
25, 2005. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006.
|
10.1.7
|
Exclusive
and Representation Agreement between CryoPort Systems, Inc. and CryoPort
Systems, Ltda. executed on August 9, 2001. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated
February 23, 2006 and referred to as Exhibit 10.1.8.
|
10.1.8
|
Secured
Promissory Note and Loan Agreement between Ventana Group, LLC and
CryoPort, Inc. dated May 12, 2006. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A4 dated February 23, 2006
and referred to as Exhibit 10.1.9.
|
10.2
|
Business
Alliance Agreement dated April 27, 2007, by CryoPort, Inc. and American
Biologistics Company LLC. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2007 and referred to
as Exhibit 10.3.
|
II-8
10.2.1
|
Corrected
Business Alliance Agreement dated April 27, 2007, by CryoPort, Inc. and
American Biologistics Company LLC. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated May 2, 2007 and referred to
as Exhibit 10.3.1.
|
10.3
|
Consultant
Agreement dated April 18, 2007 between CryoPort, Inc. and Malone and
Associates, LLC. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and
referred to as Exhibit 10.4.
|
10.4
|
Lease
Agreement dated June 26, 2007 between CryoPort, Inc. and Viking Investors
– Barents Sea LLC. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and
referred to as Exhibit 10.5.
|
10.4.1
|
Second
Amendment To Lease: Renewal dated August 24, 2009, between
CryoPort, Inc. and Viking Inventors-Barents Sea LLC. ***
|
10.5
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2007. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated November
9, 2007 and referred to as Exhibit 10.6.
|
10.6
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated September 27, 2007. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated November
9, 2007 and referred to as Exhibit 10.7.
|
10.7
|
Security
Agreement dated September 27, 2007. Incorporated by reference
to CryoPort’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated November 9, 2007
and referred to as Exhibit 10.8.
|
10.8
|
Sitelet
Agreement between FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. and CryoPort Systems,
Inc. dated January 23, 2008. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2008 and referred to as
Exhibit 10.9.
|
10.9
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2008 and
referred to as Exhibit 10.10.
|
10.10
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by reference
to CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2008 and referred
to as Exhibit 10.11.
|
10.11
|
Waiver
dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2008 and referred to as Exhibit
10.12.
|
10.12
|
Security
Agreement dated May 30, 2008. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2008 and referred to
as Exhibit 10.13.
|
10.13
|
Board
of Directors Agreement between Larry G. Stambaugh and CryoPort, Inc. dated
December 10, 2008. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2008 and referred to as
Exhibit 10.15.
|
10.14
|
Rental Agreement
with FedEx Corporate Services and CryoPort, Inc. dated May 15, 2009
(CryoPort has filed a Confidential Treatment Request under Rule 24b-5 of
the Exchange Act, for parts of this document). Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit 10.16.
|
II-9
10.15
|
Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release with Dee Kelly and CryoPort, Inc. dated July
24, 2009. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit
10.14.
|
10.16
|
Consent,
Waiver and Agreement with Enable Growth Partners LP, Enable Opportunity
Partners LP, Pierce Diversified Strategy Master Fund LLC, Ena,
BridgePointe Master Fund Ltd. and CryoPort Inc. and its subsidiary dated
July 30, 2009. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit
10.15.
|
10.17
|
Employment
Agreement with Larry G. Stambaugh and CryoPort, Inc. dated August 1,
2009. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort’s Current Report
dated August 21, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit 10.19.
|
10.18
|
Letter
Accepting Consulting Agreement dated October 1, 2007 with Carpe DM, Inc.
and CryoPort, Inc. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort,
Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated March 25, 2009 and
referred to as Exhibit 10.1.
|
10.19
|
Master
Consulting and Engineering Services Agreement dated October 9, 2007 with
KLATU Networks, LLC and CryoPort, Inc. Incorporated by
reference to CryoPort, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated
March 25, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit 10.2
|
10.20
|
Investment
Banker Termination Agreement dated April 6, 2009 with Bradley Woods &
Co. Ltd., SEPA Capital Corp., Edward Fine, and CryoPort,
Inc. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated April 13, 2009 and referred to as Exhibit
10.1.
|
10.21
|
Attorney-Client
Retainer Agreement with Gary Curtis Cannon and CryoPort, Inc. dated
December 1, 2007. Incorporated by reference to CryoPort, Inc.’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated June 11, 2009 and referred to as
Exhibit 10.3.
|
10.22
|
CryoPort,
Inc., 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 9, 2009 and referred
to as Exhibit 10.21.
|
10.23
|
CryoPort,
Inc., Form Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under the CryoPort,
Inc., 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to
CryoPort’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 9, 2009 and referred
to as Exhibit 10.22.
|
10.24
|
Form
of Warrant to be entered into between the Registrant and Rodman &
Renshaw, LLC. **
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KMJ Corbin &
Company LLP.*
|
23.2
|
Consent
by Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1) ***
|
24
|
Power
of Attorney***
|
___________________
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
**
|
To
be filed by amendment
|
|
*** | Previously filed |
II-10
ITEM
28. UNDERTAKINGS
*(a) (1)
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) to
include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities
Act;
(ii) to
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date
of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment
thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was
registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum
offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the
Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume
and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering
price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective
registration statement.
(iii) to
include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not
previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to
such information in the registration statement;
(2) That,
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and this offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
(3) To
remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the
securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of this
offering.
(6) That,
for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities
Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The
undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of
the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless
of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the
securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the
purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such
purchaser:
(i) Any
preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to
this offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any
free writing prospectus relating to this offering prepared by or on behalf of
the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned
registrant;
(iii) The
portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to this offering
containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its
securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant;
and
(iv) Any
other communication that is an offer in this offering made by the undersigned
registrant to the purchaser.
*(f) Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
*(i) The
undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information
omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement
in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the
registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act
shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was
declared effective.
(2) For
the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each
post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
this offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
*Paragraph
references correspond to those of Regulation S-K, Item 512.
II-11
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, as amended, the registrant has duly
caused this amendment to the registration statement to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Lake Forest, California, on
this January 14, 2010.
CRYOPORT,
INC.
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Larry G.
Stambaugh
|
|
Larry
G. Stambaugh
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, this amendment to the registration
statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/
Larry G. Stambaugh
|
Director
and Chief Executive Officer
|
January
14, 2010
|
||
Larry
G. Stambaugh
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|||
/s/
Catherine Doll
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
January
14, 2010
|
||
Catherine
Doll
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|||
/s/ *
|
Director
|
January
14, 2010
|
||
Carlton
M. Johnson, Jr.
|
||||
/s/ *
|
Director
|
January
14, 2010
|
||
Adam
M. Michelin
|
*
By: /s/ Larry
G.
Stambaugh
Larry G. Stambaugh
Attorney-in-fact
II-12